Last Updated: July 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ATENOLOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Atenolol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000478 ↗ Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1990-11-01 To assess the feasibility of and test the methodology for a full-scale clinical trial of therapies for asymptomatic cardiac ischemia.
NCT00000513 ↗ Trial of Antihypertensive Intervention Management Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1984-04-01 The objective of the Trial of Antihypertensive Intervention Management (TAIM) was to determine the efficacy of dietary management and/or drug therapy, namely thiazide-like diuretics or a beta-blocker, in the control of mild hypertension. Additionally, the Continuation of the Trial of Antihypertensive Intervention Management (COTAIM) tested the effects of long-term weight reduction, and sodium/potassium changes added to weight reduction, as well as the original drug treatment, on the failure rate of blood pressure control.
NCT00000514 ↗ Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Completed National Institute on Aging (NIA) Phase 3 1984-06-01 The primary objective was to assess whether long-term administration of antihypertensive therapy to elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension reduced the combined incidence of fatal and non-fatal stroke. The secondary objectives were to evaluate: the effect of long-term antihypertensive therapy on mortality from any cause in elderly people with isolated systolic hypertension; possible adverse effects of chronic use of antihypertensive drug treatment in this population; the effect of therapy on indices of quality-of-life; the natural history of isolated systolic hypertension in the placebo population.
NCT00000514 ↗ Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1984-06-01 The primary objective was to assess whether long-term administration of antihypertensive therapy to elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension reduced the combined incidence of fatal and non-fatal stroke. The secondary objectives were to evaluate: the effect of long-term antihypertensive therapy on mortality from any cause in elderly people with isolated systolic hypertension; possible adverse effects of chronic use of antihypertensive drug treatment in this population; the effect of therapy on indices of quality-of-life; the natural history of isolated systolic hypertension in the placebo population.
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed VA Office of Research and Development 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Atenolol

Condition Name

Condition Name for Atenolol
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 40
Essential Hypertension 6
Marfan Syndrome 6
Healthy 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Atenolol
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 44
Essential Hypertension 9
Coronary Artery Disease 8
Cardiovascular Diseases 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Atenolol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Atenolol
Location Trials
United States 104
Canada 18
China 8
Germany 7
Korea, Republic of 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Atenolol
Location Trials
Minnesota 8
Florida 8
Massachusetts 7
New York 6
California 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Atenolol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Atenolol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 48
[disabled in preview] 37
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Atenolol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 80
Unknown status 19
Recruiting 8
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Atenolol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Atenolol
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 7
Novartis 4
University of Florida 4
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Atenolol
Sponsor Trials
Other 129
Industry 50
NIH 11
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Atenolol Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Expiry/Competition Outlook (Generics vs Brand)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Atenolol is an established, off-patent beta-blocker with broad generic availability in multiple countries. The current competitive landscape is driven by low-cost generic supply, not by active patent exclusivity. Clinical-trial activity is typically limited to comparative studies, special-population evidence, and formulation/device work rather than late-stage pivotal programs for new molecular IP.


What is the latest clinical trials update for atenolol (2024 2025 2026)?

Atenolol’s modern clinical-trials footprint is dominated by small-to-mid studies rather than large Phase 3 registration programs. Common trial themes include:

  • Cardiovascular outcomes or surrogate endpoints in specific subgroups (elderly, comorbidities, renal impairment)
  • Comparative effectiveness versus other beta-blockers or antihypertensives
  • Safety, tolerability, and adherence studies (including dosing schedules and switching)
  • Pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) for generic or reformulated products

Registration-style late Phase 3 readouts for atenolol’s new indications are not the dominant pattern because the molecule is off-patent in most markets.

Trial-phase structure (practical takeaway):

  • Phase 2/3 registration: rare and usually not a pathway to meaningful new exclusivity
  • Phase 1/BE: frequent for generic products across geographies
  • Real-world evidence / post-marketing: common, often funded by public health bodies or observational consortia

What to track for “next” meaningful clinical updates

  • Replication of guidelines-related endpoints (e.g., blood pressure control, rate control endpoints in cardiology contexts)
  • Device-adjacent work (where available) or modified-release formulation performance
  • Trials in populations with altered exposure risk (renal function, drug-drug interaction cohorts)

Sources to ground live-trial claims: no verifiable, up-to-date trial registry extracts are provided in the input context, so no specific trial IDs or dates are cited here.


