You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CERUBIDINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Cerubidine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002590 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1994-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have lymphoma.
NCT00002590 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Lymphoma Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 2 1994-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have lymphoma.
NCT00002798 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Children With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-08-01 Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different chemotherapy regimens with or without bone marrow transplantation in treating children who have acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome
NCT00003190 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Valspodar in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1998-01-01 Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without PSC 833 followed by interleukin-2 or no further therapy in treating older patients who have acute myeloid leukemia. Some cancers become resistant to chemotherapy drugs. Combining PSC 833 with more than one chemotherapy drug may reduce resistance to the drugs and allow the cancer cells to be killed. Combining interleukin-2 with combination chemotherapy plus PSC 833 may kill more cancer cells.
NCT00003593 ↗ Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Down Syndrome and Myeloproliferative Disorder, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1999-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase III trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have Down syndrome and myeloproliferative disorder, acute myelogenous leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Cerubidine

Condition Name

Condition Name for Cerubidine
Intervention Trials
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 21
Untreated Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia 19
Leukemia 12
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Cerubidine
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 66
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 38
Leukemia, Myeloid 35
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 30
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Cerubidine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Cerubidine
Location Trials
Canada 155
Australia 64
New Zealand 23
Puerto Rico 16
Switzerland 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Cerubidine
Location Trials
Illinois 42
North Carolina 41
California 38
New York 37
Maryland 36
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Cerubidine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Cerubidine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 27
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
Phase 2 24
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Cerubidine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 34
Active, not recruiting 18
Recruiting 7
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Cerubidine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Cerubidine
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 56
Children's Oncology Group 20
Wake Forest University Health Sciences 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Cerubidine
Sponsor Trials
NIH 56
Other 48
Industry 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Cerubidine (Daunorubicin)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Cerubidine, known generically as daunorubicin, is an anthracycline antibiotic historically used in chemotherapy regimens primarily for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other hematologic malignancies. This article provides a comprehensive overview of current clinical trial developments, market dynamics, and projections for Cerubidine, emphasizing recent innovations, competitive landscape, and future growth potential aligned with the evolving oncology treatment panorama.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Developments

Cerubidine has maintained a pivotal role in chemotherapy protocols; however, recent clinical efforts focus on optimizing its efficacy, reducing toxicity, and integrating novel formulations. The following summarizes key ongoing or recently completed trials:

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Multiple phase II and III trials examine Cerubidine combined with targeted agents. Notably, studies utilizing Cerubidine with gemtuzumab ozogamicin, a CD33-directed antibody-drug conjugate, aim to enhance response rates in AML patients who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy [1].

  • Dose Optimization and Toxicity Management: Recent research emphasizes determining optimal dosing strategies to minimize cardiotoxicity— a significant adverse effect associated with anthracyclines. Trials are evaluating liposomal formulations of daunorubicin (e.g., Vyxeos) to mitigate cardiotoxicity and improve pharmacokinetics [2].

  • Novel Formulations and Delivery Platforms: Liposomal and nanoparticle-based delivery systems for Cerubidine are under investigation to improve tumor selectivity and reduce systemic side effects. A phase I trial assessing liposomal daunorubicin demonstrated promising pharmacodynamic properties with limited cardiotoxicity [3].

  • Regulatory and Labeling Updates: The FDA's approval of Vyxeos (liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) in 2017 for secondary AML has redefined Cerubidine's clinical application landscape [4]. Ongoing studies aim to extend its indications further.

Emerging Research and Future Directions

  • Personalized Medicine: Genomic profiling of leukemia patients facilitates tailored therapy, influencing Cerubidine's dosing and scheduling to maximize response and minimize adverse events [5].

  • Immunomodulatory Combinations: Trials exploring Cerubidine paired with immune checkpoint inhibitors seek synergy in overcoming chemoresistance.

Overall, the clinical trial landscape underscores a trend towards safer, more targeted, and personalized Cerubidine-based therapies, driven by reformulations and combination regimens.


Market Analysis

Historical Market Landscape

Cerubidine, as a cornerstone in AML chemotherapy, historically represented a significant segment of the global oncology drug market, especially pre-2017. Its market was characterized by:

  • Market Share: Dominance within anthracycline-based chemotherapeutics, with extensive use in hospital-based AML treatment protocols.

  • Pricing Dynamics: Generic availability historically kept prices relatively low, supporting widespread adoption across healthcare systems.

  • Therapy Alternatives: Competition from newer agents, such as targeted molecular therapies (e.g., FLT3 inhibitors) and immunotherapies, has begun to influence its market share.

Impact of Liposomal Formulations and New Approvals

The FDA approval of Vyxeos (liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine) has significantly impacted Cerubidine’s market dynamics:

  • Market Penetration: Vyxeos captured a substantial share in secondary AML treatment, positioning itself as a superior alternative to traditional Cerubidine due to improved safety and efficacy profiles [4].

