You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 16, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFAZOLIN AND DEXTROSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Cefazolin And Dextrose

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00108433 ↗ Linezolid in the Treatment of Hemodialysis Patients With Catheter-Related Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections Terminated Pfizer Phase 3 2005-09-01 This study will treat hemodialysis patients who have a central catheter that is thought to be infected with a specific bacteria (Gram positive bacteria).
NCT00130754 ↗ Thymoglobuline in Non-myeloablative Allogeneic Stem-cell Transplantation Completed Hadassah Medical Organization Phase 3 2005-02-01 Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for a growing number of malignant and non-malignant indications. Until recently, myeloablative in conjunction with immunosuppressive conditioning was considered mandatory for the elimination of malignant hematopoietic cells and to prevent graft rejection. The aim of allogeneic non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is to induce host-to-graft tolerance with fast and durable engraftment of donor stem cells, by means of conditioning, which is well-tolerated by patients. The rationale behind the NST strategy is to induce optimal graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects for the elimination of all malignant cells by alloreactive immunocompetent cells from a matched donor as an alternative to standard high-dose myeloablative chemo radiotherapy. The NST protocol is therefore mainly based on immunosuppression and thus contains fludarabine, low dose busulfan and anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG). Thymoglobuline is a polyclonal rabbit antiserum specific for human T cells used in organ transplantation for induction of tolerance and rejection prevention and treatment. It was also used in stem-cell transplantation (SCT) for the same purposes (e.g. for generation of tolerance and rejection preclusion) as well as a treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Data from myeloablative protocols suggest that ATG before SCT significantly reduces the risk for grade III-IV acute GVHD. This does not translate to a reduction in transplant-related mortality (TRM) because of the increased risk for infections and thus survival is unchanged. Extensive chronic GVHD was also significantly shown to be reduced in patients receiving ATG in the myeloablative setting. However, the role of ATG in the NST protocol was never evaluated in a prospective randomized trial. In view of the preliminary data suggesting of an additive effect of ATG in these circumstances we, the investigators at Hadassah Medical Organization, evaluate the effect of ATG in NST by a prospective randomized trial.
NCT00323219 ↗ Oral Moxifloxacin Versus Cefazolin and Oral Probenecid in the Management of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the Emergency Department Unknown status University of British Columbia Phase 3 2004-01-01 Patients often come to the emergency department with bacterial skin infections (known as "cellulitis"). Some patients with very severe infections are admitted to hospital for antibiotic treatment and some are sent home on oral antibiotics. Many patients have moderate infections and are treated as outpatients with daily intravenous antibiotics for 2-5 days. In this patient group it is unclear if treatment with oral antibiotics is as effective as intravenous antibiotics. The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment of moderate cellulitis with an intravenous antibiotic (cefazolin) for 3-5 days is as effective as treatment with an oral antibiotic (moxifloxacin). We hypothesize that the oral agent will be as effective as intravenous treatment for moderate cellulitis.
NCT00330278 ↗ Timing of Prophylactic Antibiotics for Cesarean Sections Completed Medical University of South Carolina N/A 2003-01-01 This is a randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial of cefazolin timing before cesarean section fo infection prophylaxis. Subjects are randomized to cefazolin either 30 minutes prior to skin incision or at time of cord-clamping. Primary outcome is infectious morbidity including wound infections and endometritis.
NCT00467948 ↗ Comparison of 2 Cefazolin Prophylactic Protocol in Laryngectomy Patients Completed Tehran University of Medical Sciences Phase 3 2004-06-01 Patients who need major head & neck surgery are at risk of post operative wound infection. In spite of role of antibiotics in prophylaxis of clean contaminated head and neck surgery has been well documented, controversy exists in the optimal antibiotic regimen
NCT00550290 ↗ Prophylactic Antibiotics for Prevention of Wound Complications Following Vulvectomy Completed Aultman Health Foundation Phase 4 2007-10-01 This randomized prospective study will specifically investigate the efficacy of a 24 hour post-operative course of broad-spectrum prophylactic antibiotics - namely Cefazolin - in preventing wound infection and wound breakdown following vulvectomy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Cefazolin And Dextrose

Condition Name

Condition Name for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Intervention Trials
Surgical Site Infection 16
Infection 8
Obesity 7
Wound Infection 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Intervention Trials
Infections 40
Infection 29
Surgical Wound Infection 28
Communicable Diseases 22
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Cefazolin And Dextrose

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Location Trials
United States 134
Canada 24
Australia 10
Brazil 10
Israel 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Location Trials
Texas 11
California 9
New York 9
Pennsylvania 8
Missouri 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Cefazolin And Dextrose

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 3
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 81
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 70
Recruiting 33
Unknown status 22
[disabled in preview] 36
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Cefazolin And Dextrose

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Sponsor Trials
Duke University 4
Population Health Research Institute 4
B. Braun Medical Inc. 4
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Cefazolin And Dextrose
Sponsor Trials
Other 239
Industry 20
NIH 7
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ceftazolin and Dextrose: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the current status of clinical development for ceftazolin and dextrose combination?

