You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MAKENA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Makena

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01004029 ↗ Confirmatory Study of 17P vs Vehicle for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women w/ Previous Spontaneous Preterm Delivery Completed AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2009-10-01 As part of the continuing effort to study the benefit and risks of 17P and preterm delivery, this study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial of 17P for the prevention of preterm birth prior to 35 weeks, 0 days of gestation in women with a singleton pregnancy, aged 18 years or older, with a previous singleton spontaneous preterm delivery. The study also includes a population pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy to assess the hydroxyprogesterone caproate (HPC) exposure-response relationship and the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the PK of 17P.
NCT01004029 ↗ Confirmatory Study of 17P vs Vehicle for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women w/ Previous Spontaneous Preterm Delivery Completed ResearchPoint Global Phase 3 2009-10-01 As part of the continuing effort to study the benefit and risks of 17P and preterm delivery, this study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial of 17P for the prevention of preterm birth prior to 35 weeks, 0 days of gestation in women with a singleton pregnancy, aged 18 years or older, with a previous singleton spontaneous preterm delivery. The study also includes a population pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy to assess the hydroxyprogesterone caproate (HPC) exposure-response relationship and the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the PK of 17P.
NCT01004029 ↗ Confirmatory Study of 17P vs Vehicle for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women w/ Previous Spontaneous Preterm Delivery Completed Lumara Health, Inc. Phase 3 2009-10-01 As part of the continuing effort to study the benefit and risks of 17P and preterm delivery, this study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial of 17P for the prevention of preterm birth prior to 35 weeks, 0 days of gestation in women with a singleton pregnancy, aged 18 years or older, with a previous singleton spontaneous preterm delivery. The study also includes a population pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy to assess the hydroxyprogesterone caproate (HPC) exposure-response relationship and the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the PK of 17P.
NCT01119963 ↗ Progesterone (17P, Makena®) for Prolongation of Pregnancy in Women With Preterm Rupture of the Membranes (PROM) Completed Obstetrix Medical Group Phase 2/Phase 3 2011-10-01 The objective of the study is to determine if a weekly dose of 17 hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P, Makena®) given to women with preterm rupture of the membranes will: 1. increase the probability of continuing the pregnancy until a favorable gestational age. 2. increase the interval between randomization and delivery. 3. decrease neonatal morbidity.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Makena

Condition Name

Condition Name for Makena
Intervention Trials
Comparing Bioavailability When Makena® is Administered in Healthy Post-menopausal Women 1
Pregnancy 1
Premature Birth 1
Preterm Birth 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Makena
Intervention Trials
Premature Birth 3
Rupture 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Makena

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Makena
Location Trials
United States 48
Canada 3
Czechia 3
Czech Republic 3
Italy 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Makena
Location Trials
California 4
Florida 3
Kentucky 2
Idaho 2
Colorado 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Makena

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Makena
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Makena
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Makena

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Makena
Sponsor Trials
AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 4
Lumara Health, Inc. 2
Thomas Jefferson University 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Makena
Sponsor Trials
Industry 7
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Makena

Last updated: November 8, 2025

Overview of Makena

Makena (hydroxyprogesterone caproate) is a synthetic progestin developed to prevent preterm birth in pregnant women with a history of spontaneous preterm delivery. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011, Makena has since established itself as a pivotal product in obstetric care, particularly in the realm of preterm birth prevention. Developed by Covis Pharma, the drug is marketed as its original injectable formulation, with subsequent biosimilar efforts seeking to expand access and reduce costs.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Trials

Despite its long-standing approval, Makena's clinical development pipeline has seen limited new large-scale trials. However, several studies examining the drug's efficacy, safety, and alternative administration routes continue to contribute to the body of evidence.

  • Reassessment of Efficacy and Safety: The original Phase III trial (2010) by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development indicated that weekly injections of Makena significantly reduced preterm birth risk in high-risk women. Subsequent post-marketing surveillance has focused on long-term safety profiles and alternative titration schedules to optimize outcomes.

  • Biosimilar Development: A notable clinical development has been the pursuit of biosimilar versions of hydroxyprogesterone caproate. In 2020, Biocon launched clinical trials to evaluate biosimilar candidates, aiming to facilitate market competition and improve affordability [1].

  • Exploratory Studies: Some observational studies and registry data analyses continue to monitor real-world outcomes, particularly focusing on adverse events, dosing protocols, and patient adherence.

Regulatory and Post-Marketing Surveillance

The FDA continues to monitor Makena's safety through post-marketing commitments. The key concern remains whether the benefits in preventing preterm birth outweigh potential risks, such as injection site reactions and rare thromboembolic events. The ongoing collection of safety data aims to refine usage guidelines.

