You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: June 14, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LEUKERAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Leukeran

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00875667 ↗ A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Completed Celgene Phase 2 2009-04-30 To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide versus investigator choice in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
NCT00875667 ↗ A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Completed Celgene Corporation Phase 2 2009-04-30 To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide versus investigator choice in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
NCT00910910 ↗ Study Of The Effectiveness & Safety Of Lenalidomide Versus Chlorambucil As First Line Therapy For Elderly Patients With B-Cell CLL (The ORIGIN Trial) Completed Celgene Phase 3 2009-10-13 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide as a first line therapy in treating patients with B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. This study will compare the effects (good and bad) of lenalidomide with chlorambucil.
NCT00910910 ↗ Study Of The Effectiveness & Safety Of Lenalidomide Versus Chlorambucil As First Line Therapy For Elderly Patients With B-Cell CLL (The ORIGIN Trial) Completed Celgene Corporation Phase 3 2009-10-13 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide as a first line therapy in treating patients with B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. This study will compare the effects (good and bad) of lenalidomide with chlorambucil.
NCT01088048 ↗ Study to Investigate Idelalisib in Combination With Chemotherapeutic Agents, Immunomodulatory Agents and Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma or Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 1 2010-03-25 The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety of idelalisib in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), a chemotherapeutic agent, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, a protease inhibitor, an antiangiogenic agent, and/or an immunomodulatory agent in participants with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
NCT01657955 ↗ Bendamustine Hydrochloride Injection for Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Unknown status Shandong Lanjin Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd Phase 3 2011-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether bendamustine is effective in the treatment of initial treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Leukeran

Condition Name

Condition Name for Leukeran
Intervention Trials
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 3
Mantle Cell Lymphoma 2
Neoplasms 1
B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Leukeran
Intervention Trials
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell 5
Leukemia 5
Leukemia, Lymphoid 5
Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Leukeran

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Leukeran
Location Trials
United States 62
United Kingdom 21
Brazil 5
Australia 4
Russian Federation 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Leukeran
Location Trials
Washington 3
Texas 3
New York 3
Missouri 3
California 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Leukeran

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Leukeran
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Leukeran
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Unknown status 2
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Leukeran

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Leukeran
Sponsor Trials
Celgene 2
Celgene Corporation 2
Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Leukeran
Sponsor Trials
Industry 10
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Transforming Leukemia Treatment: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections for LEUKERAN and Related Therapies

Introduction to LEUKERAN and Its Role in Leukemia Treatment

LEUKERAN, also known as Chlorambucil, is a chemotherapy drug that has been used for decades in the treatment of various types of leukemia, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While it remains a staple in some treatment regimens, the landscape of leukemia therapies is evolving rapidly with the emergence of new, more targeted treatments.

Current Clinical Trials Involving Chlorambucil

Acalabrutinib vs Chlorambucil plus Rituximab

One significant clinical trial that involves Chlorambucil is the Phase 3 study comparing Acalabrutinib with Chlorambucil plus Rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL. This study, identified as NCT04075292, randomizes patients to either receive Acalabrutinib orally twice daily or Chlorambucil orally combined with Rituximab via IV infusion for six cycles[1][4].

  • Key Findings: Acalabrutinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the Chlorambucil plus Rituximab combination. The study showed a 92% risk reduction of disease progression or death with Acalabrutinib, highlighting its superior efficacy[4].

Market Analysis of Leukemia Therapeutics

Global Market Size and Growth

The global leukemia drug market is experiencing substantial growth. As of 2023, the market size was estimated at USD 17.34 billion and is projected to reach USD 29.05 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 9.0% from 2024 to 2030[5].

Drivers of Market Growth

Several factors are driving this growth:

  • Advancements in Treatment: Breakthroughs in cancer therapeutics, particularly the development of targeted therapies like BTK inhibitors (e.g., Acalabrutinib, Brukinsa), are significantly impacting the market[3][5].
  • Aging Population: The increasing elderly population, which is more susceptible to leukemia, is another key driver[5].
  • Government Funding: Active funding from governments to support clinical trials and innovation in cancer research is also contributing to market growth[5].

Market Projections and Future Trends

Emerging Therapies

The market is expected to be driven by the launch of new therapies:

  • BTK Inhibitors: Drugs like Jaypirca and nemtabrutinib, which are non-covalent BTK inhibitors, are anticipated to launch in key markets and will be effective against BTK mutations, further driving sales[3].
  • Combination Therapies: The approval of already marketed targeted therapies like Calquence and Venclexta in combination is expected to enhance treatment outcomes and market growth[3].

Regional Impact

The anticipated launch of Brukinsa in Japan and its continued uptake in the US and EU will also contribute to the market's expansion[3].

Comparison of Chlorambucil with Newer Therapies

Efficacy and Safety

While Chlorambucil remains an option, newer therapies like Acalabrutinib have shown superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile. Acalabrutinib's ability to significantly reduce the risk of disease progression and its tolerable toxicity profile make it a preferred choice for many patients[4].

Patient Outcomes

The improved progression-free survival rates and overall response rates seen with Acalabrutinib compared to Chlorambucil plus Rituximab indicate better patient outcomes with the newer therapy[4].

Conclusion

The leukemia drug market is undergoing a significant transformation with the emergence of targeted therapies. While Chlorambucil remains a part of some treatment regimens, clinical trials and market projections indicate a shift towards more effective and safer treatments like Acalabrutinib.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Acalabrutinib has shown superior efficacy compared to Chlorambucil plus Rituximab in Phase 3 trials.
  • Market Growth: The global leukemia drug market is expected to grow significantly, driven by new therapies and an aging population.
  • Emerging Therapies: BTK inhibitors and combination therapies are key drivers of market growth.
  • Patient Outcomes: Newer therapies offer improved patient outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety.

FAQs

What is the current status of the clinical trial comparing Acalabrutinib with Chlorambucil plus Rituximab?

The Phase 3 trial has demonstrated that Acalabrutinib significantly improves progression-free survival compared to Chlorambucil plus Rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL[4].

How is the global leukemia drug market expected to grow?

The market is projected to grow from USD 17.34 billion in 2023 to USD 29.05 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 9.0% from 2024 to 2030[5].

What are the key drivers of the leukemia drug market growth?

Key drivers include advancements in treatment, an increasing elderly population, and active government funding for clinical trials and innovation[5].

How do newer therapies like Acalabrutinib compare to Chlorambucil in terms of efficacy and safety?

Acalabrutinib has shown superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile compared to Chlorambucil plus Rituximab, making it a preferred treatment option for many patients[4].

What are some of the emerging therapies expected to impact the leukemia drug market?

Emerging therapies include non-covalent BTK inhibitors like Jaypirca and nemtabrutinib, as well as combination therapies involving drugs like Calquence and Venclexta[3].

Sources

  1. AstraZeneca Clinical Trials: Study of Acalabrutinib versus Chlorambucil plus Rituximab in Adult Subjects with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
  2. PR Newswire: Global $22 Billion Leukemia Drug Market to 2025.
  3. GlobalData: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Market Report Overview.
  4. ASH Conference: Acalabrutinib Versus Chlorambucil Plus Rituximab in Patients with Treatment-Naive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
  5. NextMSC: Leukemia Therapeutics Market Analysis | 2024-2030.
Last updated: 2025-01-05

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.