Last Updated: May 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Gadoterate Meglumine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00650845 ↗ Renal Safety Evaluation After Dotarem®-Enhanced MRI Completed Guerbet Phase 4 2008-01-01 Although there is a well documented risk of acute renal failure with the iodinated contrast agents, the implication of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents in nephrotoxicity remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem®) in patients with chronic renal insufficiency by evaluating the rate of patients experiencing contrast-induced nephrotoxicity following the injection of gadoterate meglumine.
NCT01010932 ↗ Carotid and Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) Study Comparing Dotarem and Time Of Flight (TOF) Completed Guerbet Phase 3 2009-10-01 The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dotarem enhanced MRA in patients suffering from carotid or vertebral arterial disease.
NCT01012674 ↗ Carotid and Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) Study Comparing Dotarem and Time Of Flight (TOF) Completed Guerbet Phase 3 2009-10-01 The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dotarem enhanced MRA in patients suffering from carotid or vertebral arterial disease.
NCT01254552 ↗ Assessment With CCTA and MRI in Asymptomatic Patients With Type 2 Diabetes for Detection of Unrecognized Myocardial Scar in Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis Completed Guerbet Phase 4 2010-08-01 The study aimed to prospectively investigate the prevalence of myocardial scar on Dotarem-enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in asymptomatic patients with type-2 Diabetes Mellitus and to assess its correlation with subclinical coronary artery disease on Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Gadoterate Meglumine

Condition Name

Condition Name for Gadoterate Meglumine
Intervention Trials
Cerebral Arterial Diseases 2
Contrast Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2
Breast Diseases 2
Non-central Nervous System Pathology 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Gadoterate Meglumine
Intervention Trials
Cerebral Arterial Diseases 2
Renal Insufficiency 2
Breast Diseases 2
Breast Neoplasms 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Gadoterate Meglumine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Gadoterate Meglumine
Location Trials
United States 37
Japan 20
China 9
Germany 9
Italy 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Gadoterate Meglumine
Location Trials
Illinois 5
Massachusetts 4
California 3
North Carolina 3
Texas 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Gadoterate Meglumine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Gadoterate Meglumine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 6
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Gadoterate Meglumine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 7
Completed 7
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Gadoterate Meglumine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Gadoterate Meglumine
Sponsor Trials
Guerbet 12
Bayer 2
GEHC (Sponsor) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Gadoterate Meglumine
Sponsor Trials
Industry 16
Other 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Gadoterate Meglumine Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Patent-Driven Projections (US/EU)

Last updated: May 20, 2026

Executive summary: Gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA; Dotarem, Guerbet) is an established MRI contrast agent in the gadolinium chelate class. The market remains steady in routine imaging and is shaped by (1) product competition among other macrocyclic gadolinium agents (eg, gadobutrol, gadoteridol, gadoterate vs. newer regional brands), (2) regulatory constraints centered on NSF class-wide messaging about gadolinium deposition risk, and (3) device- and workflow-driven adoption in radiology. Clinical development activity for gadoterate meglumine in new indications is limited relative to the class, so near-term growth is driven primarily by penetration in existing MRI pathways, site procurement, and substitution dynamics rather than by major late-stage label expansions.

What is gadoterate meglumine and what is its current clinical development status?

Plain answer: Gadoterate meglumine is a gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent using a macrocyclic chelator (Gd-DOTA). The drug’s core clinical use is intravascular contrast enhancement for MRI, with the label reflecting established imaging indications rather than broad pipeline expansion.

How do current clinical trials for gadoterate meglumine typically look

Most incremental activity for older contrast agents tends to cluster around:

  • Comparative imaging performance in specific anatomical workflows
  • Safety follow-ups in real-world practice and registry-style postmarketing studies
  • Pharmacovigilance evaluations tied to class safety updates
  • Formulation or presentation changes (strengths, vial/syringe formats, packaging for throughput)

What is the expected pace of label expansion

For gadoterate meglumine specifically, label expansion is generally not the dominant driver. Market growth typically tracks:

  • MRI utilization growth
  • Switchovers between competing gadolinium chelates under tendering
  • Patient safety protocol adoption after gadolinium class-wide deposition risk communications

How big is the gadoterate meglumine market and what drives demand?

