Last Updated: May 2, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR METOLAZONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Metolazone

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed VA Office of Research and Development 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
NCT00649051 ↗ Fasting Study of Metolazone Tablets 2.5 mg and Zaroloxyn® Tablets 2.5 mg Completed Mylan Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2002-12-01 The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence of Mylan metolazone 2.5 mg tablets to Celltech Zaroxolyn® 2.5 mg tablets following a single, oral 10 mg (4 x 2.5 mg) dose administration under fasting conditions.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Metolazone

Condition Name

Condition Name for Metolazone
Intervention Trials
Acute Heart Failure 5
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure 4
Congestive Heart Failure 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Metolazone
Intervention Trials
Heart Failure 17
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 2
Kidney Diseases 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Metolazone

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Metolazone
Location Trials
United States 24
United Kingdom 2
Italy 2
Switzerland 1
Israel 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Metolazone
Location Trials
California 3
West Virginia 2
Virginia 2
Tennessee 2
Ohio 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Metolazone

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Metolazone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Metolazone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 6
Completed 6
Withdrawn 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Metolazone

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Metolazone
Sponsor Trials
Mylan Pharmaceuticals 3
University of Maryland 1
Stanford University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Metolazone
Sponsor Trials
Other 33
Industry 4
U.S. Fed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Metolazone Clinical Trials Update and Market Outlook

Last updated: April 26, 2026

What is metolazone and what is its role in current therapy?

Metolazone is a thiazide-like diuretic used primarily for fluid management, especially in patients with edema that is resistant to loop diuretics. Its use spans congestive heart failure and chronic edema syndromes, with practice centered on off-patent origin and mature generic availability.

Market reality: Metolazone is widely available as inexpensive generics in multiple jurisdictions, which structurally limits near-term revenue growth through “new entry” pharma channels. Competitive pressure is price-led, while clinical differentiation is constrained because the molecule is not commonly the subject of late-stage “platform” development.

What does the clinical-trials landscape show for metolazone?

A detailed, trial-by-trial update requires current registry pulls (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, ICTRP). With no trial registry dataset provided in the prompt, a complete and accurate clinical-trials update cannot be produced to the standard required for investment and R&D decision-making.

Result: No trial-level update, enrollment status, endpoints, phase, or sponsor-specific readout can be stated without risk of omission or factual error.

What is the generic market structure for metolazone?

Metolazone’s market is dominated by generics. Key implications for market analysis and projections:

  • Pricing: Typically low and highly competitive, driven by generic substitution and pharmacy reimbursement frameworks.
  • Supply: Multiple manufacturers and packaging variations reduce unit price stability.
  • Demand: Demand tracks clinical practice patterns for edema and diuretic-resistance management rather than uptake of a novel mechanism.
  • Regulatory pathway: New generics generally enter via bioequivalence and formulation differences, not clinical superiority.

Market drivers

Driver Mechanism Direction of impact
Chronic heart failure and edema prevalence Sustains baseline prescribing Up
Diuretic resistance management Supports continued use of thiazide-like add-on Up
Generic substitution Compresses price and margins Down
Formulary and reimbursement Determines patient access Mixed

Market constraints

Constraint Mechanism Direction of impact
Off-patent status (originator) No exclusivity-backed premium pricing Down
Trial signal scarcity Limits “evidence expansion” that could shift guidelines Flat
Safety monitoring burden Clinicians manage electrolyte and renal risks Mixed

How does the metolazone market project forward?

A reliable projection requires either (1) historic sales baselines by geography and formulation or (2) forward visibility on new trials, label expansions, or new launches. The prompt provides none of these inputs.

Result: A numerical forecast (e.g., TAM/SAM/SOM, CAGR, unit demand growth, revenue range by region) cannot be produced without introducing inaccuracies.

What do pricing and utilization dynamics imply for revenue?

Even without numeric forecasting, the revenue model for metolazone is structurally constrained:

  • Revenue is volume- and price-driven: Generics protect volume more than margin.
  • Utilization is guideline- and clinician-dependent: Use is influenced by prescribing culture for diuretic strategies in heart failure.
  • Mix matters: Tablet strength distribution and package size affect unit economics.
  • Switching is low-friction: In generics, pharmacies can swap suppliers, weakening long-term pricing power.

Competitive implications

Competitor set Typical advantage Practical impact
Generic manufacturers Low cost and supply redundancy Margin compression
Different strengths/pack sizes Channel optimization Some mix benefit
Alternative diuretic add-ons (class competition) Clinical preference Substitution risk

What is the most relevant R&D thesis for metolazone at this stage?

With the active ingredient off-patent in most markets, the most feasible R&D paths are not “new molecules” but incremental improvements. However, a correct analysis depends on identifying specific ongoing programs (formulations, fixed-dose combinations, safety label work, or novel indications). No program list is available in the prompt.

Result: No actionable R&D recommendation can be grounded in metolazone-specific, currently active programs without registry or company pipeline data.

Key takeaways

  • Metolazone is a mature, off-patent generic diuretic used for edema management, including resistant cases where clinicians add a thiazide-like agent.
  • Clinical-trials update cannot be completed to an investment-grade standard without registry-sourced trial records.
  • Market projections cannot be stated numerically without historical sales baselines, geography splits, and pipeline/label visibility.
  • Revenue outlook is structurally constrained by generic price competition, with demand tracking chronic disease prevalence and diuretic practice patterns.

FAQs

1) Is metolazone still actively prescribed?
Yes. It remains part of clinical practice for edema and diuretic-resistant fluid management, though the market is generic and price-sensitive.

2) Are there any ongoing late-stage trials for metolazone?
No trial-level determination can be made from the information provided.

3) What drives metolazone demand most?
Prevalence of heart failure and edema, plus clinician use of diuretic add-on strategies when loop diuretics are insufficient.

4) Can a new sponsor win share with metolazone?
Share gains generally come from supply, formulary positioning, and packaging mix rather than clinical differentiation, because the molecule is mature and generics dominate.

5) What is the most realistic path to premium pricing?
Premium pricing requires exclusivity, label expansion, or differentiated evidence. No such specifics can be asserted from the prompt.


References

[1] American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). Drug information monographs for metolazone.
[2] DailyMed. Metolazone drug label.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Metolazone search results (registry listing).
[4] EMA and EU CTR. Metolazone-related trial listings (EU registers).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.