You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AREDIA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AREDIA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00062595 ↗ Vitamin K and Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women Completed Eisai Co., Ltd. Phase 3 2000-09-01 This one year study of the K vitamers phylloquinone (K1) and menatetranone (MK4) will study supplementation effects on bone turnover and bone density. Women at least 5 years postmenopause with normal bone density who do not use estrogen therapy or the following medications may be eligible: alendronate (Fosamax), risedronate (Actonel), pamidronate (Aredia), etidronate (Didronel), zoledronate (Zometa), teriparatide (Forteo), raloxifene (Evista), tamoxifene, warfarin (Coumadin), anti-seizure medications, prednisone, or oral steroids. Eligible subjects will take calcium and vitamin D (Citracal) twice a day for the first two months and through-out the study. After the first two months, subjects are randomized to the K1, MK4 or placebo groups. Return visits occur at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Fasting blood and urine is collected at each visit and bone density is performed at 3 study visits.
NCT00062595 ↗ Vitamin K and Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Phase 3 2000-09-01 This one year study of the K vitamers phylloquinone (K1) and menatetranone (MK4) will study supplementation effects on bone turnover and bone density. Women at least 5 years postmenopause with normal bone density who do not use estrogen therapy or the following medications may be eligible: alendronate (Fosamax), risedronate (Actonel), pamidronate (Aredia), etidronate (Didronel), zoledronate (Zometa), teriparatide (Forteo), raloxifene (Evista), tamoxifene, warfarin (Coumadin), anti-seizure medications, prednisone, or oral steroids. Eligible subjects will take calcium and vitamin D (Citracal) twice a day for the first two months and through-out the study. After the first two months, subjects are randomized to the K1, MK4 or placebo groups. Return visits occur at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Fasting blood and urine is collected at each visit and bone density is performed at 3 study visits.
NCT00124605 ↗ Arsenic Trioxide and Pamidronate in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Multiple Myeloma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2005-04-01 Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as arsenic trioxide and pamidronate, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Arsenic trioxide and pamidronate may also stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Pamidronate may also stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking blood flow to the cancer. Giving arsenic trioxide together with pamidronate may kill more cancer cells. This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of arsenic trioxide and pamidronate in treating patients with advanced solid tumors or multiple myeloma
NCT00128297 ↗ Pamidronate Administration in Breast Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Completed Novartis Phase 4 2000-10-18 The study objective is to evaluate the differences, in terms of first occurrence of a skeletal event, in patients with breast cancer and symptomatic bone metastases, when pamidronate is administered during 2 years, or when it is administered during 6 months, followed by a six month rest period, and again a 6 month treatment period.
NCT00128297 ↗ Pamidronate Administration in Breast Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Completed Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group Phase 4 2000-10-18 The study objective is to evaluate the differences, in terms of first occurrence of a skeletal event, in patients with breast cancer and symptomatic bone metastases, when pamidronate is administered during 2 years, or when it is administered during 6 months, followed by a six month rest period, and again a 6 month treatment period.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AREDIA

Condition Name

Condition Name for AREDIA
Intervention Trials
Breast Cancer 4
Osteoporosis 3
Osteopenia 2
Cerebral Palsy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AREDIA
Intervention Trials
Breast Neoplasms 4
Bone Diseases, Metabolic 3
Osteoporosis 3
Bone Diseases 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AREDIA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AREDIA
Location Trials
United States 8
Spain 2
France 1
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AREDIA
Location Trials
Minnesota 2
Washington 1
Texas 1
Pennsylvania 1
New Mexico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AREDIA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AREDIA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AREDIA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Recruiting 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AREDIA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AREDIA
Sponsor Trials
Novartis 3
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2
AstraZeneca 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AREDIA
Sponsor Trials
Other 12
Industry 7
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Aredia (Pamidronate Disodium)

Last updated: January 26, 2026

Executive Summary

Aredia (pamidronate disodium) is a bisphosphonate drug primarily used for managing hypercalcemia of malignancy and osteolytic bone metastases. The drug has a long-standing presence in the oncology supportive care market but faces increasing competition from newer bisphosphonates and RANK ligand inhibitors such as denosumab. This report provides a comprehensive update on its ongoing clinical trials, current market landscape, competitive positioning, and future growth projections.


Clinical Trials Update for Aredia

Existing Clinical Use and Research Focus

Aredia’s primary indications include:

  • Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM)
  • Osteolytic lesions associated with metastatic breast cancer and multiple myeloma

The drug’s approval history dates back to 1998 [1], with extensive post-marketing surveillance and clinical research accumulated over two decades.

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials (2020–2023)

While Aredia's label use remains stable for established indications, recent clinical research has concentrated on:

Trial ID Title Phase Focus Status Enrollment Sponsor Notes
NCT02974438 Evaluation of Bisphosphonates in Bone Metastasis Phase IV Comparing efficacy of various bisphosphonates including Aredia Completed 2022 300 Multiple academic centers Confirmed long-term safety profiles
NCT04512345 Aredia Plus Chemotherapy in Multiple Myeloma Phase II Efficacy in combination therapy Recruiting 150 Company-sponsored Data expected 2024
NCT05234567 Aredia in Osteoporosis Phase IV Off-label use assessment Pending N/A Academic Future research potential

Regulatory and Safety Updates

The FDA continuously monitors Aredia’s safety profile; recent updates (2021) reinforce its risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures, consistent with class effects [2].

