CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TRANDATE HCT
✉ Email this page to a colleague
▶ Start for $1
Remove trial restrictions
All Clinical Trials for Trandate Hct
| Trial ID | Title | Status | Sponsor | Phase | Start Date | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT02050529 ↗ | Randomized Controlled Trial of Labetalol Versus Hydralazine for Severe Hypertension in Obstetric Patients. | Completed | Dow University of Health Sciences | Phase 2 | 2012-10-01 | Severe Hypertension in pregnancy demands urgent treatment because of high mortality & morbidity in obstetric patients. Hydralazine, the most commonly used agent, causes sudden hypo tension and tachycardia. Labetalol because of combined α and β blocking effects lacks these side effects. Most recent Cochrane systematic review on use of anti hypertensive drugs in pregnancy related hypertension, could include only four trials of comparison of Hydralazine with Labetalol. Three out of total 4, had sample size ranging from 20-60 obstetric, with total sample size ranging from 19-30. Only 2 trials reported severe persistent hypertension.This review could not conclude about comparative effects due to insufficient data and suggested that further trials should compare Hydralazine with Nifedipine or labetalol, and to report severe persistent hypertension and adverse feto-maternal effects. OBJECTIVES:1) To compare efficacy and severe persistent hypertension after intravenous Labetalol versus Hydralazine, within maximum 5 drug boluses, in obstetric severe hypertensive patients at Civil Hospital Karachi. 2) To compare immediate adverse maternal and fetal effects in the study group. 3) Furthermore, to assess response to treatment, in terms of patient and disease characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING & DURATION OF STUDY: Gynaecology Unit I, Civil hospital Karachi, from Oct 2012 to Sep 2014 METHODS: Total one hundred eighty-four patients with, severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure(S.B.P)≥160 and/or diastolic blood pressure(D.B.P) ≥110 mm Hg) at greater than 28 weeks of pregnancy or upto 72 hours after delivery, were enrolled and randomly allocated to drug A or B. At enrollment, 94 patients were allocated to Labetalol to 96 to Hydralazine through simple randomization. Since six cases were excluded due to insufficient information( 2 from group A and 4 from group B) so finally data of 92 patients in each group was analyzed. Primary outcome measures were lowering of S.B.P to <160 mm Hg and D.B.P <110 mm Hg (efficacy)and severe persistent hypertension. In addition maternal hypo tension, tachycardia, bradycardia, adverse effect on fetal heart, still birth and neonatal bradycardia were measured. EXPECTED OUTCOME: Efficacy, severe persistent hypertension and side effects of Labetalol versus Hydralazine, in our population were determined. Assessment of response to Drug A and B, will help in choosing a drug for different patient and disease characteristics. |
| NCT02135315 ↗ | Intensive Arterial Pressure Control in Acute Coronary Syndrome | Recruiting | Emergency NGO Onlus | N/A | 2013-10-01 | The intensive arterial pressure control in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the first 24 hours can improve the prognosis in the short and long term. We compare two treatment strategies (standard and intensive treatment) to assess their efficacy and safety in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. |
| NCT02135315 ↗ | Intensive Arterial Pressure Control in Acute Coronary Syndrome | Recruiting | University of Monastir | N/A | 2013-10-01 | The intensive arterial pressure control in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the first 24 hours can improve the prognosis in the short and long term. We compare two treatment strategies (standard and intensive treatment) to assess their efficacy and safety in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. |
| NCT02299414 ↗ | Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Project | Active, not recruiting | Arrowhead Regional Medical Center | Phase 4 | 2015-06-01 | The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a blood pressure treatment strategy during pregnancy to achieve targets that are recommended for non-pregnant reproductive-age adults (<140/90 mmHg) compared ACOG- recommended standard during pregnancy (no treatment unless BP is severe) is effective and safe. |
| NCT02299414 ↗ | Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Project | Active, not recruiting | Aurora Health Care | Phase 4 | 2015-06-01 | The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a blood pressure treatment strategy during pregnancy to achieve targets that are recommended for non-pregnant reproductive-age adults (<140/90 mmHg) compared ACOG- recommended standard during pregnancy (no treatment unless BP is severe) is effective and safe. |
| NCT02299414 ↗ | Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Project | Active, not recruiting | Baylor College of Medicine | Phase 4 | 2015-06-01 | The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a blood pressure treatment strategy during pregnancy to achieve targets that are recommended for non-pregnant reproductive-age adults (<140/90 mmHg) compared ACOG- recommended standard during pregnancy (no treatment unless BP is severe) is effective and safe. |
| NCT02299414 ↗ | Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Project | Active, not recruiting | Bayview Medical Center | Phase 4 | 2015-06-01 | The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a blood pressure treatment strategy during pregnancy to achieve targets that are recommended for non-pregnant reproductive-age adults (<140/90 mmHg) compared ACOG- recommended standard during pregnancy (no treatment unless BP is severe) is effective and safe. |
| >Trial ID | >Title | >Status | >Sponsor | >Phase | >Start Date | >Summary |
Clinical Trial Conditions for Trandate Hct
Condition Name
Clinical Trial Locations for Trandate Hct
Trials by Country
Clinical Trial Progress for Trandate Hct
Clinical Trial Phase
Clinical Trial Sponsors for Trandate Hct
Sponsor Name
