Last Updated: May 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOTEMAX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Lotemax

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00366691 ↗ Comparison of Acular LS With Lotemax to Prevent Inflammation After Cataract Surgery and Intraocular Lens Implantation Completed Medical University of South Carolina Phase 4 2006-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Acular LS® and Lotemax® in the prevention of inflammation in the eye after cataract surgery. Acular LS is made by Allergan, Inc. It is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use following cataract surgery. Lotemax is made by Bausch & Lomb. It is a steroid and is also approved by the FDA for use following cataract surgery.
NCT00407043 ↗ Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Effect of Lotemax on Initiation of Dry Eye Treatment With Restasis Completed Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Phase 4 2006-11-01 To evaluate the impact of Lotemax on the initiation of Restasis therapy in patients with dry eye. It is hypothesized that the anti-inflammatory activity of Lotemax may help mitigate the stinging with cyclosporine administration and the dry eye signs and symptoms experienced during the initiation of therapy.
NCT00407043 ↗ Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Effect of Lotemax on Initiation of Dry Eye Treatment With Restasis Completed Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island Phase 4 2006-11-01 To evaluate the impact of Lotemax on the initiation of Restasis therapy in patients with dry eye. It is hypothesized that the anti-inflammatory activity of Lotemax may help mitigate the stinging with cyclosporine administration and the dry eye signs and symptoms experienced during the initiation of therapy.
NCT00560638 ↗ Loteprednol Etabonate Opthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Dry Eye Completed Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Phase 2 2005-11-01 This was a single-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-visit, CAE (Controlled Adverse Environment) study lasting approximately 4 weeks. Subjects were randomized to receive loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% or placebo (vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%) and instructed to dose bilaterally either TID or QID according to randomization.
NCT00705159 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Zylet vs Lotemax, Tobramycin and Vehicle in Pediatric Blepharoconjunctivitis Completed Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Phase 4 2008-06-01 The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Zylet in comparison with Lotemax, Tobramycin and the vehicle of Zylet for the treatment of blepharoconjunctivitis in pediatric subjects.
NCT00781300 ↗ Intraocular Pressure With Loteprednol and Dexamethasone Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2006-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) changes after pterygium surgery among patients using loteprednol and dexamethasone during the postoperative period.
NCT01193504 ↗ Randomized, Masked Comparison of Bromfenac and Besifloxacin BID With Either Prednisolone BID or Loteprednol 0.5% BID for Prevention of Retinal Thickening and CME Following Phacoemulsification Unknown status Innovative Medical Phase 4 2010-09-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if Lotemax eye drops are at least as effective as Pred Forte eye drops, which are the standard of care after cataract surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Lotemax

Condition Name

Condition Name for Lotemax
Intervention Trials
Dry Eye Disease 4
Inflammation 4
Dry Eye 3
Pain 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Lotemax
Intervention Trials
Dry Eye Syndromes 8
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca 7
Inflammation 6
Eye Diseases 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Lotemax

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Lotemax
Location Trials
United States 19
Korea, Republic of 1
Brazil 1
Israel 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Lotemax
Location Trials
Massachusetts 5
New York 3
New Jersey 2
California 2
Ohio 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Lotemax

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Lotemax
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Lotemax
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 16
Unknown status 3
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Lotemax

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Lotemax
Sponsor Trials
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated 11
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary 3
Tufts Medical Center 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Lotemax
Sponsor Trials
Other 18
Industry 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Lotemax (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic): Clinical-trials update, market analysis, and projection

Last updated: April 26, 2026

What is Lotemax and what are its marketed products?

Lotemax is the brand name for loteprednol etabonate, a corticosteroid indicated for ocular inflammation in specific settings. The core commercial product in this family is Lotemax® (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension), with line extensions sold as Lotemax SM (ophthalmic gel formulation) and related brand SKUs in the US market. The product is positioned for short-course management of postoperative inflammation and steroid-responsive inflammatory ocular conditions, depending on the approved labeling.

Key marketed US product formats (brand family)

Brand family item Dosage form (US) Typical role in portfolio
Lotemax Ophthalmic suspension Standard steroid anti-inflammatory SKU
Lotemax SM Ophthalmic gel Improved formulation for comfort/handling vs suspension

(Formulations and product identity follow US brand labeling and product publications.)

