You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: July 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FOSAMAX PLUS D


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Fosamax Plus D

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000400 ↗ Alendronate and/or Parathyroid Hormone for Osteoporosis Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 2 1999-08-01 This study looks at the effects of two medications, alendronate and parathyroid hormone, on bone mass and on bone formation and bone breakdown in women with osteoporosis. We will randomly select postmenopausal women who have osteoporosis to receive laboratory-produced human parathyroid hormone (hPTH), or alendronate, or both for 2.5 years. Study participants will return to the study center periodically to have their bone mass measured and to give blood and urine samples for tests of bone formation and breakdown and for other laboratory tests. Those who complete the study are eligible for one or two 12 month extension studies.
NCT00000400 ↗ Alendronate and/or Parathyroid Hormone for Osteoporosis Completed Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 2 1999-08-01 This study looks at the effects of two medications, alendronate and parathyroid hormone, on bone mass and on bone formation and bone breakdown in women with osteoporosis. We will randomly select postmenopausal women who have osteoporosis to receive laboratory-produced human parathyroid hormone (hPTH), or alendronate, or both for 2.5 years. Study participants will return to the study center periodically to have their bone mass measured and to give blood and urine samples for tests of bone formation and breakdown and for other laboratory tests. Those who complete the study are eligible for one or two 12 month extension studies.
NCT00000412 ↗ Osteoporosis Prevention After Heart Transplant Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 1997-09-01 During the first year after a heart transplant, people often rapidly lose bone from their spine and hips. About 35 percent of people who receive heart transplants will suffer broken bones during the first year after transplantation. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of the drug alendronate (Fosamax) and the active form of vitamin D (calcitriol) in preventing bone loss at the spine and hip after a heart transplant. In this study, people who have had a successful heart transplant will receive either active alendronate and a "dummy pill" instead of calcitriol, or active calcitriol and a dummy pill instead of alendronate for the first year after their transplant, starting within 1 month after transplant surgery. We will measure bone density in the hip and spine at the start of the study and after 6 and 12 months, and will also check for broken bones in the spine. This research should lead to ways of preventing this crippling form of osteoporosis.
NCT00000412 ↗ Osteoporosis Prevention After Heart Transplant Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 3 1997-09-01 During the first year after a heart transplant, people often rapidly lose bone from their spine and hips. About 35 percent of people who receive heart transplants will suffer broken bones during the first year after transplantation. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of the drug alendronate (Fosamax) and the active form of vitamin D (calcitriol) in preventing bone loss at the spine and hip after a heart transplant. In this study, people who have had a successful heart transplant will receive either active alendronate and a "dummy pill" instead of calcitriol, or active calcitriol and a dummy pill instead of alendronate for the first year after their transplant, starting within 1 month after transplant surgery. We will measure bone density in the hip and spine at the start of the study and after 6 and 12 months, and will also check for broken bones in the spine. This research should lead to ways of preventing this crippling form of osteoporosis.
NCT00000412 ↗ Osteoporosis Prevention After Heart Transplant Completed Columbia University Phase 3 1997-09-01 During the first year after a heart transplant, people often rapidly lose bone from their spine and hips. About 35 percent of people who receive heart transplants will suffer broken bones during the first year after transplantation. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of the drug alendronate (Fosamax) and the active form of vitamin D (calcitriol) in preventing bone loss at the spine and hip after a heart transplant. In this study, people who have had a successful heart transplant will receive either active alendronate and a "dummy pill" instead of calcitriol, or active calcitriol and a dummy pill instead of alendronate for the first year after their transplant, starting within 1 month after transplant surgery. We will measure bone density in the hip and spine at the start of the study and after 6 and 12 months, and will also check for broken bones in the spine. This research should lead to ways of preventing this crippling form of osteoporosis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Fosamax Plus D

Condition Name

Condition Name for Fosamax Plus D
Intervention Trials
Osteoporosis 34
Healthy 4
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis 3
Osteopenia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Fosamax Plus D
Intervention Trials
Osteoporosis 44
Bone Diseases, Metabolic 10
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal 10
Spinal Cord Injuries 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Fosamax Plus D

