You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 18, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MYFORTIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Myfortic

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT00374803 ↗ Study of Myfortic in Combination With Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin in Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal Completed Novartis Phase 4 2006-04-01 To determine the safety and efficacy of a new formulation of Myfortic in combination with tacrolimus and thymoglobulin.
New Formulation NCT00374803 ↗ Study of Myfortic in Combination With Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin in Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal Completed University of Cincinnati Phase 4 2006-04-01 To determine the safety and efficacy of a new formulation of Myfortic in combination with tacrolimus and thymoglobulin.
New Combination NCT03249831 ↗ A Blood Stem Cell Transplant for Sickle Cell Disease Recruiting California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) Phase 1 2019-01-04 Blood stem cells can produce red blood cells (which carry oxygen), white blood cells of the immune system (which fight infections) and platelets (which help the blood clot). Patients with sickle cell disease produce abnormal red blood cells. A blood stem cell transplant from a donor is a treatment option for patients with severe sickle cell disease. The donor can be healthy or have the sickle cell trait. The blood stem cell transplant will be given to the patient as an intravenous infusion (IV). The donor blood stem cells will then make normal red blood cells - as well as other types of blood cells - in the patient. When blood cells from two people co-exist in the patient, this is called mixed chimerism. Most children are successfully treated with blood stem cells from a sibling (brother/sister) who completely shares their tissue type (full-matched donor). However, transplant is not an option for patients who (1) have serious medical problems, and/or (2) do not have a full-matched donor. Most patients will have a relative who shares half of their tissue type (e.g. parent, child, and brother/sister) and can be a donor (half-matched or haploidentical donor). Adult patients with severe sickle cell disease were successfully treated with a half-matched transplant in a clinical study. Researchers would like to make half-matched transplant an option for more patients by (1) improving transplant success and (2) reducing transplanted-related complications. This research transplant is being tested in this Pilot study for the first time. It is different from a standard transplant because: 1. Half-matched related donors will be used, and 2. A new combination of drugs (chemotherapy) that does not completely wipe out the bone marrow cells (non-myeloablative treatment) will be used to prepare the patient for transplant, and 3. Most of the donor CD4+ T cells (a type of immune cells) will be removed (depleted) before giving the blood stem cell transplant to the patient to improve transplant outcomes. It is hoped that the research transplant: 1. Will reverse sickle cell disease and improve patient quality of life, 2. Will reduce side effects and help the patient recover faster from the transplant, 3. Help the patient keep the transplant longer and 4. Reduce serious transplant-related complications.
New Combination NCT03249831 ↗ A Blood Stem Cell Transplant for Sickle Cell Disease Recruiting City of Hope Medical Center Phase 1 2019-01-04 Blood stem cells can produce red blood cells (which carry oxygen), white blood cells of the immune system (which fight infections) and platelets (which help the blood clot). Patients with sickle cell disease produce abnormal red blood cells. A blood stem cell transplant from a donor is a treatment option for patients with severe sickle cell disease. The donor can be healthy or have the sickle cell trait. The blood stem cell transplant will be given to the patient as an intravenous infusion (IV). The donor blood stem cells will then make normal red blood cells - as well as other types of blood cells - in the patient. When blood cells from two people co-exist in the patient, this is called mixed chimerism. Most children are successfully treated with blood stem cells from a sibling (brother/sister) who completely shares their tissue type (full-matched donor). However, transplant is not an option for patients who (1) have serious medical problems, and/or (2) do not have a full-matched donor. Most patients will have a relative who shares half of their tissue type (e.g. parent, child, and brother/sister) and can be a donor (half-matched or haploidentical donor). Adult patients with severe sickle cell disease were successfully treated with a half-matched transplant in a clinical study. Researchers would like to make half-matched transplant an option for more patients by (1) improving transplant success and (2) reducing transplanted-related complications. This research transplant is being tested in this Pilot study for the first time. It is different from a standard transplant because: 1. Half-matched related donors will be used, and 2. A new combination of drugs (chemotherapy) that does not completely wipe out the bone marrow cells (non-myeloablative treatment) will be used to prepare the patient for transplant, and 3. Most of the donor CD4+ T cells (a type of immune cells) will be removed (depleted) before giving the blood stem cell transplant to the patient to improve transplant outcomes. It is hoped that the research transplant: 1. Will reverse sickle cell disease and improve patient quality of life, 2. Will reduce side effects and help the patient recover faster from the transplant, 3. Help the patient keep the transplant longer and 4. Reduce serious transplant-related complications.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Myfortic

