Last Updated: August 18, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed McMaster University Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container

Condition Name

Condition Name for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 4
Myocardial Infarction 4
Healthy 4
Covid19 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 13
Acute Kidney Injury 7
Venous Thrombosis 7
COVID-19 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Location Trials
United States 44
China 17
Canada 14
Brazil 12
Spain 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Location Trials
California 7
New York 5
Texas 4
Ohio 3
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 48
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Unknown status 13
Withdrawn 10
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 5
GlaxoSmithKline 5
Azidus Brasil 4
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container
Sponsor Trials
Other 152
Industry 36
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units in 0.9% Sodium Chloride (Plastic Container): Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast

Last updated: April 30, 2026

What is the product and how is it positioned commercially?

Product description. The target is heparin sodium 25,000 Units supplied in 0.9% sodium chloride in a plastic container. This is a ready-to-use, parenteral anticoagulant formulation used in hospital settings for anticoagulation in procedures and for certain therapeutic indications, with dosing and administration governed by clinical protocols and patient-specific risk.

Market positioning. Heparin sodium injection is generally sold in institutional and hospital channels rather than via outpatient retail. Demand is driven by:

  • acute care volume (cardiology, vascular surgery, ICU)
  • dialysis and catheter-related anticoagulation practices
  • peri-procedural anticoagulation protocols
  • payer and hospital formulary decisions for low-cost, widely available anticoagulants

Reference point for pricing power. Because the active substance (heparin sodium) is a mature, widely manufactured anticoagulant, most product-level variation is concentrated in:

  • package form (plastic container vs glass)
  • unit strength and final concentration
  • distribution agreements and hospital contracting
  • supply reliability and regulatory compliance

What does the clinical trials landscape show for heparin sodium?

Clinical relevance of heparin sodium. Heparin is a well-established anticoagulant with extensive historical use, and the most active modern research often focuses on:

  • dosing strategies and monitoring approaches
  • comparative effectiveness versus other anticoagulants (LMWH, DOACs in selected settings, direct thrombin inhibitors)
  • special populations and peri-procedural protocols

Trial activity signal. Public clinical trial registries show frequent interventional studies using heparin sodium as:

  • bridging anticoagulation
  • anticoagulant support during procedures
  • comparator arm against newer agents

Key point for this specific formulation (heparin sodium in 0.9% saline, plastic). Clinical programs rarely develop brand-new evidence specifically tied to the container and diluent once the active ingredient and route are established, unless:

  • bioavailability is at issue (typically not for standard parenteral solutions)
  • there is a formulation change that affects stability or handling
  • it is used as part of a device/drug delivery system

Because the request is for “clinical trials update” tied to a specific packaged strength and diluent form, the practical expectation in the market is that the clinical evidence base is predominantly heparin sodium as a molecule and class, with product-level updates focused on manufacturing, stability, and labeling rather than stand-alone randomized efficacy trials.

What is the current regulatory and labeling posture impacting competition?

Regulatory context. Heparin sodium injection products are subject to manufacturing controls, sterility, and stability requirements. For clinicians and hospitals, the practical drivers for selection remain:

  • supply continuity
  • cost per unit of anticoagulant
  • compatibility with infusion systems and institutional protocols
  • lab monitoring requirements and reversal/management pathways

Container matters operationally. Plastic containers can reduce particulate and handling risks compared with legacy presentations (varies by jurisdiction and manufacturing history). Hospitals also standardize on IV-ready formats that align with pharmacy workflows, which supports continued procurement of ready-to-use heparin formulations in solution.

What does the market analysis indicate for heparin sodium injection?

Demand drivers

Heparin demand is anchored by high-frequency clinical contexts:

  • acute coronary syndromes and cardiology procedures
  • venous thromboembolism management and bridging regimens
  • perioperative anticoagulation
  • hemodialysis anticoagulation strategies
  • ECMO and extracorporeal circulation protocols (heparin is commonly used, though practice varies by site)

Competitive landscape

Primary competitive set.

  • LMWH products (less frequent dosing and different risk profile in many indications)
  • alternative parenteral anticoagulants (e.g., direct thrombin inhibitors where appropriate)
  • DOACs in outpatient and selected inpatient contexts where guideline-appropriate

Heparin’s competitive advantage.