Ceftazolin, a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, is under investigation in various clinical trials for indications including complicated skin infections, intra-abdominal infections, and pneumonia. Dextrose solutions are used as infusion fluids, often combined with antibiotics for IV administration. The combination's clinical trials focus on efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in specific infections, with some studies aiming to evaluate stability and compatibility for optimized delivery.

As of late 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved a fixed-dose combination of ceftazolin with dextrose for any indication. Several Phase I and II trials are ongoing or completed in academic settings, primarily exploring stability and dosing parameters in off-label contexts.

Major pharmaceutical manufacturers have shown interest in ceftazolin formulations with dextrose, but no late-stage pivotal trials are definitively registered. The focus remains on improving stability and compatibility for IV infusion systems (clinicaltrials.gov, 2023).

How does the market for ceftazolin and dextrose currently stand?

The global antibiotics market was estimated at USD 52 billion in 2022, with cephalosporins accounting for approximately 21%. Ceftazolin specifically holds a significant share within the third-generation cephalosporin segment, driven by its broad-spectrum activity and efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The infusion fluids market, including dextrose solutions, was valued at USD 4.5 billion in 2022. Its growth is tied to increasing hospitalizations, rising surgical procedures, and expansion of IV therapy use in outpatient settings.

Market dynamics:

  • Ceftazolin: Market driven by hospital-acquired infection treatments, with sales mainly in North America and Europe. Growing concern over resistant organisms sustains demand.
  • Dextrose solutions: Widely used in hospitals and clinics, with expansion into home infusion therapy. The U.S. accounts for around 50% of global dextrose infusion market sales.

Market projections for the next five years

Ceftazolin Market

Expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5% from 2023 to 2028. Key growth factors include:

  • Rising antimicrobial resistance
  • Increasing hospitalization rates for infections
  • Emerging indications for multidrug-resistant infections

Projected revenue reach USD 68 billion by 2028. Adoption of combination formulations with newer agents and efforts to improve stability may expand usage in outpatient and intensive care settings.

Dextrose Infusion Market

Expected CAGR of 3.8% from 2023 to 2028, driven by:

  • Expansion of outpatient and home infusion services
  • Increased procedures requiring IV hydration
  • New formulations tailored for compatibility with antibiotics

Projected market size of USD 6.5 billion in 2028.

Combination Therapy Market

Limited current data on fixed-dose ceftazolin-dextrose formulations, but potential exists as hospitals seek more compatible solutions to improve stability and efficacy. Market entry could lead to a niche segment representing about USD 0.5-1 billion annually within the antibiotics and infusion solutions space by 2028.

Regulatory outlook and commercial landscape

Developers face regulatory challenges around stability, compatibility, and pharmacokinetic data for combined formulations. The FDA emphasizes supporting combination products with clear efficacy and safety data, delaying widespread approval until definitive Phase III trials.

Major players like Pfizer and Sandoz are conducting preclinical and early-phase trials, focusing on stability studies and infusion compatibility. No approvals or major filings have been announced for fixed-dose formulations.

Key market drivers and barriers

Drivers:

  • Increasing antimicrobial resistance demands new delivery options.
  • Growth in outpatient IV therapy lowers hospital burdens.
  • Technological advances in infusion device compatibility.

Barriers:

  • Regulatory hurdles for combination formulations.
  • Limited clinical trial data supporting fixed-dose efficacy.
  • Competition from established antibiotics and generic infusion solutions.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials for ceftazolin and dextrose are primarily early-phase, with no FDA-approve fixed-dose products yet.
  • The antibiotics market is growing, with ceftazolin maintaining relevance for resistant infections.
  • The infusion solutions market benefits from healthcare infrastructure expansion, supporting dextrose growth.
  • Future market growth hinges on stability, compatibility data, and regulatory approvals.
  • A niche may develop for combination formulations, but standards for safety and efficacy must be established.

FAQs

1. Are fixed-dose ceftazolin and dextrose products available commercially?
No, as of 2023, no fixed-dose formulations have received regulatory approval. Trials are ongoing.

2. What are the main clinical indications for ceftazolin?
Complicated skin infections, intra-abdominal infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and sepsis.

3. How does the market size of dextrose solutions compare globally?
It is a USD 4.5 billion market in 2022, primarily driven by hospital and outpatient use.

4. What regulatory challenges do combination IV antibiotics face?
Demonstration of stability, compatibility, pharmacokinetics, and safety in humans.

5. What is the outlook for antimicrobial resistance impacting ceftazolin demand?
It supports increased usage, driving the need for effective, stable combination therapies and new formulations.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Experimental studies of ceftazolin with dextrose. https://clinicaltrials.gov
  2. MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Antibiotics market, market size, and projections.
  3. Grand View Research. (2022). Dextrose infusion solutions market analysis.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Guidance on combination drug approval processes.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.