You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ULTRALENTE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Ultralente

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00222521 ↗ Insulin Glargine Vs Standard Insulin Therapy Completed Moran, Antoinette, M.D. Phase 3 2003-04-01 This Study is designed to determine whether treatment of CFRD with glargine insulin will improve hemoglobin A1c, weight and muscle mass compared to the traditional regimen of bedtime NPH insulin.
NCT00222521 ↗ Insulin Glargine Vs Standard Insulin Therapy Completed Sanofi Phase 3 2003-04-01 This Study is designed to determine whether treatment of CFRD with glargine insulin will improve hemoglobin A1c, weight and muscle mass compared to the traditional regimen of bedtime NPH insulin.
NCT00222521 ↗ Insulin Glargine Vs Standard Insulin Therapy Completed University of Minnesota Phase 3 2003-04-01 This Study is designed to determine whether treatment of CFRD with glargine insulin will improve hemoglobin A1c, weight and muscle mass compared to the traditional regimen of bedtime NPH insulin.
NCT00222521 ↗ Insulin Glargine Vs Standard Insulin Therapy Completed University of Minnesota - Clinical and Translational Science Institute Phase 3 2003-04-01 This Study is designed to determine whether treatment of CFRD with glargine insulin will improve hemoglobin A1c, weight and muscle mass compared to the traditional regimen of bedtime NPH insulin.
NCT00276393 ↗ Treatment Trial Evaluating Long Acting Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes Completed Mayo Clinic Phase 4 2002-07-01 Patients with type 1 diabetes trained in multiple daily insulin injection were treated with two diffferent kinds of long acting insulin preparations. The two insulin preparations were glargine and ultralente insulin. Patients were randomized to receive one of the two insulin preparations for the first 4 months followed by the second preparation for a further four months. Short acting insulin used was the same during both periods. We found that glargine insulin was better than ultralente insulin in our study.
NCT00424411 ↗ Six Month Clinical Trial Assessing Efficacy And Safety Of Inhaled Insulin In Type 2 Diabetes Completed Pfizer Phase 3 1999-09-01 To determine, in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: 1. Whether glycemic control can be achieved at least as effectively with an insulin regimen involving pre-meal EXUBERA™ (inhaled insulin) plus a single bedtime Ultralente injection as with a conventional subcutaneous insulin regimen involving 2 mixed Regular/NPH insulin injections per day. 2. The toleration and safety of EXUBERA™ (inhaled insulin) therapy and its effects after 6 months, if any, on measures of pulmonary function.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Ultralente

Condition Name

Condition Name for Ultralente
Intervention Trials
Type 1 Diabetes 2
Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Ultralente
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus 4
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 3
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 2
Fibrosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Ultralente

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Ultralente
Location Trials
United States 42
Canada 14
Italy 7
India 7
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Ultralente
Location Trials
Texas 3
Nebraska 3
Kentucky 3
California 3
Washington 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Ultralente

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Ultralente
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Ultralente
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Ultralente

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Ultralente
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 2
Sanofi 2
Vanderbilt University 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Ultralente
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
Industry 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ultralente Insulin: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction to Ultralente Insulin

Ultralente insulin is a type of long-acting insulin that was historically used in the management of diabetes, particularly type 1 diabetes. It is derived from pork or beef sources and has a prolonged duration of action, making it suitable for use as a basal insulin.

Clinical Trials: Ultralente vs. Glargine

One of the most significant clinical trials comparing ultralente insulin to another long-acting insulin, glargine, was conducted to evaluate their efficacy and safety in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Study Design and Outcomes

  • The trial used a randomized crossover design, where patients were allocated to receive either ultralente or glargine as their basal insulin for 4 months, followed by a crossover to the other insulin type[1][4].
  • The results showed that treatment with glargine resulted in lower mean HbA1c levels (6.82 ± 0.13 vs. 7.02 ± 0.13, P = 0.026), less nocturnal glycemic variability, and fewer episodes of hypoglycemia, particularly during the day[1][4].

Insulin Dose Adjustment and Hypoglycemia

  • Patients on ultralente required more contacts with healthcare providers to achieve an adequate basal dose and had more changes in their prandial insulin doses compared to those on glargine[1].
  • The frequency of hypoglycemic events was higher with ultralente, especially during the daytime, although severe hypoglycemia rates did not differ significantly between the two groups[1][4].

