You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PICATO


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Picato

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01541553 ↗ A Sequential Treatment Regimen of Cryotherapy and Picato® for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Face and Scalp Completed LEO Pharma Phase 3 2012-03-01 The purpose of this trial is to compare the rate of complete clearance of actinic keratosis (AK) using sequential cryotherapy and field treatment with PEP005 Gel compared to cryotherapy alone.
NCT01803477 ↗ Safety and Dose Finding Study of New Vehicle Formulations Containing Ingenol Mebutate to Treat Actinic Keratosis on the Forearm Completed LEO Pharma Phase 1/Phase 2 2013-02-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if the new vehicle formulations containing ingenol mebutate are as safe and effective as Picato® gel 0.05% (it's current vehicle formulation) when applied to AK lesions on the forearm for two consecutive days.
NCT02090465 ↗ Assessment of Treatment Success and Quality of Life in Patients With Actinic Keratoses Under Therapy With Ingenol Mebutate in a Period of 8 Weeks Completed LEO Pharma 2013-07-01 Assessment of treatment success and quality of life in patients with actinic keratoses under therapy with Ingenol Mebutate (Picato) in a period of 8 weeks.
NCT02242747 ↗ Safety and Tolerability Study of Ingenol Mebutate Compared to 5-FU to Treat Facial Actinic Keratosis Completed LEO Pharma N/A 2014-05-01 Background: 5% 5-fluorouracil cream (5-FU) is a well-established treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and ingenol mebutate gel (IMB) is a new topical field therapy. Objective: To compare tolerability and safety of IMB with 5-FU for the treatment of facial AKs. Methods: Open-label, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with 100 patients with AKs within 25-cm2 contiguous field on the face. IMB was applied daily for three consecutive days. 5-FU was applied twice a day for four weeks. Treatment effect was evaluated at baseline and on days 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43, considering ITT populations.
NCT02242747 ↗ Safety and Tolerability Study of Ingenol Mebutate Compared to 5-FU to Treat Facial Actinic Keratosis Completed University of Sao Paulo N/A 2014-05-01 Background: 5% 5-fluorouracil cream (5-FU) is a well-established treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and ingenol mebutate gel (IMB) is a new topical field therapy. Objective: To compare tolerability and safety of IMB with 5-FU for the treatment of facial AKs. Methods: Open-label, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with 100 patients with AKs within 25-cm2 contiguous field on the face. IMB was applied daily for three consecutive days. 5-FU was applied twice a day for four weeks. Treatment effect was evaluated at baseline and on days 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43, considering ITT populations.
NCT02281682 ↗ IM Versus 5-FU Versus IMI Versus MAL-PDT in Treatment of Actinic Keratosis Unknown status Maastricht University Medical Center Phase 4 2014-11-01 A multi-centre randomised controled single blind clinical phase IV trial with the aim to determine the most effective treatment in terms of lesion reduction, costs and patient satisfaction in treatment of actinic keratosis (AK), when comparing topical treatment with photodynamic therapy (PDT), 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) cream, 5% Imiquimod (IMI) cream and ingenol mebutate (IM) gel.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Picato

Condition Name

Condition Name for Picato
Intervention Trials
Actinic Keratosis 13
Anogenital Warts 1
Carcinoma 1
Keratosis, Actinic 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Picato
Intervention Trials
Keratosis, Actinic 14
Keratosis 14
Lentigo 1
Hutchinson's Melanotic Freckle 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Picato

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Picato
Location Trials
United States 47
Netherlands 2
Korea, Republic of 1
Italy 1
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Picato
Location Trials
Texas 4
California 4
Tennessee 3
Indiana 3
Illinois 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Picato

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Picato
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Picato
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Unknown status 5
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Picato

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Picato
Sponsor Trials
LEO Pharma 11
Actavis Inc. 2
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Picato
Sponsor Trials
Industry 13
Other 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Picato: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction to Picato

Picato, also known as ingenol mebutate, is a topical prescription drug used to treat actinic keratosis (AK), a condition characterized by thick, hard, and scaly patches on the skin due to excessive sun exposure. It is available in two strengths: 0.015% and 0.05% gel formulations.

Clinical Trials and Safety Concerns

Efficacy in Clinical Trials

Clinical trials have shown that Picato is effective in treating actinic keratosis. In two double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trials, subjects with AK on the trunk, extremities, face, or scalp were treated with Picato gel. The trials demonstrated significant complete and partial clearance rates of AK lesions. For example, in trials using the 0.015% gel, complete clearance rates ranged from 37% to 47%, and partial clearance rates (≥ 75% reduction) ranged from 60% to 68%[4].