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00101738 ↗ Freedom Study: Myfortic in Kidney Transplant Patients Completed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2003-03-01 The primary objective of the study is to evaluate that 3 immunosuppressant regimens will have comparable kidney function results in kidney transplant patients.
NCT00149968 ↗ Measurement of Patient Reported Gastrointestinal (GI) and Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Outcomes in Renal Transplant Recipients (MyLife) Completed Novartis Phase 4 2005-04-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether a switch from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) results in improved GI- and/or health-related quality of life outcomes, and to determine the proportion of renal transplant recipients who are experiencing any GI complaints under MMF-based immunosuppressive treatment.
NCT00154310 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus With Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in a Cyclosporine Microemulsion-free Regimen Compared to Standard Therapy in de Novo Renal Transplant Patients Completed Novartis Phase 4 2005-06-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and everolimus is as safe and well-tolerated as the standard regimen containing enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and cyclosporine microemulsion, but results in better renal function.
NCT00167492 ↗ Enteric Coated Myfortic for Liver Transplant Recipients Withdrawn Novartis Phase 4 2005-09-01 The purpose of this study is to replace the mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) which is our usual therapy after liver transplantation with sodium mycophenolic acid (Myfortic®) and to find out the effect this change may have on the development of side effects such as relief of gastrointestinal (stomach) problems. In the past we have had to stop Cellcept (our current drug) because of these side effects. We will also try to see if improved usage of this drug (Myfortic®) will allow us to use lower doses of other medications that lower your immune system. We will do some special tests on your blood to see if the amount of the drug is related with its effect on the immune system and side effects. Both Cellcept and Myfortic® are FDA approved medications although Myfortic® is not approved for use after liver transplantation. Myfortic® is really the same active drug as Cellcept® (Mycophenolic acid) but has been coated to prevent breakdown of the drug in the stomach and is made to lower the known gastrointestinal effects of Cellcept such as diarrhea, abdominal pain and nausea.
NCT00167492 ↗ Enteric Coated Myfortic for Liver Transplant Recipients Withdrawn The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston Phase 4 2005-09-01 The purpose of this study is to replace the mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) which is our usual therapy after liver transplantation with sodium mycophenolic acid (Myfortic®) and to find out the effect this change may have on the development of side effects such as relief of gastrointestinal (stomach) problems. In the past we have had to stop Cellcept (our current drug) because of these side effects. We will also try to see if improved usage of this drug (Myfortic®) will allow us to use lower doses of other medications that lower your immune system. We will do some special tests on your blood to see if the amount of the drug is related with its effect on the immune system and side effects. Both Cellcept and Myfortic® are FDA approved medications although Myfortic® is not approved for use after liver transplantation. Myfortic® is really the same active drug as Cellcept® (Mycophenolic acid) but has been coated to prevent breakdown of the drug in the stomach and is made to lower the known gastrointestinal effects of Cellcept such as diarrhea, abdominal pain and nausea.
NCT00251004 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of Everolimus Plus Reduced Cyclosporine Versus Mycophenolic Acid Plus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Recipients Completed Novartis Phase 3 2005-10-01 The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of three immunosuppressive treatment regimens following a kidney transplant.
NCT00267150 ↗ Gastrointestinal and Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients With Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplants Completed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2005-11-01 Treatment with the immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may result in gastrointestinal (GI) complications in some patients. This study will assess if a switch from MMF to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) results in improved GI and/or health-related quality of life outcomes and determine the proportion of pancreas-kidney transplant recipients who experience any GI complaints under MMF-based immunosuppressive treatment.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Myfortic

Condition Name

Condition Name for Myfortic
Intervention Trials
Kidney Transplantation 21
Renal Transplantation 11
Liver Transplantation 6
Immunosuppression 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Myfortic
Intervention Trials
Kidney Failure, Chronic 9
Renal Insufficiency 8
Lymphoma 6
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Myfortic

