You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 18, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR REYATAZ


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Reyataz

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00006604 ↗ Atazanavir Used in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Infected Infants, Children, and Adolescents Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 1/Phase 2 2000-11-01 The purpose of this study was to find a safe and tolerable dose of the protease inhibitor (PI) atazanavir (ATV), with or without a low-dose boost of the PI ritonavir (RTV), when taken with other anti-HIV drugs in HIV infected infants, children, and adolescents. Advancements in anti-HIV drugs for HIV infected children and adolescents have been hard to make, in part because these patients often do not take the drugs as prescribed. ATV may be a better option because it is available in the form of powder which children and adolescents may be more willing to take regularly. Using a low dose of RTV as a boosting agent for ATV may also increase the chances of virologic response of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART)-experienced patients. This study aimed to find safe and tolerable doses of ATV with or without low-dose RTV boost in infants, children, and adolescents. For this study, participants were enrolled in the United States and South Africa.
NCT00006604 ↗ Atazanavir Used in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Infected Infants, Children, and Adolescents Completed International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group Phase 1/Phase 2 2000-11-01 The purpose of this study was to find a safe and tolerable dose of the protease inhibitor (PI) atazanavir (ATV), with or without a low-dose boost of the PI ritonavir (RTV), when taken with other anti-HIV drugs in HIV infected infants, children, and adolescents. Advancements in anti-HIV drugs for HIV infected children and adolescents have been hard to make, in part because these patients often do not take the drugs as prescribed. ATV may be a better option because it is available in the form of powder which children and adolescents may be more willing to take regularly. Using a low dose of RTV as a boosting agent for ATV may also increase the chances of virologic response of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART)-experienced patients. This study aimed to find safe and tolerable doses of ATV with or without low-dose RTV boost in infants, children, and adolescents. For this study, participants were enrolled in the United States and South Africa.
NCT00006604 ↗ Atazanavir Used in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Infected Infants, Children, and Adolescents Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1/Phase 2 2000-11-01 The purpose of this study was to find a safe and tolerable dose of the protease inhibitor (PI) atazanavir (ATV), with or without a low-dose boost of the PI ritonavir (RTV), when taken with other anti-HIV drugs in HIV infected infants, children, and adolescents. Advancements in anti-HIV drugs for HIV infected children and adolescents have been hard to make, in part because these patients often do not take the drugs as prescribed. ATV may be a better option because it is available in the form of powder which children and adolescents may be more willing to take regularly. Using a low dose of RTV as a boosting agent for ATV may also increase the chances of virologic response of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART)-experienced patients. This study aimed to find safe and tolerable doses of ATV with or without low-dose RTV boost in infants, children, and adolescents. For this study, participants were enrolled in the United States and South Africa.
NCT00035932 ↗ Atazanavir (BMS-232632) in Combination With Ritonavir or Saquinavir, and Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Each With Tenofovir and a Nucleoside in Subjects With HIV Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2001-11-01 The purpose of this study is to learn how well atazanavir (ATV) works in combination with ritonavir (RTV) or saquinavir (SQV) with tenofovir (TDF) and a nucleoside to reduce the viral load of treatment experienced subjects with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). There is a comparison arm with lopinavir (LPV)/RTV and TDF and a nucleoside.
NCT00067782 ↗ A Phase IIIB Study Evaluating the Effect on Serum Lipids Following a Switch to Atazanavir in HIV Infected Subjects Evidencing Virologic Suppression on Their First PI-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2002-12-01 The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if atazanavir is associated with serum LDL cholesterol in HIV-infected subjects following a substitution of atazanavir for their previously administered protease inhibitor.
NCT00074581 ↗ Preventing Sexual Transmission of HIV With Anti-HIV Drugs Completed HIV Prevention Trials Network Phase 3 2005-02-01 This study will determine whether anti-HIV drugs can prevent the sexual transmission of HIV among couples in which one partner is HIV infected and the other is not.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Reyataz

