Last Updated: July 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ACETAZOLAMIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Acetazolamide

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000115 ↗ Randomized Trial of Acetazolamide for Uveitis-Associated Cystoid Macular Edema Completed National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 2 1990-12-01 To test the efficacy of acetazolamide for the treatment of uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema.
NCT00004802 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Dichlorphenamide for Periodic Paralyses and Associated Sodium Channel Disorders Completed Ohio State University Phase 3 1992-06-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the efficacy of dichlorphenamide in the treatment of episodic weakness attacks in patients with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis, paramyotonia congenita with periodic paralysis, and hypokalemic periodic paralysis.
NCT00004802 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Dichlorphenamide for Periodic Paralyses and Associated Sodium Channel Disorders Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 3 1992-06-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the efficacy of dichlorphenamide in the treatment of episodic weakness attacks in patients with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis, paramyotonia congenita with periodic paralysis, and hypokalemic periodic paralysis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Acetazolamide

Condition Name

Condition Name for Acetazolamide
Intervention Trials
Obstructive Sleep Apnea 12
Acute Mountain Sickness 9
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Acetazolamide
Intervention Trials
Altitude Sickness 31
Sleep Apnea Syndromes 23
Hypoxia 17
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Acetazolamide

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Acetazolamide
Location Trials
United States 133
Kyrgyzstan 22
Belgium 8
Israel 7
Switzerland 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Acetazolamide
Location Trials
California 17
Massachusetts 12
Texas 8
Florida 7
Pennsylvania 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Acetazolamide

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Acetazolamide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 7
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Acetazolamide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 65
RECRUITING 39
Not yet recruiting 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Acetazolamide

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Acetazolamide
Sponsor Trials
University of Zurich 27
National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine named after academician M.Mirrakhimov 20
University of California, San Diego 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Acetazolamide
Sponsor Trials
Other 230
NIH 17
U.S. Fed 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 26, 2026

Acetazolamide clinical trials update, market analysis, and exclusivity/projection outlook (U.S. and key geographies)

Acetazolamide is an established, off-patent small molecule with long-standing generics availability. Current clinical-trials activity is limited and is concentrated in niche indications and supportive studies rather than new registrational, sponsor-led late-stage programs. Near-term market dynamics are driven by (1) generic pricing and tender competition, (2) hospital and ophthalmology demand for acute use, (3) intermittent demand spikes tied to clinical practice changes, and (4) country-level reimbursement. No meaningful drug-level exclusivity is expected to block generic supply in the U.S.


What clinical trials are currently evaluating acetazolamide and what do the updates show?

Are there active Phase 2/3 registrational trials for acetazolamide?

Across public registries, acetazolamide’s current study activity is mostly small, indication-specific, or supportive (PK/PD, dosing, safety, or comparative effectiveness). The program pattern is consistent with a mature, off-patent product: fewer sponsor-led Phase 3 confirmatory studies and more clinician-initiated or investigator-led trials in defined clinical settings.

Which trial types dominate in the acetazolamide pipeline?

Featured trial themes typically include:

  • Neuro-ophthalmology and glaucoma physiology endpoints (intraocular pressure response, treatment timing, rescue use)
  • Altitude illness prophylaxis or treatment protocols (comparative dosing regimens, tolerability)
  • Edema and diuretic use studies (weight change, natriuresis endpoints, electrolyte safety)
  • Hyperammonemia-related supportive studies (where used as an adjunct)
  • Safety and tolerability in special populations (renal impairment, electrolyte monitoring, older adults)

What endpoints are most commonly used?

  • Intraocular pressure change from baseline and time-to-effect (ophthalmology)
  • Symptom scores and incidence rates (altitude illness)
  • Urine volume, sodium/potassium excretion, and serum bicarbonate changes (diuretic physiology)
  • Electrolyte safety endpoints (hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis markers)
  • Hospital workflow endpoints such as time to clinical stabilization or need for rescue therapy

Bottom line: The evidence base for acetazolamide is already broad from prior decades; current trials tend to refine positioning, dosing, and safety monitoring rather than establish a new patent-protected product profile.


How big is the acetazolamide market and what drives demand?

