Last Updated: July 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HALOBETASOL PROPIONATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Halobetasol Propionate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00715975 ↗ Effectiveness and Safety of Topical Halobetasol Propionate in the Treatment of Patients With Psoriasis Completed Azidus Brasil Phase 2/Phase 3 2008-07-01 The Psoriasis and a chronic dermatosis characterized by abnormal proliferation of cells epithelial, vessel dilation and inflammation locally, which presents erythematous-scaly lesions in various areas of the body, preferably in the scalp, region and religious joints as elbows and knees. It occurs equally in both sexes and can appear at any age, and the mean age for the onset of the disease and around 27.3 years. The halobetasol propionate and an ultra-potent corticoid. Its chemical structure and similar to the Clobetasol corticoid this, until then classified as the most potent corticoid used worldwide in clinical practice. However, the molecular structure of Halobetasol gives it increased its activity antiinflammatory and anti-proliferative. The objective of this study is evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of the drug Halobetasol propionate cream formulation as a treatment in patients with plaque psoriasis mild to moderate, compared to the substance of similar power, Clobetasol propionate - Psorex - Cream.
NCT00802958 ↗ Randomized Study to Compare the Bioavailability of Two Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Topical Ointments Completed Padagis LLC 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study was to compare the relative vasoconstrictive effects of test and reference Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Ointment in healthy, female subjects.
NCT00802958 ↗ Randomized Study to Compare the Bioavailability of Two Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Topical Ointments Completed Perrigo Company 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study was to compare the relative vasoconstrictive effects of test and reference Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Ointment in healthy, female subjects.
NCT00803166 ↗ Randomized Study to Compare the Bioavailability of Three Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Topical Creams Completed Padagis LLC 2004-01-01 The purpose of this study was to compare the relative vasoconstrictive effects of two test and one reference Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Cream in healthy, female subjects.
NCT00803166 ↗ Randomized Study to Compare the Bioavailability of Three Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Topical Creams Completed Perrigo Company 2004-01-01 The purpose of this study was to compare the relative vasoconstrictive effects of two test and one reference Halobetasol Propionate 0.05% Cream in healthy, female subjects.
NCT00865267 ↗ The Dose-response Study of Topically Delivered Halobetasol Propionate Ointment in Normal Skin in Healthy Adult Subjects Completed Actavis Inc. Phase 1 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the duration of application of halobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment to be used in a definitive study of bioequivalence of to formulations of this ointment. Part A: To validate vasoconstrictor assay precision. Part B: To evaluate the dose response vasoconstriction profile of Ultravate® 0.05% ointment at different dose durations over a short period of time (0.17 - 4 hrs).
NCT00865605 ↗ Pivotal Bioequivalence Study of Topically Delivered Halobetasol Propionate Ointment in Normal Skin in Healthy Adult Subjects Completed Actavis Inc. Phase 1 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the vasoconstriction response profile and bioequivalence between one innovator lot of Ultravate® 0.05% ointment and one test/generic lot of Halobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment (Alpharma USPD, Inc.).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Halobetasol Propionate

Condition Name

Condition Name for Halobetasol Propionate
Intervention Trials
Plaque Psoriasis 9
Healthy 4
Psoriasis 4
Hemorrhoids 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Halobetasol Propionate
Intervention Trials
Psoriasis 14
Dermatitis, Atopic 1
Dermatitis 1
Acne Keloid 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Halobetasol Propionate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Halobetasol Propionate
Location Trials
United States 67
Poland 1
Brazil 1
Georgia 1
Panama 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Halobetasol Propionate
Location Trials
California 10
Florida 7
Texas 5
New York 4
Michigan 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Halobetasol Propionate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Halobetasol Propionate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Halobetasol Propionate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Recruiting 4
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Halobetasol Propionate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Halobetasol Propionate
Sponsor Trials
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. 5
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited 3
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 3
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Halobetasol Propionate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 25
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 27, 2026

Halobetasol Propionate Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (2026-2036)

Halobetasol propionate is an established, off-patent topical corticosteroid used for inflammatory dermatoses. For 2026-2036, near-term growth is driven by bundle-style maintenance prescribing, retail formulary inclusion, and substitution within the topical steroid class, not by new active-substance entrants. Market expansion is concentrated in higher-uptake geographies where low-to-mid potency steroid access is constrained and where physicians rely on higher-potency agents for short courses. Clinical-trial activity remains dominated by generic/“improved” topical submissions, bioequivalence-style studies, and locally relevant formulation work rather than first-in-class mechanism research.

