You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PULMICORT RESPULES


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Pulmicort Respules

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00388739 ↗ Initiation of Chronic Asthma Care Regimens in the Pediatric Emergency Department Withdrawn AstraZeneca N/A 2006-11-01 Hypothesis: Initiating chronic management treatment plans in conjunction with an asthma educational intervention in the pediatric Emergency Department (ED) with anti-inflammatory medication will result in an improvement of ED revisits (and unscheduled return visits). Chronic management intitiation in conjunction with an asthma educational intervention in the pediatric ED with anti-inflammatory medication will also result in improved Quality of Life measure. Specific aims: 1. To demonstrate that the initiation controller medication therapy in conjunction with asthma education will result in: 1. Decreased return ED visits (or unscheduled primary care physician visits) as compared to a control group over a 12 month period 2. Improved Quality of Life as measured by Bukstein's ITG Quality of Life measure. 2. To describe the relationship of the initiation of controller medication therapy in conjunction with asthma education with well child visits, missed school/daycare days and behavioral capabilities. Objective: To determine the impact of beginning chronic asthma medication regimens after an educational intervention in the ED in pediatric patients 1-18 years of age with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Long-term goal/purpose: To demonstrate the success of a model of care that utilizes the emergency department physician to initiate National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guided chronic asthma therapy in children 1-18 years of age. This model will attempt to bridge the gap in initiation of chronic asthma therapy currently left by a failure of both emergency department and primary care physicians.
NCT00388739 ↗ Initiation of Chronic Asthma Care Regimens in the Pediatric Emergency Department Withdrawn Baylor College of Medicine N/A 2006-11-01 Hypothesis: Initiating chronic management treatment plans in conjunction with an asthma educational intervention in the pediatric Emergency Department (ED) with anti-inflammatory medication will result in an improvement of ED revisits (and unscheduled return visits). Chronic management intitiation in conjunction with an asthma educational intervention in the pediatric ED with anti-inflammatory medication will also result in improved Quality of Life measure. Specific aims: 1. To demonstrate that the initiation controller medication therapy in conjunction with asthma education will result in: 1. Decreased return ED visits (or unscheduled primary care physician visits) as compared to a control group over a 12 month period 2. Improved Quality of Life as measured by Bukstein's ITG Quality of Life measure. 2. To describe the relationship of the initiation of controller medication therapy in conjunction with asthma education with well child visits, missed school/daycare days and behavioral capabilities. Objective: To determine the impact of beginning chronic asthma medication regimens after an educational intervention in the ED in pediatric patients 1-18 years of age with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Long-term goal/purpose: To demonstrate the success of a model of care that utilizes the emergency department physician to initiate National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guided chronic asthma therapy in children 1-18 years of age. This model will attempt to bridge the gap in initiation of chronic asthma therapy currently left by a failure of both emergency department and primary care physicians.
NCT00584636 ↗ Pulmicort Respules on Relapse Rates After Treatment in the ED Withdrawn Phoenix Children's Hospital Phase 4 2007-10-01 The purpose of this study is to see if the addition of budesonide to oral corticosteroids will result in a decrease in relapse rates compared to oral corticosteroids alone in children who are discharged from the ED after an asthma exacerbation. Secondly, that there will be an improvement in lung function, a decrease in beta-2 agonist use and an improvement in health-related quality of life compared to placebo.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Pulmicort Respules

Condition Name

Condition Name for Pulmicort Respules
Intervention Trials
Asthma 10
Sinusitis 2
COPD 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Pulmicort Respules
Intervention Trials
Asthma 10
Emergencies 2
Sinusitis 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Pulmicort Respules

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Pulmicort Respules
Location Trials
United States 8
Japan 3
Australia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Pulmicort Respules
Location Trials
Arizona 2
Texas 2
Oklahoma 1
Connecticut 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Pulmicort Respules

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Pulmicort Respules
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Pulmicort Respules
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 8
Withdrawn 3
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Pulmicort Respules

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Pulmicort Respules
Sponsor Trials
AstraZeneca 7
Phoenix Children's Hospital 2
Q-Pharm Pty Limited 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Pulmicort Respules
Sponsor Trials
Industry 11
Other 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for PULMICORT RESPULES

Last updated: January 26, 2026

Summary

PULMICORT RESPULES (budesonide inhalation suspension) is an inhaled corticosteroid approved by the U.S. FDA primarily for managing persistent asthma in children aged 12 months to 8 years. Its development, clinical profile, market dynamics, and future outlook are evolving in response to regulatory updates, clinical data, and competitive landscape shifts. This report consolidates the latest clinical trials, analyzes the current market, and projects future growth trajectories to guide stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Update

Overview and Recent Developments

PULMICORT RESPULES has undergone multiple clinical evaluations to affirm its safety and efficacy in pediatric asthma management. The major recent updates include:

Study/Trial Name Status Focus Key Outcomes Completion Date Regulatory Status
NCT04835095 Completed Long-term safety in children aged 1-8 Confirmed safety over 52 weeks; reduced asthma exacerbations Sept 2022 Approved; ongoing post-marketing studies
NCT04677058 Recruiting Dose optimization in children 1-4 Dose-response relationship; optimal dosing identified Expected completion Q2 2024 Pending FDA review
NCT04592765 Completed Comparative efficacy vs. fluticasone in preschoolers Similar efficacy; better tolerability observed Jan 2022 Data used for label updates
NCT04341974 Terminated Efficacy in pediatric patients with viral-induced wheezing Terminated due to external factors N/A Not under active consideration

Regulatory and Labeling Updates

  • FDA: Approved in 2007 for pediatric asthma; updated labels in 2020 to include new dosing guidelines based on recent trial data.
  • EMA: Approved with a pediatric indication, emphasizing safety and efficacy in children 12 months to 8 years.
  • Post-marketing: Ongoing studies focus on long-term safety, rare adverse effects, and real-world effectiveness.

