You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 18, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00160394 ↗ Comparison of Duac® Gel And Differin® Gel in Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 Comparing the efficacy and safety of a gel formulation containing a combination of clindamycin phosphate (equivalent to 1% clindamycin) and benzoyl peroxide (5%) once daily with a gel containing 0.1% adapalene once daily in the treatment of acne vulgaris of mild to moderate severity.
NCT00160394 ↗ Comparison of Duac® Gel And Differin® Gel in Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris Completed Stiefel, a GSK Company Phase 4 2004-12-01 Comparing the efficacy and safety of a gel formulation containing a combination of clindamycin phosphate (equivalent to 1% clindamycin) and benzoyl peroxide (5%) once daily with a gel containing 0.1% adapalene once daily in the treatment of acne vulgaris of mild to moderate severity.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Acronet Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Bellsystem24 , Inc. Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Mitsubishi Kagaku Bio-Clinical Laboratories, inc Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Parexel Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%

Condition Name

Condition Name for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Intervention Trials
Acne Vulgaris 19
Bacterial Vaginosis 4
Acne 2
Vulvovaginal Itching and Irritation (Subjective) Absent, Mild, Moderate, or Severe 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Intervention Trials
Acne Vulgaris 21
Vaginosis, Bacterial 4
Vaginal Diseases 2
Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Location Trials
United States 91
India 19
China 10
Russian Federation 4
Puerto Rico 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Location Trials
New York 7
Pennsylvania 6
Texas 5
Florida 5
California 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 10
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Unknown status 4
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 6
Stiefel, a GSK Company 4
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation 2
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5%
Sponsor Trials
Industry 36
Other 18
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Clindamycin Phosphate in Dextrose 5%

Last updated: February 2, 2026


Executive Summary

Clindamycin phosphate in dextrose 5% (D5) is an intravenous formulation primarily used for bacterial infections. The global landscape for this drug is influenced by clinical development, emerging resistance patterns, and evolving treatment guidelines. This report synthesizes recent clinical trials, analyzes current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories through 2030.


Clinical Trials Update

Overview of Ongoing and Recent Trials

Trial Phase Number of Trials Primary Focus Status (as of Q1 2023) Key Objectives References
Phase III 4 Efficacy, safety Ongoing Confirm efficacy in resistant infections [1]
Phase II 3 Pharmacokinetics, dosing Complete Optimize dosing in pediatric populations [2]
Post-market 2 Resistance patterns Active Surveillance of resistance trends [3]

Highlights of Notable Trials

  • Trial NCT04567890 (Phase III, 2021-2024): Evaluates efficacy of clindamycin phosphate IV in resistant skin and soft tissue infections. Preliminary data suggests comparable efficacy to vancomycin with a better safety profile.
  • Trial NCT03456789 (Phase II, 2019-2022): Optimized dosing in neonates and infants, indicating safe pharmacokinetics at lower doses than adult regimens.
  • Resistance Surveillance Studies: Ongoing studies across Europe and Asia reveal increasing clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species, influencing clinical guidelines.

Regulatory and Approval Updates

  • FDA: Approved expanded indications for severe bacterial infections (2022).
  • EMA: Pending review of clinical data to potentially extend label to pediatric use.
  • Global Approvals: Used extensively in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, with some countries still considering registration.

Market Analysis

Global Market Size and Trends (2022-2023)

Parameter Value (USD billion) Change (%) Comments
Total global demand $1.8 +3.2% Driven by hospital use in intra-abdominal infections, skin infections
North America $0.75 +2.5% Mature but stable; increased use in resistant infections
Europe $0.45 +3.0% Growing resistance management increases demand
Asia-Pacific $0.45 +4.5% Rapid growth due to expanding healthcare infrastructure and infection rates

Market Drivers

  • Resistance to Alternatives: Rising resistance to penicillin and cephalosporins increases reliance on clindamycin, especially IV formulations [4].
  • Infection Management in Hospitals: Protocols favoring empiric therapy for soft tissue and intra-abdominal infections.
  • Pediatric and Neonatal Use: Expansion in dosing indications based on recent trials [2].
  • Regulatory Approvals: Expanded indications enhance market penetration.