Are there any new Phase 3 outcomes for atenolol that change the standard of care?

No. Atenolol remains an established option for hypertension and certain cardiac rate-control uses, but the global market positioning is maintained by guideline inclusion and cost-effective generic access, not by new Phase 3 outcomes.

When clinical evidence updates appear, they usually support:

  • Comparative safety or tolerability relative to other beta-blockers
  • Refinements in patient selection
  • Evidence for dose optimization and adherence approaches

Practical market implication: new trial outcomes for atenolol are unlikely to alter pricing power or competitive entry dynamics because exclusivity is not the primary driver.


What is the current FDA status of atenolol (Orange Book availability)?

Atenolol is widely available in the US as generic beta-blocker therapy. FDA exclusivity dynamics for atenolol are typically irrelevant because:

  • The active ingredient is off-patent
  • Generic products rely on ANDA/505(j) pathways and bioequivalence rather than brand exclusivity

Orange Book expectation (high-level):

  • Multiple ANDAs listed for atenolol tablets and possibly other dosage strengths
  • Patent listings, if any, are usually limited to formulation or listed patents tied to specific product sponsor entries, not to a continuing exclusivity block for the active ingredient

Actionable note: market entry risk is governed by patent challenges and formulation-specific patents, not by molecule-level protection for atenolol itself.

(No Orange Book table can be constructed from the provided context because no product-specific listing data and no patent numbers are included.)


What patents protect atenolol and what is the expiration timeline?

Atenolol’s core patent estate from the original period is expired for major markets. Current patent relevance typically comes from:

  • Product-specific formulation/process patents for particular generic filings
  • Weakly scoped listed patents tied to manufacturing changes, specific excipient systems, or stability/handling

Expiration timeline (practical framing):

  • Active ingredient (atenolol): molecule-level patents are expired
  • Product-specific patents: depend on the specific ANDA sponsor and dosage form; many are also expired or have limited remaining terms due to age of filings

Actionable business impact:

  • Litigation over molecule-level IP is unlikely to be the driver
  • Competitive pressure is driven by cost, supply continuity, and regulatory continuity

(No patent number mapping is possible without provided Orange Book/patent dossier extracts.)


How does atenolol compare with other beta blockers on clinical evidence and market use?

Atenolol competes mainly with:

  • Metoprolol (including tartrate/succinate distinctions)
  • Propranolol
  • Bisoprolol
  • Carvedilol
  • Nebivolol
  • Others depending on indication and geography

Clinical evidence positioning (high level):

  • Atenolol is used for hypertension and selected cardiovascular indications where beta-blockade is appropriate.
  • Other beta-blockers sometimes gain share based on perceived efficacy signals in certain subgroups and specific guideline preferences.

Market differentiation is less about efficacy updates and more about:

  • Therapeutic substitution rates at prescriber and payer level
  • Pricing and formulary placement
  • Supply reliability of generic manufacturers

What generic entry risks exist for atenolol (Paragraph IV, settlement, and litigation)?

Paragraph IV risk is typically low in practice for an established off-patent molecule with broad generic penetration, unless:

  • A specific brand-like formulation or a late-listed product-specific patent is still active for particular dosage forms
  • A manufacturer targets a niche strength/formulation with a narrow patent barrier

Litigation patterns expected:

  • Limited or sporadic disputes tied to listed patents for a specific product sponsor
  • Bulk of market dynamics occur without active patent litigation

(No verified litigation dockets or settlement terms are provided in the input context, so no case list is included.)


What formulations are protected for atenolol (immediate release vs extended release)?

Atenolol is most commonly marketed as tablets. The market typically contains:

  • Immediate-release tablets in multiple strengths
  • Reformulated products where stability, dissolution, or excipient systems differ by sponsor

Where formulation patents matter

  • If a specific sponsor holds a still-active stability or process patent for a formulation variant
  • If a competitor’s ANDA design triggers a formulation-specific claim

Business relevance:

  • Even when formulation IP exists, it is usually narrow and product-specific.
  • The broader competitive landscape remains generic-driven.

(No formulation-specific patent numbers can be listed from the provided context.)


How strong is the patent estate for atenolol versus metoprolol or bisoprolol?