Plain answer: Demand tracks MRI contrast utilization and radiology throughput. Growth is constrained by mature market status and procurement-driven price compression, while supported by global MRI procedure growth and preference for macrocyclic chelates under modern safety frameworks.

Key demand drivers

  • MRI volume growth: Higher MRI adoption across outpatient and hospital settings
  • Macrocyclic preference: Macrocyclic chelators are favored in many safety protocols relative to linear agents
  • Workflow fit: Contrast administration protocols, injection system compatibility, and scan turnaround time
  • Tender dynamics: Radiology group purchasing pressures, especially in competitive markets

Competitive set that influences market share

Gadoterate meglumine is measured against other macrocyclic gadolinium agents and in-country alternatives. Competitive relevance is high because switching is usually not clinically complex for most routine MRI indications.

What is the Orange Book status of gadoterate meglumine and how does exclusivity end?

Plain answer: Gadoterate meglumine is a drug product with brand ownership historically tied to Guerbet. The exclusivity and patent timeline determines generic substitution windows in markets where generic pathways apply.

How to think about exclusivity for contrast agents

Contrast agents often face:

  • Composition-of-matter and chelate-related patent families
  • Formulation and presentation patents (packaging, concentration, stability)
  • Use and method-of-use patents in limited scenarios
  • Regulatory exclusivity that varies by jurisdiction and approval history

Market impact of exclusivity

Where exclusivity has cleared, competition usually manifests as:

  • Lower acquisition cost generics
  • Tender-based share shifts
  • Sustained volume via substitution rather than via incremental indication expansion

Which patents protect gadoterate meglumine and what barriers exist for generic entry?

Plain answer: Patent barriers in gadoterate meglumine are typically concentrated in early families (composition, manufacture) and later in formulation/presentation. In many mature contrast agents, core barriers have largely cleared, leaving formulation and manufacturing controls as practical constraints.

Common patent clusters for gadolinium chelates

  • Chelate synthesis / composition
  • Solid state / stability
  • Manufacturing method controls
  • Container-closure and presentation formats
  • Imaging use claims (less frequent for older contrast agents)

How litigation and freedom-to-operate usually affect entry

For contrast agents, the market tends to be shaped more by:

  • Clearance of composition claims
  • Ability to meet chemistry, manufacturing, and controls
  • Safety documentation equivalence than by protracted indication-driven patent fights

What generic entry risks exist for gadoterate meglumine?

Plain answer: Generic entry risk is high where primary patents and regulatory exclusivity are past expiry, with the main remaining friction being manufacturing quality, equivalence, and regulatory review.

Entry pathway dynamics

  • Where brand exclusivity ends, competitive pressure usually arrives quickly through generics or authorized alternatives
  • In tendered hospital systems, substitution is often rapid once supply and safety acceptance are established

What is the biosimilar risk for gadoterate meglumine?

Plain answer: Biosimilar risk does not apply in the standard sense because gadoterate meglumine is a small-molecule contrast agent, not a biologic.

How does gadoterate meglumine compare with other gadolinium MRI contrast agents (gadobutrol, gadoteridol, etc.)?

Plain answer: Clinically, substitution is common across macrocyclic gadolinium chelates for routine MRI. Differences that influence procurement and label preference often involve:

  • Dosing convenience (concentration and injection volume)
  • Pharmacokinetics and relaxivity performance claims
  • Local regulatory approvals and contracted pricing
  • Safety messaging alignment and institutional protocols

Procurement-facing differentiators

  • Acquisition cost per scan
  • Supply reliability and vial/syringe format compatibility
  • Radiology committee preference based on prior experience and safety governance

What clinical trial updates matter most for gadoterate meglumine (safety and imaging performance)?

Plain answer: The highest commercial relevance trial data typically relates to:

  • Safety monitoring outcomes aligned to class gadolinium deposition concerns
  • Imaging performance consistency in routine anatomical use
  • Real-world tolerability and discontinuation rates

What endpoints generally get prioritized

  • Incidence of adverse events during and after MRI administration
  • Renal impairment subgroup outcomes where applicable
  • Diagnostic quality scores and contrast enhancement adequacy
  • Signal stability across scan protocols

How do FDA regulatory milestones affect gadoterate meglumine market uptake?

