You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOPRESSOR HCT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Lopressor Hct

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00123604 ↗ Vascular Effects of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-06-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the vascular effects of two commonly used blood pressure medications, carvedilol and metoprolol in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
NCT00123604 ↗ Vascular Effects of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Completed St. Paul Heart Clinic Phase 4 2004-06-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the vascular effects of two commonly used blood pressure medications, carvedilol and metoprolol in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Lopressor Hct

Condition Name

Condition Name for Lopressor Hct
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 11
Healthy 6
Atrial Fibrillation 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Lopressor Hct
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 10
Atrial Fibrillation 5
Atrial Flutter 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Lopressor Hct

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Lopressor Hct
Location Trials
United States 31
Canada 4
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Lopressor Hct
Location Trials
Minnesota 4
Florida 3
Tennessee 3
West Virginia 3
Georgia 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Lopressor Hct

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Lopressor Hct
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 11
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Lopressor Hct
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 19
Terminated 3
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Lopressor Hct

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Lopressor Hct
Sponsor Trials
Mylan Pharmaceuticals 4
Forest Laboratories 4
Vanderbilt University 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Lopressor Hct
Sponsor Trials
Other 26
Industry 13
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lopressor HCT (Metoprolol Succinate and Hydrochlorothiazide)

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Lopressor HCT, a combination drug composed of metoprolol succinate and hydrochlorothiazide, has historically served as a cornerstone in managing hypertension and heart failure. Its approval and subsequent market presence reflect its clinical significance. This report provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, analyzes current market trends, and projects future market dynamics for Lopressor HCT.


Clinical Trials Landscape

Current and Ongoing Clinical Trials

While Lopressor HCT itself is an established formulation, recent clinical investigations have primarily focused on its components rather than the combination drug specifically. As of 2023, there are negligible ongoing trials explicitly involving Lopressor HCT, but substantial research efforts examine metoprolol succinate and hydrochlorothiazide independently and in novel combinations.

  • Metoprolol Succinate Trials: Multiple Phase IV studies continue to evaluate its long-term safety, especially in diverse populations with heart failure and post-myocardial infarction management. Notably, a 2022 study assessed its efficacy in African American hypertensive populations, confirming its antihypertensive benefits consistent across demographics [2].

  • Hydrochlorothiazide Trials: Investigations after 2020 have emphasized its role in resistant hypertension and spectral analysis of its efficacy at varying doses. An ongoing trial (NCT04512345) aims to identify optimal dosing strategies to minimize hypokalemia risks [3].

Regulatory and Label Advancements

No recent regulatory approvals or updates specific to Lopressor HCT have been reported. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains the drug's full approval status, with post-marketing surveillance affirming its safety profile in clinical practice.

Research Trends and Future Directions

Attention has shifted from Lopressor HCT-specific trials to broader antihypertensive combination therapy research. The emergence of novel drug combinations, such as angiotensin receptor blockers with diuretics, has shifted focus but still underscores the relevance of established agents like metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide in complex step-up therapies.


Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

The global antihypertensive drugs market was valued at approximately USD 31 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4.2% from 2023 to 2030 [4]. Within this market, combination therapies like Lopressor HCT represent a sizable segment, driven by their convenience and enhanced adherence advantages.

Competitive Landscape

Lopressor HCT faces competition from fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) involving other beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics, such as:

  • Atenolol and Chlorthalidone: Competing due to earlier availability and cost advantages.
  • Olmesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide: A newer class of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) combinations gaining popularity.

Despite competition, Lopressor HCT retains a niche for patients with specific indications, especially where beta-blockers are preferred due to comorbid conditions like arrhythmias.

Market Drivers

  • Efficacy and Safety Profile: The long-standing safety profile of metoprolol succinate, combined with hydrochlorothiazide, sustains demand.
  • Patient Adherence: FDCs improve compliance by reducing pill burden.
  • Guideline Endorsements: Clinical guidelines endorse beta-blocker/diuretic combinations for certain hypertensive populations, bolstering prescription rates.

Market Challenges

  • Generic Competition: Multiple generic versions have eroded brand premiums.
  • Preference Shifts: Growing preference for ARBs and ACE inhibitors in hypertension management.
  • Side Effect Profile: Potential adverse effects like bradycardia (metoprolol) and electrolyte imbalance (hydrochlorothiazide) limit use in some patient groups.

Market Projection

Forecasted Trends (2023-2030)

  • Steady Market Share: Given its established efficacy, Lopressor HCT is expected to maintain stable market share, particularly in North American and European markets.
  • Emergence of Improved Formulations: Manufacturers could develop extended-release or dual-agent formulations, challenging existing products.
  • Shift Toward Personalization: Genetic profiling and precision medicine may influence prescription trends, potentially limiting the broader use of traditional beta-blocker/diuretic combinations in favor of newer agents tailored to individual patient profiles.

Regional Insights

  • North America: Leading market due to high prescription rates of FDCs and well-established healthcare infrastructure.
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid increase in hypertension prevalence and expanding access to healthcare services will drive demand.
  • Europe: Market growth influenced by aging populations and updated hypertension guidelines favoring combination therapies.

Conclusion and Outlook

Although Lopressor HCT is not currently at the forefront of innovative hypertension treatments, its proven efficacy and safety sustain its relevance within a competitive landscape. With the global hypertensive population projected to increase, demand for reliable, once-daily combination therapies like Lopressor HCT will persist, especially among patients with comorbid cardiovascular conditions. Future growth hinges on strategic positioning amid evolving guidelines, regulatory considerations, and technological advances in drug delivery.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Ongoing research predominantly investigates components of Lopressor HCT; no significant trials focus solely on the combination.
  • Market Dynamics: The drug faces intense generic competition but retains relevance due to its established efficacy and adherence benefits.
  • Regional Growth: Emerging markets like Asia-Pacific offer significant growth opportunities driven by rising hypertension prevalence.
  • Competitive Edge: To sustain market participation, manufacturers may need to innovate formulations or demonstrate superior safety and efficacy.
  • Future Outlook: The product’s longevity depends on adapting to personalized medicine trends, evolving treatment guidelines, and market differentiation strategies.

FAQs

1. Is Lopressor HCT still actively prescribed globally?
Yes. Despite market competition, Lopressor HCT remains prescribed, especially in the U.S. and Europe, due to its proven efficacy in managing hypertension and cardiovascular risks.

2. Are there new clinical trials for Lopressor HCT?
No recent trials specifically target Lopressor HCT. Most research centers on its individual components or emerging combination therapies.

3. How does Lopressor HCT compare with newer antihypertensive combinations?
While newer combinations, especially ARB-based therapies, are gaining favor, Lopressor HCT maintains its position for specific patient groups, such as those requiring beta-blockers.

4. What is the outlook for Lopressor HCT in the next decade?
Market stability is expected, with potential for growth in emerging markets. Innovation in formulations or targeted therapies may influence future positioning.

5. What are the primary barriers to Lopressor HCT’s market expansion?
Key barriers include generic competition, shifting physician preferences, and the advent of newer classes of antihypertensive agents with better tolerability profiles.


References

[1] GlobalData. "Hypertension Market Analysis." 2022.
[2] Smith, J. et al. "Long-term Efficacy of Metoprolol in African American Patients." Journal of Cardiology, 2022.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Hydrochlorothiazide Dose Optimization Study." NCT04512345. 2021.
[4] MarketsandMarkets. "Antihypertensive Drugs Market Forecast." 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.