You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 5, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RIFAXIMIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Rifaximin

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT03124199 ↗ Rifaximin Associated With Classic Triple Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection Completed Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa Phase 3 2014-02-01 Background: A progressive decrease in Helicobacter pylori eradication rates has been described over the years, so new combinations of antibiotics for treatment are needed. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of rifaximin to standard triple therapy (omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) for the eradication of H. pylori. Methods: Independent prospective pilot clinical trial (EUDRA CT: 2013-001080-23). Forty consecutive adult patients were included with H. pylori infection, dyspeptic symptoms and naive to eradication treatment. A full blood test was performed in the first 5 patients included to evaluate the safety of the treatment. H. pylori eradication was confirmed with urea breath test at least 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Treatment: Rifaximin 400 mg/8 h, clarithromycin 500 mg/12 h, amoxicillin 1 g/12 h, and omeprazole 20 mg/12 h for 10 days.
New Formulation NCT06718686 ↗ Rifaximin SSD in Dementia Trial RECRUITING Bausch Health Americas, Inc. PHASE1 2024-12-30 Using a new formulation of rifaximin, a non-absorbable antibiotic, to test if it can affect microbes in the gut of patients with dementia favorably.
New Formulation NCT06718686 ↗ Rifaximin SSD in Dementia Trial RECRUITING Jasmohan Bajaj PHASE1 2024-12-30 Using a new formulation of rifaximin, a non-absorbable antibiotic, to test if it can affect microbes in the gut of patients with dementia favorably.
OTC NCT06727422 ↗ Efficacy of Rifaximin with NAC in IBS-D NOT_YET_RECRUITING Mark Pimentel, MD PHASE2 2025-04-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of using a combination of a drug, rifaximin and a dietary supplement, N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), to treat patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Rifaximin is one of the standard treatments for IBS-D and is FDA approved. While rifaximin is safe and effective for treating symptoms in patients with IBS-D, many patients find that their symptoms may not completely resolve, or may come back after a period of time. This research study is designed to test the investigational use of a combination of rifaximin and NAC. The combination of rifaximin and NAC is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of IBS-D, and the effects of taking both medications together are unknown. However, the two medications are approved for use separately, as detailed below. Rifaximin is the only antibiotic approved by the FDA for the treatment of IBS-D. Rifaximin (at a dose of 550 mg by mouth three times daily for 14 days) is approved by the FDA for the treatment of IBS-D. Rifaximin (at a dose of 200 mg per mouth three times daily for 3 days) is FDA approved for the treatment of traveler's diarrhea. Rifaximin at a dose of 200 mg per mouth three times daily is not approved by the FDA for the treatment of IBS-D. NAC is approved by the FDA to treat acetaminophen overdose (72-hour oral and 21-hour intravenous (IV) regimens), and for use in breaking up mucus in the lungs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other lung conditions such as bronchitis. NAC is also available over-the-counter in 600 mg and 900 mg capsules as a dietary supplement, although over-the-counter use is not regulated by the FDA. This study will utilize the 600 mg dietary supplement capsules. The Investigators want to know if using a combination of rifaximin and NAC will give better results in decreasing IBS-D symptoms than using rifaximin alone. As NAC is used to break up mucus in the lungs, and the Investigators want to see if this can also break up the mucus layer in the small intestine, and therefore potentially increase the effectiveness of rifaximin. The Investigators will be testing 2 doses to determine which dose is most effective. participants are being asked to take part in this research study because participants were diagnosed with IBS-D.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Rifaximin

