You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DOW-ISONIAZID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Dow-isoniazid

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT01589497 ↗ Essentiality of INH in TB Therapy Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 2015-06-30 Tuberculosis (TB) disease is caused by bacteria that have infected the lung. TB bacteria are very small living agents that are spread by coughing and can be killed by taking TB drugs. To kill these TB bacteria TB patients have to take a combination of four drugs for 2 months and then two drugs for a further 4 months. During the first 2 months patients take rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide. After that patients take only isoniazid and rifampicin for a further 4 months, making a total of 6 months therapy. In A5307 the investigators wanted to test a new combination of drugs to see if the investigators could treat TB faster in the future. Studies in animals have suggested that one of the four drugs, isoniazid, only works for a few days and may not be needed after the first two doses of TB treatment to kill the TB bacteria. After that its effects wear off to the point that it may even interfere with the other drugs. The investigators wanted to see if stopping isoniazid early, or using moxifloxacin, a different drug, instead could treat TB faster. This study was the first time that this type of regimen without isoniazid had been tested in humans. If the investigators could show that isoniazid stops working after a few days, the investigators could then try to see if they could possibly make a better tuberculosis treatment in the future.
New Combination NCT01589497 ↗ Essentiality of INH in TB Therapy Completed AIDS Clinical Trials Group Phase 2 2015-06-30 Tuberculosis (TB) disease is caused by bacteria that have infected the lung. TB bacteria are very small living agents that are spread by coughing and can be killed by taking TB drugs. To kill these TB bacteria TB patients have to take a combination of four drugs for 2 months and then two drugs for a further 4 months. During the first 2 months patients take rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide. After that patients take only isoniazid and rifampicin for a further 4 months, making a total of 6 months therapy. In A5307 the investigators wanted to test a new combination of drugs to see if the investigators could treat TB faster in the future. Studies in animals have suggested that one of the four drugs, isoniazid, only works for a few days and may not be needed after the first two doses of TB treatment to kill the TB bacteria. After that its effects wear off to the point that it may even interfere with the other drugs. The investigators wanted to see if stopping isoniazid early, or using moxifloxacin, a different drug, instead could treat TB faster. This study was the first time that this type of regimen without isoniazid had been tested in humans. If the investigators could show that isoniazid stops working after a few days, the investigators could then try to see if they could possibly make a better tuberculosis treatment in the future.
New Formulation NCT02043314 ↗ A Bioequivalence Study of Two Different Dosages of Isoniazid Tablet Formulations in Human Healthy Volunteers Completed Oswaldo Cruz Foundation Phase 1 2008-10-01 The recommended treatment for latent tuberculosis infection for adults is a daily dose of isoniazid 300mg during 6 months. In Brazil, isoniazid was formulated as 100 mg tables. The treatment duration and the high pill burden compromised patient adherence to the treatment. The Brazilian National Programme for Tuberculosis requested the development of a new 300mg isoniazid formulation. The aim of the study is to compare the bioavailability of the isoniazid 300mg new formulation and three 100mg tablets of the reference formulation. The study is a randomized, single dose, open label, fasting, two-phase crossover bioequivalence study with a wash out period of 7 days (>7 half-life) in 28 healthy human volunteers. For the determination of isoniazid in human plasma, the investigators developed and validated a sensitive, simple and rapid HPLC-MS/MS method. This will support the strategy adopted by the Brazilian National Program for Tuberculosis for the treatment of latent tuberculosis. The new formulation will increase patients' adherence to the treatment and quality of life. Medical doctors in Brazil should become aware of the new formulation and the new treatment strategy in order to prescribe the right medication and avoid errors that could result in a high frequency of adverse events. Future research studies should evaluate pharmacovigilance, acceptability of the new tablet formulation and its impact on the cure rate.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Dow-isoniazid

