Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ENTERO VU 24%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for ENTERO VU 24%

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT07356271 ↗ Effects of Mouthwashes on the Oral Microbiome and Systemic Health NOT_YET_RECRUITING University of Plymouth EARLY_PHASE1 2026-02-01 OVERVIEW While antimicrobial mouthwashes are proven to be clinically effective for management of certain oral microbial diseases, recent studies (Bescos et al 2025, Gallard et al 2025) suggest tha, in addition to targeting bacteria responsible for gum diseases such as gingivitis and periodontitis, they may harm healthy bacteria and disturb the balance and protective role of the oral microbiome (dysbiosis). Most findings on the oral microbiome and mouthwashes involve chlorhexidine use, demonstrating that it may induce dysbiosis and compromise the host oral microenvironment (Bescos et al 2020). A recent study completed in 2025 (Gallardo et al 2025) has shown that CPC mouthwash can also inhibit nitrate synthesis in the mouth. However there remains a need for further research on other agents used in mouthrinses, such as hydrogen peroxide, essential oils, or saline mouthwashes, to determine whether their clinical effectiveness in managing oral disease is accompanied by changes to the oral microbiome. In dentistry, despite this being the place where most people are treated, there are very few research studies that have been performed in primary care settings. Hence this study will be designed for delivery in primary care, to produce 'real-life' data on a patient cohort more typical of general dental practice. This PhD project will select several of the most commonly used over the counter (OTC) mouthwash constituents, used by the general public, that have a limited evidence base, regarding their effects on the oral microbiome in vivo. The first agent to be studied is physiological saline (sodium chloride), as this is the mouthwash advised by dental guidelines for use after tooth extractions, yet there is little evidence to support this approach. No previous studies have previously quantified its effects on clinical outcomes and the oral microbiome. All mouthwashes will be tested in people with, or without, gum disease (gingivitis and periodontitis) to determine which interventions are best used in either health or disease.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for ENTERO VU 24%

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting Medical Research Council Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting University College, London Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting Imperial College London Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00353496 ↗ Study of Lanreotide Autogel in Non-functioning Entero-pancreatic Endocrine Tumours Completed Ipsen Phase 3 2006-06-01 The study will compare the difference between lanreotide Autogel and placebo on progression free survival in patients who have an endocrine tumour in the pancreas or intestines.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ENTERO VU 24%

Condition Name

Condition Name for ENTERO VU 24%
Intervention Trials
Neuroendocrine Tumors 8
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma 3
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 3
Liver Metastases 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ENTERO VU 24%
Intervention Trials
Neuroendocrine Tumors 16
Carcinoid Tumor 9
Adenoma, Islet Cell 5
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ENTERO VU 24%

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ENTERO VU 24%
Location Trials
United States 17
Italy 9
France 6
United Kingdom 6
Denmark 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ENTERO VU 24%
Location Trials
California 4
Maryland 3
Texas 2
New York 2
Massachusetts 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ENTERO VU 24%

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ENTERO VU 24%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 4
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ENTERO VU 24%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Recruiting 6
Not yet recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ENTERO VU 24%

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ENTERO VU 24%
Sponsor Trials
Ipsen 5
GlaxoSmithKline 3
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ENTERO VU 24%
Sponsor Trials
Other 52
Industry 9
UNKNOWN 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ENTERO VU 24% Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 27, 2026

Entero Vu 24%: What clinical-trial progress and market outlook indicate

No complete, auditable set of clinical-trial identifiers (e.g., NCT/EudraCT numbers), target indication, dosage form, sponsor, trial phase, endpoints, or geographic regulatory status is provided for “Entero Vu 24%.” Without those specifics, a complete and accurate clinical trials update, market analysis, and forecast cannot be produced.

Are there trackable clinical-trial results for Entero Vu 24%?

No.

  • No NCT/EudraCT identifiers, sponsor, trial phase, study design, dosing regimen, patient population, or interim/final readouts are included with the provided label “Entero Vu 24%.”
  • No published efficacy/safety outcomes can be matched to that name and concentration with sufficient certainty to support a clinical update.

Can Entero Vu 24% be mapped to a specific market category and competitors?

No.

  • The term “Entero Vu 24%” does not uniquely map (from the information provided) to an identifiable active ingredient, molecular entity, formulation, or approved product.
  • Without a target/active ingredient and indication, a competitor set cannot be constructed from approved drugs, late-stage pipelines, or marketed pricing benchmarks.
  • No assumptions are available to determine whether the product sits in GI therapeutics, digestive enzymes, laxatives, microbiome modulators, medical foods, or another category.

Is a credible market size and sales projection possible from the provided inputs?

No.

  • A projection requires at minimum: indication, geography, formulation/route, regulatory stage, pricing framework, reimbursement pathway, and competitive intensity.
  • The provided inputs do not include any of the above, so a forecast would not be grounded in verifiable drivers (launch timing, market access, adoption curves, or hurdle pricing).

What would be required to run a complete clinical and market model (without guessing)?

A complete, auditable analysis requires the following facts for “Entero Vu 24%”:

  • Active ingredient / composition (not just a concentration)
  • Indication(s) and mechanism claim
  • Regulatory status (approved name, country, marketing authorization holder, labels)
  • Clinical trial IDs (NCT, EudraCT, ChiCTR, ISRCTN, CTRI) and phases
  • Key readouts (efficacy endpoint results, safety summaries, subgroup analyses, discontinuation rates)
  • Commercial parameters (route, dose, pack size, list price, payer coverage rules, channel)

No such data is included in the request.

Key Takeaways

  • A clinical-trials update for “Entero Vu 24%” cannot be generated without trial identifiers and outcomes mapped to the correct product and indication.
  • A market analysis and projection cannot be produced without an unambiguous active ingredient/formulation, indication, regulatory status, and pricing/reimbursement inputs.
  • Any attempt would require assumptions that cannot be validated against sources.

FAQs

  1. What does “Entero Vu 24%” refer to in clinical development?
    Not enough information is provided to map it to a specific investigational or marketed product.

  2. Can you summarize trial results without NCT/EudraCT numbers?
    No. Clinical updates require traceable study identifiers and published outcomes.

  3. How do you project market size without knowing the indication and active ingredient?
    You cannot tie demand drivers, competitors, and pricing to an unidentifiable therapeutic category.

  4. What inputs drive an adoption and sales forecast for GI products?
    Indication, regulatory stage, payer coverage, pricing, label strength, safety profile, and competitive landscape.

  5. Can you create a competitor landscape from the product name only?
    Not with the information provided; competitor matching requires the active ingredient and indication.

References

[1] No cited sources were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.