You’re using a public version of DrugPatentWatch with 5 free searches available | Register to unlock more free searches. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Last Updated: April 19, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NUBAIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Nubain

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00707824 ↗ Epidural Nalbuphine for Postcesarean Epidural Morphine Induced Pruritus Completed Mahidol University Phase 4 2000-06-01 Can epidural nalbuphine reduce incidence or severity of epidural morphine induced pruritus in patient undergoing cesarean section?
NCT00947284 ↗ Effect of Nalbuphine and Naloxone on Experimentally Induced Skin Sensitivity Terminated University of California, San Francisco N/A 2010-01-01 In previous clinical studies of post-surgical pain the investigators found that nalbuphine (Nubain), a narcotic pain killer, relieves pain more effectively when combined with low-dose naloxone (Narcan), a drug that is used to treat narcotic overdose. This finding was particularly true in men. The purpose of this study is to find out if nalbuphine combined with naloxone is more effective in relieving experimentally produced pain than either drug alone. A second reason for this study is to find out if study medications work more effectively in women or in men. Subjects will come to the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) Clinical Research Center (CRC) for 4 study visits. The first visit will be a 2-hour screening to assess the subject for study eligibility. During the other three visits, the investigators will use a thermal stimulating device to produce temporary, non-injurious skin sensitivity that subjects will feel as painful. Changes in pain will be measured following the intravenous (i.v.) administration of study drugs. Three drug combinations will be administered, a different one each visit: 1) nalbuphine 5 mg and naloxone 0.4 mg , 2) naloxone 0.4 mg and saline (an inactive solution), nalbuphine 5 mg and saline. These drug combinations will be administered in random order; all subjects will receive all three combinations.
NCT01380197 ↗ Choosing Opioid Management for Pain and Analyzing Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) Rates Equally Completed Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute Phase 3 2010-05-26 The pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD) manifestations, are complex with interactions of intracellular hemoglobin, membrane and endothelial activation but the hallmark remains recurrent and painful vaso-occlusive episodes (VOC). These painful episodes are thought to result from ischemia caused when small blood vessels are occluded by misshapen, inflexible erythrocytes. Painful episodes are the most common cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and impairment for SCD patients. There is no therapy that completely prevents or directly aborts painful events for all patients. Consequently, treatment for acute VOC is primarily supportive using hydration and medicinal pain control. Every pain medication has the potential to relieve pain but is associated with significant limitations and side effects. The primary hypothesis to be tested in this double blind, randomized controlled trial is that Nalbuphine is equivalent to morphine for pain control and patients will suffer fewer episodes of acute chest syndrome. The investigators also expect subjects will report fewer side effects from respiratory depression, abdominal distention from reduced peristalsis, reduced histamine release causing pruritis and still be provided adequate pain control. Further hypotheses to be tested is ability to recruit patient participants while being treated in the Emergency Department and that continuous infusion of Nalbuphine with accompanying patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is safe and effective in controlling pain, requiring less total opiates consumption, while decreasing length of hospitalization.
NCT01380197 ↗ Choosing Opioid Management for Pain and Analyzing Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) Rates Equally Completed Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Phase 3 2010-05-26 The pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD) manifestations, are complex with interactions of intracellular hemoglobin, membrane and endothelial activation but the hallmark remains recurrent and painful vaso-occlusive episodes (VOC). These painful episodes are thought to result from ischemia caused when small blood vessels are occluded by misshapen, inflexible erythrocytes. Painful episodes are the most common cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and impairment for SCD patients. There is no therapy that completely prevents or directly aborts painful events for all patients. Consequently, treatment for acute VOC is primarily supportive using hydration and medicinal pain control. Every pain medication has the potential to relieve pain but is associated with significant limitations and side effects. The primary hypothesis to be tested in this double blind, randomized controlled trial is that Nalbuphine is equivalent to morphine for pain control and patients will suffer fewer episodes of acute chest syndrome. The investigators also expect subjects will report fewer side effects from respiratory depression, abdominal distention from reduced peristalsis, reduced histamine release causing pruritis and still be provided adequate pain control. Further hypotheses to be tested is ability to recruit patient participants while being treated in the Emergency Department and that continuous infusion of Nalbuphine with accompanying patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is safe and effective in controlling pain, requiring less total opiates consumption, while decreasing length of hospitalization.
NCT02820051 ↗ Non-anesthesiologist-administered Propofol During the Flexible Bronchoscopy Completed Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez N/A 2014-02-01 Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a fundamental procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases. Although midazolam is the recommended sedative agent by most guidelines, propofol has gained popularity due a short recovery time, however, evidence to propofol use for sedation during FB is scarce. There is little evidence about transcutaneous CO2 pressure (PtcCO2) behavior among patients sedated with propofol when it is administered by non-anesthesiologist and in combination with intravenous opioids for analgesia and cough inhibition. The investigators performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether non-anesthesiology-administered balanced-sedation with propofol was related to high values of values of PtcCO2 compared with guideline-based sedation (midazolam and opioid). The investigators included data from outpatients 18 years or older with an indication for FB in a university hospital in northern of Mexico. Secondary outcomes were recuperation time, patient satisfaction and adverse effects.
NCT03034382 ↗ Morphine and/or Nalbuphine as Adjuvants in Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Block: for Shoulder Surgeries Unknown status Assiut University Phase 2 2016-01-01 the aim of this study is to evaluate the duration of analgesia when either morphine or nalbuphine or both are used as adjuvants in sonar guided interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
NCT04018664 ↗ Oral Abuse Potential Study of Nalbuphine Completed Syneos Health Phase 1 2018-05-29 The purpose of this study is to measure the effects of a drug called nalbuphine (an opioid drug) compared with the effects of hydromorphone (an opioid drug) and placebo (contains no active drug ingredients). The amount of nalbuphine levels in the blood will also be measured and the safety of the study drugs will be evaluated. This study has 2 parts: Part A and Part B.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Nubain

Condition Name

Condition Name for Nubain
Intervention Trials
Pain 1
Rotator Cuff Tear 1
Sickle Cell Disease 1
Cesarean Section 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Nubain
Intervention Trials
Opioid-Related Disorders 1
Rotator Cuff Injuries 1
Anemia, Sickle Cell 1
Acute Chest Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Nubain

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Nubain
Location Trials
United States 2
Mexico 1
Canada 1
Thailand 1
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Nubain
Location Trials
Georgia 1
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Nubain

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Nubain
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Nubain
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Terminated 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Nubain

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Nubain
Sponsor Trials
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta 1
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez 1
Assiut University 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Nubain
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.