You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PRIMAQUINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Primaquine

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT05788094 ↗ DHA-PPQ vs CHQ With Tafenoquine for P. Vivax Mono-infection Not yet recruiting Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit Phase 4 2023-04-01 In this area of Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), vivax malaria is the most common kind of malaria. It can stay very long in the liver, and come out later to make another episode of illness. This can happen many times even without a mosquito bite. Only 8-aminoquinoline drugs can kill the liver forms of the malaria parasite. One of these drugs is called primaquine, and it has been used all over the world for a long time. There is now a new formulation of this 8-aminoquinoline drug called tafenoquine that can also treat the malaria in the liver. The main benefit of this drug is that it is a single dose, which makes much convenient for the patients as well as for the malaria control program than conventional 14 days of primaquine. Recent research suggests that ACT (Artemisinin Combination Therapy) may antagonise the efficacy of tafenoquine (Baird et al. 2020) . This could prevent the use of tafenoquine in areas with chloroquine resistant P. vivax parasites where national malaria programmes recommend ACTs for vivax malaria. Also, currently recommended tafenoquine dose is sub-optimal: 300 mg dose proved significantly inferior to low dose primaquine in a meta-analysis of the phase 3 studies when restricted to the Southeast Asian region (Llanos-Cuentas et al. 2019; Watson et al. 2022). A tafenoquine dose of 450mg is predicted to provide >90% of the maximal effect. The objective of this research is to find out whether 450 mg dose of tafenoquine can be combined effectively with ACT providing a short course treatment for P. vivax malaria.
New Formulation NCT05788094 ↗ DHA-PPQ vs CHQ With Tafenoquine for P. Vivax Mono-infection Not yet recruiting Shoklo Malaria Research Unit Phase 4 2023-04-01 In this area of Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), vivax malaria is the most common kind of malaria. It can stay very long in the liver, and come out later to make another episode of illness. This can happen many times even without a mosquito bite. Only 8-aminoquinoline drugs can kill the liver forms of the malaria parasite. One of these drugs is called primaquine, and it has been used all over the world for a long time. There is now a new formulation of this 8-aminoquinoline drug called tafenoquine that can also treat the malaria in the liver. The main benefit of this drug is that it is a single dose, which makes much convenient for the patients as well as for the malaria control program than conventional 14 days of primaquine. Recent research suggests that ACT (Artemisinin Combination Therapy) may antagonise the efficacy of tafenoquine (Baird et al. 2020) . This could prevent the use of tafenoquine in areas with chloroquine resistant P. vivax parasites where national malaria programmes recommend ACTs for vivax malaria. Also, currently recommended tafenoquine dose is sub-optimal: 300 mg dose proved significantly inferior to low dose primaquine in a meta-analysis of the phase 3 studies when restricted to the Southeast Asian region (Llanos-Cuentas et al. 2019; Watson et al. 2022). A tafenoquine dose of 450mg is predicted to provide >90% of the maximal effect. The objective of this research is to find out whether 450 mg dose of tafenoquine can be combined effectively with ACT providing a short course treatment for P. vivax malaria.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Primaquine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000640 ↗ A Phase III Comparative Study of Dapsone / Trimethoprim and Clindamycin / Primaquine Versus Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate PCP in Patients With AIDS Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 3 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of two oral treatments for mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP): dapsone/trimethoprim or clindamycin/primaquine as compared to a standard treatment program of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) to assess the tolerance of these two alternative treatments as compared to the standard treatment of SMX/TMP. Per 09/09/92 amendment, to assess the efficacy and tolerance of these two alternative treatments in patients who are intolerant to SMX/TMP. The type of treatment being studied has the advantages of wide applicability throughout the world (including developing countries) and low cost. An oral treatment is more accessible to patients than drugs given by injection or by inhalation.
NCT00000640 ↗ A Phase III Comparative Study of Dapsone / Trimethoprim and Clindamycin / Primaquine Versus Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate PCP in Patients With AIDS Completed Jacobus Pharmaceutical Phase 3 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of two oral treatments for mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP): dapsone/trimethoprim or clindamycin/primaquine as compared to a standard treatment program of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) to assess the tolerance of these two alternative treatments as compared to the standard treatment of SMX/TMP. Per 09/09/92 amendment, to assess the efficacy and tolerance of these two alternative treatments in patients who are intolerant to SMX/TMP. The type of treatment being studied has the advantages of wide applicability throughout the world (including developing countries) and low cost. An oral treatment is more accessible to patients than drugs given by injection or by inhalation.
NCT00000640 ↗ A Phase III Comparative Study of Dapsone / Trimethoprim and Clindamycin / Primaquine Versus Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate PCP in Patients With AIDS Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of two oral treatments for mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP): dapsone/trimethoprim or clindamycin/primaquine as compared to a standard treatment program of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) to assess the tolerance of these two alternative treatments as compared to the standard treatment of SMX/TMP. Per 09/09/92 amendment, to assess the efficacy and tolerance of these two alternative treatments in patients who are intolerant to SMX/TMP. The type of treatment being studied has the advantages of wide applicability throughout the world (including developing countries) and low cost. An oral treatment is more accessible to patients than drugs given by injection or by inhalation.
NCT00000717 ↗ The Safety and Efficacy of Clindamycin and Primaquine in the Treatment of Mild - Moderate Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in Patients With AIDS Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To determine the safety and effectiveness of clindamycin and primaquine in the treatment of mild Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. As many as 80 percent of AIDS patients experience at least one episode of PCP and about one-third of these patients have a recurrence of the disease. Drugs currently used for treatment of acute PCP are toxic to the majority of AIDS patients. The combination of clindamycin and primaquine reduces the numbers of PCP organisms in laboratory tests and in animal studies. Both drugs can be given orally, concentrate in lung tissue, and have been used safely in humans for treatment of other diseases. It is possible that the combination may prove to be as good or better than standard therapy for PCP and side effects may be less.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Primaquine

Condition Name

Condition Name for Primaquine
Intervention Trials
Malaria 46
Vivax Malaria 20
Malaria, Vivax 15
Malaria,Falciparum 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Primaquine
Intervention Trials
Malaria 107
Malaria, Vivax 41
Malaria, Falciparum 30
Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Primaquine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Primaquine
Location Trials
Thailand 35
United States 27
Cambodia 17
Brazil 15
Indonesia 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Primaquine
Location Trials
Mississippi 3
Maryland 3
California 3
Washington 2
Ohio 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Primaquine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Primaquine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 38
Phase 3 24
Phase 2/Phase 3 7
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Primaquine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 87
Not yet recruiting 12
Unknown status 11
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Primaquine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Primaquine
Sponsor Trials
University of Oxford 35
Menzies School of Health Research 16
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit 16
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Primaquine
Sponsor Trials
Other 331
Industry 23
U.S. Fed 19
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.