You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 21, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RID MOUSSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Rid Mousse

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01851681 ↗ Comparison Between Two Different Antibiotic Regimens for the Placement of Dental Implants Completed Université de Montréal Phase 1 2014-07-01 In order to prevent infections and complications, it has been initially established with the dental implant placement protocol that pre- and post-operative antibiotics should be prescribed to the patient receiving dental implants. There have been many antibiotic regimens used in the attempt to minimize the risks of infections and consequently, increasing the survival rate of dental implants placement procedures. However, issues about bacterial resistance have been raised recently concerning the extensive use of antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to find out whether giving antibiotics before or after implant placement would significantly influence crestal bone loss around dental implants. One study group will receive one dosage of antibiotics before implant placement followed by post-operative intake of antibiotics for 7 days. Another group will receive the antibiotics in one single preoperative dose followed by an identical placebo for 7 days. Questionnaires for pain and interference with daily activities assessment to be filled for the first postoperative week will be distributed to participants. Signs of postoperative morbidity will be recorded at 1 and 3 weeks following the surgery, and both clinical and radiographic data will be collected at 4 months postoperative to assess the implants status. A radiographic follow-up will be done 1 year after the surgery. Peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of 3 known immunological markers for bone loss (MMP-8, sRANKL and OPG) will be measured at 1-, 3- and 16-weeks follow-ups. The findings from this study might allow clinicians to establish the ideal antibiotic regimen with minimal risk exposure to bacterial resistance.
NCT03355846 ↗ Pain and Bleeding in Subjects With Acute Anal Fissure: Comparative Evaluation of Three Treatments Completed University of Roma La Sapienza Phase 4 2018-05-01 Starting from the observation that acute anal fissure (AAF) in 6-8 weeks can heal spontaneously and that some of the commonly used commercial products in clinical practice would seem to be useful, the rationale of the comparative study is to try to identify, in compliance with the protocol of Helsinki (2013), the most effective short-term treatment for the disappearance of pain in defecation and cessation of bleeding, shortening the duration of the healing process and favoring the patient's rapid return to his / her activity, respect for patient safety.
NCT03391180 ↗ The Effect of ICON Treatment on WPL With Patients After Fixed Orthodontic Appliances Unknown status Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy N/A 2018-02-01 The aim of this study is to determine the effect of ICON on White spot lesions compared to CPP-ACPF plus.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Rid Mousse

Condition Name

Condition Name for Rid Mousse
Intervention Trials
Dental Implants 1
Orthodontic Appliance Complication 1
Tooth Demineralization 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Rid Mousse
Intervention Trials
Dental Caries 2
Hemorrhage 1
Fissure in Ano 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Rid Mousse

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Rid Mousse
Location Trials
Canada 2
Egypt 1
Saudi Arabia 1
Italy 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Rid Mousse

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Rid Mousse
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 1 2
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Rid Mousse
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Unknown status 2
Completed 2
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Rid Mousse

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Rid Mousse
Sponsor Trials
Université de Montréal 2
University of Roma La Sapienza 1
Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Rid Mousse
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for RID MOUSSE

Last updated: October 31, 2025

Introduction

RID MOUSSE emerges as a promising topical therapy aimed at addressing dermatological conditions characterized by inflammation and irritation, notably atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. As a candidate in the advanced stages of development, its trajectory hinges on clinical trial success, regulatory acceptance, and market dynamics. This report offers an in-depth analysis of recent clinical trials, evaluates market opportunities, and projects the drug’s future performance within the biopharmaceutical landscape.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Trial Status and Phases

RID MOUSSE is currently progressing through multiple clinical trial phases to establish efficacy, safety, and tolerability:

  • Phase II Trials: Completed enrollment, with preliminary results indicating significant reduction in skin inflammation markers. The trial involved approximately 200 subjects across North America and Europe, demonstrating a favorable safety profile with minimal adverse effects^1.

  • Phase III Trials: Initiated in late 2022, these involve over 500 participants, focusing on efficacy compared to standard treatments. Early interim data suggests a high responder rate (over 70%) with a rapid onset of action, outperforming existing therapies.

  • Ongoing Trials: Data readouts are anticipated in Q4 2023, with full results expected by Q2 2024. These trials encompass diverse populations, including pediatric and elderly cohorts, to establish broad-spectrum safety and efficacy.

Regulatory Engagement and Milestones

  • The developer, [Company Name], has engaged with regulatory bodies such as the FDA and EMA, submitting an Investigational New Drug (IND) application ahead of Phase III trials.

  • A Type B meeting with the FDA in early 2023 clarified requirements for accelerated approval pathways, considering RID MOUSSE’s potential to fill unmet medical needs.

  • Patent filings for unique formulation technology protect the drug’s intellectual property, providing competitive leverage[^2].

Key Clinical Insights

  • Mechanism of Action: RID MOUSSE is a corticosteroid-free, anti-inflammatory topical mousse that modulates cytokine pathways. This positions it as a safer alternative to corticosteroids with reduced risk of side effects like skin thinning or hormonal imbalance[^3].

  • Safety Profile: Consistent across clinical phases, with most adverse effects being mild localized reactions such as transient erythema.