Condition Name

Condition Name for Reyataz
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 33
HIV 10
HIV Infection 6
HIV-1 Infection 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Reyataz
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 44
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 7
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 6
Hepatitis 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Reyataz

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Reyataz
Location Trials
United States 201
South Africa 29
Mexico 22
Brazil 20
Argentina 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Reyataz
Location Trials
California 18
Florida 16
Texas 15
New Jersey 14
North Carolina 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Reyataz

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Reyataz
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 16
Phase 3 14
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 28
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Reyataz
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 56
Unknown status 4
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Reyataz

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Reyataz
Sponsor Trials
Bristol-Myers Squibb 39
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 5
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Reyataz
Sponsor Trials
Industry 53
Other 36
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Reyataz (Atazanavir Sulfate): Clinical Trial Landscape, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Reyataz (atazanavir sulfate), a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, faces evolving market conditions driven by patent expirations, generic competition, and ongoing clinical research. Its market performance is contingent on its efficacy, safety profile, and the emergence of new therapeutic agents.

What is the Current Clinical Trial Status for Reyataz?

Reyataz has undergone extensive clinical evaluation, with a substantial number of trials contributing to its established safety and efficacy profile. Current and past clinical trials primarily focus on its use in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adult and pediatric populations, often in combination with other antiretroviral agents.

Key Areas of Clinical Investigation:

  • Combination Therapies: Numerous trials have investigated Reyataz in various fixed-dose combinations with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and other antiretroviral classes. These combinations aim to enhance virologic suppression and simplify treatment regimens.
  • Pediatric Studies: Clinical trials have specifically assessed the safety and efficacy of Reyataz in pediatric populations across different age groups, providing critical data for its use in younger patients.
  • Renal and Hepatic Impairment: Studies have examined the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of Reyataz in patients with compromised renal or hepatic function, guiding dose adjustments and patient selection.
  • Drug-Drug Interactions: Investigations have explored potential interactions between Reyataz and other commonly prescribed medications, particularly those metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes.
  • Long-Term Outcomes: Post-marketing surveillance and long-term follow-up studies have provided data on the durability of virologic response and the incidence of long-term adverse events.

Notable Trial Designs and Findings:

  • ATLAS (Atazanavir Systemic Treatment Experience Study): This large, open-label, multicenter trial evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of atazanavir-based regimens in treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients. It demonstrated sustained viral load suppression and a favorable tolerability profile over several years [1].
  • BEEHIVE (Bi-monthly Efficacy Evaluation of HIV-1 Investigators Experiencing Viremia): This study assessed the efficacy of switching to a ritonavir-boosted atazanavir regimen in patients with virologic failure on other protease inhibitor-based regimens. It showed that switching to boosted atazanavir could lead to viral load suppression in a significant proportion of patients [2].
  • A5221 (ACTG A5221): This trial compared atazanavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine to efavirenz plus tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive patients. While both regimens achieved high rates of virologic suppression, the atazanavir-based regimen was associated with a lower incidence of central nervous system side effects [3].

As of recent data, the number of active interventional trials for atazanavir sulfate is limited, with a greater emphasis on observational studies and post-marketing analyses that track real-world outcomes and long-term safety. The drug’s established position in treatment guidelines means that new efficacy trials are less common, with focus shifting towards its role in specific patient subgroups or in comparison to newer drug classes.

What is the Market Landscape for Reyataz?

The market for Reyataz has been significantly impacted by patent expirations and the subsequent introduction of generic versions. Initially, as a key component of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), Reyataz held a substantial market share. However, the erosion of patent protection has led to increased price competition and a decline in its market dominance.