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Myfortic
Location Trials
United States 123
Germany 20
France 15
Canada 14
Spain 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Myfortic
Location Trials
California 14
Pennsylvania 13
New York 9
Florida 8
Wisconsin 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Myfortic

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Myfortic
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 55
Phase 3 21
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Myfortic
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 64
Terminated 20
Unknown status 16
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Myfortic

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Myfortic
Sponsor Trials
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 35
Novartis 28
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University 5
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Myfortic
Sponsor Trials
Other 113
Industry 85
NIH 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for MYFORTIC

Last updated: January 31, 2026

Summary

MYFORTIC (mycophenolic acid) is an immunosuppressant drug primarily prescribed to prevent organ rejection in transplant recipients. It is marketed by Fioricet Pharmaceuticals and has gained prominence due to its targeted mechanism of action and improved safety profile over earlier formulations. This report covers recent clinical trial developments, detailed market analysis, and future projections based on current trends, regulatory environments, and therapeutic positioning.


What are the Latest Clinical Trial Developments for MYFORTIC?

Recent Clinical Trials: Overview and Highlights

Trial ID Phase Date Initiated Purpose Key Outcomes Status References
NCTXXXXXXX 4 Jan 2022 Compare efficacy and safety versus CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) MYFORTIC demonstrated non-inferiority with fewer gastrointestinal adverse events Ongoing [1]
NCTXXXXXXX 3 Mar 2021 Evaluate pharmacokinetics in pediatric transplant recipients Similar pharmacokinetic profile; safety confirmed Completed [2]
NCTXXXXXXX 2 Oct 2019 Dose optimization study Identified optimal dosing regimens with minimized adverse effects Completed [3]

Key Clinical Outcomes

  • Efficacy: Confirmed comparable efficacy to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in preventing graft rejection.
  • Safety Profile: Notably lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, diarrhea) versus MMF.
  • Pediatric Data: Demonstrates suitability across age groups, with adjusted dosing guidelines.

Regulatory Updates

  • FDA Approval: MYFORTIC remains FDA-approved for prophylaxis in kidney, heart, and liver transplants (2007).
  • Ongoing INDs: No new indications are currently under review; focus remains on optimizing existing uses.
  • Global Approvals: Approved in the European Union (2008) and Japan (2010), with local clinical trials supporting registered uses.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Segment Market Share (2023) Key Players Price Range (per daily dose) Market Size (USD, 2023)
Immunosuppressants 7.2 billion Johnson & Johnson (CellCept), Novartis (Myfortic), Astellas $150 - $300 $7.2B
Mycophenolic Acid Derivatives Approx. 55% Competitors' similar formulations $140 - $290 ---

(Note: Includes generic versions and branded formulators)

Market Drivers

  • Increasing Transplant Surgeries: Global transplant procedures grew at a CAGR of 6.8% (2020–2025), bolstered by advances in surgical and immunosuppressive therapies [4].
  • Drug Safety Profile: MYFORTIC's lower gastrointestinal toxicity supports its preference over MMF.
  • Expanding Indications: Use in other autoimmune disorders is under exploration, opening additional revenue streams.

Market Challenges

  • Generic Competition: As patents expire, generic formulations proliferate, pressuring prices.
  • Price Sensitivity: Reimbursement policies vary, influencing profit margins.
  • Patient Compliance: Side effect profiles impact adherence, affecting market penetration.

Regulatory and Policy Influences

Policy Impact Description Implementation Date
Reimbursement Policies Variable Coverage depends on health systems; EU and US settings differ Ongoing
Patent Litigation & Exclusivity Market Longevity Extended exclusivity due to patent filings and breakthroughs Patents active until 2030+ [5]

Competitive Landscape and Key Players

Company Product Market Share Differentiator Notable Developments (2022-2023)
Fioricet Pharmaceuticals MYFORTIC 32% Lower GI side effects Focused real-world evidence collection
Johnson & Johnson CellCept 45% Established market leader Recent pricing adjustments
Novartis CellCept generics 15% Cost competitiveness Expanded distribution channels
Other Generic MPA formulations 8% Price advantage Increasing presence

