You’re using a public version of DrugPatentWatch with 5 free searches available | Register to unlock more free searches. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Last Updated: April 26, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RID MOUSSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for RID MOUSSE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01851681 ↗ Comparison Between Two Different Antibiotic Regimens for the Placement of Dental Implants Completed Université de Montréal Phase 1 2014-07-01 In order to prevent infections and complications, it has been initially established with the dental implant placement protocol that pre- and post-operative antibiotics should be prescribed to the patient receiving dental implants. There have been many antibiotic regimens used in the attempt to minimize the risks of infections and consequently, increasing the survival rate of dental implants placement procedures. However, issues about bacterial resistance have been raised recently concerning the extensive use of antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to find out whether giving antibiotics before or after implant placement would significantly influence crestal bone loss around dental implants. One study group will receive one dosage of antibiotics before implant placement followed by post-operative intake of antibiotics for 7 days. Another group will receive the antibiotics in one single preoperative dose followed by an identical placebo for 7 days. Questionnaires for pain and interference with daily activities assessment to be filled for the first postoperative week will be distributed to participants. Signs of postoperative morbidity will be recorded at 1 and 3 weeks following the surgery, and both clinical and radiographic data will be collected at 4 months postoperative to assess the implants status. A radiographic follow-up will be done 1 year after the surgery. Peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of 3 known immunological markers for bone loss (MMP-8, sRANKL and OPG) will be measured at 1-, 3- and 16-weeks follow-ups. The findings from this study might allow clinicians to establish the ideal antibiotic regimen with minimal risk exposure to bacterial resistance.
NCT03355846 ↗ Pain and Bleeding in Subjects With Acute Anal Fissure: Comparative Evaluation of Three Treatments Completed University of Roma La Sapienza Phase 4 2018-05-01 Starting from the observation that acute anal fissure (AAF) in 6-8 weeks can heal spontaneously and that some of the commonly used commercial products in clinical practice would seem to be useful, the rationale of the comparative study is to try to identify, in compliance with the protocol of Helsinki (2013), the most effective short-term treatment for the disappearance of pain in defecation and cessation of bleeding, shortening the duration of the healing process and favoring the patient's rapid return to his / her activity, respect for patient safety.
NCT03391180 ↗ The Effect of ICON Treatment on WPL With Patients After Fixed Orthodontic Appliances Unknown status Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy N/A 2018-02-01 The aim of this study is to determine the effect of ICON on White spot lesions compared to CPP-ACPF plus.
NCT03823612 ↗ Reminerlization Potential of Innovative Biomimetic Material in Caries White Spot Lesions Unknown status Cairo University Phase 4 2019-03-01 to remineralize the white spot caries lesions after orthodontic treatment , the investigator will use two different materials ( Clinpro tooth creme versus Gc tooth mousse) and will compare between their effects in remineralization of white spot caries lesions.
NCT04280406 ↗ The Effect of Preoperative Antibiotics on Peri-implant Healing Recruiting Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Phase 1 2020-02-25 Introduction: In order to minimize postoperative morbidity and failures of dental implant therapy, several antibiotic regimens have been proposed in the literature. However, the extensive use of antibiotics in health care has been debated due to the adverse effects and bacterial resistance. Furthermore, the impact of preoperative antibiotics on peri-implant bone level is still not clear. Objectives: The primary objective of this study will be to assess whether giving preoperative antibiotics (azithromycin 500mg) after implant placement over 7 days will influence peri-implant crestal bone levels after 4 months in healthy patients undergoing platform-switched implant placement. The secondary objectives will be to evaluate postoperative pain severity, surgery-associated morbidities, and 1-year implant survival rate. Methods: Fifty individuals will be recruited in a double-masked 2-arm randomized clinical trial. Participants in the intervention group will receive 500mg of azithromycin 1 hour before implant placement. Participants in the control group will take one placebo 1 hour preoperatively. The changes in mesial and distal crestal bone level (primary outcome) will be measured at baseline and 4-month follow-up using standardized periapical radiographs. Pain severity and surgery-associated morbidities (secondary outcomes) will be evaluated by clinical examinations and self-administered questionnaires. Implant survival rate will be assessed at the 1-year follow-up. Descriptive and bivariate analyses will be used to analyze the data. A P value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Clinical relevance: This study will be the first placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized clinical trial studying the effect of preoperative azithromycin on radiographical, clinical and patient-based outcomes after implant surgery. This type of design will reduce as much as possible the risk of bias and increasing the quality of evidence. The results from this study might help provide guidelines for clinicians that will optimize implant survival rate while decreasing antibiotics exposure to patients undergoing straightforward implant surgery.
NCT04280406 ↗ The Effect of Preoperative Antibiotics on Peri-implant Healing Recruiting Université de Montréal Phase 1 2020-02-25 Introduction: In order to minimize postoperative morbidity and failures of dental implant therapy, several antibiotic regimens have been proposed in the literature. However, the extensive use of antibiotics in health care has been debated due to the adverse effects and bacterial resistance. Furthermore, the impact of preoperative antibiotics on peri-implant bone level is still not clear. Objectives: The primary objective of this study will be to assess whether giving preoperative antibiotics (azithromycin 500mg) after implant placement over 7 days will influence peri-implant crestal bone levels after 4 months in healthy patients undergoing platform-switched implant placement. The secondary objectives will be to evaluate postoperative pain severity, surgery-associated morbidities, and 1-year implant survival rate. Methods: Fifty individuals will be recruited in a double-masked 2-arm randomized clinical trial. Participants in the intervention group will receive 500mg of azithromycin 1 hour before implant placement. Participants in the control group will take one placebo 1 hour preoperatively. The changes in mesial and distal crestal bone level (primary outcome) will be measured at baseline and 4-month follow-up using standardized periapical radiographs. Pain severity and surgery-associated morbidities (secondary outcomes) will be evaluated by clinical examinations and self-administered questionnaires. Implant survival rate will be assessed at the 1-year follow-up. Descriptive and bivariate analyses will be used to analyze the data. A P value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Clinical relevance: This study will be the first placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized clinical trial studying the effect of preoperative azithromycin on radiographical, clinical and patient-based outcomes after implant surgery. This type of design will reduce as much as possible the risk of bias and increasing the quality of evidence. The results from this study might help provide guidelines for clinicians that will optimize implant survival rate while decreasing antibiotics exposure to patients undergoing straightforward implant surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for RID MOUSSE

Condition Name

Condition Name for RID MOUSSE
Intervention Trials
Tooth Demineralization 1
White Spot Lesion 1
White Spot Lesion of Tooth 1
Acute Anal Fissure 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for RID MOUSSE
Intervention Trials
Dental Caries 2
Tooth Demineralization 1
Hemorrhage 1
Fissure in Ano 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RID MOUSSE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for RID MOUSSE
Location Trials
Canada 2
Saudi Arabia 1
Italy 1
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RID MOUSSE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for RID MOUSSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 1 2
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for RID MOUSSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Unknown status 2
Completed 2
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RID MOUSSE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for RID MOUSSE
Sponsor Trials
Université de Montréal 2
Cairo University 1
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for RID MOUSSE
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.