Plain answer: Regulatory status influences procurement through:

  • Label confidence in dosing and indications
  • Safety communications acceptance
  • Market availability and manufacturing compliance history

How safety communications shape utilization

Class-wide gadolinium deposition messaging affects:

  • Patient risk stratification protocols
  • Renal function screening behaviors
  • Use frequency decisions for noncritical exams

What market projection scenarios apply to gadoterate meglumine through 2030?

Plain answer: With limited new-indication catalyst risk, projections are shaped by MRI volume growth plus price pressure from competitive macrocyclic chelates and generics where eligible. Base-case expectations are steady growth in volume with flattish or modestly declining pricing.

Scenario framework

  • Base case: Volume growth tracks MRI procedure growth; pricing erodes slowly due to competition and tendering
  • Downside: Accelerated substitution to lower-cost macrocyclic competitors and/or generics once cleared in major markets
  • Upside: Contract wins in health systems favoring a specific macrocyclic agent plus stable reimbursement patterns

What drives the slope

  • Hospital tender schedules and multi-year purchasing contracts
  • Regulatory actions affecting product availability
  • Supply disruptions or manufacturing scale constraints by incumbent and generic entrants

What commercial projection is most likely by region?

Plain answer: Market maturity suggests regional outcomes diverge based on generic penetration timing, tender practices, and radiology guideline adoption.

US

  • Pricing pressure is shaped by competitive supply and any generic availability once cleared
  • Utilization remains supported by entrenched MRI contrast workflows

EU/UK

  • Reimbursement and tendering govern brand vs. generic share
  • Safety protocol alignment maintains steady demand for macrocyclic agents

Emerging markets

  • Growth tied to expanding MRI installations and hospital adoption
  • Competitive procurement can shift fast once multiple macrocyclic options and generics are available

How strong is the patent estate for gadoterate meglumine in major markets?

Plain answer: Strength is typically highest in early composition and manufacturing families. For an established contrast agent, market dynamics usually hinge on remaining late-life formulation/presentation patents and on whether core barriers have expired in each jurisdiction.

Where patent strength most affects commercialization

  • Packaging and stability patents can restrict certain generic presentations
  • Manufacturing process claims can create compliance friction for entrants
  • Use claims are less commonly the primary barrier for routine gadolinium contrast use

What patent litigation affects gadoterate meglumine commercialization?

Plain answer: For gadolinium contrast agents of this maturity, litigation typically does not drive annual market share as strongly as tender competition and regulatory/CMC equivalence. When disputes occur, outcomes generally influence the timing of generic availability rather than clinical adoption.

Key Takeaways

  • Gadoterate meglumine is a mature, entrenched MRI contrast agent; near-term market growth is driven mainly by MRI procedure volume and procurement dynamics rather than large late-stage label expansions.
  • Clinical development activity is usually incremental, with safety and routine imaging performance endpoints holding the most commercial relevance.
  • Patent and regulatory status determine generic substitution windows; where core barriers have cleared, competition tends to shift share via tender pricing and supply access.
  • Macrocyclic class preferences support baseline demand, while deposition-related safety messaging constrains utilization patterns in higher-risk patient groups.
  • Projections through 2030 are most consistent with steady volume growth and ongoing price pressure, with regional divergence driven by generic penetration timing and tender practices.

FAQs

1) Will gadoterate meglumine face significant substitution from other macrocyclic gadolinium agents?
Yes, substitution is common across macrocyclic agents in routine MRI, with tender pricing and workflow fit typically determining share.

2) Are there any clinically meaningful biosimilar risks for gadoterate meglumine?
No. It is a small-molecule contrast agent, not a biologic.

3) What trial endpoints most influence procurement decisions for gadolinium contrast agents?
Adverse event rates, renal subgroup tolerability, and diagnostic image quality or enhancement consistency.

4) How do gadolinium deposition safety communications change real-world utilization?
They increase screening and risk stratification behaviors, particularly for renal impairment, which can dampen usage in higher-risk scenarios.

5) What timing factors most affect generic entry economics for gadoterate meglumine?
Patent expiry and remaining formulation/presentation restrictions, plus regulatory/CMC approval timelines and supply readiness.

References

  1. FDA. Drug Safety Communications and class-wide gadolinium deposition safety communications (website content).
  2. EMA. PRAC and related safety updates on gadolinium-containing contrast agents (website content).
  3. Orange Book (FDA). Listing for gadoterate meglumine products (database content).
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. Gadoterate meglumine study records (database content).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.