Innovative Formulations and Routes of Delivery

Recent research explores alternative delivery mechanisms, such as intravaginal formulations, aiming to improve patient compliance and reduce systemic side effects. While these are in preclinical or early-phase trials, they signal a potential evolution in preterm birth prophylaxis strategies.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global preterm birth prevention market, valued at approximately USD 1.8 billion in 2022, is driven by a rising incidence of preterm births and increased awareness of maternal health risks [2]. Makena's market share remains significant in the United States, but it faces challenges from biosimilar entries and newer therapeutic candidates.

  • Market Share and Revenue: Covis Pharma reports Makena’s annual global revenue exceeding USD 170 million, primarily in North America. However, patent expirations and biosimilar challenges are poised to pressure pricing and market dominance.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Makena commands high reimbursement rates due to its traditional injectable form, with costs often exceeding USD 30,000 per pregnancy course. Recent policy debates focus on reducing drug costs to enhance access.

Competitive Landscape

  • Biosimilars and Generics: Biocon's biosimilar candidate aims to capture a significant portion of the market upon approval, prompted by increasing pressure from payers and healthcare providers seeking cost-effective options.

  • Alternative Therapies: Other progestins like 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate and vaginal formulations of progesterone (e.g., Crinone, Pfizer) offer varying administration routes, with some studies suggesting comparable efficacy.

  • Regulatory and Market Dynamics: The FDA’s recent approval of a generic version of hydroxyprogesterone caproate from Torrent Pharmaceuticals signals an impending price competition [3].

Market Growth Drivers

  • Accelerating preterm birth rates globally, especially in developing countries, expand market potential.
  • Increasing awareness of maternal health and routine screening programs.
  • Policy initiatives to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.

Market Challenges

  • Patent expirations and biosimilar proliferation threaten to erode proprietary revenue.
  • Variability in clinical practice guidelines influences prescribing behaviors.
  • Concerns about safety and efficacy lead to hesitance among some practitioners.

Future Market Projections

The preterm birth prophylaxis market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 5.5% through 2030. The entry of biosimilars and new delivery methods could accelerate growth, potentially surpassing USD 3 billion globally by 2030.

Market Projections

  • Post-Biosimilar Entry: Market share for original Makena is forecasted to decline by as much as 40% within 2-3 years following biosimilar launches, assuming price discounts and expanded access.

  • Increased Adoption of Alternative Formulations: Vaginal progesterone-based therapies are likely to supplement injectable formulations, creating a more diversified market landscape.

  • Regional Growth: Emerging markets, such as China and India, present significant expansion opportunities, driven by increasing healthcare infrastructure and maternal health initiatives.

  • Impact of Regulatory Changes: Payer policies favoring lower-cost options and broader reimbursement inclusion may further influence market dynamics.

Conclusion

While Makena currently maintains a strong foothold in preterm birth prevention, its future market positioning hinges on new clinical developments, biosimilar approvals, and healthcare policy changes. Continuous surveillance of clinical trial outcomes and market entries will be critical for stakeholders aiming to navigate this evolving landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials for Makena primarily focus on safety, biosimilar development, and alternative delivery routes, with limited groundbreaking studies since FDA approval.

  • Market dynamics are increasingly influenced by biosimilar entries, policy reforms, and the diversification of therapeutic options.

  • The market for preterm birth prophylaxis is projected to grow steadily, driven by rising preterm birth incidences and expanding access in emerging economies.

  • Pricing pressures and regulatory policies will continue shaping the competitive landscape, possibly favoring cost-effective biosimilars over branded formulations.

  • Innovation in formulation and administration could redefine treatment paradigms, offering potential for improved compliance and outcomes.


FAQs

  1. What is the current status of biosimilar development for Makena?
    Biocon and other pharmaceutical companies have initiated clinical trials for biosimilar versions of hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Approval timelines vary but are anticipated within the next 2-3 years, pending successful trials and regulatory reviews.

  2. Are there any new clinical trials investigating alternative administration routes for Makena?
    Yes, preliminary studies are exploring vaginal and transdermal formulations to improve patient compliance and reduce systemic side effects. However, these are still in early phases.

  3. How has the market responded to biosimilar entries aimed at hydroxyprogesterone caproate?
    Market response includes increased pricing competition and greater accessibility in some regions. Payers are incentivizing biosimilar adoption, which could significantly reduce Makena's market share.

  4. What are the primary safety concerns associated with Makena?
    Long-term safety data indicate rare instances of injection site reactions and thromboembolic events. Ongoing surveillance aims to monitor and minimize these risks.

  5. What is the outlook for Makena's market share over the next five years?
    Market share may decline due to biosimilar competition, but established safety and efficacy profiles support continued demand. Overall, steady market growth is expected, especially in regions with high preterm birth rates.


References

[1] Biocon Announces Clinical Trial Initiatives for Biosimilar Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate. (2020). Pharma Business News.
[2] Global Preterm Birth Prevention Market Report, 2022. MarketResearch.com.
[3] FDA Approves Generic Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate for Preterm Birth Prevention. (2022). FDA Press Release.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.