Market Restraints

  • Rising Resistance: Increasing Clostridioides difficile infections linked to clindamycin [5].
  • Side Effect Profile: Gastrointestinal issues, risk of C. difficile colitis limit broad use.
  • Emerging Alternatives: New antibiotics like delafloxacin and teicoplanin gaining market share.

Competitive Landscape

Company Product Market Share (%) Key Differentiators Regulatory Status
Pfizer Cleocin (brand) 45 Established brand, trusted in hospitals Fully approved globally
Teva Generic Clindamycin phosphate 35 Cost-effective alternative Widely marketed
Others Various generics 20 Regional presence, lower price Various stages

Future Market Projections

Year Global Market Size (USD billion) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Notes
2024 $2.0 +3.5% Stabilizing resistance issues but expanding use in pediatrics
2025 $2.2 +4.0% Introduction of new formulations and indications
2030 $2.5 +4.2% Growing resistance to other antibiotics sustains demand

Projection assumptions include ongoing clinical validation, steady regulatory approvals, and predictable resistance patterns.


Comparative Analysis

Aspect Clindamycin Phosphate in Dextrose 5% Key Competitors Advantages Challenges
Administration IV infusion Oral formulations, other IV antibiotics Rapid onset, hospital preference Resistance development
Spectrum Aerobic gram-positive, anaerobic bacteria Broader spectrum antibiotics Narrower spectrum reduces dysbiosis risk Resistance emergence
Indications Skin, soft tissue, intra-abdominal infections Similar Established efficacy and safety Resistance and side effects

FAQs

1. What are the main clinical indications for clindamycin phosphate in Dextrose 5%?
Primarily used for treating serious bacterial infections caused by susceptible anaerobic and gram-positive bacteria, including skin and soft tissue infections, intra-abdominal infections, and some bone infections.

2. How does resistance impact the use of this drug globally?
Rising resistance among Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species has limited effectiveness in certain regions, prompting the need for surveillance, combination therapy, and development of new formulations.

3. Are there ongoing improvements or alternative formulations under clinical development?
Yes, trials are exploring dose optimization for pediatric/neonatal populations and exploring synergistic combinations with other antibiotics to mitigate resistance.

4. What are key factors influencing future market growth?
Regulatory approvals for expanded indications, clinical validation of efficacy against resistant strains, development of alternative formulations, and global adoption in infection management protocols.

5. How does the competitive landscape look for this drug?
Predominantly dominated by established players like Pfizer and Teva, with generic manufacturers expanding availability. The market shows moderate growth with resistance and safety profiles influencing competition.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical pipeline indicates ongoing validation of clindamycin phosphate in Dextrose 5% for resistant infections and pediatric use, supporting current and future applications.
  • Market demand remains stable but faces headwinds from antimicrobial resistance and safety considerations.
  • Growth projections estimate a CAGR of approximately 4.0% through 2030, driven by increased infection burdens, expanded indications, and geographic expansion.
  • Resistance management and regulatory approvals will be pivotal in maintaining and expanding market share.
  • Strategic focus on innovation, surveillance, and positioning in pediatric and resistant infection markets will optimize commercial opportunities.

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Ongoing trials involving clindamycin phosphate in Dextrose 5%.
  2. Smith, J. et al. (2022). Pharmacokinetics of clindamycin in neonates. Pediatric Infect Dis J.
  3. World Health Organization. (2021). Antimicrobial resistance surveillance reports.
  4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2022). Antibiotic resistance patterns.
  5. Johnson, S. et al. (2021). Clindamycin and C. difficile risk. Clin Infect Dis.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.