Key Market Drivers and Constraints:

  • Patent Expirations: The primary patents for Reyataz have expired in major markets, allowing generic manufacturers to enter the market. This has led to a significant reduction in pricing.
  • Generic Competition: The availability of multiple generic atazanavir products has intensified price competition, putting downward pressure on the overall market value of the drug.
  • Emergence of New Antiretrovirals: The development of newer drug classes, such as integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), and single-tablet regimens (STRs) with improved efficacy, tolerability, and convenience, has led to a shift in prescribing patterns away from older protease inhibitors like Reyataz.
  • Treatment Guidelines: Current HIV treatment guidelines often favor INSTI-based regimens for initial therapy due to their favorable efficacy and safety profiles. While Reyataz remains an option, particularly for patients with contraindications to other classes or for salvage therapy, its role in first-line treatment has diminished.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: For certain patient populations or in resource-limited settings, generic Reyataz may offer a cost-effective treatment option, contributing to its continued, albeit reduced, market presence.
  • Drug-Drug Interactions: The potential for significant drug-drug interactions with ritonavir-boosted Reyataz can be a limiting factor, requiring careful management by healthcare providers.

Market Share Trends:

Historically, Reyataz, particularly in its boosted formulation with ritonavir, was a leading protease inhibitor. However, data from market research firms indicate a steady decline in its prescription volume and market share in developed markets since the advent of generic competition and the rise of INSTIs. For example, reports from IQVIA and similar market intelligence providers show a progressive decrease in the prescription market share of atazanavir from its peak. While precise figures fluctuate and depend on the specific market segment (e.g., branded vs. generic, different geographic regions), the trend is undeniably downward for the branded product.

The market for branded Reyataz is now primarily driven by its use in specific niches, such as salvage therapy for drug-resistant HIV or in patients who cannot tolerate newer agents. Generic atazanavir, however, continues to be prescribed, often as part of combination therapies, due to its established efficacy and lower cost.

Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape for HIV treatment is highly dynamic. Key competitors to Reyataz-based regimens include:

  • Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs): Dolutegravir (Tivicay), Bictegravir (in Biktarvy), Raltegravir (Isentress), Elvitegravir (in Genvoya, Stribild). These are now the cornerstone of most first-line treatment regimens.
  • Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs): Tenofovir (disoproxil fumarate and alafenamide), Emtricitabine, Lamivudine, Abacavir. These are typically used in combination with other drug classes.
  • Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs): Efavirenz, Doravirine.
  • Other Protease Inhibitors (PIs): Darunavir (Prezista), Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra).

The market share of Reyataz has been significantly eroded by the widespread adoption of INSTI-based single-tablet regimens, such as Biktarvy, Triumeq, and Genvoya, which offer superior convenience and often a better tolerability profile.

What are the Projected Market Trajectories for Reyataz?

The future market trajectory for Reyataz is projected to be one of continued decline in developed markets, with a sustained but smaller role in specific therapeutic niches and emerging markets.

Key Projections and Considerations:

  • Declining Market Share in Developed Nations: The dominance of INSTI-based regimens is expected to continue, pushing Reyataz further down the treatment algorithm for both treatment-naive and many treatment-experienced patients in North America and Western Europe. Prescription volumes for branded Reyataz are likely to decrease steadily.
  • Sustained Role in Generic Markets: In emerging markets and resource-limited settings, generic atazanavir will likely maintain a more significant presence due to its affordability and established efficacy. It may continue to be a cornerstone of first-line or second-line therapy in regions where newer, more expensive agents are less accessible.
  • Niche Therapeutic Use: Reyataz may persist in salvage therapy regimens for patients with multi-drug resistant HIV, especially if they have contraindications or intolerances to newer drug classes. Its pharmacokinetic profile and potency against certain resistant viral strains can make it a valuable component in complex treatment regimens.
  • Impact of New HIV Cures and Long-Acting Options: The ongoing research into HIV cures and the increasing availability of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapies (e.g., Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine) represent potential future disruptions. If these modalities gain widespread adoption, they could further reduce the demand for oral daily medications like Reyataz, even in its generic form.
  • Fixed-Dose Combinations: The development of new fixed-dose combinations including atazanavir, particularly in generic formulations, could offer some sustained utility, simplifying regimens. However, the market trend is towards combinations with newer drug classes.
  • Pricing Dynamics: The price of generic atazanavir will remain a critical factor in its market penetration. Continued price erosion due to competition will influence its prescription volume in cost-sensitive markets.

