Last Updated: May 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ONUREG


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Onureg

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00336063 ↗ Vorinostat and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer or Nasal Natural Killer T-Cell Lymphoma Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2006-03-03 This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of vorinostat when given together with azacitidine in treating patients with nasopharyngeal cancer or nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma that has recurred (come back) at or near the same place as the original (primary) tumor, usually after a period of time during which the cancer could not be detected or has spread to other parts of the body. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vorinostat and azacitidine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Vorinostat and azacitidine also may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving vorinostat together with azacitidine may kill more cancer cells.
NCT00392353 ↗ Vorinostat and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-11-22 This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of vorinostat and azacitidine and to see how well they work in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia. Vorinostat may stop the growth of cancer or abnormal cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as azacitidine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer or abnormal cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving vorinostat together with azacitidine may kill more cancer or abnormal cells.
NCT00658814 ↗ Azacitidine and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Older Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2008-12-01 This phase II trial is studying the side effects of giving azacitidine together with gemtuzumab ozogamicin to see how well it works in treating older patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as azacitidine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Azacitidine may also stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies, such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Giving azacitidine together with gemtuzumab ozogamicin may kill more cancer cells.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Onureg

Condition Name

Condition Name for Onureg
Intervention Trials
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 19
Myelodysplastic Syndrome 10
Recurrent Acute Myeloid Leukemia 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Onureg
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 28
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 27
Leukemia, Myeloid 25
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Onureg

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Onureg
Location Trials
United States 226
Canada 13
France 2
Australia 2
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Onureg
Location Trials
Texas 15
California 11
Ohio 10
New York 10
Missouri 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Onureg

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Onureg
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
Phase 2 20
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Onureg
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 14
Recruiting 12
Active, not recruiting 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Onureg

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Onureg
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 28
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 9
Bristol-Myers Squibb 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Onureg
Sponsor Trials
NIH 28
Other 21
Industry 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Onureg Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Onureg (azacitidine) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is Onureg and what is its current clinical and regulatory position?

Onureg is an oral formulation of azacitidine (subcutaneous azacitidine is distinct from oral azacitidine). It is approved for use in adults with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and for certain post–hypomethylating agent (HMA) contexts, under label terms that are tied to prior therapy response and disease characteristics. Market uptake and longer-range valuation depend on sustained depth of disease control in HR-MDS, durability of response after induction/maintenance-style approaches, and expansion into additional disease settings where oral HMA exposure can be positioned versus injectable HMAs.

Core market driver: Onureg competes primarily within the HMA backbone in HR-MDS and, indirectly, with other investigational oral HMA strategies. Its differentiated value proposition for payers and providers centers on (1) oral administration convenience, (2) regimen adherence and feasibility in maintenance patterns, and (3) real-world ability to deliver HMA exposure without injection logistics.

Which active clinical trials and late-stage readouts matter for Onureg’s next growth phase?

A complete “active pipeline” listing with trial IDs, exact enrollment status, endpoints, and timing cannot be produced from the information available in this prompt. This response therefore focuses on the specific trial families most commonly used for label expansion narratives in HR-MDS and HMA optimization, and on market-relevant execution metrics that typically determine whether new indications convert into durable revenue.

Trial classes that typically shift Onureg revenue

Onureg’s next revenue steps generally come from one or more of these trial categories:

  1. Maintenance and consolidation strategies after initial response to HMAs
    • Goal: improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) or increase MRD-negative rates in defined biomarker strata.
  2. Sequencing and combination regimens
    • Goal: improve response rate and durability versus single-agent HMA exposure, often by pairing with agents targeting immune checkpoints or clonal evolution pathways.
  3. Earlier-line disease settings or expanded risk groups
    • Goal: increase eligible patient pool and reduce barriers in line-of-therapy positioning.
  4. Biomarker-enriched cohorts
    • Goal: raise response probability and reduce payer pushback by aligning efficacy with validated stratifiers.

These categories govern what investors and competitors track: whether endpoints translate into clinically meaningful survival benefit or durable remission that payers treat as value-positive.

What is the current commercial market picture for Onureg in HR-MDS?

1) Total addressable patient logic

The HR-MDS segment is defined by risk scores and the treatment gap between supportive care and HMA-based disease modification. Onureg’s reachable population depends on:

  • HR-MDS incidence in treated markets
  • proportion receiving HMAs
  • proportion appropriate for oral administration in real-world practice
  • access constraints driven by prior therapy requirements and reimbursement policies

In practice, the market is shaped less by theoretical incidence and more by actual HMA conversion rates in the settings where Onureg is label-aligned.

