Last Updated: August 18, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ADVAIR HFA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Advair Hfa

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00102882 ↗ Study Of Asthma And Genetics In Patients To Be Treated With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Or Salmeterol Xinafoate Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-10-01 This study may last up to 36-38 weeks. Patients will visit the clinic 11 times. A blood sample will be taken at Visit 1 to look at subjects' genes. Breathing tests will be done during the study. Study medicines and procedures will be provided at no cost. Patients will be treated with VENTOLIN (8 wks), ATROVENT (8 wks), then ADVAIR or SEREVENT (16 wks). ADVAIR and SEREVENT are FDA approved for the treatment of asthma in patients 4 years of age and older.
NCT00115492 ↗ Advair® DISKUS® Versus Serevent® DISKUS® For Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 This study evaluates the effect of two medicines on COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) exacerbations. This study will last up to 56 weeks, and subjects will visit the clinic 10 times. Subjects will be given breathing tests and will record their breathing symptoms daily on diary cards. All study related medicines and medical examinations will be provided at no cost. The two drugs used in this study have been approved by FDA for use in patients with COPD.
NCT00120978 ↗ Can Advair and Flovent Reduce Systemic Inflammation Related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Unknown status GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 Large population-based studies suggest that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are 2 to 3 times at risk for cardiovascular mortality, which accounts for a large proportion of the total number of deaths. How COPD increases the risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes is largely unknown. However, there is growing evidence that persistent low-grade systemic inflammation is present in COPD and that this may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease among COPD patients. Inflammation and more specifically, C-reactive protein (CRP), has been linked with all stages of atherosclerosis, including plaque genesis, rupture and subsequent thrombo-fibrosis of vulnerable vessels. Recently, our group has demonstrated in a relatively small study that short-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy can repress serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients. Conversely, withdrawal of ICS leads to a marked increase in serum CRP levels. Although very promising, these data cannot be considered definitive because the study was small in size and scope (N=41 patients). Additionally, this study did not address the potential effects of combination therapy with ICS and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA). This is an important short-coming because combination therapy of ICS and LABA have been shown to produce improved clinical outcomes over ICS monotherapy and is commonly used by clinicians in the treatment of moderate to severe COPD. We hypothesize that inhaled fluticasone (Flovent®) reduces systemic inflammation and that combination therapy (Advair®) is more effective than steroids alone in reducing systemic inflammation in COPD. In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether ICS by themselves or in combination with LABAs can: 1. reduce CRP levels in stable COPD patients and 2. reduce other pro-inflammatory cytokines, which have been linked with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
NCT00120978 ↗ Can Advair and Flovent Reduce Systemic Inflammation Related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Unknown status University of British Columbia Phase 4 2004-12-01 Large population-based studies suggest that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are 2 to 3 times at risk for cardiovascular mortality, which accounts for a large proportion of the total number of deaths. How COPD increases the risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes is largely unknown. However, there is growing evidence that persistent low-grade systemic inflammation is present in COPD and that this may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease among COPD patients. Inflammation and more specifically, C-reactive protein (CRP), has been linked with all stages of atherosclerosis, including plaque genesis, rupture and subsequent thrombo-fibrosis of vulnerable vessels. Recently, our group has demonstrated in a relatively small study that short-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy can repress serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients. Conversely, withdrawal of ICS leads to a marked increase in serum CRP levels. Although very promising, these data cannot be considered definitive because the study was small in size and scope (N=41 patients). Additionally, this study did not address the potential effects of combination therapy with ICS and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA). This is an important short-coming because combination therapy of ICS and LABA have been shown to produce improved clinical outcomes over ICS monotherapy and is commonly used by clinicians in the treatment of moderate to severe COPD. We hypothesize that inhaled fluticasone (Flovent®) reduces systemic inflammation and that combination therapy (Advair®) is more effective than steroids alone in reducing systemic inflammation in COPD. In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether ICS by themselves or in combination with LABAs can: 1. reduce CRP levels in stable COPD patients and 2. reduce other pro-inflammatory cytokines, which have been linked with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
NCT00144911 ↗ ADVAIR® DISKUS® Inhaler (Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol) Versus SEREVENT® DISKUS® Inhaler (Salmeterol) For The Treatment Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations. ADVAIR® DISKUS® Inhaler and SEREVENT® DISKUS® Inhaler Are Tra Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-10-01 This study evaluates the effect of two medicines on COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) exacerbations. This study will last up to 56 weeks, and subjects will visit the clinic 10 times. Subjects will be given breathing tests and will record their breathing symptoms daily on diary cards. All study related medicines and medical examinations will be provided at no cost. The two drugs used in this study have been approved by the FDA for use in patients with COPD.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Advair Hfa

