You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Axicabtagene ciloleucel - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for axicabtagene ciloleucel
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for axicabtagene ciloleucel
Recent Clinical Trials for axicabtagene ciloleucel

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
National Cancer Institute (NCI)PHASE2
City of Hope Medical CenterPHASE2
Washington University School of MedicinePHASE1

See all axicabtagene ciloleucel clinical trials

Pharmacology for axicabtagene ciloleucel
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for axicabtagene ciloleucel Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for axicabtagene ciloleucel Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2037-08-11 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-08-09 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-05-19 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. YESCARTA axicabtagene ciloleucel Injection 125643 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-07-14 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for axicabtagene ciloleucel Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Axicabtagene Ciloleucel

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (marketed as Yescarta) is a pioneering chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy designed to treat certain hematologic malignancies, notably large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Since its FDA approval in 2017, the drug has emerged as a key player in the personalized immunotherapy landscape, influencing market dynamics and financial trajectories within the biotech and oncology sectors. Analyzing its evolving landscape involves understanding regulatory pathways, competitive positioning, reimbursement patterns, manufacturing challenges, and broader market forces.

Market Overview and Key Therapeutic Indications

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is approved for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and transformed follicular lymphoma.[1] Its approval marked a significant advancement in adoptive cell therapy, introducing a new modality for previously limited treatment options.

The global CAR-T cell therapy market is projected to grow significantly, estimated to reach approximately US$8-10 billion by 2026, driven by increased adoption, expanding indications, and technological advancements.[2] As of 2022, Yescarta maintains a leading position in this sector, although competition from rivals like Novartis’s Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) and Gilead/Kite’s Tecartus influences its market share.

Market Dynamics

Regulatory Landscape and Approvals

The regulatory environment significantly influences the trajectory of axicabtagene ciloleucel. Its initial approval by the FDA in 2017 for specific lymphoma subtypes set a precedent for accelerated pathways and breakthrough designations that streamlined subsequent approvals.[1] Post-approval, ongoing studies aim to expand indications, including earlier lines of therapy and additional malignancies such as primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and certain pediatric indications.

Regulatory agencies like the EMA and Japan’s PMDA have followed suit, providing approvals that extend the therapy’s reach globally. However, disparities in geographic approval timelines and reimbursement policies present challenges and opportunities for market penetration.

Competitive Positioning and Differentiation

While axicabtagene ciloleucel pioneered the CAR-T market, competitors have rapidly advanced. Kymriah achieved approvals for pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and certain non-Hodgkin lymphomas, broadening its market scope.[3] Tecartus, with its primary indications in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), has also expanded the Gilead/Kite portfolio.

Differentiation factors for Yescarta include its manufacturing process, efficacy data, and safety profile. However, adverse events like cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity remain barriers. Manufacturers continue optimizing lymphodepletion regimens and supportive care to mitigate these risks.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain Challenges

Autologous CAR-T therapies pose significant manufacturing challenges, including complexity, cost, and time delays. Yescarta’s production involves harvesting a patient’s T-cells, engineering them to express CARs, and then reinfusing them—a process that can take several weeks.[4] Supply chain disruptions or manufacturing bottlenecks directly impact market availability and financial performance.

Innovations like centralized manufacturing, automation, and the exploration of allogeneic (“off-the-shelf”) CAR-T products aim to address these issues. Nonetheless, current manufacturing constraints influence market penetration and revenue realization.

Reimbursement and Pricing Pressures

Pricing for axicabtagene ciloleucel remains high, often exceeding US$373,000 per treatment course, reflecting its personalized manufacturing process and innovative nature.[5] Reimbursement negotiations are complex, with payers demanding evidence of cost-effectiveness and long-term benefit.

The evolving landscape of value-based agreements and outcomes-based payments could influence the financial trajectory, potentially improving access but also exerting pressure on margins. Payers’ growing emphasis on health economics impacts future reimbursement rates and adoption speed.

Market Penetration and Patient Access

Initially concentrated in academic centers and specialized hospitals, access to Yescarta is expanding as manufacturing scales and reimbursement mechanisms improve. Efforts to streamline delivery and increase manufacturing capacity are crucial for broader adoption.

The therapy’s relatively high cost and the need for specialized infrastructure limit widespread deployment, particularly in emerging markets. Nevertheless, ongoing clinical trials aiming at earlier lines of therapy and combination strategies could further expand its patient base, affecting long-term revenue streams.