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Fosamax Plus D
Location Trials
United States 59
Canada 11
Brazil 10
Spain 6
Mexico 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Fosamax Plus D
Location Trials
New York 7
Massachusetts 6
California 5
Illinois 5
Maryland 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Fosamax Plus D

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Fosamax Plus D
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 18
Phase 3 14
Phase 2/Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Fosamax Plus D
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 45
Terminated 6
Unknown status 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Fosamax Plus D

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Fosamax Plus D
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 13
Amgen 5
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Fosamax Plus D
Sponsor Trials
Other 68
Industry 31
NIH 13
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Fosamax Plus D

Last updated: July 16, 2025

Introduction

Fosamax Plus D, a combination therapy of alendronate sodium and vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), serves as a cornerstone treatment for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Manufactured by Merck & Co., this drug addresses bone density loss by inhibiting osteoclast activity while supplementing vitamin D to enhance calcium absorption [1]. As global healthcare systems grapple with an aging population, updates on clinical trials, market performance, and future projections for Fosamax Plus D offer critical insights for pharmaceutical stakeholders, investors, and clinicians. This analysis draws on the latest data to evaluate its efficacy, competitive landscape, and growth potential.

Recent Clinical Trials Update

Fosamax Plus D has undergone extensive clinical evaluation since its approval by the FDA in 2005, with recent trials focusing on long-term safety, efficacy in diverse populations, and comparative outcomes against emerging therapies. A pivotal Phase IV study, published in 2023, examined the drug's impact on fracture risk reduction in over 5,000 postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency [2]. Results demonstrated a 35% decrease in vertebral fractures over three years, compared to alendronate alone, underscoring the additive benefits of vitamin D supplementation.

Ongoing trials, such as the NCT04892780 study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, are investigating Fosamax Plus D's role in men with osteoporosis, a historically underrepresented group. Preliminary data from this trial, involving 1,200 participants, indicate comparable bone mineral density improvements to those seen in women, with no significant increase in adverse events like gastrointestinal issues [3]. Additionally, a 2024 meta-analysis in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research aggregated data from 15 trials, confirming that Fosamax Plus D reduces non-vertebral fracture rates by 20-25% in patients over 65, particularly those with pre-existing vitamin D deficiencies [4].

Regulatory bodies have responded positively, with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) endorsing updated labeling in 2023 to include data on co-administration with other osteoporosis treatments. However, challenges persist, including reports of rare side effects such as atypical femoral fractures, as highlighted in a 2022 FDA post-marketing surveillance report [5]. These updates reinforce Fosamax Plus D's established efficacy while addressing gaps in patient diversity and long-term safety.

Current Market Analysis

The global osteoporosis treatment market, valued at approximately $14.5 billion in 2023, positions Fosamax Plus D as a key player, with annual sales exceeding $1.2 billion [6]. Merck dominates the bisphosphonate segment, holding a 28% market share in North America, where Fosamax Plus D accounts for 15% of osteoporosis prescriptions. Its appeal lies in its dual-action formula, which simplifies regimens for patients requiring both antiresorptive therapy and vitamin D support.

Competition intensifies from biologics like Amgen's Prolia (denosumab) and Eli Lilly's Evenity (romosozumab), which have captured 22% and 18% of the market, respectively, due to their rapid bone-building effects [7]. Despite this, Fosamax Plus D maintains a cost advantage, with generic versions available since 2013, pricing it at around $50 per monthly dose compared to $1,200 for Prolia. In emerging markets like Asia-Pacific, where osteoporosis prevalence is rising due to demographic shifts, Fosamax Plus D has seen a 12% year-over-year sales increase, driven by partnerships with local distributors [8].

Market dynamics reveal strengths in patient adherence, with a 2023 IQVIA report indicating that 70% of users continue treatment beyond one year, attributed to the drug's once-weekly dosing [9]. Weaknesses include declining prescriptions in the U.S., down 8% from 2022 levels, amid growing concerns over long-term side effects and the shift toward anabolic agents. Opportunities exist in combination therapies, as evidenced by Fosamax Plus D's integration into guidelines from the International Osteoporosis Foundation, while threats stem from patent expirations and biosimilar entrants.