Condition Name

Condition Name for Advair Hfa
Intervention Trials
Asthma 52
Bioequivalence 10
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 9
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Advair Hfa
Intervention Trials
Asthma 48
Lung Diseases 20
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 20
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 18
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Advair Hfa

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Advair Hfa
Location Trials
United States 699
Canada 46
Germany 23
Argentina 23
United Kingdom 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Advair Hfa
Location Trials
Florida 29
California 29
North Carolina 28
Texas 27
Colorado 25
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Advair Hfa

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Advair Hfa
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 35
Phase 3 17
Phase 2 6
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Advair Hfa
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 63
Unknown status 5
Withdrawn 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Advair Hfa

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Advair Hfa
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 33
Respirent Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd. 12
Becro Ltd. 11
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Advair Hfa
Sponsor Trials
Industry 97
Other 32
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ADVAIR HFA Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2026–2035 Projection (Patent, Generic, and Competitor Landscape)

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Executive summary: ADVAIR HFA (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate) remains a leading branded inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) in the US, with the next major risk centered on patent and exclusivity expiry for specific ADVAIR HFA formulations and device/platform improvements, plus ongoing share pressure from once-daily and “ICS/LABA +” competitors. A complete clinical trials update and forward market projection require a source-verified mapping of (1) active interventional studies tied to ADVAIR HFA itself versus label-adjacent fluticasone/salmeterol products, and (2) current US payer and net-sales data. With only the drug name provided, a complete and accurate update cannot be produced.

What clinical trials are currently recruiting or active for ADVAIR HFA, and what do the results show?

Featured snippet answer: A current, source-verified list of ADVAIR HFA-specific interventional trials (recruiting, active, not recruiting, results posted) and their endpoints cannot be compiled from the provided inputs.

Which NCT studies are specifically for ADVAIR HFA versus fluticasone/salmeterol generics?

Featured snippet answer: Without a trial registry crosswalk, it is not possible to separate ADVAIR HFA brand-only studies from studies of equivalent generic formulations that use different inhaler devices.

What outcomes are being measured (exacerbations, lung function, adherence, rescue use)?

Featured snippet answer: Endpoint selection and statistical targets require trial-level extraction from registries and/or published protocols.

Are there head-to-head trials versus Symbicort, Breo, Trelegy, or other ICS/LABA/LAMA regimens?

Featured snippet answer: Head-to-head design, comparators, run-in periods, and statistical plans require direct retrieval from study records and publications.

What is the Orange Book status of ADVAIR HFA, and which patents protect the brand?

Featured snippet answer: An Orange Book status summary with listed patents, expiration dates, and exclusivity blocks cannot be generated from the provided inputs.

Which ADVAIR HFA patents cover fluticasone/salmeterol active ingredients, device delivery, and formulation?

Featured snippet answer: Patent numbers, assignees, claims, and jurisdiction scope require Orange Book and supporting patent-cascade retrieval.

What patents expire next for ADVAIR HFA in the US?

Featured snippet answer: Next-expiring patents and any pediatric, data, or market exclusivity extensions depend on a current listing.

When does ADVAIR HFA lose exclusivity, and how does that affect generic launch timing?

Featured snippet answer: Exclusivity and patent-expiration-driven timing cannot be determined without a current expiration table of relevant patents and exclusivity periods.

Does ADVAIR HFA face Paragraph IV risks from generic filers?

Featured snippet answer: A Paragraph IV risk view needs specific filer identities, FDA filing dates, and any litigation records tied to those filings.

What settlement agreements or consent decrees constrain generic entry?

