You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 5, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CHLORAMPHENICOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Chloramphenicol

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT00579956 ↗ A Randomized Double Blinded Comparison of Ceftazidime and Meropenem in Severe Melioidosis Unknown status Mahidol University N/A 2007-12-01 Melioidosis, an infection caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, is a major cause of community-acquired septicaemia in northeast Thailand. Common manifestations include cavitating pneumonia, hepatic and splenic abscesses, and soft tissue and joint infections. Despite improvements in diagnostic procedures and treatment, the mortality of severe melioidosis remains unacceptably high - approximately 35% with currently used antibiotics (ceftazidime or co-amoxiclav). There is clear evidence that antibiotics can affect mortality; the use of ceftazidime rather than previous regimens (doxycycline + chloramphenicol + co-trimoxazole) led to a 50% reduction in mortality from 80% to 35%. However, the mortality in the first 48 hours has not been altered by any treatment regimen. A key question is whether alternative antibiotics could improve early outcome. The hypothesis tested is that meropenem is superior to ceftazidime in terms of mortality for the treatment of melioidosis.
NCT00579956 ↗ A Randomized Double Blinded Comparison of Ceftazidime and Meropenem in Severe Melioidosis Unknown status Wellcome Trust N/A 2007-12-01 Melioidosis, an infection caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, is a major cause of community-acquired septicaemia in northeast Thailand. Common manifestations include cavitating pneumonia, hepatic and splenic abscesses, and soft tissue and joint infections. Despite improvements in diagnostic procedures and treatment, the mortality of severe melioidosis remains unacceptably high - approximately 35% with currently used antibiotics (ceftazidime or co-amoxiclav). There is clear evidence that antibiotics can affect mortality; the use of ceftazidime rather than previous regimens (doxycycline + chloramphenicol + co-trimoxazole) led to a 50% reduction in mortality from 80% to 35%. However, the mortality in the first 48 hours has not been altered by any treatment regimen. A key question is whether alternative antibiotics could improve early outcome. The hypothesis tested is that meropenem is superior to ceftazidime in terms of mortality for the treatment of melioidosis.
NCT00372541 ↗ Ceftriaxone Versus Chloramphenicol for Treatment of Severe Pneumonia in Children Completed Makerere University Phase 3 2006-09-01 Acute lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sub Saharan Africa. The World Health Organisation (WHO) still recommends intravenous chloramphenicol for the treatment of severe pneumonia in children aged less than five years. However, up to 20% of children fail treatment due to the emergence of resistance by bacteria. Several centers now use ceftriaxone, a third generation cephalosporin, which is reported to be efficacious in the treatment of severe pneumonia. However the high cost of ceftriaxone is too prohibitive to allow for its routine use in resource constrained countries. The purpose of this study is to compare chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone in the treatment of severe pneumonia in children under five. We hypothesize that 92.7% of children who receive once daily intravenous ceftriaxone (75 mg/kg body weight)for 7 days, will recover from severe pneumonia compared to 80.2 % of those who receive intravenous chloramphenicol (25mg/kg body weight/dose every 6 hours for 7 days).
NCT00277147 ↗ Salmonella Typhi Vi O-Acetyl Pectin-rEPA Conjugate Vaccine Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 1 2006-01-09 This study will evaluate a new (conjugate) vaccine for typhoid fever, which remains a serious disease especially difficult to treat in developing countries. Salmonella typhi, the bacteria causing typhoid fever, have become resistant to several antibiotics increasing the difficulty of treating the disease. The disease may have serious complications effecting bones, brain, and intestines, with permanent injury or death. Methods to control typhoid fever, such as a sanitary water and food supply, along with effective sewage treatment, are not likely to be available soon in those countries. NIH scientists developed a vaccine called Vi, made of a polysaccharide (a chain of linked sugars) from the surface of Salmonella typhi, the bacteria that cause typhoid fever. It has been approved by the World Health Organization and is licensed in 94 countries. It is effective in adults but not in young children. Clinical trials have shown that chemically binding the Vi to a protein to form a "conjugate vaccine" has improved and extended its efficacy to children (conjugate vaccines to other bacteria, notably meningitis causing bacteria have been used extensively and successfully). Now NIH scientists have developed another vaccine for typhoid fever - using a polysaccharide from fruit, known as pectin. The pectin has been chemically treated so that it resembles Vi. The treated pectin, O-acetyl pectin, is bound to a protein; exoprotein A, (rEPA). The result is a conjugate, as was formed for Vi. Similarly to the Vi conjugate it induces antibodies against Salmonella typhi in laboratory animals. If the O-acetyl pectin conjugate proves successful, it will be evaluated in children ages 5 to 14 years old and in infants, toward using it with routine vaccines for infants. Volunteers ages 18 to 45 who do not have an allergy to fruit pectin and who have not been vaccinated against nor had typhoid fever within the last 5 years may be eligible for this study. Volunteers will undergo several tests at their first visit to the clinic for this study. A blood sample (about 2/3 of an ounce) will be taken to test for HIV, hepatitis B and C, complete blood count, liver functions, blood chemistry and pregnancy in women of childbearing age. The blood sample will also be tested for antibodies to Vi, rEPA (the protein of the conjugate), and pectin. There will also be a urine collection for testing. If the laboratory tests are acceptable, volunteers will be asked to return to the clinic on a...
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for Chloramphenicol

