You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LORTAB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Lortab

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00174538 ↗ Codeine in Sickle Cell Disease Completed PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. Phase 1/Phase 2 2005-03-01 The objective of this study is to determine if a subject's genetic make-up would affect the treatment response to codeine in subjects with sickle cell disease.
NCT00385684 ↗ Low-Dose Opiate Therapy for Discomfort in Dementia (L-DOT) Completed VA Office of Research and Development Phase 4 2007-10-01 The purpose of this study was to determine whether a low dose an opiate pain medication is effective for the treatment of discomfort in patients with advanced dementia. The study medication was also known as Lortab and contained both a narcotic pain medication and acetaminophen (the same pain medication as contained in Tylenol). This study was an eight-week long clinical trial for discomfort among veterans with advanced dementia who were admitted to a Nursing Home Care Unit (NHCU) at the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center.
NCT00574015 ↗ The Comparison of Supraperiosteal Nerve Block With Opiate Analgesia in Alleviating the Pain of Toothache Completed Albany Medical College Phase 4 2007-12-01 This study will compare the degree of pain control provided by two techniques for persons with toothache in an emergency department. The two techniques include; - standard oral narcotic pain medication - numbing the tooth with local anesthetic by needle injection
NCT00583453 ↗ Celecoxib as a Post-tonsillectomy Pain Medication Completed Pfizer Phase 2 2007-10-01 The hypothesis is that celecoxib effectively reduces pain after a tonsillectomy and reduces post-operative narcotic use. To test this hypothesis, the study is placebo controlled (sugar pill). Half of the participants will receive a sugar pill, half will not. All participants will receive the standard post-operative pain medications. We ask participants to log the amount of medications they use daily, and the amount of pain they have each day. It is hoped that celecoxib will reduce the amount of post-operative pain medication needed.
NCT00583453 ↗ Celecoxib as a Post-tonsillectomy Pain Medication Completed University of Iowa Phase 2 2007-10-01 The hypothesis is that celecoxib effectively reduces pain after a tonsillectomy and reduces post-operative narcotic use. To test this hypothesis, the study is placebo controlled (sugar pill). Half of the participants will receive a sugar pill, half will not. All participants will receive the standard post-operative pain medications. We ask participants to log the amount of medications they use daily, and the amount of pain they have each day. It is hoped that celecoxib will reduce the amount of post-operative pain medication needed.
NCT00892606 ↗ Methadone Versus Morphine for Orthopedic Surgery Patients Completed University of Louisville Phase 4 2009-01-01 The investigators propose to compare analgesia by methadone and ketamine with a combination of morphine and ketamine in orthopedic surgery patients with moderate to severe pain. The investigators hypothesize that when given with ketamine before surgical incision, methadone is more effective than morphine in reducing postoperative morphine consumption and reducing pain during movement.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Lortab

Condition Name

Condition Name for Lortab
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 4
Pain 2
Children 1
Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Lortab
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 4
Tonsillitis 2
Fractures, Bone 2
Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Lortab

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Lortab
Location Trials
United States 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Lortab
Location Trials
Tennessee 3
Texas 2
New York 2
California 1
Georgia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Lortab

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Lortab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Lortab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Terminated 3
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Lortab

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Lortab
Sponsor Trials
Baylor College of Medicine 2
Emory University 1
VA Office of Research and Development 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Lortab
Sponsor Trials
Other 16
Industry 3
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lortab (Hydrocodone and Acetaminophen)

Last updated: November 6, 2025


Introduction

Lortab, a proprietary combination drug integrating hydrocodone and acetaminophen, has historically played a pivotal role in pain management. Marketed by specific pharmaceutical companies, Lortab's formulary and regulatory landscape have evolved amid increasing opioid scrutiny. This report examines recent clinical trial developments, contemporaneous market analyses, and future projections associated with Lortab, providing critical insights for stakeholders within the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Lortab

Lortab's formulation, comprising hydrocodone—a Schedule II opioid—and acetaminophen, has been extensively studied for analgesic efficacy. Its longstanding clinical use is supported by numerous trials indicating effectiveness in managing moderate to severe pain, particularly post-surgical and chronic pain conditions.

Recent Clinical Trial Developments

While Lortab itself has not been the subject of recent large-scale clinical trials, ongoing research predominantly focuses on developing alternative formulations or comparable opioids with improved safety profiles. Notably:

  • Shift toward Abuse-Deterrent Formulations: New formulations of hydrocodone combined with tamper-resistant technologies aim to mitigate misuse, influencing the clinical landscape indirectly impacting Lortab [1].

  • Safety Profile Studies: Numerous retrospective analyses evaluate the hepatotoxic risks associated with acetaminophen doses in combination drugs, influencing prescribing practices and regulatory policies [2].

  • Alternative Pain Management Trials: Emerging studies on non-opioid pain therapeutics—such as gabapentinoids or NSAIDs—indirectly influence Lortab's clinical positioning by offering substitutes.

Regulatory and Policy Impact

The 2014 rescheduling of hydrocodone from Schedule III to Schedule II by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) significantly impacted clinical trial activity and prescribing behaviors. The tighter regulatory controls have limited the scope of new Lortab-related trials but intensified research into alternative formulations and abuse deterrence [3].


Market Analysis of Lortab

Historical Market Position

Lortab enjoyed prominence as an effective opioid analgesic for moderate to severe pain until the late 2010s. Its market share was heavily reliant on prescriber preferences, regulatory policies, and concerns over opioid addiction.

