You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 10, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EFAVIRENZ; EMTRICITABINE; TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00039741 ↗ Anti-HIV Drug Regimens and Treatment-Switching Guidelines in HIV Infected Children Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 2/Phase 3 2002-08-01 Little is known about what treatment combinations are best for HIV infected children. This study examined the long-term effectiveness of different anti-HIV drug combinations in children and strategies for switching treatment if the first treatment does not work. The study enrolled children who had not previously taken anti-HIV medication. Participants in this study were recruited in the United States, South America and Europe. Some European children may also enroll in a substudy that will observe changes in body fat in children taking anti-HIV medications.
NCT00039741 ↗ Anti-HIV Drug Regimens and Treatment-Switching Guidelines in HIV Infected Children Completed PENTA Foundation Phase 2/Phase 3 2002-08-01 Little is known about what treatment combinations are best for HIV infected children. This study examined the long-term effectiveness of different anti-HIV drug combinations in children and strategies for switching treatment if the first treatment does not work. The study enrolled children who had not previously taken anti-HIV medication. Participants in this study were recruited in the United States, South America and Europe. Some European children may also enroll in a substudy that will observe changes in body fat in children taking anti-HIV medications.
NCT00039741 ↗ Anti-HIV Drug Regimens and Treatment-Switching Guidelines in HIV Infected Children Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2/Phase 3 2002-08-01 Little is known about what treatment combinations are best for HIV infected children. This study examined the long-term effectiveness of different anti-HIV drug combinations in children and strategies for switching treatment if the first treatment does not work. The study enrolled children who had not previously taken anti-HIV medication. Participants in this study were recruited in the United States, South America and Europe. Some European children may also enroll in a substudy that will observe changes in body fat in children taking anti-HIV medications.
NCT00084136 ↗ Prospective Evaluation of Anti-retroviral Combinations for Treatment Naive, HIV Infected Persons in Resource-limited Settings Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 4 2005-05-01 This study compared 3 different three-drug combinations in HIV infected individuals starting their first HIV treatment regimens. Participants were recruited from resource-limited areas in Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, and also from the United States. The study hypothesis was each of the once daily combinations (PI based, or NNRTI based) would not have inferior efficacy compared to the twice daily NNRTI based combination.
NCT00084136 ↗ Prospective Evaluation of Anti-retroviral Combinations for Treatment Naive, HIV Infected Persons in Resource-limited Settings Completed AIDS Clinical Trials Group Phase 4 2005-05-01 This study compared 3 different three-drug combinations in HIV infected individuals starting their first HIV treatment regimens. Participants were recruited from resource-limited areas in Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, and also from the United States. The study hypothesis was each of the once daily combinations (PI based, or NNRTI based) would not have inferior efficacy compared to the twice daily NNRTI based combination.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Condition Name

Condition Name for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 18
HIV-1 Infection 7
HIV 5
HIV Infection 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 26
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 9
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 6
Hepatitis C 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Location Trials
United States 232
Canada 16
Germany 11
South Africa 10
United Kingdom 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Location Trials
California 15
Florida 13
North Carolina 12
New York 12
Illinois 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 16
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 29
Withdrawn 3
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 15
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 11
AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Efavirenz; Emtricitabine; Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 34
Other 25
NIH 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

The combination of Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (collectively referred to as EFV, FTC, and TDF) remains a cornerstone of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-1 infection worldwide. This fixed-dose combination (FDC) offers an effective, once-daily treatment option, with widespread use supported by extensive clinical data. Given ongoing advancements and emerging therapies, analyzing recent clinical trial updates, market dynamics, and future projections is essential for stakeholders in pharmaceutical, healthcare, and investment sectors.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Data and Developments

In recent years, the landscape of HIV treatment has evolved with the introduction of novel agents and formulations, yet EFV-based regimens maintain relevance, particularly in resource-limited settings due to cost-effectiveness and established efficacy.

  • Virological Suppression and Long-term Safety:
    Multiple longitudinal studies reaffirm the sustained virological suppression offered by EFV+FTC+TDF regimens. A pivotal study published in The Lancet HIV (2021) demonstrated comparable long-term viral suppression and safety profiles over a 5-year period compared to integrase inhibitor-based therapies, emphasizing the regimen's durability.

  • Neuropsychiatric and CNS Adverse Events:
    Recent trials focus on EFV's side-effect profile, especially neuropsychiatric adverse events such as vivid dreams, depression, and sleep disturbances. A phase IV observational study (2022) indicated a higher incidence among older patients, prompting revisions in prescribing guidelines for vulnerable populations.

  • Drug Resistance Monitoring:
    Emerging resistance data continues to reinforce the clinical utility of EFV-containing regimens. A 2023 surveillance study detected low but notable rates (<2%) of NNRTI resistance mutations in regions with high ART coverage, underscoring retention of efficacy but necessitating ongoing resistance surveillance.

  • Novel Formulations and Delivery Methods:
    Although primarily available as oral FDC tablets, research into long-acting injectable formulations of EFV remains in early phases. A Phase I trial (2022) exploring subcutaneous EFV depot formulations indicated promising pharmacokinetics, but regulatory approval remains pending.

Regulatory and Developmental Trends

While Efavirenz's patent protection has expired in major markets, development efforts focus on improving formulations and reducing adverse effects. Several generic versions now facilitate broader access, raising concerns about biosimilar quality and market competition.

Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

The HIV pharmacotherapy market is projected to reach USD 33.7 billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of approximately 4.3% (Fortune Business Insights). EFV+FTC+TDF, as a first-line regimen, accounts for a significant market share, especially in low- and middle-income regions.

  • Market Drivers:

    • Cost Effectiveness: Patent expiry has facilitated affordable generics, primarily in Africa and parts of Asia.
    • Global HIV Burden: An estimated 38 million people living with HIV globally, with approximately 25 million on ART—many on EFV-based regimens.
    • Policy Shifts: WHO guidelines (2019) favor a transition toward integrase inhibitor-based regimens, but EFV remains vital in countries with limited access to newer drugs.
  • Regional Variations:

    • Sub-Saharan Africa: Dominated by first-generation NNRTI-based therapies due to affordability and existing infrastructure.
    • North America & Europe: Moving toward integrase inhibitors (e.g., Dolutegravir) with declining EFV utilization; however, EFV still retains a market share within certain patient subgroups and generics.

Market Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges:

    • Side-Effect Profile: Neuropsychiatric adverse effects reduce patient adherence and may lead to regimen switching.
    • Emerging Resistance: Potential for resistance development necessitates vigilant surveillance.
    • Shift to Newer Agents: Introduction of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) like Dolutegravir, which offer better safety and tolerability.
  • Opportunities:

    • Biosimilars and Generics: Growing availability improves access, especially in LMICs.
    • Combination Formulations: Compatibility with other drugs can streamline therapy.
    • Long-acting Injectable Development: Exploring depot formulations can transform adherence paradigms.

Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical players, including GSK (original developer), Mylan (now part of Viatris), and Teva, dominate the generics market for EFV-based formulations. Patent expiration has led to increased competition, pressure on pricing, and market penetration, particularly in vulnerable populations.

Market Projection

Future Trends and Outlook

Projections suggest a gradual decline in EFV’s market share in high-income markets driven by newer, better-tolerated therapies. Conversely, in low-income regions, EFV remains a mainstay due to affordability.

  • Growth in LMICs:
    Expected to sustain demand for EFV-based generics over the next decade, particularly as WHO guidelines emphasize lifelong ART. Market growth in Africa and parts of Asia could approximate 2-3% annually, primarily driven by expanding access initiatives.

  • Global Shift toward Integrase Inhibitors:
    The adoption rate of Dolutegravir-containing regimens is expected to surpass EFV in high-income nations by 2025. Nevertheless, EFV-based regimens will retain a residual market, especially where existing infrastructure and cost constraints limit transitions.

  • Pipeline and Innovation Impact:
    Long-acting formulations, if commercially successful, could rejuvenate interest in EFV, particularly for patients with adherence challenges. Regulatory approvals of injectable EFV are anticipated within the next 3–5 years, potentially creating a niche market segment.

  • Market Revenue Forecast:
    The overall EFV-based therapy market is projected to decline at an annual rate of 4-6% in high-income regions but remain relatively stable—around USD 2–2.5 billion annually—in LMICs through 2030.

Conclusions

EFV combined with FTC and TDF continues to sustain its relevance in the global HIV treatment paradigm, especially within resource-constrained settings. Clinical data affirm sustained efficacy, but side-effect profiles and evolving guidelines are gradually shifting the market toward newer therapies. The development of long-acting injectables and the proliferation of biosimilars enhance future market dynamics, offering opportunities for differentiation and expanded access.

Key Takeaways

  • Sustained Clinical Utility: EFV+FTC+TDF maintains strong efficacy, supported by extensive clinical trial data, particularly vital in low-resource settings.
  • Safety Considerations: Neuropsychiatric adverse events remain a concern; careful patient selection and ongoing monitoring are essential.
  • Market Dynamics: Patent expirations and generics have expanded access, especially in LMICs; however, high-income markets favor newer agents.
  • Future Opportunities: Development of long-acting formulations, biosimilars, and combination therapies offer growth pathways despite declining use in some regions.
  • Strategic Focus: Stakeholders should balance cost-effective access with safety improvements, monitor resistance trends, and prepare for integration of next-generation therapies.

FAQs

1. Will Efavirenz-based regimens be phased out entirely?
While high-income countries are shifting toward integrase inhibitors like Dolutegravir, EFV regimens will likely remain in use within LMICs for the foreseeable future due to affordability and infrastructure considerations.

2. Are there ongoing efforts to mitigate EFV’s neuropsychiatric side effects?
Yes. Research into alternative formulations, lower doses, and long-acting injectables aims to improve tolerability and adherence, potentially reducing neuropsychiatric adverse events.

3. How does resistance impact the future market of EFV?
Low but increasing resistance rates necessitate vigilant surveillance. Resistance development may lead to regimen switches but is unlikely to eliminate EFV use entirely, especially where alternatives are limited.

4. What role do biosimilars play in EFV's market?
Biosimilars and generics have expanded access, driving down costs and increasing utilization, particularly in African and Asian markets.

5. When might long-acting EFV formulations be available?
Early-phase trials are promising, with regulatory submissions possibly within 3–5 years. Long-acting EFV could revolutionize adherence strategies if approved and adopted widely.

References

[1] World Health Organization. (2019). Guidelines on HIV Treatment and Care.
[2] The Lancet HIV. (2021). Long-term outcomes of efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy.
[3] Fortune Business Insights. (2021). HIV drugs market analysis and forecast.
[4] UNAIDS. (2022). Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2022 fact sheet.
[5] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2022). Studies on efavirenz long-acting formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.