Patient Experience and Glycemic Control

  • The study indicated that patients on glargine had better glycemic control and less fear of hypoglycemia, contributing to a better quality of life[1].

Market Analysis of Insulin

Global Insulin Market Size and Growth

  • The global insulin market was valued at USD 19.45 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3.74% from 2025 to 2030, reaching USD 23.21 billion by 2030[5].

Market Segments and Key Players

  • The long-acting insulin segment, which includes insulins like glargine, dominated the market in 2024 with a share of 52.36% due to its longer duration of action and reduced injection frequency[5].
  • Major players in the insulin market include Novo Nordisk A/S, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Biocon Ltd, and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH[5].

Regional Market Dynamics

  • The Asia Pacific region is expected to be the fastest-growing market, while North America remains the largest market for insulin products[2][5].

Projections for Ultralente Insulin

Declining Use of Ultralente

  • Given the superior outcomes observed with glargine and other modern long-acting insulins, the use of ultralente insulin is likely to decline. Modern insulins offer better glycemic control, reduced hypoglycemia risk, and improved patient convenience[1][4].

Market Trends and Drivers

  • The increasing prevalence of diabetes, particularly type 2, and advancements in insulin formulations and delivery systems are driving the growth of the insulin market. However, these trends favor newer, more advanced insulins over traditional ones like ultralente[5].

Technological Innovations

  • Technological innovations such as continuous glucose monitoring systems and advanced insulin delivery devices further enhance the appeal of modern insulins, making ultralente less competitive in the market[5].

Regulatory and Clinical Trial Landscape

FDA Regulations and Clinical Trials

  • Clinical trials, including those comparing different types of insulin, are rigorously regulated by the FDA to ensure patient safety and data integrity. New insulin products and biosimilars are continually being developed and approved, further reducing the relevance of ultralente insulin[3].

Patient and Healthcare Provider Preferences

Shift to Modern Insulins

  • Both patients and healthcare providers are increasingly preferring modern long-acting insulins like glargine due to their better efficacy, safety profile, and convenience. This shift is expected to continue, reducing the demand for ultralente insulin[1][4].

Conclusion

Ultralente insulin, while historically significant in the management of diabetes, is being phased out in favor of more advanced and effective long-acting insulins like glargine. Clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of glargine in terms of glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia risk. The insulin market is driven by the increasing prevalence of diabetes and technological innovations, which further diminish the role of ultralente insulin.

Key Takeaways

  • Ultralente insulin is less effective compared to modern long-acting insulins like glargine in clinical trials.
  • The global insulin market is growing, driven by the increasing prevalence of diabetes and technological advancements.
  • Modern insulins offer better glycemic control, reduced hypoglycemia risk, and improved patient convenience.
  • The use of ultralente insulin is expected to decline as healthcare providers and patients prefer newer, more advanced insulins.
  • Regulatory and clinical trial landscapes favor the development and approval of new insulin products and biosimilars.

FAQs

Q: What are the main differences between ultralente and glargine insulin?

A: Glargine insulin offers better glycemic control, less nocturnal glycemic variability, and a reduced frequency of hypoglycemia compared to ultralente insulin.

Q: Why is the use of ultralente insulin declining?

A: The use of ultralente insulin is declining due to the superior efficacy and safety profile of modern long-acting insulins like glargine.

Q: What drives the growth of the global insulin market?

A: The growth of the global insulin market is driven by the increasing prevalence of diabetes, particularly type 2, and advancements in insulin formulations and delivery systems.

Q: Which region is expected to be the fastest-growing market for insulin products?

A: The Asia Pacific region is expected to be the fastest-growing market for insulin products.

Q: What are some of the key players in the insulin market?

A: Major players in the insulin market include Novo Nordisk A/S, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Biocon Ltd, and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.

Sources

  1. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Glargine Versus Ultralente Insulin - Diabetes Care, January 2005.
  2. Insulin Market - Size, Share, Growth & Trends - Mordor Intelligence.
  3. U.S. Clinical Trials Market Size Industry Analysis Report, 2033 - Biospace.
  4. Randomized controlled clinical trial of glargine versus ultralente insulin - Mayo Clinic.
  5. Insulin Market Size, Share & Growth | Industry Report, 2030 - Grand View Research.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.