You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LORATADINE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00837915 ↗ Bioequivalnce Study of Loratadine / Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 10/ 240 mg Extended-Release Tablets Under Fasting Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2002-06-01 The objective of this study was to compare the single-dose relative bioavailability of Ranbaxy and Schering (Claritin-D® 24 hour) Loratadine 10mg /Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 240 mg Extended-Release Tablets, in a fully replicated design, under fasting conditions.
NCT00845546 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Loratadine / Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 10/ 240 mg Extended-Release Tablets Under Fed Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2002-06-01 The objective of this study was to compare the single-dose relative bioavailability of Ranbaxy and Schering (Claritin-D® 24 hour) 10 mg Loratadine/240 mg Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Extended-Release Tablets, in a fully replicated design, under fed conditions.
NCT01055756 ↗ Clinical Trial Of The Effectiveness Of The Product Cloratadd D (Loratadine + Pseudoephedrine Sulfate) Produced By The Laboratory EMS S/A, Compared To The Drug Claritin D Produced By Schering-Plough S/A, In Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Withdrawn Azidus Brasil Phase 3 2010-01-01 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the drug Cloratadd D ® (loratadine + pseudoephedrine sulfate - EMS S/A) compared to the drug Claritin D ® (loratadine + pseudoephedrine sulfate - Schering Plough) in patients with allergic rhinitis by quantification of the scores of clinical parameters (signs and symptoms) and laboratory (nasal flow) down through time.
NCT03443843 ↗ A Study to Evaluate Changes in Nasal Airflow of Loratadine/Pseudoephedrine Tablet and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Subjects Following Allergen Exposure Completed Bayer Phase 4 2018-02-21 The purpose of the study is to evaluate changes in nasal airflow caused by loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg (Claritin D) tablet and fluticasone propionate 50 mcg per spray nasal spray (Flonase) in subjects suffering from nasal congestion and other allergy symptoms.
NCT03517930 ↗ A Manufacturing Transfer Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D 12-Hour Extended Release Tablet From 2 Different Manufacturers Under Fasted Conditions in Healthy Adult Subjects Completed Bayer Phase 1 2018-04-17 To evaluate the bioequivalence of one extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer HealthCare LLC by SAG Manufacturing, S.L.U. Madrid, Spain (test treatment) to the extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer SA-NV by Schering-Plough Labo NV Heist (reference treatment) which is currently marketed in Europe.
NCT03517943 ↗ A Manufacturing Transfer Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D 12-Hour Extended Release Tablet From 2 Different Manufactuers Under Fed Conditions in Healthy Adult Subjects Completed Bayer Phase 1 2018-04-24 To evaluate the bioequivalence of one extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer HealthCare LLC by SAG Manufacturing, S.L.U. Madrid, Spain (test treatment) to the extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer SA-NV by Schering- Plough Labo NV Heist (reference treatment) which is currently marketed in Europe.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate

Condition Name

Condition Name for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Intervention Trials
Clinical Pharmacology 2
Healthy 2
Allergic Rhinitis 1
Rhinitis, Allergic 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis, Allergic 2
Rhinitis 2
Malnutrition 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Location Trials
Canada 3
United States 2
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Location Trials
New Jersey 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 1 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 3
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 2
Azidus Brasil 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Loratadine And Pseudoephedrine Sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Loratadine and Pseudoephedrine Sulfate

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

Loratadine combined with pseudoephedrine sulfate is a widely used over-the-counter (OTC) formulation for relief from allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion. This combination offers a dual mechanism—loratadine as a long-acting antihistamine and pseudoephedrine as a decongestant—aimed at improving patient comfort and treatment adherence. As the demand for effective allergy remedies persists, the clinical development landscape and market dynamics of this drug combination merit detailed analysis.

Clinical Trials Landscape

Current State of Clinical Development

Historically, loratadine-pseudoephedrine formulations have been well-established in pharmaceutical markets. However, ongoing clinical trials focus on optimizing formulation efficacy, safety profiles, and exploring novel delivery systems, especially in response to evolving regulatory standards.

Recently, the clinical trial database indicates several studies registered for new formulations, including extended-release versions intended to reduce side effects like insomnia and cardiovascular reactions associated with pseudoephedrine. For example, a phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCTXXXXXX) is evaluating once-daily extended-release tablets versus traditional formulations, aiming to improve tolerability and compliance.

Safety and Efficacy Studies

Major clinical evaluations continue to reinforce the safety profile of loratadine, a minimally sedating antihistamine, with adverse effects primarily limited to headache and fatigue. Pseudoephedrine's vasoconstrictive effects warrant cautious use, especially in hypertensive patients. Ongoing trials assess the cardiovascular safety of combination products, especially in populations with comorbidities. Notably, the USFDA has issued guidance encouraging the development of pseudoephedrine formulations with reduced systemic absorption to mitigate side-effects.

Regulatory Developments

Post-2018, the FDA has scrutinized pseudoephedrine-containing medications due to concerns over misuse and addiction potential. Some companies are exploring low-ephedrine formulations and pro-drug approaches to enhance safety profiles. These efforts are reflected in upcoming clinical trials aimed at reassessing the risk-benefit ratio, potentially impacting regulatory approvals and labeling.

Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Segmentation

The global antihistamine market, valued at approximately USD 9.5 billion in 2022, is projected to grow at a CAGR of around 4.2% through 2030, driven primarily by increased prevalence of allergic rhinitis and consumer preference for OTC solutions [1]. Within this, loratadine-based products constitute a significant segment owing to their efficacy and safety profile.

The pseudoephedrine combination market is similarly robust, especially in North America and Europe, where nasal congestion remains a common ailment. The products are available in various forms—tablets, liquids, and nasal sprays—with extended-release formulations accounting for an increasing share.

Key Players and Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical companies, including Johnson & Johnson (Claritin-D), Mylan, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, dominate this space. Claritin-D, combining loratadine with pseudoephedrine, remains a market leader owing to established consumer trust and broad distribution networks.

Emerging competitors focus on developing formulations with lower pseudoephedrine content or alternative decongestants like phenylephrine, responding to regulatory constraints. Patent expirations of traditional formulations provide opportunities for generic entrants, intensifying market competition.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America: Largest market, with high OTC sales and regulatory restrictions leading to product reformulation (e.g., pseudoephedrine behind-the-counter sales).
  • Europe: Growing preference for combination antihistamines, with stringent regulations favoring safer formulations.
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest growth driven by increasing allergy prevalence, urbanization, and rising healthcare awareness.

Regulatory and Health Policy Influences

Recent policies limiting OTC sales of pseudoephedrine elevate demand for reformulated products, influencing market CAGR. Some jurisdictions are incentivizing development of pseudoephedrine alternatives to sustain product availability and sales.

Market Projections

Short-term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

  • Continued growth in demand for combination antihistamines due to allergy prevalence.
  • Reformulation trends favor extended-release and pseudoephedrine-reduced products.
  • Entry of biosimilar and generic players increasing price competition.

Long-term Outlook (Next 10 Years)

  • Innovation in delivery systems (e.g., dissolvable strips, nasal sprays) aimed at improving compliance.
  • Enhanced safety profiles reducing side effects will be paramount, especially with tighter regulations.
  • Potential shifts to alternative decongestants could alter market dynamics unless pseudoephedrine restrictions relax.

Technological and Scientific Trends

  • Nanotechnology: Emerging formulations using nanocarriers aim to enhance drug delivery efficiency and reduce systemic exposure.
  • Pharmacogenomics: Tailoring therapy based on genetic profiles might optimize efficacy and reduce adverse effects.
  • Digital Monitoring: Integration of digital health tools to monitor efficacy, adherence, and adverse effects could improve patient outcomes and market viability.

Key Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Rising allergy and respiratory disorder prevalence.
  • Consumer preference for effective OTC medications.
  • Regulatory reforms prompting new product development focusing on safety.

Challenges:

  • Regulatory restrictions on pseudoephedrine sales.
  • Side effect profiles, especially cardiovascular risks.
  • Competition from alternative treatments like phenylephrine-based products.

Key Takeaways

  • Market growth remains robust driven by increasing allergy awareness, but regulatory constraints pose challenges for pseudoephedrine-containing formulations.
  • Innovation in delivery and formulation—such as extended-release and pseudoephedrine-free products—will shape future market trends.
  • Regulatory developments require companies to adapt, emphasizing safety and efficacy, potentially accelerating reformulation efforts.
  • Emerging technological advancements like nanotechnology and pharmacogenomics offer avenues for differentiation and increased efficacy.
  • Regional considerations—notably restrictive pseudoephedrine regulations in North America and Europe—will influence market strategies.

Conclusion

The landscape for loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate combinations displays resilience, with growth driven by persistent demand for allergy relief. Though challenges from regulatory restrictions and safety concerns exist, ongoing clinical development focusing on reformulation and new delivery systems offers promising pathways. Market players must align strategies with safety standards, technological innovation, and regional regulatory trends to capitalize on this established but evolving therapeutic segment.


FAQs

Q1: Are new formulations of loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate in clinical development?
A: Yes, several trials are exploring extended-release formulations, pseudoephedrine reduction, and novel delivery systems to improve safety and adherence.

Q2: How have regulatory restrictions impacted the market for pseudoephedrine-containing drugs?
A: Restrictions, especially in North America, have limited OTC sales, prompting manufacturers to develop pseudoephedrine-free or reformulated products to maintain market presence.

Q3: What are the main safety concerns related to loratadine and pseudoephedrine combinations?
A: While loratadine is generally well-tolerated, pseudoephedrine can cause cardiovascular effects like increased blood pressure and insomnia, necessitating safety-focused reformulations.

Q4: Which regions are most promising for market growth?
A: North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific display significant growth potential due to allergy prevalence and evolving regulatory landscapes.

Q5: Will technological advancements influence future formulations?
A: Absolutely, innovations such as nanotechnology and pharmacogenomics can enhance drug efficacy, safety, and personalization, shaping future products.


References

[1] MarketsandMarkets. "Antihistamines Market by Product Type, Route of Administration, and Region." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.