Featured snippet answer: Settlement terms are case-specific and require docket-level extraction.

How many patents cover ADVAIR HFA, and how strong is the patent estate by claim scope?

Featured snippet answer: A claim-scope strength assessment requires patent-by-patent review (independent claims, dependent claims, remaining term, and enforcement history).

Method-of-use versus formulation versus device patents

Featured snippet answer: Without the patent list, it is not possible to quantify counts by category.

Which jurisdictions matter most for enforcement?

Featured snippet answer: ADVAIR HFA enforcement strategy and geographic exposure cannot be assessed without the relevant jurisdictional portfolio.

What is the market size of ADVAIR HFA today, and what share pressures exist from competitors?

Featured snippet answer: A quantified market analysis cannot be produced from the provided inputs alone.

Where is ADVAIR HFA strongest (COPD vs asthma, channel mix, age cohorts)?

Featured snippet answer: Segment breakdown requires current market research and prescribing data.

How does ADVAIR HFA compare with Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol), Breo Ellipta (fluticasone/vilanterol), and Trelegy (fluticasone/umeclidinium/vilanterol)?

Featured snippet answer: Comparative share, persistence, and switching rates require verified commercial datasets.

What is the impact of once-daily convenience and triple therapy on ICS/LABA retention?

Featured snippet answer: Retention dynamics require claims and longitudinal adherence measures.

What generic and biosimilar risks exist for ADVAIR HFA, and which companies are likely challengers?

Featured snippet answer: Generic risk and challenger identification depend on FDA filing activity and litigation history tied to ADVAIR HFA.

What generic entry risks exist for fluticasone/salmeterol HFA devices and strengths?

Featured snippet answer: Risk varies by strength, delivery system, and any remaining non-infringement or design-around opportunities.

How do device differences (HFA, actuator counts, dose meters) affect generic substitution?

Featured snippet answer: Device/platform patent barriers require a specific device-and-formulation patent map.

What regulatory developments affect ADVAIR HFA (FDA label changes, safety communications, REMS, manufacturing updates)?

Featured snippet answer: Regulatory status updates require FDA label revision and safety communication retrieval for the brand and each strength.

Has ADVAIR HFA’s label changed for asthma phenotypes or COPD subpopulations?

Featured snippet answer: Label evolution must be sourced from FDA labeling history.

Are there formulation or CMC (chemistry, manufacturing, controls) actions that change supply or approval status?

Featured snippet answer: CMC actions require supplement-level tracking in FDA systems.

ADVAIR HFA commercial projection 2026–2035: baseline, downside, and upside scenarios

Featured snippet answer: A multi-year projection requires a starting market baseline, unit forecasts, expected patent/generic entry dates, and competitor share moves, none of which can be sourced from the provided inputs.

Scenario drivers: generic substitution, payer step therapy, and guideline shifts

Featured snippet answer: Scenario construction needs verified assumptions tied to known entry events and guideline adherence metrics.

Revenue exposure by geography (US only vs ex-US) and by product strength/device

Featured snippet answer: Geography and strength-level exposure require current sales attribution.

KPI model to track (TRx, NRx, adherence, time to switch, net price erosion)

Featured snippet answer: KPI definitions and calibration require historical data.

Key Takeaways

  • A complete clinical trials update for ADVAIR HFA requires trial-level registry extraction tied specifically to the brand product.
  • A defensible patent and exclusivity timeline requires a current Orange Book patent list and corresponding expirations/exclusivity blocks.
  • A credible market projection requires a sourced baseline (US net sales and/or TRx/NRx), plus sourced assumptions on generic entry and competitor share dynamics.

FAQs

  1. Which NCT trials include ADVAIR HFA and what endpoints were reported for asthma or COPD exacerbations?
  2. What patents in the Orange Book for ADVAIR HFA remain listed, and what are their expiration dates by strength and dosage form?
  3. What Paragraph IV filings exist for fluticasone/salmeterol HFA products, and what do court dockets show about the next generic entry risk?
  4. How does ADVAIR HFA’s formulary position compare with once-daily ICS/LABA and triple therapy in major US payer formularies?
  5. What FDA label changes and safety communications affect ADVAIR HFA prescribing and persistence?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.