Market Decline and Regulatory Challenges

Recent years witnessed a sharp decline in Lortab prescriptions, driven by:

  • Regulatory Scrutiny: The FDA’s warnings regarding hepatotoxicity risks associated with acetaminophen have prompted reevaluation of combination drugs like Lortab [4].

  • Opioid Crisis Impact: Widespread opioid misuse and abuse epidemic resulted in policy shifts, prescription limitations, and increased monitoring. The CDC’s guidelines for prescribing opioids have reduced overall opioid dispensation by approximately 30% since 2010 [5].

  • Availability of Alternatives: The market now favors abuse-deterrent opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and integrative pain management strategies, further eroding Lortab’s market share.

Current Market Dynamics

  • The global opioid analgesics market was valued at approximately USD 8 billion in 2021, with Lortab-linked products accounting for a fraction of this, primarily in the United States.

  • United States accounts for over 80% of sales of hydrocodone-based products, although prescriptions have declined significantly, with a 50% reduction from 2010 to 2021 [6].

Legal and Policy Influences

  • Several states have implemented strict opioid prescribing limits, including mandatory electronic prescriptions and prior authorization requirements.

  • The FDA’s 2015 decision to limit acetaminophen doses in combination products aimed at reducing hepatotoxicity, indirectly decreasing Lortab prescriptions [4].


Future Market Projection for Lortab

Market Outlook (2023-2030)

Given regulatory pressures, legal restrictions, and evolving clinical practices, the future of Lortab appears constrained:

  • Decline in Prescriptions: Forecasted to decline at an annual CAGR of approximately 7-10% over the next decade, driven by regulatory tightening and shifting clinical paradigms.

  • Potential Resurgences: While unlikely, niche applications in palliative care or restricted medical settings might sustain minimal demand.

  • Manufacturing and Formulation Developments: No significant pipeline indicates replacements or reformulations of Lortab are imminent. The current trend favors non-opioid analgesics and abuse-deterrent formulations.

  • Regulatory Bottlenecks and Litigation: Ongoing litigation regarding opioid manufacturers and regulatory agencies’ actions may further curtail Lortab’s market viability.

Competitive Landscape

  • Alternatives such as ER (extended-release) hydrocodone formulations and combination drugs like Vicodin and Norco have largely supplanted Lortab.

  • The introduction of non-opioid analgesics and device-based pain management options threaten to further marginalize Lortab’s relevance.

Potential Growth Drivers

  • Limited if regulatory and societal trends persist. Only specific effective pain management protocols in controlled environments could preserve minimal niche demand.

  • Advances in drug reformulation, such as abuse-deterrent technologies, may slightly influence the market but likely won't reverse the declining trend of traditional Lortab use.


Conclusion

Lortab’s clinical and market trajectory underscores the profound influence of regulatory policies, societal health priorities, and pharmaceutical innovation. While historically a mainstay in pain management, the drug’s future viability diminishes amid escalating concerns over opioid misuse and hepatotoxicity. Industry stakeholders and healthcare providers should focus on compliance, alternative therapies, and innovative formulations aligned with evolving standards to ensure continued efficacy and safety.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Evolution: Lortab remains clinically effective but has faced diminished clinical trial activity and regulatory hurdles, especially after the 2014 DEA rescheduling.

  • Market Decline: Prescription volume for Lortab has declined sharply, influenced by regulatory restrictions, the opioid epidemic, and availability of safer alternatives.

  • Regulatory and Safety Trends: Heightened focus on opioid misuse and acetaminophen hepatotoxicity have led to tighter controls, reducing Lortab’s market footprint.

  • Future Outlook: The market projection indicates a steady decline toward near obsolescence by 2030, unless reforms or novel formulations emerge.

  • Strategic Focus: Companies should explore non-opioid pain solutions and abuse-deterrent technologies to address ongoing demand for pain management therapies.


FAQs

1. Why has Lortab’s prescriptive use declined significantly in recent years?
The decline stems from regulatory actions, including stricter prescribing guidelines, increased awareness of opioid abuse, and safety concerns related to acetaminophen hepatotoxicity, leading to reduced demand and market share.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials related to Lortab?
Direct clinical trials on Lortab are scarce; most current research focuses on alternative opioids, abuse-deterrent formulations, and non-opioid analgesics, indirectly impacting Lortab's relevance.

3. Could reformulated versions of Lortab revive its market?
While reformulations incorporating abuse-deterrent technologies may prolong some use, regulatory barriers and societal shifts favor alternative therapies, limiting any significant resurgence.

4. What are the primary safety concerns associated with Lortab?
Its main concerns involve the risk of opioid dependence and overdose, along with hepatotoxicity due to acetaminophen doses exceeding safe levels.

5. How does the opioid epidemic influence the future of drugs like Lortab?
The epidemic prompts tighter regulations, prescriber caution, and a shift toward non-addictive pain management options, severely impacting traditional opioids like Lortab.


References

[1] FDA. (2015). "FDA Limits Acetaminophen in Prescription Pain Drugs." U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] Monti, J., et al. (2018). "Hepatotoxicity Risks of Acetaminophen in Combination Drugs." Journal of Hepatology.
[3] DEA. (2014). "Rescheduling of Hydrocodone-Medicine Schedule." U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
[4] FDA. (2015). "Guidance on Acetaminophen Content in Opioid Combinations." Food and Drug Administration.
[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). "Opioid Prescribing Trends."
[6] IQVIA. (2022). "U.S. Opioid Sales and Prescription Data."

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical or investment advice.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.