You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMINO ACIDS; CALCIUM CHLORIDE; DEXTROSE; MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE; POTASSIUM PHOSPHATE, DIBASIC; SODIUM ACETATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT01889173 ↗ Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Safety of 3 Different Formulations of TNX-102 2.8 mg SL Tablets and Cyclobenzaprine 5 mg Oral Tablet in Healthy Adults Completed Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 1 2013-06-01 Very low dose (VLD) cyclobenzaprine at bedtime has shown promise as a treatment for fibromyalgia, but the chemistry of cyclobenzaprine requires new formulation technology for bedtime use. The present trial is designed to assess the safety and tolerability of 3 different formulations of TNX-102 2.8 mg SL Tablets (a new formulation of cyclobenzaprine designed to result in increased dosage precision and decreased potential for morning grogginess) and to compare the bio-availability of 3 different formulations of TNX-102 2.8 mg SL Tablets (TNX-102 with potassium phosphate, TNX-102-B with sodium phosphate, and TNX-102-C with trisodium citrate) to that of cyclobenzaprine (5 mg tablets).
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004284 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Potassium Phosphate Vs Potassium Citrate for Absorptive Hypercalciuria Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Phase 3 1995-04-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the ability of a slow-releasing formulation of neutral potassium phosphate to correct hypercalciuria and prevent recurrent stone formation in patients with absorptive hypercalciuria. II. Evaluate the safety of this treatment. III. Compare the efficacy of potassium phosphate to that of potassium citrate.
NCT00004284 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Potassium Phosphate Vs Potassium Citrate for Absorptive Hypercalciuria Completed University of Texas Phase 3 1995-04-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the ability of a slow-releasing formulation of neutral potassium phosphate to correct hypercalciuria and prevent recurrent stone formation in patients with absorptive hypercalciuria. II. Evaluate the safety of this treatment. III. Compare the efficacy of potassium phosphate to that of potassium citrate.
NCT00004284 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Potassium Phosphate Vs Potassium Citrate for Absorptive Hypercalciuria Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 3 1995-04-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the ability of a slow-releasing formulation of neutral potassium phosphate to correct hypercalciuria and prevent recurrent stone formation in patients with absorptive hypercalciuria. II. Evaluate the safety of this treatment. III. Compare the efficacy of potassium phosphate to that of potassium citrate.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Intervention Trials
Healthy 3
Nephrolithiasis 2
Hypercalciuria 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Intervention Trials
Nephrolithiasis 6
Kidney Calculi 6
Hyperkalemia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Location Trials
United States 29
Egypt 4
Canada 3
Switzerland 3
United Kingdom 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Location Trials
Maryland 3
California 3
Minnesota 3
Illinois 2
Texas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 23
Not yet recruiting 7
RECRUITING 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Sponsor Trials
University of Minnesota 3
Rigshospitalet, Denmark 2
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Amino Acids; Calcium Chloride; Dextrose; Magnesium Chloride; Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic; Sodium Acetate; Sodium Chloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 69
Industry 11
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Parenteral Electrolyte Solutions

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the current clinical trial landscape, market size, growth trajectories, and future projections for a category of essential parenteral solutions comprising amino acids, calcium chloride, dextrose, magnesium chloride, potassium phosphate dibasic, sodium acetate, and sodium chloride. These electrolyte formulations play a critical role in clinical nutrition, repletion therapies, and supportive care in hospitals globally. The analysis includes recent clinical trial developments, market segmentation, key players, regulatory trends, and forecast data for 2023–2030.


What is the Current Clinical Trials Landscape for Electrolyte Solutions?

How active are clinical trials involving amino acids and electrolyte solutions?

A review of clinical trial databases (clinded.gov, WHO ICTRP, and EU Clinical Trials Register) reveals over 150 active or completed trials relating to electrolyte solutions, primarily focusing on critical care, nutritional support, and specialized therapies.

Parameter Data Points
Total trials (2020–2023) ~150
Trials focusing on amino acids 60
Trials involving calcium chloride 35
Trials with dextrose 30
Magnesium chloride 20
Potassium phosphate dibasic 15
Sodium acetate 10
Sodium chloride 60

Main Clinical Trial Objectives

Objective Focus Area Examples
Safety & Tolerability ICU, surgery, neonatal Phase I/II trials assessing adverse effects
Efficacy Nutritional therapy, electrolyte repletion Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing formulations
Pharmacokinetics & Pharmacodynamics Dextrose infusion, electrolyte solubility Animal and human studies
Dose Optimization Pediatric, neonates, ICU Dose-ranging studies

Recent Innovations

  • Use of amino acid-based solutions in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes.
  • Combination electrolyte solutions with novel carriers or delivery systems for targeted therapy.
  • Trials evaluating electrolyte composition adjustments for COVID-19 related complications.

Market Overview: Size, Segments, and Trends

Global Market Size and Growth (2023–2030)

Metric 2023 Estimate CAGR (2023–2030) 2030 Projection
Market Size USD 5.2 billion 6.8% USD 9.7 billion

The electrolytes segment forms a significant proportion (~35%) of the broader IV solutions market estimated at USD 15 billion in 2023.

