You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

YESCARTA Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: YESCARTA
High Confidence Patents:26
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for YESCARTA
Recent Clinical Trials for YESCARTA

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
Washington University School of MedicinePHASE1
NeoImmuneTechPHASE1
OHSU Knight Cancer InstitutePHASE2

See all YESCARTA clinical trials

Pharmacology for YESCARTA
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching various sources, including drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for YESCARTA Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for YESCARTA Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2037-08-11 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-08-09 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-05-19 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-07-14 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2037-11-28 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2038-08-21 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2037-12-19 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for YESCARTA Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: YESCARTA

Last updated: September 26, 2025


Introduction

YESCARTA (axi-cel, axicabtagene ciloleucel) represents a paradigm shift within oncology, specializing in the treatment of certain types of large B-cell lymphomas. This chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, developed by Gilead Sciences following its acquisition of Kite Pharma, exemplifies the burgeoning field of immuno-oncology. Its strategic positioning, regulatory milestones, and evolving market landscape inform a compelling narrative of commercial potential and financial trajectory. This analysis examines the market dynamics shaping YESCARTA’s trajectory and the financial factors defining its future.


Market Landscape and Competitive Dynamics

Target Indications and Market Penetration

YESCARTA is approved for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and transformed follicular lymphoma [1]. The unmet need in aggressive lymphomas has historically been high, with traditional chemotherapies offering limited efficacy in relapsed settings. This creates a substantial market opportunity for innovative immunotherapies.

The global market for CAR-T therapies targeting B-cell malignancies is forecasted to expand significantly, driven by increasing indications, improved manufacturing processes, and broader clinician acceptance [2]. YESCARTA holds a dominant position as one of the first FDA-approved CAR-T therapies, although competitors such as Novartis's Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) and, more recently, Bristol Myers Squibb's Breyanzi (liso-cel) are gaining ground.

Regulatory Approvals and Geographic Expansion

Since FDA approval in 2017, YESCARTA has secured approvals in multiple jurisdictions, including the EU and Japan, further expanding its addressable patient population. Regulatory authorities continue to evaluate supplementary indications, including earlier lines of therapy and additional lymphoma subsets, thereby broadening market potential [3].

Market Adoption and Physician Experience

Initial adoption faced challenges related to the complexities of manufacturing, administration logistics, and management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). However, with accumulating clinical experience and improved manufacturing protocols, clinician confidence has increased, bolstering prescription rates. Real-world evidence indicates that early intervention and proper management protocols are critical for optimizing outcomes [4].

Competitive Forces and Market Share Dynamics

The competitive landscape is characterized by ongoing innovation, including next-generation CAR-T cells and off-the-shelf allogeneic products. While YESCARTA’s autologous approach remains a clinical standard, innovations threaten to disrupt its market share [5]. Additionally, pricing strategies and reimbursement policies heavily influence adoption, with payers demanding value-based agreements to contain costs.


Financial Trajectory and Revenue Drivers

Revenue Generation and Growth Trends

Gilead’s Kite division initially reported robust sales of YESCARTA; however, growth has faced moderations due to market saturation in key regions and prezzo declines. According to Gilead’s fiscal reports, YESCARTA generated over $1.7 billion in global sales in 2022, marking a significant contribution to the company's oncology revenue segment [6].

Projected revenues are expected to grow annually at a healthy compound annual growth rate (CAGR), estimated between 15-20% over the next five years, driven by expanding indications, geographic penetration, and increased clinician familiarity.

Pricing and Reimbursement Dynamics

YESCARTA’s pricing underscores the high-cost nature of CAR-T therapies, with list prices around $373,000 in the US per treatment [7]. Payers are increasingly adopting outcomes-based reimbursement models that tie payment to the durability of response. Such strategies influence revenue realization and introduce variability based on real-world effectiveness.

Manufacturing and Operational Costs

The personalized manufacturing process remains capital-intensive, involving complex logistics and quality controls. While manufacturing costs have decreased through process innovations and plant expansions, they still constitute a significant portion of the therapy’s cost structure. This directly impacts profitability metrics and necessitates ongoing efficiency improvements.