What clinical trials are ongoing or recently completed for halobetasol propionate?

Latest observable clinical-trials pattern (by category). For halobetasol propionate, recent and ongoing “trials” in public registries typically cluster into:

  • Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies for generic halobetasol propionate creams, ointments, lotions, foams, and sprays.
  • Local tolerability and skin safety studies for different vehicle systems.
  • Pediatric or special-population studies focused on safety monitoring for topical corticosteroid exposure.
  • Device-adjacent studies for foam/spray applicators that affect dose delivery consistency.

Featured snippet answer: Halobetasol propionate clinical development is largely regulatory-led (BE/local safety) rather than new mechanism R&D, so “updates” generally map to formulation changes and local skin safety outcomes.

Which trial outcomes matter commercially for halobetasol propionate?

For commercial decisioning, the most actionable readouts are:

  • Evidence of consistent dosing delivery by vehicle (especially foam vs. ointment vs. lotion).
  • Systemic exposure signals from improved formulations (peak plasma cortisol suppression or HPA-axis markers when studied).
  • Local tolerability: erythema, burning/stinging, atrophy signals, contact dermatitis incidence in repeated-use designs.
  • Pediatric safety guardrails where included: duration limits, surface-area controls, and follow-up monitoring intensity.

What does “completion” usually imply for market impact?

Completion of BE/local-safety studies for halobetasol propionate typically supports:

  • Faster ANDA commercialization timing under FDA’s abbreviated pathway.
  • Claiming interchangeable product equivalence, which strengthens payer substitution and wholesaler shelf consolidation.
  • Vehicle-based differentiation that competes on patient adherence rather than on clinical superiority.

How does halobetasol propionate fit into the topical corticosteroid market?

Halobetasol propionate sits in the higher-potency tier of topical corticosteroids, competing with other super-high and high-potency steroids on:

  • Strength-to-efficacy expectations.
  • Safety framing for short-course use (barrier atrophy risk, systemic absorption risk).
  • Prescriber comfort with rapid suppression of erythema and pruritus in limited areas.

Key competitive set

Commercial substitution commonly occurs across the topical steroid class, including:

  • Other ultra-/high-potency corticosteroids (cream/ointment/lotion formats).
  • Short-course combination products where they exist (depending on country approvals).
  • Off-label use patterns where alternative steroids are selected based on patient history and site of application.

Featured snippet answer: Halobetasol propionate competes primarily by vehicle, dosing convenience, and formulary positioning within the high-potency topical steroid segment.

Why vehicle matters in this category

Vehicle-level differences drive adherence and usage duration:

  • Ointments: occlusion and efficacy for thick plaques; higher perceived greasiness.
  • Creams: easier spreading; less occlusive; common for mixed skin surfaces.
  • Lotions: scalp/wet-area usability; lower residue.
  • Foams/sprays: improved application speed and patient acceptance for hair-bearing sites.

What is the halobetasol propionate market size and growth outlook?

Market sizing approach (category-level). The topical corticosteroid market grows with:

  • Chronic dermatology prevalence (eczema, psoriasis, lichen planus variants).
  • Periodic exacerbation cycles driving repeat prescriptions.
  • Switch patterns from brand to generics that stabilize unit demand but lower pricing.
  • Regulatory tightening on topical steroid safety messaging that can influence prescriber behavior and duration.

Featured snippet answer: Halobetasol propionate’s unit demand is resilient because it is used for flares and refractory localized disease, but value growth depends mainly on mix shifts and pricing discipline across generics.

2026-2031 growth drivers

  • Formulary stabilization: Multiple generic equivalents keep access broad.
  • Vehicle mix shift: Foam/spray improves adherence and can increase duration per episode.
  • Healthcare system penetration: Increased dermatologist access and guideline adoption in certain regions supports appropriate short-course use.
  • Retail channel conversion: Higher-potency topical steroids maintain consistent shelf availability.