Where does acetazolamide get used most?

Demand is concentrated in:

  • Ophthalmology: acute management pathways that include acetazolamide in select protocols for elevated intraocular pressure, often as an adjunct to other agents
  • Altitude medicine: prophylaxis and treatment in travelers and high-altitude occupational settings
  • Diuresis: use as a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor where guideline pathways call for adjunct diuresis
  • Neurology/critical care adjunct contexts: where carbonic anhydrase inhibition helps modify physiologic parameters

What are the largest market demand drivers?

  • Hospital formulary inclusion and protocol use, not brand-led adoption
  • Generic unit cost and tender pricing for inpatient use
  • Forecast sensitivity to clinical practice guidelines that recommend acetazolamide in limited subsets rather than broad first-line use
  • Regulatory or reimbursement changes that affect access and co-pay burdens for outpatient prophylaxis

Key market constraint

Acetazolamide is inexpensive relative to most chronic specialty drugs, which typically limits promotional-led market expansion. Uptake depends on continued protocol inclusion and procurement economics.


What is the revenue outlook for acetazolamide through 2030?

Base case market trajectory

For off-patent, generics-led products, revenue typically follows:

  • Volume stability or mild growth in use-cases where clinical pathways remain stable
  • Revenue dilution due to additional generic entrants and price compression
  • Mid-single-digit inflation pass-through in some markets only if tender mechanisms protect incumbent supply

Main forecast shaping variables

  1. Generic price pressure: new suppliers and tender cycles can drive downward ASPs.
  2. Hospital budget cycles: inpatient use can be steady but vulnerable to formulary re-optimization.
  3. Reimbursement policy: outpatient prophylaxis use can shift with health system coverage and travel patterns.
  4. Safety and electrolyte monitoring protocols: adverse event perception can reduce use in borderline patients even when clinically indicated.

Projection view

  • U.S.: modest volume changes; revenue likely flat to declining in real terms due to ongoing price erosion.
  • EU/UK: similar pattern with tender and reimbursement controls; potential slight volume lift from protocol stability but ongoing price pressure.
  • Emerging markets: higher unit volume potential with variable access and supply reliability, but ASPs remain compressed.

Bottom line: The market is likely to remain stable-to-declining in revenue per unit as generic pricing compresses, with only limited incremental upside tied to narrow clinical use-case growth.


What patents protect acetazolamide, and when do they expire?

Is acetazolamide still under meaningful patent protection in the U.S.?

Acetazolamide is a legacy small molecule. The active ingredient and standard therapeutic uses are generally not protected by composition-of-matter patents in the U.S. in a way that blocks generic entry today.

What types of IP could still exist even if composition-of-matter patents expired?

  • Process or formulation patents (extended release, specific salts, or manufacturing methods)
  • Method-of-use patents (rare for a mature molecule; depends on jurisdiction and claim scope)
  • Patent thickets around specific fixed-dose combinations (if any exist in certain markets)

Practical IP impact

For a molecule at generics scale, litigation and exclusivity are usually not present at the drug-substance level. Competitive access is typically limited by manufacturing capacity, quality systems, and regulatory approvals rather than active patent barriers.


What is the Orange Book status of acetazolamide (U.S.) and what does it imply for generic entry?

Orange Book listings and exclusivity

Acetazolamide tablets and related dosage forms are widely available. Orange Book status historically shows either expired patents or listings that do not block routine generics for standard oral formulations.

Generic entry implication

  • If no unexpired patents protect the listed reference product for the relevant dosage form/route, Paragraph IV challenges are less central.
  • Competition is typically driven by ANDA availability and manufacturing economics rather than litigation timelines.

Bottom line: Orange Book status for acetazolamide generally indicates a mature, non-blocked generics environment.


What patent litigation or Paragraph IV challenges affect acetazolamide?

Are there active acetazolamide patent disputes?

For an off-patent legacy diuretic/carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, large-scale contemporary patent litigation is uncommon. When disputes occur, they tend to be formulation- or process-specific rather than the underlying acetazolamide molecule.

What would litigation change commercially?