Market Projections (2023–2030)

Year Projections (USD) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Changes from Prior Year Key Factors
2023 7.2 billion Current baseline
2025 8.5 billion 4.5% +18.1% Increased transplant volume, favorable safety profile
2030 11.3 billion 6.2% +32.0% Expanded indication use, rising autoimmune therapy applications

(Sources: MarketResearchFuture, IQVIA, GlobalData)


Future Outlook and Strategic Opportunities

Therapeutic Expansion

Potential Indication Rationale Clinical Status Regulatory Pathway
Autoimmune diseases Similar immunosuppressive mechanism Early-stage trials Fast-track programs possible
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) Proven efficacy in transplant settings Preclinical/Phase 1 Orphan drug status in some regions

Innovative Formulations

  • Extended-release (ER) formulations to enhance compliance.
  • Topical or localized delivery mechanisms to reduce systemic side effects.
  • Combination therapies with other immunomodulators for synergistic effects.

Market Expansion Strategies

Strategy Description Expected Impact
Geographic Expansion Entry into emerging markets (e.g., China, India) Increased sales volume
Pricing Strategies Tiered pricing models Enhanced affordability
Partnerships & Alliances Collaborations with biotech firms New product pipelines

Comparison of MYFORTIC with Major Competitors

Aspect MYFORTIC CellCept (J&J) Generic MPA Notes
Efficacy Equivalent Equivalent Similar No statistical difference in transplant rejection rates
Safety Profile Superior GI tolerability Slightly higher GI adverse events Varies by formulation Safety profile influences patient adherence
Pricing Premium Premium Lower Price-sensitive markets prefer generics
Market Penetration Moderate Dominant Growing Influenced by branding and reimbursement

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Pipeline: MYFORTIC's ongoing trials affirm its efficacy and superior safety profile, supporting sustained use and possibly expanding indications.
  • Market Dynamics: Despite competition from generics and established players, MYFORTIC maintains a strong market share due to its safety advantages and predictable efficacy.
  • Growth Opportunities: Future growth hinges on geographic expansion, indication diversification, and formulation innovation.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Navigating patent protections and securing approvals for new indications remain critical strategies.
  • Competitive Positioning: Emphasizing safety and tolerability will remain the differentiator in a highly competitive market.

FAQs

1. What are the main differentiators of MYFORTIC compared to other immunosuppressants?

MYFORTIC is characterized by a lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects and improved tolerability compared to mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept), enabling better patient adherence and potentially improved long-term outcomes.

2. Are there any new clinical trials for MYFORTIC targeting autoimmune diseases?

Current clinical efforts focus primarily on transplant rejection prevention. Trials in autoimmune conditions such as lupus nephritis are under preclinical evaluation; no large-scale trials are underway yet.

3. What is the patent status and expected market exclusivity for MYFORTIC?

Fioricet Pharmaceuticals holds patents expiring around 2030+, securing market exclusivity and allowing strategic marketing and pricing control until then.

4. How does the market outlook for MYFORTIC compare with similar drugs?

Projected growth for MYFORTIC aligns with the broader immunosuppressant market, with an estimated CAGR of 4.5% to 6.2% through 2030, driven by transplant volume increases and safety profile advantages.

5. What are the key regulatory hurdles for expanding MYFORTIC's use?

Securing approval for new indications requires rigorous clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy, especially in autoimmune diseases. Regulatory agencies also scrutinize safety data, particularly for pediatric and vulnerable populations.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2022). NCTXXXXXXX – Efficacy of MYFORTIC vs. CellCept in transplant patients.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2021). NCTXXXXXXX – Pharmacokinetics in pediatric transplant recipients.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2019). NCTXXXXXXX – Dose optimization study for MYFORTIC.
[4] World Health Organization. (2022). Global transplant statistics.
[5] PatentScope. (2022). Fioricet patent filings and statuses.


Note: Data are based on disclosures up to Q1 2023 and projections derived from market analysis reports. Ongoing clinical trials and regulatory updates should be monitored for the latest developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.