2031-2036 maturity factors

  • Pricing pressure and commoditization intensify across generic versions.
  • Differentiation migrates to packaging, dosing devices, and claims around ease-of-use rather than efficacy.
  • Substitution within class reduces the share impact of any single supplier absent meaningful formulation/route differentiation.

What is the forecast for halobetasol propionate revenue and volume through 2036?

Base-case projection (category framework).

  • Volume: Low-to-mid single-digit CAGR driven by ongoing dermatology utilization and episodic use cycles.
  • Value: Near/low single-digit CAGR driven by generic price erosion offset by vehicle mix and channel penetration.

Scenario bands (practical ranges for planning).

  • Downside: Continued price compression and reduced episode duration lead to flat-to-low growth.
  • Base: Volume expansion offsets modest price decline.
  • Upside: Stronger foam/spray uptake and higher patient persistence lifts unit demand and value.

Featured snippet answer: Expect volume growth to outpace value growth because pricing in topical steroids compresses while usage frequency stays stable.

What patents protect halobetasol propionate, and when do they expire?

Halobetasol propionate is a mature active ingredient. In major regulated markets (notably the US), the foundational composition and early process protection has long since lapsed, leaving:

  • Remaining lifecycle patents tied to specific formulations, vehicles, and manufacturing processes in certain regions.
  • Potential method-of-use, dosing regimen, or delivery-device patents for particular marketed versions, if any.

Featured snippet answer: Patent protection is now largely product-specific and jurisdiction-specific, with most competitive pressure driven by generic substitution rather than active-substance exclusivity.

Where patent strategy usually still exists

  • Foam/spray delivery systems with specific excipient blends and stability/performance attributes.
  • Manufacturing process patents that reduce impurities or improve particle behavior.
  • Formulation patents that target skin feel and spreadability tied to particular excipient systems.

What is the Orange Book status of halobetasol propionate in the US?

Orange Book reality for mature topical steroids: US FDA Orange Book listings typically show multiple ANDA products for halobetasol propionate with the active ingredient widely available. For a current “status by product” view, each marketed strength and dosage form has its own listing structure, expiration references, and patent codes.

Featured snippet answer: The Orange Book is expected to show extensive generic entries with limited remaining patent barriers, so commercial risk concentrates on product-specific formulation/manufacturing patents and any still-listed, code-linked patents.

How to map Orange Book to commercial risk

For investors and licensing teams, the practical mapping is:

  • Identify which halobetasol propionate strengths/dosage forms still carry listed patents.
  • Check patent codes tied to the formulation versus method-of-use versus packaging/device.
  • Compare remaining legal life versus intended ANDA or 505(b)(2) launch timeline.

Which companies are selling halobetasol propionate generics, and where do they differentiate?

Differentiation is typically not via the active ingredient but via:

  • Vehicle (cream vs ointment vs lotion vs foam).
  • Packaging and patient instructions.
  • Supply reliability and contract manufacturing capacity.
  • Tender pricing and pharmacy benefit manager access.

Featured snippet answer: Most market competition is between generic manufacturers competing on vehicle-specific products and contract terms.

Commercial levers with highest impact

  • Payer contracts: preferred formulary positioning reduces churn.
  • Wholesale terms: inventory turnover and shelf presence.
  • Dermatology channel: sampling and rep support for vehicle choices that fit scalp or plaque presentation.

What generic entry risks exist for halobetasol propionate?

Given the age of the active ingredient, “generic entry risk” focuses on:

  • Remaining formulation/manufacturing patents tied to certain marketed versions.
  • Potential exclusivity-like protections tied to specific NDA holders or specific strengths/dosage forms if any still exist in certain jurisdictions (rare for mature actives).
  • Litigation risk if a newer formulation has an active patent estate.

Featured snippet answer: Generic risk is mainly product-version-specific, not active-ingredient-wide.

What would block or delay an entry?

  • A still-in-force patent asserted in litigation against a competitor’s ANDA that maps to the same formulation/vehicle.
  • A need to redesign excipient composition or manufacturing steps to avoid infringement.
  • Regulatory delays due to product quality issues or stability requalification.

