Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HEPARIN SODIUM 2,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Condition Name

Condition Name for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Intervention Trials
Healthy 4
Myocardial Infarction 4
Covid19 4
Thrombosis 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 13
Acute Kidney Injury 7
Venous Thrombosis 7
COVID-19 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Location Trials
United States 44
China 17
Canada 14
Brazil 12
Spain 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Location Trials
California 7
New York 5
Texas 4
Ohio 3
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 27
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Unknown status 13
Withdrawn 10
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 5
GlaxoSmithKline 5
Azidus Brasil 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Sponsor Trials
Other 152
Industry 36
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Projection for Heparin Sodium 2,000 Units in Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container

Last updated: May 4, 2026

What is this product and how is it used?

“Heparin sodium 2,000 units in dextrose 5% in plastic container” is a ready-to-administer parenteral preparation combining:

  • Heparin sodium (anticoagulant; typically used for line patency and anticoagulation support in clinical workflows)
  • Dextrose 5% (D5W) as the diluent/base
  • Packaged in a plastic container for infusion-related handling

In practice, these “heparinized” or “heparin-in-dextrose” formats are used in settings where standardized anticoagulant dosing and stable handling matter, including vascular access maintenance and peri-procedural anticoagulation protocols. Product-specific labeling and concentration details determine the exact indications and dosing regimens, but the clinical value proposition typically centers on consistent preparation, controlled concentration, and administration workflow.

What is the clinical trials update for this specific drug-product?

No complete, reliably citable, product-specific clinical trials update (by exact formulation and container configuration: “2,000 units in D5% in plastic container”) can be produced from the information available in this request. Clinical activity for heparin exists across many indications and formulations, but a defensible “trials update” tied to this exact packaged strength and solvent/container configuration requires direct evidence (trial registries, publications, or regulator postings) that is not present in the input.

How big is the market for heparin in D5W/ready-to-use formats?

A market-sizing response that is decision-grade for this exact product requires mapping to:

  • The correct ATC/therapeutic category coverage (heparin and anticoagulants)
  • The correct dosage form and packaging segment (parenteral, premixed solutions)
  • The correct geography and payer lens
  • The correct trade name / strength equivalence classes used by commercial databases

The request does not provide those mapping anchors, and producing market size and share for only this formulation without a traceable taxonomy risks misclassification (heparin is widely sold in multiple forms: vial strengths, prefilled syringes, premixed infusion solutions, catheter lock solutions, and institution-specific preparations). A precise market analysis therefore cannot be completed without the missing taxonomy and source-backed segmentation.

What demand drivers and regulatory forces shape heparin solution sales?

Even without product-specific trial or market sizing, industry drivers for heparin parenterals are consistent:

Demand drivers

  • Ongoing high-throughput use in hospital anticoagulation workflows (inpatient, procedural, and critical care)
  • Vascular access maintenance protocols that rely on standardized anticoagulant concentrations
  • Shift toward premixed/ready-to-administer products to reduce preparation error, variability, and nursing time

Supply and product-quality constraints

  • Heparin production is sensitive to raw material sourcing and manufacturing controls
  • Variation risk in heparin potency and trace impurity profiles has historically driven strict quality oversight
  • Sterility assurance and container-material compatibility are core to parenteral product performance

Regulation

Heparin and anticoagulants are regulated under standard parenteral safety frameworks. For product-market outcomes, the controlling elements are typically:

  • Facility and lot release compliance
  • Container closure integrity
  • Stability and shelf-life validation by solvent and container type

(These are process drivers. A quantified forecast cannot be generated without market baseline data.)

What is the competitive landscape?

This category is dominated by:

  • Large generic and branded parenteral manufacturers with established heparin production and packaging lines
  • Hospital supply contracts that prioritize cost, supply reliability, and administration standardization
  • Formulation differentiation (solution base, container material, and unit strength) that affects substitution decisions

For this specific “2,000 units in D5% in plastic container” strength, competitors would be other heparin-in-dextrose premixes or institutional substitutes used for the same workflow. Without a source-linked list of labeled alternatives by strength and solvent, any competitor table would be non-actionable.

What market projection can be provided?

No source-backed quantitative projection (CAGR, unit growth, revenue outlook by geography, or share changes) can be produced from the information provided. Heparin market trajectories vary materially based on:

  • biosafety and supply stability,
  • anticoagulation guideline shifts,
  • generic penetration and contract pricing,
  • hospital formulary dynamics,
  • and the extent to which premixed ready-to-use products replace manual preparation.

A projection must be anchored to a baseline dataset and segmentation logic that is not included in the request.


Key Takeaways

  • This product is a parenteral heparin sodium preparation in D5W, packaged in a plastic container, used in hospital anticoagulation and line/patency workflows.
  • A product-specific clinical trials update for the exact “2,000 units in D5% in plastic container” configuration cannot be produced from the provided input.
  • A decision-grade market analysis and projection also cannot be completed because the request lacks the taxonomy and source-backed market baseline needed to avoid misclassification across heparin forms.
  • For heparin solutions broadly, demand is driven by hospital anticoagulation workflow standardization, while outcomes are shaped by manufacturing, quality, and contract purchasing.

FAQs

  1. Is heparin sodium 2,000 units in D5% a standard anticoagulant infusion?
    It is a heparin-in-dextrose parenteral format; exact clinical use depends on the labeled indication and dosing workflow for the specific product package/strength.

  2. Are there clinical trials for heparin sodium premixed in D5W?
    Heparin has extensive trial history, but a trials update tied to this exact premix strength and container configuration requires product-specific evidence.

  3. What drives hospital demand for heparin premixes?
    Standardized administration, reduced preparation variability, and compatibility with catheter and peri-procedural protocols.

  4. How do contracts affect the market for this product?
    Hospital group purchasing and formulary decisions largely determine uptake and substitution among equivalent heparin solution formats.

  5. What typically impacts pricing and supply for heparin products?
    Manufacturing capacity, raw material sourcing, quality and lot release constraints, and generic competition under contract.


References

[1] (No cited sources were provided in the request.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.