  • Pricing Shift: Vyxeos commands higher prices relative to generic Cerubidine, influencing overall market revenue streams for daunorubicin formulations.

  • Regulatory Landscape: The approval has prompted off-label use of liposomal formulations and spurred investment into similar nanotechnology-based delivery platforms.

Current Market Size and Forecast

Based on recent industry reports, the global oncology therapeutics market is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 7-8% through 2030, driven by rising AML incidence and advancements in targeted therapy [6]. Cerubidine’s specific market size is thus influenced by:

  • Market Share of Generic Daunorubicin: Estimated to decline from over 60% pre-2017 to approximately 30% in the current market, due to the adoption of liposomal formulations and novel therapies.

  • Regional Dynamics:

    • North America: Largest market share owing to high AML prevalence, advanced healthcare infrastructure, and regulatory approval for Vyxeos.
    • Europe and Asia-Pacific: Growing markets with rising AML incidence and increasing acceptance of liposomal chemotherapies.
  • Market Challenges: Concerns regarding cardiotoxicity, high costs of liposomal formulations, and competition from targeted immunotherapies.


Market Projection for Cerubidine (2024-2030)

Future Growth Drivers

  • Expansion of Liposomal and Targeted Formulations: Ongoing clinical trials may lead to new formulation approvals, potentially rejuvenating Cerubidine's market presence.

  • Personalized Medicine Adoption: Genomic-led treatment optimization could expand the use of Cerubidine in tailored regimens.

  • Global Healthcare Expansion: Increased access in emerging markets, coupled with local manufacturing, can expand Cerubidine's footprint.

Projected Revenue Trends

  • Short Term (2024-2026): Marginal decline in traditional formulations' market share (~5-10%) due to competition from liposomal derivatives.

  • Mid to Long Term (2027-2030): Stabilization or slight resurgence contingent on successful trial outcomes and regulatory approvals for novel formulations. Overall, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2-4% is anticipated in the traditional cerubidine market segment, with liposomal formulations possibly experiencing a CAGR exceeding 10-12% due to their growing acceptance.

Competitive Outlook

  • Analysts expect the combination of targeted agents, liposomal technology, and precision medicine to reshape the therapeutic landscape, positioning Cerubidine as part of diversified regimens, rather than a standalone front-line agent in AML.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical innovations focus on enhancing Cerubidine’s safety profile, notably through liposomal formulations and combination strategies with targeted agents.

  • The market landscape is shifting, with Liposomal Vyxeos dominating secondary AML therapy, marginalizing traditional Cerubidine use but opening opportunities for next-generation formulations.

  • Market projections suggest gradual growth driven by technological advancements, expanded indications, and global market expansion, with traditional formulations facing decline due to high costs and competition.

  • Regulatory developments and clinical trial results will be critical in dictating Cerubidine’s future relevance in AML treatment paradigms.

  • As personalized medicine becomes mainstream, Cerubidine’s role may evolve towards niche or adjunctive applications, maintaining its therapeutic significance in resistant or refractory cases.


FAQs

Q1. What are the primary clinical benefits of liposomal formulations of Cerubidine?
Liposomal formulations improve drug delivery by enhancing tumor targeting, reducing systemic toxicity—particularly cardiotoxicity—and enabling higher tolerated doses, which can improve treatment efficacy in AML.

Q2. How does Cerubidine compare with newer targeted therapies for AML?
While traditional Cerubidine remains effective in certain AML subtypes, targeted therapies such as FLT3 inhibitors and IDH inhibitors offer personalized, less toxic options. Cerubidine is often reserved for resistant cases or specific treatment regimens.

Q3. Are there ongoing efforts to develop non-anthracycline alternatives to Cerubidine?
Yes. Research is focused on non-anthracycline agents that minimize cardiotoxicity, including targeted molecular drugs and immunotherapies, though no direct substitutions are yet widespread.

Q4. How has the approval of Vyxeos impacted Cerubidine’s market prospects?
Vyxeos has captured significant market share in secondary AML, leading to a decline in traditional Cerubidine sales. However, it has also broadened the overall anthracycline market through improved formulations.

Q5. Will Cerubidine regain market dominance in AML treatment?
Unlikely in the short term. The shift towards targeted and personalized therapies, along with newer formulations, has reduced the dominance of conventional Cerubidine. Nevertheless, it remains a vital option in specific clinical contexts.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Combination Therapy of Daunorubicin in AML." Accessed 2023.
[2] National Cancer Institute. "Liposomal Daunorubicin: Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity." 2021.
[3] Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. "Liposome-Encapsulated Daunorubicin: Phase I Trial Results," 2022.
[4] FDA. "Vyxeos (Daunorubicin and Cytarabine) Approval Letter," 2017.
[5] Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. "Personalized Approaches in AML." 2022.
[6] MarketWatch. "Global Oncology Drugs Market Forecast," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.