Condition Name

11110-0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.1Cataract SurgeryPlagueCholeraPneumonia[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for Chloramphenicol
Intervention Trials
Cataract Surgery 1
Plague 1
Cholera 1
Pneumonia 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

21110-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2PneumoniaGlaucomaNecrosisMeningitis[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for Chloramphenicol
Intervention Trials
Pneumonia 2
Glaucoma 1
Necrosis 1
Meningitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Chloramphenicol

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for Chloramphenicol
Location Trials
Thailand 5
Iran, Islamic Republic of 3
Uganda 3
Brazil 3
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

+
Trials by US State for Chloramphenicol
Location Trials
Maryland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Chloramphenicol

Clinical Trial Phase

30.0%30.0%10.0%30.0%00.811.21.41.61.822.22.42.62.833.2Phase 4Phase 3Phase 2/Phase 3[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for Chloramphenicol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

47.1%41.2%5.9%5.9%012345678Unknown statusCompletedNot yet recruiting[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for Chloramphenicol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Unknown status 8
Completed 7
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Chloramphenicol

Sponsor Name

trials0112233Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesUniversity of OxfordMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on Aids[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for Chloramphenicol
Sponsor Trials
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 3
University of Oxford 2
MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on Aids 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

93.7%0051015202530OtherU.S. FedNIH[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for Chloramphenicol
Sponsor Trials
Other 30
U.S. Fed 1
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Chloramphenicol: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction

Chloramphenicol, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, has been a cornerstone in the treatment of bacterial infections since its discovery in 1947. Despite its efficacy, the drug's use is often limited due to serious side effects. Here, we delve into the current state of clinical trials, market analysis, and future projections for chloramphenicol.

Clinical Trials Update

Chloramphenicol is not frequently involved in new clinical trials due to its well-established use and the associated risks, such as bone marrow toxicity and aplastic anemia. However, there are some ongoing and recent trials that are worth noting:

  • EU Clinical Trials: There are a few clinical trials associated with chloramphenicol listed in the EU Clinical Trials Register, such as EUCTR2020-000429, although specific details on these trials are not widely available[1].

  • Combination Therapies: Researchers are exploring combination therapies that include chloramphenicol to enhance its effectiveness against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. These studies aim to create more potent treatment options by combining chloramphenicol with other antibiotics[3].

Mechanism of Action and Indications

Chloramphenicol works by binding to the 50S subunit of bacterial ribosomes, inhibiting protein synthesis and thus bacterial growth. It is effective against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

  • Indications: Chloramphenicol is used to treat serious and life-threatening infections such as typhoid fever, meningitis, and bacterial conjunctivitis. It is also effective against tetracycline-resistant vibrios in the treatment of cholera[4].

Market Analysis

Global Demand and Drivers

  • Healthcare Needs: The global demand for chloramphenicol remains strong, driven by healthcare needs in developing countries where affordable antibiotics are crucial. Its broad-spectrum effectiveness and cost-effectiveness make it an essential treatment option in underserved regions[3].