Safety Concerns and Risk of Skin Cancer

However, recent safety reviews have raised concerns about the potential link between Picato and an increased risk of skin cancer. Health Canada conducted a safety review and found that there may be a link between Picato and an increased risk of skin cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma. This review included data from clinical trials, case reports, and scientific literature[1].

In the European Union, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also conducted a safety review after observing a higher number of skin cancer cases in patients using Picato. The review concluded that there was a higher occurrence of skin cancers, especially squamous cell carcinoma, in areas treated with Picato compared to imiquimod. As a result, the marketing authorization for Picato was withdrawn in the EU[3].

Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

The global Picato gel market has been impacted significantly by the safety concerns and regulatory actions. Despite its initial approval and market presence, the drug's future in many regions is uncertain.

Market Size and Growth

The global market for actinic keratosis treatments, which includes Picato, is expected to see moderate growth. However, the specific market share of Picato is likely to decline due to the safety concerns. The U.S. actinic keratosis treatment market, for example, is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.03% from 2023 to 2030, but this growth is largely driven by other topical treatments like nucleoside metabolic inhibitors (e.g., Fluroplex, Carac, and Efudex)[5].

Regional Analysis

The market for Picato has been most significantly affected in the European Union, where the drug has been withdrawn from the market. In contrast, Picato remains available in the United States, although the FDA is also reviewing its safety and risks[3].

Competitive Landscape

The competitive landscape for actinic keratosis treatments is diverse, with several other topical and systemic treatments available. The withdrawal of Picato from certain markets has created opportunities for other treatments to gain market share. For instance, imiquimod, which was compared to Picato in safety reviews, is likely to see increased usage as a safer alternative[3].

Market Projections

Future Outlook

Given the safety concerns and regulatory actions, the future market prospects for Picato are challenging. The drug's continued availability in the U.S. market is contingent on the outcome of the FDA's safety review. If the FDA decides to withdraw or restrict the use of Picato, it would significantly impact the drug's global market presence.

Impact on Actinic Keratosis Treatment Market

The actinic keratosis treatment market will likely see a shift towards other topical treatments that have a safer profile. The growth of the market will be driven by increased awareness and diagnosis of actinic keratosis, as well as the strong commercial performance of alternative treatments[5].

Recommendations for Patients and Healthcare Providers

Patients who have used Picato are advised to watch for unusual skin changes or growths, which may occur weeks to months after use, and seek medical advice if any occur. Healthcare providers should consider alternative treatment options for actinic keratosis, given the potential risks associated with Picato[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Efficacy: Picato has shown significant efficacy in treating actinic keratosis in clinical trials.
  • Safety Concerns: There is a potential link between Picato and an increased risk of skin cancer, leading to regulatory actions in several regions.
  • Market Impact: The global market for Picato has been negatively impacted by safety concerns and regulatory withdrawals.
  • Future Outlook: The drug's future is uncertain, with its continued availability dependent on ongoing safety reviews.
  • Alternative Treatments: Other topical treatments are gaining market share due to their safer profiles.

FAQs

What is Picato used for?

Picato is used to treat actinic keratosis, a condition characterized by thick, hard, and scaly patches on the skin due to excessive sun exposure.

What are the safety concerns associated with Picato?

There is a potential link between Picato and an increased risk of skin cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma.

Why was Picato withdrawn from the European market?

Picato was withdrawn from the European market due to a higher occurrence of skin cancers in areas treated with the drug compared to other treatments like imiquimod.

Is Picato still available in the United States?

Yes, Picato is still available in the United States, but the FDA is reviewing its safety and risks.

What are the alternative treatments for actinic keratosis?

Alternative treatments include other topical formulations like imiquimod, Fluroplex, Carac, and Efudex, which have a safer profile compared to Picato.

Sources

  1. Health Canada: Information Update - Use of the drug Picato may increase the risk of skin cancer.
  2. Cognitivemarketresearch.com: Global Picato Gel Market Report 2024 Edition.
  3. The Hospitalist: EU panel review supports decision to pull Picato from market.
  4. FDA: PICATO® (ingenol mebutate) gel, for topical use.
  5. Grandviewresearch.com: U.S. Actinic Keratosis Treatment Market Size Report, 2030.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.