Even if a narrow claim exists (for a specific dosage form or process), it typically affects:

  • A specific NDC strength or release profile
  • A limited set of generic entrants
  • Time-to-market for a subset of products

Bottom line: The dominant commercial reality is supply competition rather than exclusionary litigation.


How do formulations and dosage forms affect acetazolamide competition?

What dosage forms are typically marketed?

  • Oral tablets (most common)
  • Oral sequela use in acute protocols

What formulation variables matter for generic competition?

  • Bioequivalence and dissolution performance for tablets
  • Particle size or excipient systems affecting rate of absorption
  • Stability and shelf-life for stored inventory
  • Packaging and dosing accuracy for hospital use

Manufacturing/IP barriers

For generics, barriers are mostly:

  • Analytical control of formulation
  • Demonstrated bioequivalence
  • Reliable scale-up

Bottom line: Formulation differentiation can exist, but it rarely creates lasting exclusivity for acetazolamide.


Which companies supply acetazolamide and how does the competitive landscape look?

Market structure

Acetazolamide is generally supplied by multiple generic manufacturers. Competition is typically fragmented across:

  • ANDA holders and repackagers
  • Regional distributors
  • Hospital group purchasing organizations that drive tender allocations

What matters most to procurement

  • Unit price and contract pricing
  • Supply continuity and lot acceptance history
  • Documentation quality and stability performance
  • Ability to meet forecast demand during tender cycles

Bottom line: Competitive advantage tends to be manufacturing reliability and procurement terms, not branded differentiation.


How could acetazolamide trial results translate into market uptake?

Translation path

Even when trials show clinical utility, market impact is constrained by:

  • Lack of patent exclusivity
  • Generic commoditization
  • Guideline incorporation cycles

Where impact is most likely

  • Protocol refinement in ophthalmology (timing, dosing, rescue criteria)
  • Altitude medicine guidance updates (who should prophylax, dosing windows)
  • Safety optimization (electrolyte monitoring, contraindication refinement)

Bottom line: Trial impact is most likely to show up as usage pattern changes, not as drug price premium.


What commercialization risks and opportunity windows exist for acetazolamide?

Risks

  • Continued price erosion from generics and tender dynamics
  • Supply disruptions affecting hospital formularies and outpatient channels
  • Safety perception in populations requiring electrolyte monitoring
  • Guideline shifts toward alternatives if better tolerated agents are preferred in practice

Opportunities

  • Niche growth where acetazolamide is preferred for speed of effect or cost
  • Rising demand in altitude and travel markets where prophylaxis use expands
  • Protocol standardization in acute ophthalmic care where adjunct therapy remains part of practice

Bottom line: Opportunities are usage-based, not IP-based.


Key takeaways

  • Acetazolamide remains a mature, off-patent small molecule; current clinical-trial activity is limited and mostly supportive or niche-indication oriented.
  • Market revenue is constrained by generic pricing and tender competition; the most realistic forecast is stable-to-declining real revenue with potential mild volume movement.
  • Patent and Orange Book exclusivity are not expected to materially block generic competition for standard acetazolamide formulations in the U.S.
  • Commercial differentiation is driven by supply reliability, procurement contracts, and protocol inclusion rather than proprietary formulations or brand exclusivity.

FAQs

1) Is acetazolamide being studied for altitude sickness in new clinical trials?
Clinical studies exist that refine dosing regimens and tolerability, with endpoints focused on symptom incidence and electrolyte/acid-base safety.

2) Are there active investigations of acetazolamide in glaucoma or neuro-ophthalmology?
Yes, studies typically evaluate physiologic response and treatment timing as adjunct approaches rather than introducing a new proprietary product.

3) Does acetazolamide have any current FDA exclusivity that delays generics?
For standard acetazolamide formulations, exclusivity is not a material barrier in a commoditized generics landscape.

4) What is the main determinant of acetazolamide pricing in the U.S.?
Tender and contract pricing among generic suppliers, tied to manufacturing cost and supply continuity.

5) What safety monitoring is most important for acetazolamide use in practice?
Electrolytes and acid-base status, especially in patients with renal impairment or prolonged use scenarios.


References

  1. FDA, Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Acetazolamide studies and results. U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.