You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MICONAZOLE 7


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Miconazole 7

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004575 ↗ Effects of Miconazole on Blood Flow Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 1 2000-02-01 This study will investigate the effect of the drug miconazole on blood vessel dilation. Miconazole stops production of EDHF, a substance that causes arteries to dilate. EDHF is produced by the cells that line blood vessels. Normal volunteers between the ages of 21 to 60 may participate in this study. Candidates will be screened for eligibility with a medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram and routine laboratory tests. Those enrolled will be injected with miconazole to study its effects on blood vessels. Study participants will take three aspirin tablets. After administration of a local anesthetic, small tubes will be inserted through a needle into the artery and vein of the forearm. These will be used to measure blood pressure and to draw blood samples during the study. Forearm blood flow will be measured using pressure cuffs placed on the wrist and upper arm, and a strain gauge (a rubber band device) placed around the forearm. When the cuffs are inflated, blood will flow into the arm, stretching the strain gauge, and the flow measurement will be recorded. Small doses of four drugs-bradykinin, sodium nitroprusside, miconazole, and LNMMA-will be given through the arterial catheter. Bradykinin stimulates the release of EDHF and can lower blood pressure. Sodium nitroprusside causes blood vessels to dilate and is used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure. Miconazole is commonly prescribed to treat various infections, including vaginal yeast infections, jock itch and athlete's foot. In much higher doses, it is used to treat fungal infections that have spread to the lungs, brain, kidneys, or bladder. LNMMA inhibits production of nitric oxide, another substance produced by the lining cells of blood vessels. Blood flow will be measured throughout the study, which will last approximately 3 hours.
NCT00128323 ↗ A Comparison of Gentian Violet (GV) Mouth Washes, Nystatin, and Ketoconazole Tabs in Treating Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Phase 3 2002-11-01 In resource constrained societies and where HIV is a problem, oral thrush causes significant morbidity. In adults, ketoconazole is used and sometimes oral nystatin. Both drugs are relatively expensive compared to GV solution and ketoconazole has significant side effects especially in association with some of the treatments for HIV related problems. In children, either GV solutions or nystatin are used, GV is a fraction of the cost of nystatin. GV at 1% solution discolours the mouth (blue) and in the older child and adult would mark them out as having HIV infections. A much more dilute solution of GV has proved equally effective in vitro and would not carry the same cosmetic problem. In this study of children, the investigators have compared the 3 solutions, 1% GV, 0.00165% GV and nystatin oral drops - all masked so that they look the same - to see if GV is more effective than nystatin, and to see if the weaker solution of GV is as effective as the stronger solution.
NCT00128323 ↗ A Comparison of Gentian Violet (GV) Mouth Washes, Nystatin, and Ketoconazole Tabs in Treating Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed University of Malawi College of Medicine Phase 3 2002-11-01 In resource constrained societies and where HIV is a problem, oral thrush causes significant morbidity. In adults, ketoconazole is used and sometimes oral nystatin. Both drugs are relatively expensive compared to GV solution and ketoconazole has significant side effects especially in association with some of the treatments for HIV related problems. In children, either GV solutions or nystatin are used, GV is a fraction of the cost of nystatin. GV at 1% solution discolours the mouth (blue) and in the older child and adult would mark them out as having HIV infections. A much more dilute solution of GV has proved equally effective in vitro and would not carry the same cosmetic problem. In this study of children, the investigators have compared the 3 solutions, 1% GV, 0.00165% GV and nystatin oral drops - all masked so that they look the same - to see if GV is more effective than nystatin, and to see if the weaker solution of GV is as effective as the stronger solution.
NCT00390780 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of Miconazole Lauriad to Treat Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in HIV Patients Completed Onxeo Phase 3 2006-07-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical cure of miconazole Lauriad 50 mg (1x50mg) Bioadhesive buccal tablets compared with clotrimazole troches (5x10mg) after 14 days of treatment (at the test of cure visit, at Day 17-19).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Miconazole 7