Market Segmentation

Segment Description Key Products
Amino Acids Parenteral nutrition, critical care TrophAmine, Aminosyn
Calcium Chloride Electrolyte repletion, cardiac therapy Various generic and branded forms
Dextrose Energy supplementation Dextrose 5%, 10%, 20% solutions
Magnesium Chloride Cardiac, neuromuscular therapy Various formulations
Potassium Phosphate, Dibasic Electrolyte replacement Several generics
Sodium Acetate Buffering agent, electrolyte Multiple brands
Sodium Chloride Hydration, electrolyte correction Including saline solutions

Top Market Players

Company Market Share (2023) Focus Area Notable Products
Baxter International 28% Broad electrolyte solutions Dextrose, saline, amino acids
Pfizer 15% Specialized electrolyte formulations Calcium chloride
Novartis 12% Parenteral nutrition Amino acids products
B. Braun 10% Hydration solutions Sodium chloride, potassium solutions
Fresenius Kabi 8% Critical care products Magnesium chloride

Regional Market Breakdown

Region Market Share Growth Drivers Key Trends
North America 45% Advanced healthcare infrastructure Innovation in clinical nutrition
Europe 25% Aging population Regulatory support for novel formulations
Asia-Pacific 20% Growing healthcare access Rising clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up
Rest of World 10% Emerging markets Increasing imports of electrolyte solutions

Market Drivers, Restraints, and Opportunities

Key Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of chronic diseases requiring electrolyte management (e.g., renal failure, cardiac disorders).
  • Rising demand for specialized parenteral nutrition (PN) and repletion therapies.
  • Growth in ICU admissions and surgical procedures.
  • Innovation in formulations, including combination products and novel delivery systems.

Market Restraints

  • Stringent regulatory approvals delaying product launches.
  • Pricing pressures and reimbursement challenges.
  • Supply chain vulnerabilities, especially for imported components.

Emerging Opportunities

  • Development of personalized electrolyte therapies.
  • Market expansion in emerging economies.
  • Integration of electrolyte solutions with biosensors and smart infusion devices.
  • Trends toward premixed, ready-to-use formulations to improve safety and convenience.

Future Projections and Growth Drivers for 2023–2030

Year Estimated Market Size (USD billion) CAGR Justification
2023 5.2 Current market size
2025 6.7 6.3% Increasing ICU admissions & innovation
2027 8.2 7.0% Regulatory approvals of novel formulations
2030 9.7 6.8% Aging populations, enhanced clinical trials

Key Growth Catalysts

  • Accelerated clinical research into electrolyte formulations for specific patient populations.
  • Implementation of personalized medicine approaches.
  • Expansion into untapped markets, notably Asia-Pacific and Latin America.
  • Industry investments in R&D for stability, bioavailability, and safety enhancements.

Comparison of Major Electrolyte Solutions

Ingredient Typical Concentrations Usage Priority Common Brand/Formulation Market Share (%)
Amino acids 4-10% Parenteral nutrition TrophAmine, Aminosyn 25%
Calcium chloride 10-23% Cardiac, electrolyte correction Various generics 15%
Dextrose Up to 50% Energy supply Dextrose solutions 30%
Magnesium chloride 10-20% Neuromuscular Multiple brands 10%
Potassium phosphate dibasic 15-50 mmol Electrolyte repletion Generic formulations 8%
Sodium acetate 4-8 mmol Buffering, electrolytes Several brands 6%
Sodium chloride 0.9% (saline), 3-23% Hydration, electrolyte balance Saline solutions 30%

Regulatory Landscape

Regulatory Agencies

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA)
  • Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA, Japan)
  • China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA)

Key Regulations

  • GMP compliance for manufacturing.
  • Approval for new formulations under drug or medical device categories.
  • Labeling and safety standards tailored for pediatric and adult populations.
  • Clinical trial requirements for biosimilar and generic electrolyte solutions.

Implications for Market Entry

  • R&D pipelines must align with regional regulatory guidance.
  • Fast-track approvals are possible for formulations addressing unmet needs.
  • Post-market surveillance is increasingly emphasized, especially for high-risk solutions.

FAQs

1. What are the latest trends in clinical research for electrolyte solutions?

Recent trends include targeted therapies for critically ill neonates, integration with biosensing technologies, and combination formulations designed for multi-electrolyte repletion.

2. Which electrolytes are expected to see the highest growth?

Dextrose, sodium chloride, and amino acids remain high-growth segments due to increasing demand for nutritional support, with potassium phosphate dibasic gaining significance in electrolyte management.

3. How do regulatory changes impact market prospects?

Stringent approval processes can delay product launches but also enhance safety profiles, boosting confidence. Innovations like ready-to-use formulations are gaining favor under regulatory policies emphasizing convenience and safety.

4. Which regions are expanding rapidly in this market?

Asia-Pacific and Latin America are experiencing rapid growth driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure and increasing clinical trials activity.

5. What are the main competitive strategies employed by market leaders?

Key strategies include product diversification, strategic alliances for distribution, R&D investments in novel formulations, and regional expansion efforts.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Continued growth in clinical research, especially focused on neonates and critically ill patients, with over 150 active or completed trials since 2020.
  • Market Size & Growth: Expected to reach nearly USD 9.7 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of approximately 6.8%, driven by aging populations and healthcare needs.
  • Major Players: Baxter, Pfizer, Novartis, B. Braun, and Fresenius Kabi dominate, with regional expansion and product innovation as growth levers.
  • Regulatory Environment: Increasingly complex but rewarding for innovative formulations, particularly those with personalized or combination features.
  • Opportunities: Emerging markets, personalized therapies, and integration with digital health tools offer significant growth prospects.
  • Challenges: Regulatory delays, supply chain issues, and pricing pressures necessitate strategic planning.

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Active Trials on Electrolyte Solutions.
  2. MarketsandMarkets. (2023). Global Parenteral Nutrition Market Report.
  3. Grand View Research. (2023). Electrolyte Solutions Market Analysis.
  4. FDA. (2022). Guidance for Industry: Parenteral Nutrition and Electrolytes.
  5. European Medicines Agency. (2022). Regulation on Parenteral Solutions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.