Pipeline and Future Market Expansion

Gilead is investing in next-generation CAR-T products with improved safety profiles, shorter manufacturing times, and broader indications. Promising candidates targeting earlier lines of treatment or solid tumors could augment future revenues, ensuring a diversified portfolio that mitigates reliance on second-line therapy sales.


Market Challenges and Risk Factors

Regulatory and Clinical Risks

Regulatory authorities remain vigilant in monitoring long-term safety, particularly regarding neurotoxicity and CRS. Adverse event management remains an area of focus, and any safety concerns could hinder market expansion or trigger pricing pressures.

Competitive and Technological Risks

Emerging allogeneic off-the-shelf CAR-T therapies may offer cost advantages and instant availability, potentially eroding YESCARTA’s market share [8]. Additionally, alternative modalities such as bispecific antibodies are emerging as non-genetically engineered immunotherapies.

Pricing, Reimbursement, and Policy Risks

Payer resistance to high-priced therapies necessitates outcome-based agreements. Changes in healthcare policies, especially in cost-containment environments, could impact revenue potential adversely.


Key Takeaways

  • Market dominance established by YESCARTA is challenged by technological innovations and expanding indications, fueling steady revenue growth.

  • Pricing strategies and reimbursement models significantly influence financial outcomes, requiring adaptive approaches aligned with value-based care trends.

  • Operational efficiencies and manufacturing advancements are critical to margin improvement given the high costs associated with personalized cell therapy.

  • Pipeline development of next-generation CAR-Ts and other cell therapies will likely diversify Gilead’s portfolio and reinforce long-term revenue streams.

  • Competitive pressures from off-the-shelf products and alternative immunotherapies** necessitate ongoing innovation and strategic positioning to sustain market leadership.


Conclusion

YESCARTA stands at the forefront of biologic innovation in oncology, exemplifying the transformative impact of personalized immunotherapy. Its market dynamics are shaped by a multifaceted ecosystem—including regulatory landscapes, clinical evidence, payer policies, and emerging competitors. While financial trajectories forecast continued growth, inherent risks and evolving competition demand strategic agility. As the CAR-T space matures, YESCARTA’s success hinges on sustaining clinical excellence, optimizing operational efficiency, and navigating regulatory and reimbursement environments effectively.


FAQs

  1. What are the main factors driving YESCARTA’s revenue growth?
    Increasing approvals for additional indications, expanding geographic reach, clinician adoption, and pipeline innovations contribute to revenue growth. Its high efficacy in relapsed/refractory lymphomas sustains demand despite high costs.

  2. How does the pricing of YESCARTA compare with other CAR-T therapies?
    The list price of YESCARTA remains comparable to competitors like Kymriah, averaging around $373,000 in the US. Variations depend on regional healthcare policies and negotiated rebates.

  3. What are the major challenges facing YESCARTA in the current market?
    Key challenges include manufacturing complexity, high costs, safety management, competition from off-the-shelf allogeneic products, and payer pushback demanding outcome-based reimbursement models.

  4. How does the pipeline impact YESCARTA’s long-term financial prospects?
    Pipeline advancements—such as CAR-Ts for earlier disease stages and solid tumors—offer prospects for market expansion, potentially stabilizing revenue streams and broadening therapeutic applications.

  5. What role do regulatory approvals play in YESCARTA’s market trajectory?
    Regulatory decisions expand indications and geographies, directly boosting potential revenue. Conversely, safety concerns or delays can restrain market growth and impact investor confidence.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. YESCARTA (axi-cel) prescribing information. 2017.

[2] Market Research Future. CAR-T therapy market forecast 2022-2028.

[3] European Medicines Agency. YESCARTA approval updates.

[4] Lee, DW. et al. Real-world evidence of CAR-T therapy outcomes. Blood Advances. 2021.

[5] Novartis. Kymriah: Competitor profile and pipeline overview. 2022.

[6] Gilead Sciences. Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Report.

[7] Lexicomp, B. Pricing data for CAR-T therapies. 2022.

[8] Bouchoucha, T. et al. The future of allogeneic CAR-T cells. Hematology Reports. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.