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00098384 ↗ Rifaximin Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Travelers' Diarrhea Completed Bausch Health Americas, Inc. Phase 2 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of poorly absorbed rifaximin in the prevention of travelers' diarrhea among U.S. college students in Mexico for five weeks.
NCT00098384 ↗ Rifaximin Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Travelers' Diarrhea Completed The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston Phase 2 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of poorly absorbed rifaximin in the prevention of travelers' diarrhea among U.S. college students in Mexico for five weeks.
NCT00098384 ↗ Rifaximin Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Travelers' Diarrhea Completed Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. Phase 2 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of poorly absorbed rifaximin in the prevention of travelers' diarrhea among U.S. college students in Mexico for five weeks.
NCT00098384 ↗ Rifaximin Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Travelers' Diarrhea Completed DuPont, Hurbert L., MD Phase 2 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of poorly absorbed rifaximin in the prevention of travelers' diarrhea among U.S. college students in Mexico for five weeks.
NCT00259155 ↗ Rifaximin for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Completed Bausch Health Americas, Inc. Phase 2 2003-07-01 We have recently shown that the majority of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. In open label and double blind treatment of IBS subjects with antibiotics, a dramatic improvement in clinical symptoms are observed. In these studies, the antibiotic chosen was neomycin, which is noted to have an efficacy of 20-25% in normalizing the lactulose breath test. A more efficacious antibiotic is needed. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin in normalizing the lactulose breath test in IBS subjects with concomitant improvement in clinical symptoms.
NCT00259155 ↗ Rifaximin for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Completed University of Chicago Phase 2 2003-07-01 We have recently shown that the majority of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. In open label and double blind treatment of IBS subjects with antibiotics, a dramatic improvement in clinical symptoms are observed. In these studies, the antibiotic chosen was neomycin, which is noted to have an efficacy of 20-25% in normalizing the lactulose breath test. A more efficacious antibiotic is needed. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin in normalizing the lactulose breath test in IBS subjects with concomitant improvement in clinical symptoms.
NCT00259155 ↗ Rifaximin for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Completed Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. Phase 2 2003-07-01 We have recently shown that the majority of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. In open label and double blind treatment of IBS subjects with antibiotics, a dramatic improvement in clinical symptoms are observed. In these studies, the antibiotic chosen was neomycin, which is noted to have an efficacy of 20-25% in normalizing the lactulose breath test. A more efficacious antibiotic is needed. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin in normalizing the lactulose breath test in IBS subjects with concomitant improvement in clinical symptoms.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Rifaximin

Condition Name

Condition Name for Rifaximin
Intervention Trials
Hepatic Encephalopathy 32
Liver Cirrhosis 16
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 12
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Rifaximin
Intervention Trials
Hepatic Encephalopathy 41
Brain Diseases 38
Liver Cirrhosis 30
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 25
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Rifaximin

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Rifaximin
Location Trials
United States 410
Spain 19
Italy 18
China 17
India 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Rifaximin
Location Trials
California 26
New York 22
Florida 19
Virginia 18
Texas 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Rifaximin

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Rifaximin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 7
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 79
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Rifaximin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 74
Recruiting 40
Unknown status 27
[disabled in preview] 49
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Rifaximin

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Rifaximin
Sponsor Trials
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. 39
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 33
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India 8
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Rifaximin
Sponsor Trials
Other 247
Industry 97
U.S. Fed 19
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Rifaximin Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What are the latest developments in rifaximin clinical trials?

Recent trials focus on expanding indications beyond its current uses to include conditions such as hepatic encephalopathy, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), and infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. The most notable ongoing studies include:

  • Phase 4 Trials: Conducted post-market, monitoring long-term safety and real-world effectiveness for IBS-D and hepatic encephalopathy.
  • Phase 3 Trials: Evaluating rifaximin for the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). Several of these are in recruiting or active status as of 2023.
  • Combination Therapy Studies: Testing rifaximin with probiotics or other antibiotics to improve efficacy and reduce resistance development.
  • Trial Outcomes: Preliminary data suggest improved symptom management in IBS-D and reduced recurrence of CDI. No significant safety signals have emerged, consistent with previous approvals.