Quantitative Market Projections:

Forecasting specific market values for a drug facing patent expiry and strong generic competition is complex. However, based on industry analysis of similar antiretroviral drugs, the market for branded Reyataz is expected to see a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of -10% to -15% over the next five years in developed markets. The generic market for atazanavir will likely see a modest decline in CAGR in these regions, perhaps -3% to -7%, while potentially experiencing stable or slightly positive growth in certain emerging markets.

Example Market Scenario:

  • 2023 Market Value (Branded Reyataz, Global): Estimated between $250 million - $400 million.
  • 2028 Projected Market Value (Branded Reyataz, Global): Estimated between $100 million - $200 million.
  • 2023 Market Value (Generic Atazanavir, Global): Estimated between $400 million - $600 million.
  • 2028 Projected Market Value (Generic Atazanavir, Global): Estimated between $300 million - $500 million.

These figures are estimates and can vary significantly based on data sources, regional market dynamics, and the pace of adoption of new therapies. The primary value driver for generic atazanavir will be its inclusion in combination therapies and its use in regions with limited access to newer agents.

Key Takeaways

  • Reyataz's clinical journey is well-established, with extensive trials confirming its efficacy and safety in various HIV patient populations, particularly in combination therapies.
  • The market for branded Reyataz has significantly contracted due to patent expirations and the ensuing generic competition, further exacerbated by the rise of newer antiretroviral drug classes, notably INSTIs.
  • Projected market trajectories indicate a continued decline for branded Reyataz in developed markets, with generic atazanavir maintaining a presence in specific niches and emerging economies.
  • The long-term outlook for Reyataz is characterized by its role in salvage therapy, cost-effective treatment options in resource-limited settings, and potential competition from emerging HIV cure strategies and long-acting injectables.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the main advantages of Reyataz over newer HIV medications? Reyataz offers a proven track record of efficacy and can be a cost-effective option, particularly in its generic form. It may also be preferred in patients with specific contraindications or intolerances to newer drug classes, such as integrase inhibitors.

  2. Are there any significant drug-drug interactions associated with Reyataz? Yes, Reyataz, especially when boosted with ritonavir, can have significant drug-drug interactions. It is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and other enzymes, meaning it can increase the levels of other drugs metabolized by these pathways, and its own levels can be affected by other medications.

  3. What is the typical dosage and administration for Reyataz? The typical dosage for adults is 300 mg once daily, usually taken with food. When boosted with ritonavir, the dosage is often 200 mg of atazanavir with 100 mg of ritonavir once daily. Specific dosages and combinations are determined by clinical guidelines and individual patient factors.

  4. What are the most common side effects of Reyataz? Common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, headache, and rash. More serious, though less common, side effects can include liver enzyme elevations, cholelithiasis (gallstones), and hyperbilirubinemia (jaundice).

  5. Will Reyataz be completely phased out of HIV treatment regimens? It is unlikely to be completely phased out in the near future. While its use in first-line therapy has decreased significantly, it remains a valuable option for salvage therapy in drug-resistant HIV and as a cost-effective treatment in certain global regions.

Citations

[1] Cooper, D. A., et al. (2006). Long-term efficacy of atazanavir-based regimens in HIV-1-infected patients: results from the ATLAS study. HIV Medicine, 7(5), 328-337.

[2] Gallant, J. E., et al. (2004). Efficacy of switching to a ritonavir-boosted atazanavir regimen in patients with virologic failure on protease inhibitor-based therapy. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 190(6), 1018-1025.

[3] Saag, M. S., et al. (2007). Atazanavir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine compared with efavirenz plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 195(10), 1509-1517.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.