Last Updated: May 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SPORANOX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Sporanox

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00356915 ↗ Itraconazole Tablets Vs. Itraconazole Capsules vs. Placebo in Onychomycosis of the Toenail. Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2006-07-01 Onychomycosis is a common condition accounting for approximately half of all nail disorders. It is most commonly caused by dermatophytes. Itraconazole has been approved for the treatment of onychomycosis in the United States with an approved dosage regimen for the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail of once daily (QD) treatment with 200mg of itraconazole (two 100 mg capsules) for 12 weeks. Barrier Therapeutics has developed a 200 mg tablet which could be used in a more convenient one-tablet-per-day dosing regimen. This clinical trial will compare the efficacy and safety of this new tablet formulation with itraconazole capsules and placebo.
NCT00356915 ↗ Itraconazole Tablets Vs. Itraconazole Capsules vs. Placebo in Onychomycosis of the Toenail. Completed Stiefel, a GSK Company Phase 3 2006-07-01 Onychomycosis is a common condition accounting for approximately half of all nail disorders. It is most commonly caused by dermatophytes. Itraconazole has been approved for the treatment of onychomycosis in the United States with an approved dosage regimen for the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail of once daily (QD) treatment with 200mg of itraconazole (two 100 mg capsules) for 12 weeks. Barrier Therapeutics has developed a 200 mg tablet which could be used in a more convenient one-tablet-per-day dosing regimen. This clinical trial will compare the efficacy and safety of this new tablet formulation with itraconazole capsules and placebo.
NCT00588016 ↗ Concentration of Itraconazole Solution in Nasal Secretions Completed Mayo Clinic Phase 1 2007-04-01 The primary objective of this study is to determine the concentration of itraconazole irrigation in nasal mucous specimens via collection and High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Eight (8) patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and two (2) healthy controls will be enrolled in the initial evaluation. After an initial control nasal specimen, followed by seven days of twice daily topical itraconazole irrigation, nasal specimens will be collected at varying time intervals and the concentrations measured. The primary endpoint is development of a reliable collection and assay technique with concentration curves over time of topically administered itraconazole. A secondary endpoint is to determine if the concentrations measured achieve a mean inhibitory concentration (MIC90) to commonly cultured fungal species in the nose.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Sporanox

Condition Name

Condition Name for Sporanox
Intervention Trials
Healthy 7
Prostate Cancer 3
Neutropenia 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Sporanox
Intervention Trials
Carcinoma, Basal Cell 4
Carcinoma 4
Mycoses 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Sporanox

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Sporanox
Location Trials
United States 67
China 5
Canada 5
United Kingdom 4
Japan 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Sporanox
Location Trials
California 8
Minnesota 5
Florida 5
Arizona 4
Maryland 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Sporanox

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Sporanox
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Sporanox
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 28
Active, not recruiting 3
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Sporanox

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Sporanox
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 4
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2
Jean Yuh Tang 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Sporanox
Sponsor Trials
Industry 32
Other 19
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sporanox Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 27, 2026

Sporanox (itraconazole): Clinical-Study Status, Market Snapshot, and Forward Projections

What is Sporanox and what clinical development remains active?

Sporanox is the branded name for itraconazole, an oral triazole antifungal. The product line is long established, and the practical market focus is now on line extensions, formulation-specific repositioning, and competitive/coverage dynamics, rather than large, brand-new pivotal programs.

Clinical development status (broadly):

  • No current, widely documented late-stage (Phase 3) brand-new itraconazole Sporanox program is publicly signposted as a major upcoming label expansion in major trial registries in the way modern branded launches typically are.
  • Clinical activity in itraconazole is concentrated in:
    • Comparative effectiveness in endemic mycoses and dermatologic indications.
    • Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) studies and real-world adherence/PK work.
    • New combinations or regimen optimization (often investigator-driven rather than brand-sponsored).

Because your prompt requests an update with market analysis and projections, the commercial outlook is driven much more by patent/coverage life, generic displacement risk, and guideline positioning than by near-term late-stage trials.

Which indications anchor itraconazole’s commercial demand?

Itraconazole is used across a set of antifungal indications that, in combination, keep demand resilient even as branded pricing compresses.

Commercial demand drivers typically include:

  • Onychomycosis (nail fungal infections)
  • Dermatophyte infections (selected skin infections depending on country guideline)
  • Endemic mycoses (country and guideline dependent)
  • Vulvovaginal candidiasis and other Candida infections (where appropriate)
  • Other systemic fungal infections where itraconazole remains a guideline-supported option

These indications do not require new pivotal trials to keep market share; they require maintained formulary access and clinically favorable safety/interaction management.

What is the current clinical-trial “shape” for itraconazole?

The clinical-trial footprint for an established antifungal typically shifts to:

  • Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions work
  • Bioequivalence and formulation performance studies (where relevant to generics)
  • Real-world evidence endpoints (persistence, adherence, time-to-therapy, dosing adequacy)
  • Comparative trials against other azoles or systemic antifungals

For business planning, the key point is that pipeline-upside from a brand-sponsored Phase 3 launch is not the core variable for Sporanox. Market dynamics are.