  • Antibiotic Resistance: The rising concern of antibiotic resistance has reinforced the importance of established antibiotics like chloramphenicol. Its effectiveness against certain drug-resistant bacterial strains makes it a vital component in current antibiotic therapy[3].

  • Ophthalmic Use: The market for chloramphenicol eye drops is driven by the increasing prevalence of ophthalmic disorders, the rise in the geriatric population, and the growing awareness of eye care. Easy availability and accessibility of these eye drops also contribute to market growth[2].

Market Trends

  • New Product Launches: The market has seen recent launches of related products, such as Novartis's acquisition of Xiidra (lifitegrast ophthalmic solution) for dry eye treatment, and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories' launch of Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution for eye allergies. These developments indicate a dynamic market with ongoing innovation[2].

  • Strategic Partnerships: Pharmaceutical companies are forming partnerships with healthcare organizations to improve the distribution channels for chloramphenicol, especially in emerging markets. These collaborations aim to make the drug more accessible and affordable[3].

Market Restraints

  • Side Effects: Despite its efficacy, chloramphenicol's use is hampered by serious side effects such as bone marrow toxicity, aplastic anemia, and the gray syndrome in newborns. These risks limit its widespread use and necessitate careful patient selection[4].

  • Regulatory Issues: The FDA has withdrawn all oral drug products containing chloramphenicol due to the high risk of fatal aplastic anemia associated with this route of administration. This has restricted the drug's use to topical applications and severe infections where the benefits outweigh the risks[4].

Market Projections

Global Market Growth

  • Steady Growth: The chloramphenicol market is expected to grow steadily, driven by continuous demand in both human and animal healthcare sectors. Its affordability and established demand base make it a secure investment with consistent returns[3].

  • CAGR: The market is projected to have a significant Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) reflecting its ongoing demand in healthcare and veterinary sectors. The exact CAGR figures vary by region but indicate a positive growth trajectory[5].

Regional Markets

  • North America: The North America chloramphenicol market is expected to grow during the 2024-2030 period. The market analysis includes revenues and volume share by countries, types, and applications, highlighting the United States and Canada as key markets[5].

  • Emerging Markets: The market in emerging regions is driven by the need for affordable and effective antibiotics. Partnerships between pharmaceutical companies and local distributors are crucial in expanding access to chloramphenicol in these areas[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: While new clinical trials are limited, research focuses on combination therapies to combat antibiotic resistance.
  • Market Drivers: Global demand is driven by healthcare needs, especially in developing countries, and the rise in ophthalmic disorders.
  • Market Trends: New product launches and strategic partnerships are key trends shaping the market.
  • Market Restraints: Serious side effects and regulatory issues limit the drug's use.
  • Market Projections: The market is expected to grow steadily, with a significant CAGR, driven by continuous demand in healthcare and veterinary sectors.

FAQs

What is the primary mechanism of action of chloramphenicol?

Chloramphenicol works by binding to the 50S subunit of bacterial ribosomes, inhibiting protein synthesis and thus bacterial growth[4].

Why is chloramphenicol not frequently used despite its efficacy?

Chloramphenicol is not frequently used due to its high risk of serious side effects such as bone marrow toxicity and aplastic anemia[4].

What are the key drivers of the chloramphenicol market?

The key drivers include healthcare needs in developing countries, the rise in ophthalmic disorders, and the growing awareness of eye care[2][3].

What are the recent trends in the chloramphenicol market?

Recent trends include new product launches, strategic partnerships to improve distribution, and the development of combination therapies to address antibiotic resistance[2][3].

What is the projected growth of the chloramphenicol market?

The market is expected to grow steadily with a significant CAGR, driven by continuous demand in healthcare and veterinary sectors[3][5].

Sources

  1. Synapse: Chloramphenicol - Drug Targets, Indications, Patents[1].
  2. Allied Market Research: Chloramphenicol Eye Drops Market Share, Trend and Forecast 2030[2].
  3. Market Research Intellect: Chloramphenicol Market Size And Projection[3].
  4. DrugBank: Chloramphenicol: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action[4].
  5. 6Wresearch: North America Chloramphenicol Market (2024-2030)[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.