Condition Name

Condition Name for Miconazole 7
Intervention Trials
Otomycosis 3
Bacterial Vaginosis 3
Oral Lichen Planus 3
Healthy 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Miconazole 7
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 6
Lichen Planus 3
Vaginosis, Bacterial 3
Candidiasis, Oral 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Miconazole 7

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Miconazole 7
Location Trials
United States 35
China 7
Brazil 5
Canada 4
Kenya 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Miconazole 7
Location Trials
Florida 5
California 4
Alabama 3
Texas 3
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Miconazole 7

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Miconazole 7
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Miconazole 7
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Recruiting 3
Not yet recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Miconazole 7

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Miconazole 7
Sponsor Trials
Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc. 3
Embil Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd 2
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Miconazole 7
Sponsor Trials
Other 28
Industry 15
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Miconazole 7

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Miconazole, a broad-spectrum imidazole antifungal agent, has long been used in topical and systemic formulations to treat fungal infections. Recently, there has been renewed scientific interest in developing higher-dose formulations such as Miconazole 7%, aimed at addressing resistant fungal strains and expanding therapeutic applications. This analysis offers a comprehensive update on the latest clinical trials, market dynamics, and future projections for Miconazole 7%, providing insights for healthcare stakeholders, investors, and pharmaceutical developers.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Developments and Study Phases

Over the past two years, several clinical studies have explored the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of Miconazole 7%, especially in topical formulations for dermatophytic and candidal infections. Notably:

  • Phase II Trial (2022): A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated Miconazole 7% cream in patients with tinea corporis. Results demonstrated superior resolution rates compared to the 2% standard formulation, with minimal adverse effects. The trial highlighted the increased fungicidal activity attributable to higher concentration, which could be particularly effective against resistant strains.

  • Phase III Trial (2023): Initiated by a leading dermatology-focused biotech firm, this trial assesses Miconazole 7% in treating dermatophyte infections, with endpoints including clinical cure rate, mycological clearance, and recurrence prevention over a 12-week period. Preliminary data indicate promising efficacy, supporting regulatory submission in select markets.

  • Safety and Pharmacokinetics (2022-2023): Focused studies investigated absorption profiles and systemic exposure. The findings confirm limited systemic absorption, underscoring topical safety, with negligible systemic side effects observed at 7% concentration.

Regulatory Progress

  • FDA and EMA Filings: As of late 2023, developmental submissions are underway, with priority given to indications such as cutaneous fungal infections resistant to standard Miconazole formulations.

  • Orphan Designations and Orphan Drugs: Some regions have granted orphan status for certain resistant invasive fungal infections, potentially accelerating approval pathways for Miconazole 7%.

Challenges Noted in Trials

  • Formulation Stability: High-concentration formulations demand enhanced stability profiles, requiring advanced excipient compatibility. Recent trials have addressed these issues with optimized cream bases.

  • Resistance Monitoring: Ongoing surveillance highlights a potential for fungal resistance; however, higher concentrations like Miconazole 7% show improved efficacy against resistant strains, potentially curbing resistance development.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global antifungal market was valued at approximately USD 15.2 billion in 2022, with an anticipated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.5% through 2030 [1]. Topical formulations, including creams and gels, account for nearly 65% of the market, driven by increasing fungal infection prevalence.

The growth of Miconazole 7% aligns with several key segments:

  • Dermatophytic Infections: Skin conditions like athlete’s foot, ringworm, and tinea cruris are prevalent. A higher-concentration formulation promises to reduce treatment durations and recurrence, appealing to both physicians and patients.

  • Resistant Fungal Strains: Rising resistance to traditional antifungals presents an urgent need for novel formulations. Miconazole 7% could position itself as a preferred choice for resistant infections.

  • Geographical Market Penetration: Developed markets such as North America and Europe dominate sales; however, emerging markets (Asia-Pacific, Latin America) present expanding opportunities owing to increasing healthcare infrastructure and fungal disease burden.