Market Analysis and Projection for Sporanox

What does the antifungal category look like commercially?

The oral systemic antifungal category is characterized by:

  • Strong generic competition in many geographies and price bands for older molecules.
  • Ongoing need for reliable oral systemic therapy in:
    • endemic fungal disease burden settings
    • immunocompromised patient segments
  • Significant role of formularies, reimbursement rules, and treatment guidelines.

For itraconazole, the branded economics tend to compress as generics scale. The remaining upside for a branded product typically comes from:

  • payer differentiation and contracting
  • treatment guideline entrenchment
  • patient-niche benefits (dose-limiting tolerability profile vs comparators)

How has generic competition impacted branded itraconazole pricing?

In older small-molecule antimycotics, the standard trajectory after the initial brand launch window is:

  • branded penetration declines as generic molecules enter
  • pricing falls due to therapeutic substitution
  • the remaining branded market becomes concentrated in:
    • specific payer preferences
    • patient-specific tolerability history
    • prescriber preference under interaction-risk considerations

Sporanox should be modeled as a mature, off-patent product in most markets unless a specific still-active exclusivity or controlled-formulation life exists locally.

Where does value persist for Sporanox despite generic entry?

Sporanox value typically persists in channels where:

  • prescribers need a stable reference product for interaction-risk management
  • clinicians apply itraconazole where it remains guideline-supported over alternatives
  • payers maintain access for certain indications with lower administrative burden than alternate regimens

This translates into an expectation of:

  • declining average realized price over time
  • relatively stable unit demand if indications and guideline use remain steady
  • occasional reimbursement cycles that can create short-term volatility

Commercial Projections (Base-Case Framework)

What is the projected market direction for Sporanox over the next 3 to 5 years?

Given itraconazole’s mature status and the typical generic trajectory for older antifungals, the expected commercial direction for the branded product is:

Projection logic (industry standard for off-patent mature brands):

  • Units: modest decline or flat depending on guideline persistence and patient volume.
  • Price: continued erosion from generic substitution and payer rate pressure.
  • Revenue: typically declines, with slower decline if brand remains covered and clinically entrenched.

Base-case expectation (directional):

  • Revenue declines year over year, driven primarily by price compression.
  • Market share remains stable to slightly down in markets where brand contracting persists.

This is the operational planning view for a product like Sporanox, where incremental clinical-trial-driven upside is not the dominant variable.

Scenario set for revenue and share

A practical projection set for investment and R&D resource allocation:

Scenario Primary driver Revenue direction Brand share direction
Base ongoing generic substitution, steady guideline use Down (moderate) Flat to slight decline
Bull payer contracting stabilizes, fewer substitution barriers in key markets Down (slower) Flat
Bear accelerated substitution, restrictive formularies, deeper price cuts Down (steeper) Decline

Competitive and Strategic Implications for Business Planning

What does Sporanox’s positioning imply for competitors and partners?

Sporanox competes in a class where value is often dictated by:

  • payer coverage rules for systemic azoles
  • safety and interaction management
  • clinical guideline endorsement

Strategic implications:

  • Competitors can take share via newer azoles, different dosing convenience, or payer-favored formularies.
  • Partners can capture value by targeting high-use indications where itraconazole remains clinically appropriate.
  • A branded holder typically relies on contracting and patient continuity, not pipeline expansion.

Key Takeaways

  • Sporanox (itraconazole) is a mature antifungal with commercial performance dominated by generic competition, formulary access, and guideline use, not new late-stage pivotal trials.
  • The clinical development landscape centers on optimization (PK/interaction, regimen, real-world outcomes) rather than near-term brand label expansions.
  • Market projections for the branded product follow a typical off-patent pattern: pricing erosion drives revenue decline, with unit demand relatively stabilized by entrenched indication use.
  • Base-case business planning should assume moderate year-over-year revenue decline, stable to slightly declining brand share, and scenario sensitivity to payer contracting.

FAQs

  1. Is Sporanox entering a new Phase 3 program for label expansion?
    No widely signposted late-stage label-expansion program is the dominant public development signal for the brand.

  2. What indications most influence Sporanox demand?
    Demand is anchored by common dermatologic and fungal indications (including onychomycosis and selected systemic/endemic mycoses, depending on country guidance).

  3. What is the biggest threat to Sporanox revenue?
    Generic substitution and payer-driven price pressure.

  4. What is the most likely upside lever for the branded product?
    Maintained formulary contracting and reduced administrative substitution barriers in key reimbursement channels.

  5. What should investors focus on for near-term outlook?
    Realized price trends, formulary status, and share retention in priority markets rather than pipeline milestones.


References

[1] U.S. FDA. Sporanox (itraconazole) prescribing information. (Latest available version).
[2] EMA. Sporanox and related itraconazole product information (where applicable).
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Itraconazole (Sporanox) studies and trial records (retrieved from registry entries).
[4] WHO. Guidelines and resources on fungal diseases and antifungal use (category-level context for itraconazole positioning).
[5] National guideline bodies (e.g., IDSA and other country-specific fungal guidelines). Itraconazole-related recommendations for antifungal therapy.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.