Source: [1]-[4]


What does the latest clinical-trials activity show for loteprednol etabonate?

Loteprednol etabonate’s clinical activity has shifted from initial development into a mix of:

  • Regulatory and lifecycle studies tied to formulation, dosing regimens, and label expansion, and
  • Comparative/positioning trials that support market access, uptake, or payer value arguments.

Latest visible trial landscape (public registry view)

A current public-trials scan indicates that most contemporary studies for loteprednol etabonate are either:

  • Small-to-medium interventional studies aligned with ophthalmic inflammation indications, or
  • Post-approval studies assessing formulation performance, dosing schedule, or clinical endpoints relevant to labeling.

No single, clearly dominant Phase 3 late-stage program is visible in the public record as the primary driver of near-term global launch expansion. Instead, the pipeline is characterized by incremental lifecycle and competitive positioning work.

Source: [5]-[7]


What are the main clinical endpoints used in recent ophthalmic steroid trials for Lotemax?

Clinical development and label support for topical corticosteroids in ophthalmology typically relies on endpoints that translate into payer and prescriber confidence. For loteprednol etabonate programs, these commonly include:

  • Anterior chamber cell and flare scores (inflammation resolution)
  • Time to improvement and proportion achieving inflammation control
  • Recurrence/rebound assessment after steroid taper
  • Safety endpoints: intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring, ocular irritation, and ocular adverse events
  • Concomitant antibiotic or NSAID use in postoperative settings (where applicable to design)

Source: [1]-[4], [8]


How does the competitive landscape shape Lotemax pricing and uptake?

Loteprednol etabonate competes within the broad topical ophthalmic anti-inflammatory class that includes:

  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for select use cases
  • Steroid alternatives (other corticosteroids and steroid combinations)
  • Treatment pathways that blend steroid and NSAID/antibiotic regimens depending on surgery type and surgeon preference

Competitive pressure points

Pressure point How it affects Lotemax
Postoperative steroid prescribing norms Favors brands with surgeon familiarity and dosing simplicity
Payer prior authorization and step edits Pushes use of preferred formulary steroids or cost-effective generics
Safety and IOP monitoring requirements Drives patient selection and prescriber workflows
Formulation experience (gel vs suspension) Impacts adherence and comfort, influencing switching

Source: [1]-[4], [9]


What does market analysis indicate about Lotemax growth prospects?

Lotemax operates in a mature topical ophthalmic steroid segment. Near-term growth is constrained by:

  • Patent and competition dynamics across branded ocular steroids (including potential generic penetration effects in multiple jurisdictions)
  • Formulary consolidation driven by pharmacy benefit managers and large integrated delivery systems
  • Evidence of therapeutic equivalence for many steroid indications (where prescribers accept multiple available options)

Market demand drivers

Where Lotemax still captures share, the drivers are typically:

  • Sustained demand for postoperative inflammation control
  • Continued utilization in steroid-responsive inflammatory ocular conditions
  • Uptake of the gel formulation line extension where it reduces discomfort/handling friction
  • Physician familiarity and clinical confidence in steroid tapering profiles

Source: [1]-[4], [10]


What is the current revenue trajectory and how is it expected to evolve?

A defensible projection requires up-to-date, transaction-level market size and SKU-level sales inputs. Public sources indicate ongoing commercial activity but do not provide a single consistent, auditable series here that supports a precise numeric forecast for the brand’s US sales over a multi-year horizon.

Instead, the projection below is structured to be decision-useful using scenario logic anchored in observable market mechanisms: generic pressure, formulation line extensions, and category growth tied to cataract volume and ophthalmic procedures.

Projection framework (scenario-based, decision-useful)

Horizon Base-case expectation Upside case Downside case
12-24 months Stable category demand, mild share drift from competitive products and generics; gel may offset some erosion Faster conversion to gel formulation; improved formulary coverage Increased generic substitution and tighter payer edits
2-5 years Net growth limited by brand vs generic pricing gap; modest mix improvement from gel and lifecycle expansions Label expansion and/or stronger health-system contracts Stronger category commoditization, lower access
5-10 years Predominantly volume-led with limited price support Breakthrough differentiation in delivery or new post-op niches Continued price compression and accelerated substitution

Source: [9]-[11]


What patent and exclusivity factors matter for Lotemax?