  • entrenched clinician familiarity
  • broad hospital access and protocol integration
  • reversibility with protamine
  • mature supply chains for the active molecule

Procurement and contracting economics

For heparin sodium in plastic containers, hospital procurement tends to price on:

  • contracted cost per unit strength
  • compliance and documentation
  • distribution reliability
  • substitution flexibility within formulary classes

This creates a market where brand differentiation is limited and manufacturing and supply execution drive share as much as clinical factors.

How should a market projection be constructed for this formulation?

Forecast logic for mature generics-class anticoagulants

For established anticoagulants with limited formulation-level clinical differentiation, a practical projection uses:

  1. growth in hospital procedures and acute care volume
  2. shifts in anticoagulant mix (LMWH uptake, DOAC penetration in certain settings)
  3. impact of manufacturing scale-up and supply constraints
  4. substitution within hospital formularies based on contracting

Directionally expected trajectory (2019-2024 trend to forward view)

Across major markets, heparin sodium generally shows stable-to-slightly growing unit volumes driven by aging and chronic disease burden, partially offset by:

  • migration to LMWH and DOACs where clinically appropriate
  • periodic substitution during shortages (which can amplify demand temporarily for compliant supply)

Because the active ingredient is entrenched, the most material near-term variability typically comes from supply and contracting dynamics, not from new efficacy outcomes.

Scenario projection (base case, 3-year horizon)

Without product-specific public unit sales for the exact “25,000 Units in 0.9% sodium chloride in plastic container” SKU, the correct approach in business planning is to model at the class level (heparin sodium injection) and map category volume to product’s packaging share. The expected outcome for a mature formulation is:

  • Base case: low single-digit market value growth, volume flattish to modestly up
  • Upside case: higher growth if supply stability favors this presentation or if contracted purchasing shifts toward IV-ready heparin formats
  • Downside case: category compression if formularies move further toward LMWH/DOACs or if procurement pricing pressures intensify

What are the highest-impact diligence points for investment or R&D decisions?

1) Is there a clinical “claim gap” for this exact packaged form?

Usually no. For a solution formulation in saline with standard heparin sodium activity, the evidence base tends to be molecule-level and labeled dosing. Diligence should focus on regulatory compliance, stability, and handling rather than planning for separate Phase 3 efficacy.

2) Manufacturing and supply execution

For hospital anticoagulants, supply continuity is a competitive advantage. If a manufacturer can maintain compliance and delivery during constrained periods, share gains can occur even without new clinical evidence.

3) Contracting and formulary insertion

This is the main path to volume. Buyers standardize by:

  • contract pricing
  • package compatibility (plastic bag, infusion system)
  • pharmacy workflow fit

4) Labeling and traceability requirements

Heparin products require robust documentation for batch-level traceability. Any execution risk (sterility assurance, particulate control, stability drift) can block procurement even with low cost.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical evidence for heparin sodium is molecule-driven; stand-alone clinical development for the “25,000 Units in 0.9% saline, plastic container” format is uncommon.
  • Market demand is hospital-led and tied to acute care and procedural anticoagulation protocols.
  • Competitive dynamics are largely procurement- and supply-execution driven, with pressure from LMWH and DOAC substitution in specific indications.
  • Forecast expectation is stable to modest growth in value with low-to-mid single-digit category movement, depending on contracting and supply conditions.
  • For product-level strategy, the highest-leverage diligence is manufacturing reliability, packaging fit, and hospital contracting, not new efficacy trials.

FAQs

1) Are new randomized trials expected specifically for heparin sodium in plastic saline for 25,000 Units?

Typically not. Most modern trial activity uses heparin as a comparator or standard-of-care anticoagulant rather than driving new efficacy claims tied to a specific ready-to-use packaging SKU.

2) What most affects hospital adoption of heparin sodium injection presentations?

Contract pricing, supply continuity, and packaging compatibility with institutional IV and pharmacy workflows.

3) How does DOAC or LMWH adoption affect heparin sodium demand?

It can reduce heparin use in some outpatient or guideline-selected contexts, but heparin remains embedded in acute care, bridging, and procedural settings.

4) What is the biggest commercial risk for a heparin product?

Supply interruptions and execution failures in manufacturing or regulatory compliance, which can force formulary exclusion and reorder delays.

5) What is the best way to forecast this specific SKU without public SKU-level sales?

Forecast at the heparin sodium injection category level, then map to packaging and strength share assumptions based on hospital purchasing patterns for IV-ready presentations.


References

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval and Related Information (heparin sodium labeling and related regulatory documents). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
[3] European Medicines Agency. EPAR search and public documents (heparin sodium-containing products). https://www.ema.europa.eu/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.