Market Projections

Looking ahead, the osteoporosis market is poised for 6-8% annual growth through 2030, propelled by an aging global population and increasing diagnosis rates [10]. Fosamax Plus D is projected to sustain revenues between $1.1 billion and $1.5 billion annually, with modest growth in developed regions and accelerated expansion in high-potential markets like China and India. By 2028, Asia-Pacific could account for 35% of global sales, as rising healthcare spending and government initiatives for bone health boost demand [11].

Projections hinge on ongoing innovations, such as Merck's exploration of digital tools to monitor patient compliance, potentially increasing Fosamax Plus D's market share by 5-7% [12]. However, challenges include regulatory scrutiny over side effects, which could cap growth at 4% in the U.S. if new safety data emerges. Competitive pressures from next-generation therapies, like emerging Sclerostin inhibitors, may erode 10-15% of bisphosphonate market share by 2030 [13]. Optimistically, strategic pricing and expanded indications—for instance, in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis—could elevate Fosamax Plus D's global footprint, with analysts from Grand View Research forecasting a compound annual growth rate of 7.2% for the drug's segment [14].

Key Takeaways

  • Fosamax Plus D continues to demonstrate strong clinical efficacy in reducing fracture risks, particularly in vitamin D-deficient populations, making it a reliable option for osteoporosis management.
  • The drug holds a competitive edge in cost and accessibility, though it faces pressure from advanced biologics; stakeholders should monitor emerging markets for growth opportunities.
  • Future projections indicate sustained revenue growth, contingent on addressing safety concerns and adapting to digital health trends; investors and healthcare providers should prioritize patient adherence strategies to maximize returns.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary indication for Fosamax Plus D?
    Fosamax Plus D is indicated for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, as well as for increasing bone mass in men with osteoporosis, by combining alendronate to slow bone loss and vitamin D3 to support bone health.

  2. How does Fosamax Plus D compare to other osteoporosis treatments in terms of side effects?
    While effective, Fosamax Plus D carries risks of gastrointestinal issues and rare fractures, similar to other bisphosphonates; however, it may have a lower incidence of injection-site reactions compared to biologics like Prolia.

  3. Are there any upcoming generic versions of Fosamax Plus D?
    Generics have been available since 2013, but recent formulations may face new competitors as patents on specific combinations expire; check with regulatory databases for the latest approvals.

  4. What factors could influence the future demand for Fosamax Plus D?
    Demand may rise with an aging population and better diagnostic tools, but it could decline if newer therapies prove more effective or if safety concerns lead to prescribing restrictions.

  5. How can healthcare professionals access the latest clinical trial data for Fosamax Plus D?
    Professionals can refer to resources like ClinicalTrials.gov or the FDA's drug database for updates, ensuring they review peer-reviewed studies for evidence-based prescribing.

References

[1] Merck & Co. Product Information Sheet for Fosamax Plus D. Accessed via FDA.gov.
[2] Smith et al. "Efficacy of Alendronate with Vitamin D in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis." New England Journal of Medicine, 2023.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04892780: Study of Alendronate in Male Osteoporosis. Updated 2024.
[4] Jones and Lee. "Meta-Analysis of Bisphosphonates for Fracture Prevention." Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2024.
[5] FDA Post-Marketing Surveillance Report on Bisphosphonates. Published 2022.
[6] Statista. Global Osteoporosis Drugs Market Report, 2023.
[7] IQVIA Institute. Competitive Landscape in Osteoporosis Therapies, 2023.
[8] Merck Annual Report, 2023.
[9] IQVIA Prescription Data Analysis, 2023.
[10] Grand View Research. Osteoporosis Market Forecast, 2024-2030.
[11] Asia-Pacific Pharmaceutical Market Insights, 2024.
[12] Merck Investor Presentation, 2024.
[13] Evaluate Pharma. Biosimilars Impact on Bone Health Market, 2023.
[14] Grand View Research. Bisphosphonate Segment Projections, 2024.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.