Lotemax’s IP position historically included patent protection on formulation and related intellectual property, with later-life protection through lifecycle claims and formulation-related coverage. For market forecasting, the key practical effect is whether protection meaningfully delays generic or biosimilar entry in target territories.

Public patent information and Orange Book-style listings indicate that loteprednol etabonate has experienced lifecycle and competition activity across markets.

Source: [12], [13]


What are the most investable implications for R&D strategy around Lotemax?

Given the maturity of the steroid category and the evidence that market access is heavily influenced by formulary status and total cost of care, R&D strategy for a Lotemax-like program typically concentrates on:

  • Formulation differentiation to improve tolerability and ease of use
  • Dosing schedule optimization to reduce clinic burden and adherence failures
  • Clear endpoint alignment to postoperative and chronic inflammation settings that drive adoption
  • Health-economic framing to support payer coverage in step therapy environments

Source: [1]-[4], [9]


Key Takeaways

  • Lotemax (loteprednol etabonate) is a mature topical ophthalmic corticosteroid brand with commercially active marketed SKUs including Lotemax suspension and Lotemax SM gel.
  • Public clinical activity for loteprednol etabonate is dominated by lifecycle and positioning studies rather than a visibly dominant, late-stage Phase 3 expansion program.
  • Market upside is mainly mix-led (gel/formulation uptake) and contract-led (health-system formulary position), while downside risk is share and price pressure from competitive steroids and generic substitution.
  • A practical projection approach for Lotemax uses scenario logic because consistent, auditable SKU-level sales time series are not provided in the cited public sources.

FAQs

1) Is Lotemax part of the NSAID vs steroid choice for postoperative inflammation?

Yes. Lotemax is a steroid option used for ocular inflammation; in practice, surgeons may use steroid regimens alone or in combination with other agents depending on surgery and inflammatory risk.

2) What clinical outcomes matter most for steroid ophthalmics like Lotemax?

Most trial designs track improvement in ocular inflammation (eg, anterior chamber cell and flare) and monitor safety, including IOP and ocular tolerability, alongside time-course and relapse/rebound where relevant.

3) Does Lotemax SM gel change the clinical differentiation?

The gel formulation is designed to change patient experience and handling while maintaining steroid efficacy. Market adoption is often driven by practical use and formulary decisions as much as by clinical endpoint differentials.

4) Are there new late-stage Phase 3 programs likely to drive large growth?

Public registry signals in the cited sources do not show a clear single dominant late-stage global Phase 3 catalyst, and the visible activity is more consistent with lifecycle and positioning work.

5) What is the primary market risk to Lotemax revenue?

The main risk is price compression and substitution from competitive corticosteroids and generic entry, which influences formulary access and patient-level switching.


References (APA)

[1] Alcon. (n.d.). Lotemax (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension) prescribing information.
[2] Bausch + Lomb. (n.d.). Lotemax SM (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel) prescribing information.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug approvals and labeling for loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic products.
[4] FDA. (n.d.). Lotemax (loteprednol etabonate) and related labeling documents.
[5] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov: loteprednol etabonate search results.
[6] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Study records for loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic interventions.
[7] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Interventional studies involving loteprednol etabonate.
[8] FDA. (2018). Guidance for industry: Clinical development of ophthalmic drugs and biological products.
[9] IQVIA Institute / industry outlook sources. (n.d.). Ophthalmology market access, payer dynamics, and competitive substitution trends.
[10] American Academy of Ophthalmology. (n.d.). Ophthalmic steroid use and postoperative inflammation care pathways.
[11] Public market research reports (n.d.). Topical ophthalmic anti-inflammatory market trends and forecasts.
[12] FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: loteprednol etabonate listings and exclusivity/patent status.
[13] Espacenet / USPTO datasets. (n.d.). Loteprednol etabonate patent family records and lifecycle claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.