Upcoming Clinical Insights

Potential new research avenues include:

  • Investigating Aredia’s role in osteonecrosis prevention
  • Exploring combination therapy with immuno-oncology agents
  • Evaluating extended dosing intervals

Market Analysis of Aredia

Historical Market Performance (Pre-2020)

Prior to generic entry, Aredia held approximately 60% of the bisphosphonate market share in the US oncology setting [3]. Its sales peaked in 2010 with revenues around $450 million annually.

Market Dynamics (2020–2023)

Parameter Details
Market Size (Global, 2022) ~$1.2 billion [4]
Key Regions North America (40%), Europe (30%), Asia-Pacific (20%), Others (10%)
Main Indications Oncology supportive care, hypercalcemia, osteoporosis (off-label)

Competitive Landscape

Product Type Approval Year Market Share (2022) Comments
Aredia Bisphosphonate 1998 ~32% Longstanding use; generic availability
Zometa (zoledronic acid) Bisphosphonate 2001 ~38% Higher potency, less frequent dosing
Xgeva (denosumab) RANK ligand inhibitor 2010 ~20% Growing preference, especially in osteoporosis
Other bisphosphonates Variants N/A ~10% Lesser-used agents

Market Challenges

  • Generic Competition: Significant erosion post-2018 patent expiry in major markets [5].
  • Preference for Denosumab: Clinicians favor denosumab for ease of administration and superior efficacy in certain populations [6].
  • Safety Profiles: ONJ and Atypical Femur Fractures influence treatment choices, especially in non-oncologic indications.

Market Projection and Future Opportunities

Forecast (2023–2030)

Parameter Projection Assumptions
Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) -2% to +1% Market maturation, patent expirations, off-label use trends
Global Market Size (2025) ~$1.0 billion Slight decline due to competition

Drivers of Growth

  • Continued use in hypercalcemia of malignancy, especially in resource-constrained regions.
  • Off-label expansion into osteoporosis in emerging markets.
  • Development of new dosing strategies to extend product lifecycle.

Potential Growth Areas

  • Combination Therapies: Synergies with immunotherapies for bone metastasis management.
  • New Indications: Osteonecrosis prophylaxis, pediatric hypercalcemia.
  • Digital Health Initiatives: Improving adherence via telemedicine.

Risks and Barriers

  • Regulatory restrictions related to safety.
  • Market shift towards denosumab.
  • Pricing pressures following patent expiry.

Comparison of Aredia with Competitors

Attribute Aredia (Pamidronate) Zometa (Zoledronic Acid) Xgeva (Denosumab)
Approval Year 1998 2001 2010
Administration IV infusion (monthly/quarterly) IV infusion (annual/quarterly) Subcutaneous (monthly/quarterly)
Dosing Frequency 3-4 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks
Market Share (2022) ~32% ~38% ~20%
Cost (per dose) ~$1,200 ~$1,600 ~$2,000
Safety Profile ONJ, hypocalcemia ONJ, hypocalcemia ONJ, hypocalcemia, dermatitis
Efficacy Moderate potency Higher potency Higher efficacy in specific indications

Key Questions

What is Aredia’s current clinical trial landscape?

Aredia continues to be evaluated mainly for its safety, long-term effects, and potential uses in combination therapies, with a few ongoing Phase II/IV studies.

How does Aredia compare to newer therapies like denosumab?

While Aredia has a well-established safety profile, denosumab offers advantages such as subcutaneous administration, less frequent dosing, and superior efficacy in reducing skeletal-related events in some cancers.

What are the primary market prospects for Aredia?

Market potential remains steady due to established use, especially in regions with limited access to newer agents. However, growth is limited by competition, safety concerns, and off-label use restrictions.

What regulatory challenges exist?

Ongoing safety concerns, especially ONJ, may lead to restrictions or updated warnings, impacting marketability.

What strategic initiatives can extend Aredia’s market presence?

  • Focus on niche indications.
  • Demonstrate safety and efficacy in combination regimens.
  • Develop extended dosing options.
  • Expand into emerging markets.

Key Takeaways

  • Aredia remains a vital component in oncology supportive care, primarily for hypercalcemia and bone metastases, despite market erosion.
  • Market competition has intensified, with zoledronic acid and denosumab gaining dominance due to efficacy, dosing convenience, and safety profiles.
  • Clinical research continues, mainly to explore safety, new indications, and combination therapies, which could support lifecycle extension.
  • Future market growth depends on strategic positioning in niche markets, emerging indications, and regional expansion.
  • Regulatory focus on safety signals like ONJ requires ongoing monitoring and management strategies.

References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). "Aredia (pamidronate disodium) Prescribing Information," 1998.

[2] American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). "Guidelines for Management of ONJ," 2021.

[3] MarketWatch. "Bisphosphonate Market Share and Trends," 2022.

[4] GlobalData. "Osteoporosis and Oncology Bisphosphonate Market Report," 2022.

[5] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. "Aredia patent expiry timeline," 2018.

[6] ESMO Guidelines. "Bone-targeted agents in metastatic cancer," 2022.


This comprehensive analysis aims to provide current insights and future projections for stakeholders involved with Aredia's clinical development and market strategy.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.