For all mature beta-blockers, patent strength is generally weak at the molecule level because:

  • Original development patents are long expired
  • Residual strength is usually sponsor- and formulation-specific and short-lived

Relative expectation:

  • Market competition among beta-blockers tends to be decided by generic competition intensity, payer placement, and country-specific guideline interpretations
  • Patent estates rarely create large duration-driven hold-ups for these older actives

(No comparative patent-strength scorecard is possible without a sourced dossier for each molecule.)


What is the current market size and revenue outlook for atenolol?

No numeric market size forecasts can be produced from the provided context without:

  • Region-specific sales baselines
  • Product-specific mix data (strengths, channels, countries)
  • Competitor pricing and volume trends by country

However, the structural market dynamics are clear:

  • Atenolol is an older generic with low differentiation
  • Revenue growth depends primarily on volume stability and country-specific pricing rather than innovation
  • Pricing pressure from multiple generics limits upside

Near-term projection pattern (directional):

  • Global units: likely stable to slowly declining in higher-income markets as prescribers shift to other beta-blockers or newer antihypertensives
  • Global value: generally flat to down because of continued generic price compression

(No figures are included because there is no baseline data in the input.)


Which companies sell atenolol and how does the competitive landscape affect pricing?

Atenolol is sold by many generic manufacturers across jurisdictions. Pricing and availability are shaped by:

  • Multi-supplier tendering dynamics
  • Supply capacity and raw material availability
  • Regulatory status continuity (batch approvals, GMP compliance)

Expected commercial outcome:

  • Margins compress as more ANDA and authorized generic entries exist
  • Tenders and pharmacy channel purchasing drive near-uniform low price points

(No company list is included because the input context provides no country scope or manufacturer dataset.)


How do FDA regulatory changes affect atenolol generic supply?

Key ongoing regulatory drivers for generic cardiovascular drugs include:

  • Ongoing cGMP enforcement and facility inspections
  • Updates to ANDA quality requirements and stability expectations
  • Labeling changes driven by safety communications
  • Drug shortage response measures and supply chain resilience

Practical impact on atenolol:

  • Quality-system compliance influences continuity of supply more than IP
  • Supply disruptions, when they occur, can temporarily raise prices even for older generics

(No specific FDA action history is included due to missing sources.)


What manufacturing or IP barriers could delay new generic entry for atenolol?

Typical barriers for an off-patent tablet molecule are:

  • Lack of compliant manufacturing capacity for certain strengths
  • Regulatory inspection outcomes at a plant level
  • Narrow formulation/process patents (where present and still active)

Likelihood:

  • High generic substitutability lowers average entry friction
  • Barriers tend to be operational, not IP-based

Could biosimilars or biologics compete with atenolol’s indication?

No. Atenolol is a small-molecule beta-blocker. Biosimilars apply to biologic drug classes, not to beta-blocker tablets.

Competitive pressure comes from:

  • Alternative small molecules (other beta-blockers, antihypertensive classes)
  • Fixed-dose combinations containing beta-blockers

Key Takeaways

  • Atenolol is widely generic and off-patent at the molecule level in major markets; competitive dynamics are primarily pricing and supply-driven.
  • Clinical-trial activity is mainly comparative, special-population, PK/BE, and post-marketing evidence rather than new late-stage registration programs.
  • Patent risk and Paragraph IV litigation are generally limited for an established generic beta-blocker unless sponsor-specific listed patents remain active for particular dosage/forms.
  • Market value is likely stable to declining in many regions due to ongoing price compression, with demand tied to persistent guideline use and formulary substitution patterns.

FAQs

1) Is atenolol still used for hypertension in 2026?
Yes. It remains in use in many markets, with formulary placement influenced by local guideline interpretation and generic pricing.

2) What are the most common atenolol dosing strengths sold as generics?
Market offerings vary by country, but tablets commonly come in standard strength tiers (e.g., single-digit to low-double-digit mg ranges depending on local product catalogs).

3) Does atenolol have any active patent barriers in the US?
Patent barriers, if any, are typically product-specific and narrow; the molecule is broadly off-patent, so barriers are not expected to be widespread.

4) Are there FDA-approved extended-release versions of atenolol?
Atenolol is primarily marketed as tablets; any extended-release availability depends on region and specific sponsor product listings.

5) What is the biggest commercial risk for atenolol manufacturers?
Supply continuity and generic price compression are the main risks; IP barriers are usually secondary for mature actives.


References (APA)

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Website). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. (Database). https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.