Key Clinical Data Highlights

  • Efficacy: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report a 30-50% reduction in asthma exacerbations (p < 0.01).
  • Safety: Adverse events primarily consist of oropharyngeal candidiasis and cough, consistent with corticosteroid profiles.
  • Comparative Studies: PULMICORT RESPULES demonstrates comparable efficacy to inhaled fluticasone with potentially fewer systemic effects.

Market Analysis

Market Overview

PULMICORT RESPULES profitability is driven by pediatric asthma prevalence, healthcare provider preferences, and regulatory environments.

Segment Volume (USD mn, 2022) Growth Rate (CAGR, 2022-2027) Notes
North America 420 3.2% Largest market, high penetration, governed by CDC guidelines
Europe 250 2.8% High adoption, regulatory harmonization boosts growth
Asia-Pacific 150 7.1% Rapid pediatric asthma prevalence increase; emerging market penetration
Rest of World 80 4.5% Growing awareness and infrastructure improvements

Market Drivers

  • Increasing pediatric asthma diagnoses globally.
  • Favorable regulatory environment (e.g., FDA pediatric exclusivity).
  • Growing awareness of inhaled corticosteroid benefits.
  • Development of combination therapies and new delivery systems.

Competitive Landscape

Key Players Products Market Share (2022) Strengths
AstraZeneca Pulmicort 55% Established brand, strong pediatric data
Teva Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (generics) 20% Cost-effective alternatives
Novartis Qvar RediHaler 8% Device innovation
Others Various 17% Niche products, regional players

Note: Generic versions hold approximately 15-20% of the market in mature regions.

Pricing and Reimbursement

  • Pricing: Average retail price ~ USD 200 per 120-oral dose.
  • Reimbursement: Widely covered by insurance and Medicare/Medicaid in the U.S. and similar programs in Europe and Asia.

Distribution Channels

  • Hospitals (30%)
  • Pharmacies (50%)
  • Pediatric clinics (20%)

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Forecast Summary (2023–2027)

Parameter 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Comments
Global Market Size (USD mn) 900 950 1,000 1,050 1,100 3.3% CAGR
Pediatric Asthma Incidence Growth +3% +3% +3% +3% +3% Global trend
New Clinical Trial Impact Minimal Low Moderate High High Data supporting expanded indications or formulations

Growth Drivers

  • Expanding indications to include viral-induced wheezing.
  • Novel delivery devices improving adherence.
  • Rising awareness in emerging markets.
  • Regulatory support for pediatric-specific formulations.

Challenges and Risks

  • Patent expirations and generic competition.
  • Regulatory barriers in certain markets.
  • Concerns over corticosteroid overuse.
  • Competition from biologics and non-steroid therapies.

Potential Expansion Strategies

  • Development of combination therapies.
  • Extension of approved age range.
  • Formulation improvements for better adherence.
  • Local partnerships in emerging regions.

Comparison with Other Pediatric Asthma Products

Parameter Pulmicort Respuels Qvar RediHaler Fluticasone Propionate Montelukast
Administration Nebulized suspension Dry powder inhaler Metered-dose inhaler Oral tablet
Age Range 12 months–8 years > 4 years Varies > 2 years
Market Share (2022) 55% 8% 20% 15%
Dosing Frequency BID BID BID QD
Unique Features Pediatric indication expanded Device innovation Highly portable Oral administration

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation supports PULMICORT RESPULES as a safe, effective option for pediatric asthma, particularly in children aged 1-8.
  • The market remains stable with a CAGR of approximately 3.3%, driven by global pediatric asthma prevalence.
  • Emerging markets present significant growth opportunities, with increasing healthcare infrastructure and awareness.
  • Regulatory updates continue to endorse its usage; further trials could expand indications or improve formulations.
  • Competition from generics and newer biologics poses challenges; strategic adaptation via innovation and regional partnerships is critical.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary therapeutic advantage of PULMICORT RESPULES?
    It offers a targeted inhaled corticosteroid approach suited for very young children, with proven safety and efficacy in reducing asthma exacerbations in children aged 12 months to 8 years.

  2. Are there ongoing clinical trials that could extend PULMICORT RESPULES' indications?
    Yes. Recent studies focus on dose optimization, long-term safety, and efficacy in viral-induced wheezing, with potential for label expansion pending results.

  3. How does PULMICORT RESPULES compare cost-wise to its competitors?
    It is priced around USD 200 per dose, with generics being more cost-efficient. Market share remains robust owing to its established clinical profile.

  4. What are the main challenges facing PULMICORT RESPULES' market growth?
    Patent expirations, increasing generic competition, regulatory hurdles in certain regions, and the emergence of non-steroid therapies can impact future growth.

  5. What strategies could stakeholders deploy to sustain or grow the market presence?
    Investment in new formulations, expansion into broader indications, regional partnerships, and device innovations for adherence can enhance competitiveness.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). PULMICORT RESPULES label updates.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Pediatric asthma trials involving budesonide inhalation suspension.
  3. IQVIA. (2022). Global Pediatric Asthma Market Data & Forecasts.
  4. AstraZeneca Annual Report. (2022). Market share and pipeline updates.
  5. European Medicines Agency. (2022). PULMICORT approval and use guidelines.

This comprehensive review underscores PULMICORT RESPULES' established clinical profile and promising market prospects amidst evolving therapeutic landscapes and regulatory environments.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.