You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EFFIENT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Effient

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00059215 ↗ A Trial of CS-747 (Prasugrel) Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 2 2003-04-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a drug known as CS-747 (also known as prasugrel) on subjects having a procedure called a percutaneous coronary intervention (also referred to as PCI) in which a doctor will attempt to open a blocked vessel (or vessels) in the heart using a catheter (a long thin tube) that has a small balloon on the end. In many cases, patients who have this procedure receive a stent, a small wire spring that helps keep the vessel open.
NCT00097591 ↗ A Comparison of Prasugrel (CS-747) and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome Subjects Who Are to Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 3 2004-11-01 The sponsors of this investigational drug are developing prasugrel (also known as CS-747) as a possible treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (heart attack or chest pain) who need, or are expected to need, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; also called a balloon angioplasty). Prasugrel was compared with Clopidogrel to determine which drug is better at reducing deaths, future heart attacks, or stroke.
NCT00097591 ↗ A Comparison of Prasugrel (CS-747) and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome Subjects Who Are to Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 3 2004-11-01 The sponsors of this investigational drug are developing prasugrel (also known as CS-747) as a possible treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (heart attack or chest pain) who need, or are expected to need, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; also called a balloon angioplasty). Prasugrel was compared with Clopidogrel to determine which drug is better at reducing deaths, future heart attacks, or stroke.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Effient

Condition Name

Condition Name for Effient
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Disease 19
Acute Coronary Syndrome 9
Acute Coronary Syndromes 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Effient
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Disease 22
Myocardial Ischemia 21
Coronary Disease 19
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Effient

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Effient
Location Trials
United States 143
United Kingdom 30
Canada 15
Korea, Republic of 11
France 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Effient
Location Trials
Florida 20
Massachusetts 11
Ohio 9
Maryland 7
California 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Effient

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Effient
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 17
Phase 3 11
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Effient
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 39
Recruiting 5
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Effient

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Effient
Sponsor Trials
Eli Lilly and Company 19
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. 14
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Effient
Sponsor Trials
Industry 63
Other 48
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections for Effient (Prasugrel)

Introduction

Effient, known generically as prasugrel, is an antiplatelet medication approved by the FDA on July 10, 2009, for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including coronary stenting. This article will delve into the clinical trials that have shaped our understanding of Effient, provide a market analysis, and offer projections for its future in the pharmaceutical market.

Clinical Trials Overview

TRITON-TIMI 38 Trial

The pivotal clinical trial for Effient was the TRITON-TIMI 38 study, a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial that compared prasugrel with clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. This trial enrolled 13,608 patients across 707 sites in 30 countries and demonstrated that prasugrel significantly reduced the rate of a combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal heart attack, or nonfatal stroke compared to clopidogrel. However, it also showed a higher risk of bleeding, including life-threatening and fatal cases, associated with prasugrel[3][4].

Trial Design and Outcomes

The TRITON-TIMI 38 trial involved patients randomly assigned to receive either prasugrel (60 mg loading dose followed by 10 mg daily) or clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily), both in combination with aspirin. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal heart attack, or nonfatal stroke over a median follow-up period of at least 12 months. The results indicated that prasugrel was more effective in reducing these cardiovascular events but at the cost of increased bleeding risks[3].

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

A cost-effectiveness analysis of the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial data showed that prasugrel was economically dominant compared to clopidogrel, particularly in the first 30 days of treatment. Even when compared to generic clopidogrel at a hypothetical cost of $1 per day, prasugrel remained cost-effective, although not cost-saving after the initial 30 days[3].

Market Analysis

Current Market Position

Effient is positioned as a premium antiplatelet agent, offering superior efficacy in preventing cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel, albeit with a higher risk of bleeding. This positioning is critical in the market where healthcare providers and payers weigh the benefits and risks of different treatments.

Competitive Landscape

The antiplatelet market is competitive, with clopidogrel (Plavix) being a well-established generic option. However, Effient's superior efficacy, as demonstrated in clinical trials, allows it to maintain a significant market share among patients undergoing PCI. The expiration of clopidogrel's patent has led to increased competition from generics, but Effient's unique benefits continue to support its market presence[3][4].

Economic Outlook and Impact

The global economic outlook for 2025 suggests a mixed bag for pharmaceuticals. While economic growth is expected to be modest, with the U.S. and China experiencing slower growth, other regions like Europe and Japan are anticipated to see improvements. This could impact healthcare spending and, by extension, the demand for medications like Effient. However, the ongoing need for effective treatments in cardiovascular care is likely to sustain demand for Effient despite economic fluctuations[2][5].

Projections for Effient

Market Growth

Given the ongoing need for effective antiplatelet therapy and the demonstrated superiority of Effient in clinical trials, the market for this drug is expected to remain robust. As healthcare systems continue to prioritize evidence-based treatments, Effient is likely to maintain its position as a preferred option for patients undergoing PCI.

Regulatory and Clinical Trial Landscape

Future clinical trials and regulatory updates will be crucial in shaping the market for Effient. For instance, the NIH's guidelines for clinical trials, such as those outlined in the PAR-25-028 notice, emphasize the importance of milestone-driven trials and efficient trial management. These standards could influence how future trials for Effient or similar drugs are conducted, potentially leading to more streamlined and cost-effective research processes[1].

Cost-Effectiveness and Access

The cost-effectiveness of Effient, particularly in comparison to generic alternatives, will continue to be a key factor in its market success. As healthcare systems aim to balance efficacy with cost, the economic dominance of Effient in certain patient populations will remain a compelling argument for its use.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Efficacy: Effient has demonstrated superior efficacy in preventing cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel, albeit with a higher risk of bleeding.
  • Market Position: Effient maintains a significant market share due to its proven benefits, despite competition from generic antiplatelet agents.
  • Economic Outlook: The global economic landscape may impact healthcare spending, but the demand for effective cardiovascular treatments is expected to sustain Effient's market presence.
  • Future Projections: Effient is likely to continue as a preferred option for patients undergoing PCI, driven by its clinical superiority and cost-effectiveness.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary indication for Effient (prasugrel)?

A: Effient is indicated for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including coronary stenting.

Q: What were the key findings of the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial?

A: The TRITON-TIMI 38 trial showed that prasugrel significantly reduced the rate of cardiovascular death, nonfatal heart attack, or nonfatal stroke compared to clopidogrel, but with a higher risk of bleeding.

Q: How does Effient compare to generic clopidogrel in terms of cost-effectiveness?

A: Effient is economically dominant compared to clopidogrel, particularly in the first 30 days of treatment, and remains cost-effective even when compared to generic clopidogrel at a lower cost.

Q: What are the potential economic impacts on the market for Effient in 2025?

A: The global economic outlook for 2025 suggests modest growth, which may impact healthcare spending. However, the ongoing need for effective cardiovascular treatments is likely to sustain demand for Effient.

Q: How might future clinical trials and regulatory updates influence the market for Effient?

A: Future clinical trials and regulatory updates, such as those emphasizing milestone-driven trials and efficient trial management, could lead to more streamlined and cost-effective research processes, potentially influencing the market for Effient.

Sources

  1. PAR-25-028: Single-Site Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials (R61/R33)
    • National Institutes of Health, Grants.nih.gov
  2. 2025 Global Outlook: Clearing the Hurdles
    • Charles Schwab, Schwab.com
  3. New Analysis Shows Prasugrel Cost-Effective Compared with Clopidogrel
    • Di Cardiology, Dicardiology.com
  4. Effient (prasugrel) FDA Approval History
    • Drugs.com
  5. 2025 Global Market Outlook
    • Russell Investments, Russellinvestments.com

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.