Financial Trajectory Analysis

Revenue Trends

Since its market launch, axicabtagene ciloleucel has demonstrated robust growth within its target indications. For example, Regeneron’s 2022 financial disclosures indicated Yescarta generated approximately US$1.1 billion worldwide in 2021, with a steady upward trajectory anticipated as indications expand and access broadens.[6]

Revenue generation depends heavily on treatment volume, manufacturing capacity, and payer acceptance. Notably, a significant portion of revenues originates from the U.S., where reimbursement and advanced healthcare infrastructure facilitate adoption.

Cost Structure and Profitability

High manufacturing costs and logistical complexity result in substantial per-treatment expenses, affecting margins. Estimates suggest manufacturing costs range from US$20,000 to US$50,000 per patient, with further costs for clinical administration, monitoring, and adverse event management.[4] Gross margins are thus heavily influenced by scale efficiencies and reimbursement policies.

Profitability remains favorable for manufacturers with economies of scale, but sustained growth requires continual investment in manufacturing capacity, clinical development, and logistics. Unit economics are expected to improve over time as production processes mature and technological innovations reduce costs.

Investment and Market Outlook

Vaccine and biopharma companies are investing heavily in CAR-T development, including next-generation constructs with enhanced efficacy and safety profiles. Public market investors look favorably upon high-growth potential CAR-T products like Yescarta, provided they can overcome manufacturing and reimbursement hurdles.

The upcoming pipeline advancements, such as dual-targeting CARs and allogeneic “off-the-shelf” products, may disrupt current financial trajectories, providing broader and more affordable access and expanding revenue opportunities.

Future Market Drivers and Challenges

Positive Drivers

  • Expanded Indications: Clinical trials exploring Yescarta’s efficacy in indolent lymphomas, multiple myeloma, and solid tumors could augment sales.
  • Earlier Lines of Therapy: Moving CAR-T earlier in treatment algorithms promises increased patient populations.
  • Global Expansion: Increasing approvals and reimbursement in Europe, Asia, and emerging markets expand market size.
  • Technological Innovations: Automation, allogeneic CAR-T, and combination therapies can improve safety, reduce costs, and facilitate faster deployment.

Challenges

  • Manufacturing Bottlenecks: Capacity constraints threaten the ability to meet demand.
  • Safety Concerns and Management: Safety profile improvements are critical to broader acceptance.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement Pressures: Cost containment policies could limit revenue growth.
  • Competitive Landscape: Success of rival CAR-Ts and pipeline candidates influences market share.

Conclusion

Axicabtagene ciloleucel stands at a pivotal juncture. Its initial success as a first-generation CAR-T therapy has established it as a cornerstone in hematologic oncology. Future growth hinges on scaling manufacturing, securing reimbursement, expanding indications, and technological innovations to improve safety and efficacy. Strategic positioning and continuous clinical development will determine its long-term financial trajectory, shaping the broader landscape of personalized immunotherapy.


Key Takeaways

  • Axicabtagene ciloleucel continues to dominate the CAR-T market, with strong growth prospects driven by expanded indications and global deployment.
  • Manufacturing complexities and high treatment costs remain primary challenges affecting financial margins and access.
  • Regulatory approvals and reimbursement policies are critical determinants influencing market penetration and revenue trajectory.
  • Innovation in allogeneic CAR-T products and combination regimens has the potential to unlock new markets and improve profitability.
  • Strategic focus on safety, scalability, and affordability will be essential for sustaining growth and maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main clinical indications for axicabtagene ciloleucel?
A: It is approved for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy, including DLBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and transformed follicular lymphoma.

Q2: How does manufacturing affect the financial performance of Yescarta?
A: Manufacturing complexities and costs influence profit margins and supply availability; scaling and technological innovations aim to reduce these costs and improve profitability.

Q3: What strategies are manufacturers employing to expand access to Yescarta?
A: Strategies include increasing manufacturing capacity, streamlining logistics, conducting clinical trials for earlier-line indications, and navigating reimbursement negotiations.

Q4: How does competition impact Yescarta’s market share?
A: Competitors like Kymriah and Tecartus offer alternative CAR-T therapies with overlapping indications, necessitating differentiation through efficacy, safety, and cost management.

Q5: What future innovations could influence the market trajectory of axicabtagene ciloleucel?
A: Advances such as allogeneic (“off-the-shelf”) CAR-T products, dual-targeting constructs, and combination therapies could expand indications, reduce costs, and improve safety profiles.


Sources

[1] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Yescarta (Axicabtagene ciloleucel) Prescribing Information. 2017.
[2] Grand View Research. CAR-T Cell Therapy Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report, 2022.
[3] Novartis. Kymriah Prescribing Information. 2017.
[4] Brudno, J.N., et al. Manufacturing Challenges and Innovations in CAR-T Therapy. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2021.
[5] IMS Health. Biologics Pricing Report, 2022.
[6] Regeneron Financial Report, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.