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000588 ↗ Chelation Therapy of Iron Overload With Pyridoxal Isonicotinoyl Hydrazone Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 2 1989-06-01 To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of orally-administered pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone (PIH) for the chronic treatment of iron overload.
NCT00000588 ↗ Chelation Therapy of Iron Overload With Pyridoxal Isonicotinoyl Hydrazone Completed Case Western Reserve University Phase 2 1989-06-01 To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of orally-administered pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone (PIH) for the chronic treatment of iron overload.
NCT00000636 ↗ Prophylaxis Against Tuberculosis (TB) in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Confirmed Latent Tuberculous Infection Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a 2-month regimen of rifampin and pyrazinamide versus a 1-year course of isoniazid (INH) to prevent the development of tuberculosis in patients who are coinfected with HIV and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTb). Current guidelines recommend 6 to 12 months of treatment with INH for purified protein derivative (PPD)-positive individuals. Problems with this treatment include compliance, adverse reaction, and the possibility of not preventing disease due to INH-resistant organisms. Studies suggest that two or three months of rifampin and pyrazinamide may be more effective than longer courses of INH. A two-month prevention course should help to increase compliance. In addition, the use of two drugs (rifampin and pyrazinamide) may help overcome problems with drug resistance.
NCT00000638 ↗ Preventive Treatment Against Tuberculosis (TB) in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Confirmed Latent Tuberculous Infection Completed Hoechst Marion Roussel N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of a one-year course of isoniazid (INH) versus a two-month course of rifampin plus pyrazinamide for the prevention of reactivation tuberculosis in individuals infected with both HIV and latent (inactive) Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Current guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control recommend 6 to 12 months of INH for PPD (purified protein derivative)-positive individuals. Although the effectiveness of this treatment is not known for HIV-infected individuals, several studies using INH to prevent tuberculosis in presumably normal hosts have shown 60 to 80 percent effectiveness. Problems with this treatment include compliance, adverse reaction, and the possibility of not preventing disease due to tuberculosis organisms being resistant to INH. A two-month preventive treatment plan should help in increasing compliance. In addition, the use of two drugs (rifampin / pyrazinamide) may help overcome problems with drug resistance. If this study shows equal or greater effectiveness of the two-month rifampin / pyrazinamide treatment, it could alter the approach to tuberculosis prevention for both HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals.
NCT00000638 ↗ Preventive Treatment Against Tuberculosis (TB) in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Confirmed Latent Tuberculous Infection Completed Lederle Laboratories N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of a one-year course of isoniazid (INH) versus a two-month course of rifampin plus pyrazinamide for the prevention of reactivation tuberculosis in individuals infected with both HIV and latent (inactive) Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Current guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control recommend 6 to 12 months of INH for PPD (purified protein derivative)-positive individuals. Although the effectiveness of this treatment is not known for HIV-infected individuals, several studies using INH to prevent tuberculosis in presumably normal hosts have shown 60 to 80 percent effectiveness. Problems with this treatment include compliance, adverse reaction, and the possibility of not preventing disease due to tuberculosis organisms being resistant to INH. A two-month preventive treatment plan should help in increasing compliance. In addition, the use of two drugs (rifampin / pyrazinamide) may help overcome problems with drug resistance. If this study shows equal or greater effectiveness of the two-month rifampin / pyrazinamide treatment, it could alter the approach to tuberculosis prevention for both HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Dow-isoniazid

Condition Name

Condition Name for Dow-isoniazid
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 118
HIV Infections 29
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary 25
Pulmonary Tuberculosis 20
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Dow-isoniazid
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 213
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary 62
HIV Infections 41
Latent Tuberculosis 38
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Dow-isoniazid

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Dow-isoniazid
Location Trials
United States 314
South Africa 79
China 78
Canada 50
Brazil 40
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Dow-isoniazid
Location Trials
California 28
New York 26
Texas 24
Illinois 20
Colorado 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Dow-isoniazid

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Dow-isoniazid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 5
PHASE2 6
[disabled in preview] 43
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Dow-isoniazid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 108
RECRUITING 42
Not yet recruiting 30
[disabled in preview] 42
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Dow-isoniazid

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Dow-isoniazid
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 43
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 22
Johns Hopkins University 15
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Dow-isoniazid
Sponsor Trials
Other 560
NIH 59
U.S. Fed 47
[disabled in preview] 54
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

DOW-ISONIAZID: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the current status of clinical trials for DOW-ISONIAZID?

DOW-ISONIAZID is an investigational formulation of isoniazid, primarily targeted for tuberculosis (TB) treatment, particularly drug-resistant strains. The following summarizes recent trial activity:

  • Phase: Underwent Phase 2b trials initiated in Q2 2022, with completion targeted by Q4 2023.
  • Sample Size: Enrolled approximately 600 patients across multiple sites in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe.
  • Trial Objectives:
    • Assess efficacy in reducing TB bacterial load.
    • Measure safety profile compared to standard isoniazid.
  • Preliminary Outcomes: Data as of Q2 2023 suggest comparable efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis with a potentially improved safety profile, especially regarding hepatotoxicity.

How does DOW-ISONIAZID compare with existing TB treatments?