2) Uptake dynamics

Oral HMA products win through:

  • schedule feasibility (fewer infusion visits)
  • clinic workflow reduction
  • patient adherence and tolerability
  • payer coverage confidence driven by robust survival and response datasets

Uptake slows when:

  • reimbursement coverage tightens to strict subgroups
  • clinicians revert to familiar injectable HMAs after adverse-event experiences
  • head-to-head or combination data shift physician preference

3) Competitive landscape

Onureg’s competitive set is primarily other HMA options (injectables and investigational orals) used in HR-MDS. The credible threats are products or regimens that:

  • show superior OS or longer-duration response
  • reduce treatment discontinuation due to cytopenias and infection risk
  • demonstrate a clearer benefit in biomarker-defined subgroups

What market share and sales trajectory is realistic for Onureg over the next 5 years?

A numeric projection requires current-year revenue run-rate, region-by-region share, and consensus or internal estimates for patient growth and treatment persistence. This information is not present in the prompt, so no complete, accurate financial model can be produced.

What can be stated with decision-grade specificity is the projection framework that determines range outcomes:

Revenue engine inputs

  1. Eligible patient base growth
    • incidence and treatment penetration of HR-MDS
    • persistence on therapy (median treatment duration, discontinuation rates)
  2. Share shifts
    • conversion from injectables to oral HMA
    • adoption in maintenance/combination pathways if label expansion occurs
  3. Net price and payer mix
    • formulary placement
    • utilization management (prior authorization, step edits)
  4. Safety and tolerability
    • discontinuation and dose modification patterns
    • hospitalization and infection management burden

Projection scenario design (qualitative)

  • Base case: Stable HR-MDS penetration with gradual share gains from injectable HMAs, driven by real-world feasibility and incremental guideline acceptance.
  • Upside case: Positive label expansion tied to maintenance or expanded line-of-therapy, supported by survival endpoint strength and tolerability consistency.
  • Downside case: Coverage limits reduce treated eligible population, and persistence drops due to adverse-event burden relative to competitor regimens.

How should investors benchmark Onureg versus peers?

Benchmarks should be anchored in adoption and persistence metrics rather than only response rates.

High-signal KPI set

  • Share of HR-MDS HMA market captured by oral azacitidine
  • Persistence distribution (time on treatment)
  • Dose intensity and dose interruptions
  • Hospitalization rates and infection burden (real-world proxy for tolerability)
  • Treatment discontinuation reasons (progression vs toxicity)
  • Time to access expansion (formulary cycle speed post-label change)

What risks and catalysts move the Onureg thesis fastest?

Catalysts

  • Positive clinical readouts that convert into label changes in maintenance or additional HR-MDS subpopulations
  • Strong real-world evidence on adherence and tolerability supporting guideline adoption
  • Any data package that reduces payer coverage friction (clear stratified benefit, manageable AE profile)

Risks

  • Tight payer policies that restrict eligible patient subgroups
  • Competitive regimen improvements that reduce oral HMA switching
  • Safety signals that increase discontinuation, worsening persistence and lowering net revenue

Key Takeaways

  • Onureg’s growth is determined by whether oral azacitidine expands within HR-MDS through maintenance, sequencing, combination, or biomarker-enriched label refinement.
  • Market performance hinges more on real-world persistence, access, and net price than on trial response rates alone.
  • A numeric 5-year revenue forecast cannot be produced from the information provided in this prompt; any complete projection requires current sales run-rate, patient estimates, and treatment persistence inputs tied to reimbursement and regional share.

FAQs

  1. What is Onureg’s primary use area?
    Onureg is used in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes under label-specific conditions that center on HMA-based disease management.

  2. Why does Onureg’s oral route matter commercially?
    Oral administration lowers treatment logistics burden and can improve adherence and clinic workflow, which supports payer and provider adoption if safety and persistence are consistent.

  3. What clinical trial outcomes would most likely expand Onureg’s market?
    Survival and durability outcomes in maintenance, expanded line-of-therapy settings, and biomarker-enriched cohorts that translate into labelable superiority or meaningful added benefit.

  4. What are the main commercial risks for Onureg?
    Payer access restrictions, higher-than-expected discontinuation from adverse events, and competitor regimens that reduce switching from injectables.

  5. How should Onureg market performance be measured beyond sales?
    Track persistence, dose interruptions, discontinuation drivers, hospitalization and infection proxies, and formulary coverage velocity after any label change.


References

No sources were provided in the prompt, and no external sources can be reliably cited.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.