You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLOMID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Clomid

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00296465 ↗ A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Three Dosage Strengths of Pulsatile GnRH Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 2/Phase 3 2005-02-01 This study will be performed in approximately 132 women with anovulatory/oligoovulatory infertility.
NCT00427700 ↗ Induction of Ovulation With Raloxifene or Clomiphene Citrate in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Completed Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre Phase 3 2008-08-01 The Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is a common disorder related to ovulation problems. Clomiphene citrate (CC) is the drug of first choice for this condition. Nevertheless, CC has a detrimental effect over uterine receptivity. Raloxifene is a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, that does not have a detrimental effect over the endometrium, and also increase the serum levels of FSH, thus, inducting ovulation. The objective of this study is to compare the ovulation rate in PCOS patients between clomiphene citrate and raloxifene in a double blind randomized trial.
NCT00719186 ↗ Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 3 2009-02-01 The primary research hypothesis is that ovulation induction with an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) is more likely to result in live birth than ovulation induction with a selective estrogen receptor modulator (clomiphene citrate) in infertile women with PCOS. A safety hypothesis will also be incorporated into the primary research hypothesis in which we hypothesize both treatments are equally safe for mother and child. Secondary research hypotheses include: 1. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in singleton pregnancy compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Singleton pregnancy is defined as presence of a single intrauterine gestational sac with a single fetal pole and observable heart motion. 2. Treatment with letrozole will less likely result in a first trimester intrauterine fetal demise than treatment with clomiphene citrate. A first trimester IUFD is defined as a pregnancy that ends before 13 weeks gestation. 3. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in ovulation (increased ovulation rate) compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Ovulation is defined as a midluteal progesterone level ≥ 3 ng/mL. 4. The shortest time to pregnancy will be with letrozole. 5. Age, body mass index, SHBG, testosterone, LH, Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), and degree of hirsutism and acne will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 6. Improvement in SHBG, testosterone, AMH, and LH levels will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 7. DNA polymorphisms in estrogen action genes will predict response to study drug. 8. Quality of Life will be better on letrozole than clomiphene. 9. Letrozole will be more cost effective at achieving singleton pregnancies than clomiphene.
NCT00719186 ↗ Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II Completed Penn State University Phase 3 2009-02-01 The primary research hypothesis is that ovulation induction with an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) is more likely to result in live birth than ovulation induction with a selective estrogen receptor modulator (clomiphene citrate) in infertile women with PCOS. A safety hypothesis will also be incorporated into the primary research hypothesis in which we hypothesize both treatments are equally safe for mother and child. Secondary research hypotheses include: 1. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in singleton pregnancy compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Singleton pregnancy is defined as presence of a single intrauterine gestational sac with a single fetal pole and observable heart motion. 2. Treatment with letrozole will less likely result in a first trimester intrauterine fetal demise than treatment with clomiphene citrate. A first trimester IUFD is defined as a pregnancy that ends before 13 weeks gestation. 3. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in ovulation (increased ovulation rate) compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Ovulation is defined as a midluteal progesterone level ≥ 3 ng/mL. 4. The shortest time to pregnancy will be with letrozole. 5. Age, body mass index, SHBG, testosterone, LH, Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), and degree of hirsutism and acne will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 6. Improvement in SHBG, testosterone, AMH, and LH levels will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 7. DNA polymorphisms in estrogen action genes will predict response to study drug. 8. Quality of Life will be better on letrozole than clomiphene. 9. Letrozole will be more cost effective at achieving singleton pregnancies than clomiphene.
NCT00719186 ↗ Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II Completed The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Phase 3 2009-02-01 The primary research hypothesis is that ovulation induction with an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) is more likely to result in live birth than ovulation induction with a selective estrogen receptor modulator (clomiphene citrate) in infertile women with PCOS. A safety hypothesis will also be incorporated into the primary research hypothesis in which we hypothesize both treatments are equally safe for mother and child. Secondary research hypotheses include: 1. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in singleton pregnancy compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Singleton pregnancy is defined as presence of a single intrauterine gestational sac with a single fetal pole and observable heart motion. 2. Treatment with letrozole will less likely result in a first trimester intrauterine fetal demise than treatment with clomiphene citrate. A first trimester IUFD is defined as a pregnancy that ends before 13 weeks gestation. 3. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in ovulation (increased ovulation rate) compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Ovulation is defined as a midluteal progesterone level ≥ 3 ng/mL. 4. The shortest time to pregnancy will be with letrozole. 5. Age, body mass index, SHBG, testosterone, LH, Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), and degree of hirsutism and acne will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 6. Improvement in SHBG, testosterone, AMH, and LH levels will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 7. DNA polymorphisms in estrogen action genes will predict response to study drug. 8. Quality of Life will be better on letrozole than clomiphene. 9. Letrozole will be more cost effective at achieving singleton pregnancies than clomiphene.
NCT00719186 ↗ Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II Completed University of Colorado, Denver Phase 3 2009-02-01 The primary research hypothesis is that ovulation induction with an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) is more likely to result in live birth than ovulation induction with a selective estrogen receptor modulator (clomiphene citrate) in infertile women with PCOS. A safety hypothesis will also be incorporated into the primary research hypothesis in which we hypothesize both treatments are equally safe for mother and child. Secondary research hypotheses include: 1. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in singleton pregnancy compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Singleton pregnancy is defined as presence of a single intrauterine gestational sac with a single fetal pole and observable heart motion. 2. Treatment with letrozole will less likely result in a first trimester intrauterine fetal demise than treatment with clomiphene citrate. A first trimester IUFD is defined as a pregnancy that ends before 13 weeks gestation. 3. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in ovulation (increased ovulation rate) compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Ovulation is defined as a midluteal progesterone level ≥ 3 ng/mL. 4. The shortest time to pregnancy will be with letrozole. 5. Age, body mass index, SHBG, testosterone, LH, Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), and degree of hirsutism and acne will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 6. Improvement in SHBG, testosterone, AMH, and LH levels will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 7. DNA polymorphisms in estrogen action genes will predict response to study drug. 8. Quality of Life will be better on letrozole than clomiphene. 9. Letrozole will be more cost effective at achieving singleton pregnancies than clomiphene.
NCT00719186 ↗ Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II Completed University of Michigan Phase 3 2009-02-01 The primary research hypothesis is that ovulation induction with an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) is more likely to result in live birth than ovulation induction with a selective estrogen receptor modulator (clomiphene citrate) in infertile women with PCOS. A safety hypothesis will also be incorporated into the primary research hypothesis in which we hypothesize both treatments are equally safe for mother and child. Secondary research hypotheses include: 1. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in singleton pregnancy compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Singleton pregnancy is defined as presence of a single intrauterine gestational sac with a single fetal pole and observable heart motion. 2. Treatment with letrozole will less likely result in a first trimester intrauterine fetal demise than treatment with clomiphene citrate. A first trimester IUFD is defined as a pregnancy that ends before 13 weeks gestation. 3. Treatment with letrozole is more likely to result in ovulation (increased ovulation rate) compared to treatment with clomiphene citrate. Ovulation is defined as a midluteal progesterone level ≥ 3 ng/mL. 4. The shortest time to pregnancy will be with letrozole. 5. Age, body mass index, SHBG, testosterone, LH, Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), and degree of hirsutism and acne will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 6. Improvement in SHBG, testosterone, AMH, and LH levels will be significant predictors of ovulation and conception regardless of treatment. 7. DNA polymorphisms in estrogen action genes will predict response to study drug. 8. Quality of Life will be better on letrozole than clomiphene. 9. Letrozole will be more cost effective at achieving singleton pregnancies than clomiphene.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Clomid