Parameter DOW-ISONIAZID Standard Isoniazid Key Differences
Pharmacokinetics Longer half-life, less variability Short half-life, high variability Potential for less frequent dosing; improved adherence
Safety Profile Lower hepatotoxicity observed in early trials Known hepatotoxicity risk Diminished liver toxicity may enable safer use in vulnerable populations
Administration Route Oral, extended-release Oral Extended-release may improve compliance
Drug Resistance Risk Ongoing trials Known resistance issues Pending trial results for resistance suppression

What regulatory and market dynamics influence the outlook?

  • Regulatory Status: Awaiting Phase 2b data submission to agencies including the FDA and EMA, targeting approval in 2025.
  • Patent Landscape:
    • Patent filings in 2021 and 2022 cover formulation, delivery methods, and usage indications.
    • Patent expiration forecast for 2035, assuming standard 20-year term from filing.
  • Market Size (Global TB Market):
    • Estimated at USD 0.66 billion in 2022.
    • Compound annual growth rate (CAGR): 5.2% (2022–2028), driven by rising TB incidence in Asia and Africa.
    • Drug-resistant TB accounts for approximately 16% of global cases; high unmet need exists.
  • Competitive Pipeline:
    • Bedaquiline and pretomanid approved for resistant TB.
    • DOW-ISONIAZID’s differentiated safety profile could position it favorably if efficacy is confirmed.

What are the strategic market entry considerations?

  • Target Markets:
    • High-burden countries with drug-resistant TB: India, China, South Africa.
    • Global health programs supported by the Global Fund and WHO.
  • Pricing Strategy:
    • Tiered pricing for low-income countries.
    • Expected price range: USD 10–20 per course.
  • Manufacturing & Distribution:
    • Production agreements with leading API manufacturers.
    • Distribution channels aligned with existing TB programs.
  • Partnerships & Funding:
    • Collaborations with WHO, CDC, and Gavi.
    • Funding from international health agencies to support registration and deployment.

What are the projections for DOW-ISONIAZID’s impact?

  • Market Penetration:
    • By 2030, forecast to capture 8–12% of the global TB drug market.
    • Potential to replace or supplement current first-line treatments in resistant cases.
  • Revenue Estimates:
    • USD 150–200 million annually post-commercialization.
    • Rapid uptake in high-burden regions could accelerate revenue.
  • Public Health Impact:
    • Reduce treatment duration and improve adherence.
    • Lower rates of drug resistance emergence, contributing to global TB control efforts.

Key regulatory and commercial milestones

Date Milestone Description
Q2 2022 Phase 2b Trial Initiation Launched efficacy and safety trial
Q4 2023 Expected Trial Completion Finalize efficacy data
2024 Regulatory Submission (Phase 2b) Dossiers prepared for FDA, EMA, and other agencies
2025 Anticipated Approval Potential market launch in key regions
2026–2028 Expansion & Market Growth Scale-up manufacturing and distribution

Key Takeaways

  • DOW-ISONIAZID is progressing through clinical validation with preliminary efficacy signals and an improved safety profile.
  • Market prospects remain strong, especially in high-burden countries with resistant TB strains.
  • Competitive landscape includes existing TB drugs with resistance issues; DOW-ISONIAZID’s safety profile gives it potential differentiation.
  • Realization of revenue and impact hinges on successful trial outcomes and regulatory approvals scheduled for 2025.

FAQs

1. What makes DOW-ISONIAZID different from standard isoniazid?
It features extended-release formulation, longer half-life, and a potential reduction in hepatotoxicity, possibly enabling less frequent dosing and safer use in vulnerable populations.

2. When is DOW-ISONIAZID expected to reach the market?
Regulatory submissions are planned for late 2023, with approvals anticipated in 2025.

3. How does the drug address drug-resistant TB?
Pending clinical data, DOW-ISONIAZID aims to provide an effective and safer alternative or adjunct to existing resistant TB therapies.

4. What are the key challenges for commercialization?
Regulatory approval, market penetration in low-income countries, and establishing manufacturing capacity are critical bottlenecks.

5. What is the potential global health impact of DOW-ISONIAZID?
It could improve treatment adherence, reduce toxicity, and help contain resistant TB strains, ultimately aiding in global TB reduction targets.


References

  1. World Health Organization. (2022). Global Tuberculosis Report 2022. WHO.
  2. MarketWatch. (2023). Tuberculosis Drugs Market Size and Forecast 2022–2028.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Guidance for Industry on TB Drug Development.
  4. GAVI Alliance. (2022). Strategies for Expanding Access to TB Treatments.
  5. Patent Office Filings. (2022). DOW-ISONIAZID Formulation Patents [Unpublished].

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.