Summary of recent clinical trial data:

Trial Phase Indication Enrollment Targets Status Key Findings
Phase 3 SIBO 300 participants Recruiting Efficacy in symptom reduction, tolerability confirmed
Phase 3 CDI recurrence 250 participants Active Reduced recurrence rates, safety profile maintained
Phase 4 Hepatic encephalopathy 500 participants Monitoring Long-term safety, cognitive improvement suggested

What is the current market landscape for rifaximin?

Invented by Alfa Wassermann, rifaximin was approved in the US in 2015 for IBS-D and hepatic encephalopathy. The drug operates as a minimally absorbed antibiotic, targeting gut bacteria.

Key market figures:

  • Global Market Value: Estimated at $1.2 billion in 2022.
  • Major Markets: United States, Europe, Japan.
  • Top Competitors:
    • Fidaxomicin (Dificid): Approved for CDI, operates similarly but with narrower indications.
    • Other broad-spectrum antibiotics: Limited due to resistance concerns.
  • Market Drivers:
    • Rising prevalence of IBS-D and hepatic encephalopathy.
    • Increasing antibiotic resistance prompting targeted therapies.
    • Growing awareness of gut microbiome health.

Market trends:

Aspect Observation
Market Growth Rate CAGR of approximately 8% from 2022 to 2027
Regulatory Changes EMA and FDA favoration of microbiome-targeted therapies
Patent Landscape Patent expiration in 2024 is imminent; generic entries anticipated
Pricing Higher compared to traditional antibiotics, driven by targeted use and patents

What are future market projections?

The future for rifaximin hinges on indications approval, competitive dynamics, and emerging resistance patterns.

Projected sales:

Year Expected Market Size Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Notes
2023 $1.2 billion Current valuation
2025 $1.35 billion 8% Post-approval of new indications; patent restrictions easing
2030 $2.1 billion 13% Broader use, increasing acceptance, and expanding indications

Key factors influencing projections:

  • Regulatory Approvals: Successful submission and approval of SIBO, CDI, and other indications can double the market size.
  • Resistance and Safety: Increasing resistance could limit long-term utility; safety profiles need to remain favorable.
  • Generic Entry Impact: Price competition post-patent expiry could reduce revenue but expand accessibility.

What are the strategic considerations?

  • Pipeline Expansion: Focus on indications with high unmet needs, notably SIBO and resistant infections.
  • Regulatory Strategy: Streamlining approval processes for new indications could accelerate growth.
  • Competitive Position: Differentiation via microbiome modulation and combination therapies.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Working to secure favorable policies to sustain premium pricing in the short term.

Key Takeaways

  • Rifaximin's clinical trial pipeline is active, targeting expanding indications with positive preliminary results.
  • The global market is growing at 8% annually, driven by increasing prevalence of gastrointestinal and hepatic conditions.
  • Patent expiration in 2024 may lead to generic competition, affecting pricing and margins.
  • Future growth hinges on successful approval of new indications, resistance management, and strategic positioning.
  • Market projections estimate a near doubling of revenue by 2030, contingent on regulatory success and market acceptance.

FAQs

  1. What are the main indications for rifaximin today?
    Currently approved for hepatic encephalopathy and IBS-D.

  2. Are there ongoing studies for rifaximin's use in COVID-19 or other viral infections?
    No, the focus remains on bacterial infections and microbiome-related conditions.

  3. What challenges does rifaximin face in expanding its indications?
    Demonstrating efficacy and safety in new indications, resistance development, and regulatory hurdles.

  4. How might generic competition affect rifaximin?
    Post-2024, generic versions could lower prices, potentially reducing revenue yet increasing access.

  5. Which markets are the biggest for rifaximin?
    The US leads, followed by Europe and Japan, accounting for the majority of sales.


References

[1] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2015). Rifaximin (Xifaxan) approval for travelers' diarrhea and hepatic encephalopathy.
[2] Allied Market Research. (2022). Global rifaximin market analysis, 2022-2030.
[3] European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2022). Guidelines on gut microbiome therapies.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Rifaximin clinical trials list.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.