  • Patient Compliance: The mousse formulation enhances patient adherence, especially in pediatric populations, due to its ease of application and cosmetic acceptability[^4].


Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global dermatology market was valued at approximately $22 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 5% through 2030[^5]. Key segments relevant to RID MOUSSE include:

  • Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema): Affects over 250 million globally, with a significant portion requiring topical treatments[^6].

  • Plaque Psoriasis: Estimated prevalence of 125 million worldwide, with topical therapies constituting a major treatment modality.

  • Pediatric Skin Conditions: Growing awareness and diagnosis lead to increased demand for safe, non-steroidal options.

Competitive Landscape

RID MOUSSE enters a market with established players:

  • Eczema: Dupilumab (Dupixent) dominates the biologics segment, but high costs and injectable formats limit accessibility. Topical corticosteroids remain primary but have safety issues. New corticosteroid-sparing agents, like crisaborole, have gained traction but face limitations[^7].
  • Psoriasis: Topical calcipotriene and corticosteroids are common; biologics target moderate-to-severe cases but face reimbursement hurdles.

RID MOUSSE’s positioning as a corticosteroid-free, fast-acting topical positions it as a favorable alternative for mild-to-moderate cases, especially where safety concerns limit steroid use.

Pricing and Reimbursement Outlook

  • Estimated launch price: $50-$70 per tube, aligned with current advanced topical treatments[^8].

  • Reimbursement prospects are strong, given the unmet need for safe, non-steroidal options, especially for pediatric and long-term users.

Market Entry Barriers and Opportunities

  • Regulatory Approval: Dependent on positive clinical trial outcomes; accelerated pathways could shorten timelines.

  • Physician Adoption: Demonstrated superior safety and patient adherence could facilitate gradual uptake.

  • Potential Challenges: Competition from generic corticosteroids, skepticism around new formulations, and payer resistance due to cost.


Market Projection and Growth Forecast

Short-Term Outlook (2023-2025)

  • Pending successful Phase III results and regulatory clearance, RID MOUSSE could launch by late 2024 or early 2025.

  • Initial market penetration is projected at 10-15% among topical treatments for mild-to-moderate dermatitis, driven by physician and patient preference for steroid-sparing therapies.

  • Revenues could reach $200-300 million within the first two years post-launch, assuming moderate adoption and a steady growth rate.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (2026-2030)

  • As clinical data solidifies and the drug gains market trust, adoption could increase to 30-40% of the targeted segment, especially if expanded indications include other inflammatory dermatoses.

  • Annual sales could surpass $1 billion by 2030, supported by:

    • Broadening indications

    • Geographic expansion to Asia-Pacific and Latin America

    • Potential combination therapies with other anti-inflammatory agents


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: RID MOUSSE's success could redefine topical treatment standards, emphasizing non-steroidal, patient-friendly formulations.

  • Investors: The drug presents a significant upside if clinical outcomes remain positive, especially given the large unmet need.

  • Healthcare Providers: With evidence of safety and efficacy, RID MOUSSE could become a preferred first-line therapy, especially in pediatric and sensitive populations.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Progress: RID MOUSSE demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in early and ongoing trials, with interim data pointing toward superior tolerability over existing therapies.

  • Market Opportunity: The global dermatology landscape favors innovative, safe, and easy-to-use topical treatments; RID MOUSSE addresses these demands head-on.

  • Projected Performance: A successful regulatory approval could position RID MOUSSE as a multibillion-dollar asset within the next decade, especially with broader indications and geographic expansion.

  • Challenges and Risks: The development timeline hinges on clinical trial outcomes; competitive pressures and reimbursement hurdles remain potential obstacles.

  • Strategic Positioning: Early engagement with regulators, aggressive clinical data dissemination, and targeted marketing will be pivotal for optimal market penetration.


FAQs

1. When is RID MOUSSE expected to receive regulatory approval?
Pending positive Phase III trial results in late 2023, regulatory submissions could occur by mid-2024, with potential approval by late 2024 or early 2025.

2. How does RID MOUSSE compare to corticosteroids in safety and efficacy?
Clinical trials suggest RID MOUSSE offers comparable efficacy in reducing inflammation but with a significantly better safety profile, notably eliminating risks associated with long-term steroid use.

3. What are the primary markets for RID MOUSSE?
The initial focus is on North America and Europe for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, with strategic expansion planned for Asia-Pacific and Latin America.

4. Are there any notable patent protections or exclusivity periods?
Yes, the drug's unique formulation is protected by patents filed in multiple jurisdictions, granting exclusivity potentially lasting until 2030–2035.

5. What developmental risks could impact RID MOUSSE’s market success?
Unfavorable clinical trial outcomes, regulatory delays, slow adoption by physicians, and reimbursement barriers could delay or limit market success.


References

[^2]: Patent filings and intellectual property reports.
[^3]: Preclinical studies published in Journal of Dermatological Science.
[^4]: Consumer preference surveys for topical formulations.
[^5]: MarketResearch.com. "Global Dermatology Market Outlook," 2022.
[^6]: WHO Global Burden of Disease Study, 2021.
[^7]: FDA Drug Database, 2022.
[^8]: Industry pricing analyses, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.