What formulation and vehicle innovations could drive future trials and demand?

The next competitive wave in topical corticosteroids tends to center on:

  • Improved delivery systems for hair-bearing areas (scalp-first usability).
  • Reduced residue and faster absorption vehicles.
  • Better patient comfort to improve adherence and thus sustained flare control.
  • Safety-focused excipient blends that reduce stinging and improve tolerability for repeated use.

Featured snippet answer: Demand upside is most plausible from vehicle changes that increase adherence and simplify dosing for plaques and scalp lesions.

How strong is the patent estate for halobetasol propionate versus other topical steroids?

For market entry and litigation planning:

  • Halobetasol propionate’s estate strength is generally lower than newer topical dermatology actives because the active ingredient is mature.
  • Remaining strength, where it exists, is concentrated in specific formulation and manufacturing improvements rather than broad composition coverage.

Featured snippet answer: The patent landscape is usually more permissive than in newer dermatology therapeutics, making licensing and litigation less central to entry than for newer first-in-class drugs.

What does settlement and Paragraph IV litigation look like for halobetasol propionate?

Because the active ingredient is mature and multiple generics are entrenched, Paragraph IV litigation tends to be:

  • Episodic and product-specific (newer vehicle formulations).
  • Less frequent than in pipeline therapeutics where brand exclusivity still constrains generic entry.

Featured snippet answer: Litigation is typically not the primary driver of market share for halobetasol propionate. Product/version-specific patent disputes can still occur but are not expected to dominate class-level dynamics.

Regulatory questions: what FDA pathway governs generic halobetasol propionate?

Commercial expectation: Most halobetasol propionate generics use ANDA pathways referencing listed reference products for the same dosage form and strength, supported by BE studies and quality system compliance. Novel formulation applicants may use 505(b)(2) if relying on data beyond reference labeling.

Featured snippet answer: Entry is usually ANDA-based, with BE/local tolerability and chemistry/manufacturing controls determining timeline more than clinical development.

What regulatory timelines drive launch execution?

  • BE study conduct and statistical readiness.
  • CMC dossier completeness and inspection schedule alignment.
  • Labeling negotiations that align with safety duration language and vehicle-specific instructions.

Market positioning: how does halobetasol propionate compare with alternative high-potency topical steroids?

Competitive comparison framework

  • Potency and flare control speed: typically similar within the class when appropriately applied.
  • Safety messaging and clinician confidence: depends on published label experience and dosing limitations.
  • Vehicle match: scalp and flexure management often determines selection.

Featured snippet answer: Differences tend to be practical (vehicle usability, residue, adherence) rather than clinically distinct efficacy profiles.

Where halobetasol propionate can win share

  • Hair-bearing application convenience through foam/lotion formats.
  • Formulary placement for short-course flare management.
  • Patient preference driven by stinging reduction or improved spreading.

Key Takeaways

  • Halobetasol propionate clinical activity is primarily formulation and regulatory execution (BE and local safety), not active-substance innovation.
  • Market growth to 2036 is expected to be volume-led with value constrained by generic price compression.
  • Patent and Orange Book barriers are primarily product- and vehicle-specific; generic competition remains the dominant force.
  • Future demand upside is most plausible from vehicle improvements that increase adherence and match application sites like scalp and plaque distribution.

FAQs

  1. How do foam versus ointment formulations of halobetasol propionate affect patient adherence and dosing frequency?
  2. What are the HPA-axis or systemic absorption monitoring endpoints typically used in topical corticosteroid clinical studies?
  3. Which topical steroid excipient changes most often trigger regulatory re-bridging or additional bioequivalence work?
  4. How do payers structure formulary tiering for high-potency topical corticosteroids like halobetasol propionate?
  5. What are the most common CMC failure points for ANDA approval of topical semi-solids and how do they impact launch timing?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (FDA database).
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for halobetasol propionate. (ClinicalTrials.gov).
  3. FDA. ANDA Guidance for Industry: Bioequivalence Studies for Human Drug Products. (FDA guidance documents).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.