Condition Name

Condition Name for Clomid
Intervention Trials
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 17
Infertility 16
PCOS 4
Anovulation 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Clomid
Intervention Trials
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 27
Infertility 22
Syndrome 16
Anovulation 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Clomid

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Clomid
Location Trials
Egypt 25
United States 24
Spain 1
Belgium 1
Iraq 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Clomid
Location Trials
Iowa 2
New York 2
Colorado 1
California 1
Alabama 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Clomid

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Clomid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 33
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Clomid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 31
Unknown status 11
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Clomid

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Clomid
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 9
Cairo University 5
Mansoura University 4
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Clomid
Sponsor Trials
Other 74
Industry 4
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clomid: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction to Clomid

Clomid, also known as clomiphene citrate, is a widely used medication for treating infertility, particularly in cases of anovulation or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It works by stimulating the release of hormones that cause ovulation, making it a first-line treatment for many fertility issues.

Clinical Trials and Efficacy

Ovulation Induction

Clinical trials and medical studies have consistently shown that Clomid is highly effective in inducing ovulation. Approximately 80% of women taking Clomid will successfully ovulate, and about 10 to 12% will conceive per cycle[1].

Treatment Outcomes

Studies have also highlighted the importance of monitoring and dosage. For example, women under 38 years old should attempt no more than six cycles of Clomid without ultrasound monitoring, while those 38 and older should attempt no more than three cycles. With ultrasound monitoring, the recommended number of cycles is even more limited, especially for older women[1].

Safety and Side Effects

While Clomid is generally well-tolerated, it can have side effects such as changes in cervical mucus and endometrial effects, which can negatively impact success rates. Increasing the dosage does not necessarily improve pregnancy rates and may worsen side effects[1].

Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Growth

The Clomid market is experiencing significant growth driven by the rising prevalence of infertility and increased demand for reproductive treatments. As of 2024, the market valuation is expected to be around USD 36 billion, projected to reach USD 84.07 billion by 2031, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.88%[2].

Key Drivers

Several factors are driving the growth of the Clomid market:

  • Increasing Urbanization: The rising urban population, especially in regions like Asia-Pacific, is propelling the demand for Clomid[2].
  • Lifestyle Changes: Delayed pregnancies and lifestyle changes are contributing to higher rates of infertility, thus increasing the demand for Clomid[2].
  • Advancements in Reproductive Healthcare: Improvements in reproductive healthcare and easier access to fertility clinics, particularly in developing nations, are fueling market growth[2].
  • Government Initiatives: Government programs promoting reproductive health and technological advancements in fertility treatments are also significant drivers[2].

Regional Market Dynamics

The Clomid market is diverse and growing across various regions:

  • Asia-Pacific: This region is rapidly growing, driven by countries like China, Japan, India, and South Korea, due to a large population, rising disposable income, and increasing urbanization[2].
  • North America and Europe: These regions are driven by high healthcare expenditure, advanced healthcare infrastructure, and rising awareness about fertility treatments[5].
  • Latin America and Middle East & Africa: These regions show steady market development, supported by increasing government initiatives and improving healthcare access[5].

Market Projections

Future Growth Prospects

The Clomid market is expected to continue its robust growth:

  • By 2031, the market is projected to reach USD 84.07 billion, up from USD 36 billion in 2024[2].
  • The Clomiphene Citrate market, specifically, is expected to grow from USD 1,231.82 million in 2023 to USD 1,780.04 million by 2031, at a CAGR of 5.4%[5].

Competitive Landscape

The market is characterized by strategic consolidations and competitive dynamics:

  • Key players such as Sanofi, Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Cosette Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and EMD Serono Inc are prominent in the market[2].
  • Mergers and acquisitions are common as companies seek to expand their product portfolios and leverage synergies to drive growth and competitiveness[2].

Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges

Despite the growth, the Clomid market faces several challenges:

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Stringent regulations and varying healthcare policies across different regions can impact market dynamics[2].
  • Competition: The market is competitive, with multiple players vying for market share[2].
  • Economic Factors: Economic fluctuations, especially in developing regions, can affect consumer behavior and market growth[2].

Opportunities

There are several opportunities for growth and innovation:

  • Technological Advancements: Improvements in reproductive healthcare technologies and the development of new fertility treatments offer significant growth opportunities[2].
  • Sustainable Solutions: Growing environmental concerns and the demand for sustainable alternatives are fostering a shift towards eco-friendly Clomid products and services[2].
  • Emerging Markets: Regions like Latin America and the Middle East & Africa present opportunities for market expansion due to improving healthcare access and increasing awareness about fertility treatments[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Efficacy: Clomid is highly effective in inducing ovulation, with 80% of women successfully ovulating and 10-12% conceiving per cycle.
  • Market Growth: The Clomid market is expected to grow significantly, reaching USD 84.07 billion by 2031.
  • Regional Dynamics: The market is driven by different factors in various regions, including urbanization, lifestyle changes, and advancements in healthcare.
  • Challenges and Opportunities: The market faces regulatory, competitive, and economic challenges but also offers opportunities for technological advancements and sustainable solutions.

FAQs

What is the current state of the Clomid market?

The Clomid market is experiencing growth, stability, and challenges, driven by increasing demand for reproductive treatments and improvements in healthcare infrastructure[2].

Who are the key players in the Clomid market?

Key players include Sanofi, Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Cosette Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and EMD Serono Inc, among others[2].

What factors are driving the growth of the Clomid market?

The growth is driven by factors such as increasing urbanization, lifestyle changes, advancements in reproductive healthcare, and government initiatives promoting reproductive health[2].

Are there any challenges affecting the Clomid market?

Yes, the market faces challenges including regulatory hurdles, competition, and economic factors such as fluctuations in consumer behavior and market dynamics[2].

How is the competitive landscape in the Clomid market?

The competitive landscape is characterized by strategic consolidations, mergers and acquisitions, and competitive dynamics among key players vying for market share[2].

Sources

  1. Shady Grove Fertility: Clomid for Infertility: What You Need to Know.
  2. OpenPR: Clomid Market Size, Share and Forecast By Key Players-Sanofi.
  3. ResearchNester: Clinical Trials Market Size & Share, Growth Trends 2037.
  4. MDPI: Clomiphene Citrate Treatment as an Alternative Therapeutic Approach.
  5. Verified Market Research: Clomiphene Citrate Market Size, Share, Scope, Growth & Forecast.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.