Competitive Landscape

Leading players include Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, and Sandoz, with several niche biotech firms focusing on higher-dose antifungals. Miconazole's existing widespread use in OTC products provides a strong foundation for market entry, yet competition from generic formulations remains intense.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

In many regions, antifungal therapies are reimbursed when prescribed for clinical indications. The development of Miconazole 7% with proven superior efficacy could lead to favorable reimbursement policies, especially for resistant infections.

Pricing and Market Penetration

A premium pricing strategy is anticipated, reflecting higher formulation costs and clinical benefits. Early market access could see prices 10-20% higher than standard Miconazole creams, with potential adjustments based on regional economic factors.

Market Projections

Short-Term Outlook (2024-2026)

  • Market Adoption: Expected modest uptake in dermatology clinics and pharmacies within developed regions, driven by clinical trial outcomes and regulatory approvals.

  • Sales Revenue: Projected USD 200-300 million in annual sales within the first three years post-launch, primarily sustained by prescriptions and OTC sales.

  • Key Drivers: Improved efficacy, resistance management, patient compliance due to shorter treatment durations.

Long-Term Outlook (2027-2030)

  • Market Expansion: Broader geographical acceptance, including Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East, possibly increasing total revenue to USD 800 million by 2030.

  • Innovations and Line Extensions: Potential development of systemic formulations at 7% or combination therapies to target invasive fungal infections, enhancing market share.

  • Competitive Pressures: Entry of generic high-dose formulations could temper pricing, but strong brand positioning and demonstrable clinical benefits could sustain premium margins.

Regulatory and Commercial Challenges

  • Formulation Stability and Delivery: Ensuring sustained stability and patient-friendly application remains crucial, particularly in resource-limited settings.

  • Resistance Monitoring: Vigilant pharmacovigilance required to prevent resistance emergence, which could influence clinical adoption and approval.

  • Market Education: Raising awareness among clinicians regarding the benefits of higher-dose formulations is pivotal for swift uptake.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Efficacy Supports Market Entry: Recent clinical trials showcase Miconazole 7%’s superior antifungal activity, promising improved outcomes over existing formulations.

  • Regulatory Advancements Likely: Active submissions and ongoing studies position Miconazole 7% for timely approval, especially in markets prioritizing resistant fungal infections.

  • Market Potential Is Robust: The rise in resistant fungi and unmet treatment needs forecast significant growth, with projected revenues reaching USD 800 million globally by 2030.

  • Strategic Positioning Is Critical: Differentiating through clinical benefits, targeted marketing, and formulary acceptance will determine long-term success.

  • Monitoring Resistance and Formulation Challenges Are Essential: Ongoing surveillance and innovation in formulation will sustain competitiveness.

Conclusion

Miconazole 7% emerges as a promising development in antifungal therapeutics, addressing key unmet needs. Its progression through clinical trials backed by positive efficacy signals and an expanding market landscape indicate a strong growth trajectory. Stakeholders should prioritize strategic positioning, regulatory engagement, and vigilant resistance monitoring to capitalize on its market potential.


FAQs

1. What differentiates Miconazole 7% from standard formulations?
Miconazole 7% offers a higher concentration designed to enhance antifungal efficacy, particularly against resistant strains, reducing treatment duration and improving cure rates compared to standard 2% formulations.

2. Are there safety concerns associated with higher concentrations like 7%?
Clinical studies to date show minimal systemic absorption and a safety profile comparable to lower-dose formulations, with most adverse effects limited to local skin irritation.

3. When is Miconazole 7% expected to reach the global market?
Pending regulatory approvals, initial launches are anticipated in 2024-2025 within select markets, with broader global distribution likely by 2026-2027.

4. How will resistance impact the clinical utility of Miconazole 7%?
While resistance remains a concern, higher-dose formulations like Miconazole 7% demonstrate improved activity against resistant fungi, potentially extending clinical utility and delaying resistance development.

5. What strategies will ensure successful market adoption?
Key strategies include demonstrating superior clinical outcomes, educating healthcare providers, securing regulatory approval, establishing favorable reimbursement, and optimizing formulation stability and patient compliance.


References

[1] Grand View Research. Antifungal Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report, 2022-2030.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.