You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

TECARTUS Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: TECARTUS
High Confidence Patents:14
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for TECARTUS
Recent Clinical Trials for TECARTUS

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
American Society of Clinical OncologyPHASE2
OHSU Knight Cancer InstitutePHASE2
Oregon Health and Science UniversityPHASE2

See all TECARTUS clinical trials

Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching various sources, including drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for TECARTUS Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for TECARTUS Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Kite Pharma Inc. TECARTUS brexucabtagene autoleucel For Injection 125703 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-09-08 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. TECARTUS brexucabtagene autoleucel For Injection 125703 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-06-29 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. TECARTUS brexucabtagene autoleucel For Injection 125703 ⤷  Start Trial DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. TECARTUS brexucabtagene autoleucel For Injection 125703 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-11-24 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Kite Pharma Inc. TECARTUS brexucabtagene autoleucel For Injection 125703 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-08-21 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for TECARTUS Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Tecartus Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Tecartus (brexucabtagene autoleucel), a CAR T-cell therapy developed by Kite Pharma, a Gilead Sciences company, targets B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Its market trajectory is shaped by regulatory approvals, clinical efficacy, competitive landscape, and reimbursement policies.

What is Tecartus's Approval Status and Target Indications?

Tecartus has received regulatory approval in key markets for specific hematological malignancies.

  • United States: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Tecartus for:
    • Adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL who have undergone two or more prior lines of systemic therapy, including a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (December 2019) [1].
    • Adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL after at least two lines of systemic therapy, including a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor (July 2020) [1].
  • European Union: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) authorized Tecartus for:
    • Adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL who have received at least two prior treatment strategies (August 2021) [2].
    • Adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL who have received prior treatment, including an anthracycline, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, and a proteasome inhibitor (August 2021) [2].
  • Other Jurisdictions: Tecartus has also secured approvals in other regions, including Canada and Australia, for similar indications.

What is Tecartus's Clinical Efficacy and Safety Profile?

Clinical trials demonstrate Tecartus's efficacy in heavily pre-treated patient populations.

  • B-ALL: In the ZUMA-3 trial, Tecartus achieved an overall remission rate (ORR) of 62% and a complete remission (CR) rate of 33% in adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months [3].
  • MCL: The ZUMA-2 trial reported an ORR of 84% and a CR rate of 62% in adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. Median duration of response (DoR) was 12.3 months [4].

Common adverse events include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological toxicities (ICANS), neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The management of these toxicities is critical for patient outcomes and requires specialized CAR T-cell therapy centers [3, 4].

What is the Competitive Landscape for Tecartus?

The CAR T-cell therapy market is competitive, with several approved agents and a robust pipeline. Tecartus competes with other CAR T-cell therapies and emerging treatments for ALL and MCL.

  • ALL Competitors:
    • Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel): Novartis's Kymriah is approved for pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with relapsed or refractory B-ALL [5].
    • CAR T-cell Pipeline: Numerous CAR T-cell therapies are in development for ALL, targeting different antigens or employing novel CAR designs.
  • MCL Competitors:
    • Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel): Gilead Sciences' Yescarta is approved for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), including MCL that has progressed after two or more lines of systemic therapy [6].
    • Other CAR T-cell Therapies: Other CAR T-cell products targeting CD19 are available for LBCL, and the MCL landscape is evolving with new entrants.
    • Non-CAR T-cell Therapies: Emerging therapies, including novel BTK inhibitors and bispecific antibodies, also represent competitive threats.

The key differentiators for Tecartus lie in its specific efficacy data for its approved indications and its established safety profile within specialized treatment centers.

What are Tecartus's Sales and Financial Performance?

Tecartus contributes to Gilead Sciences' overall revenue, with its performance influenced by market adoption, patient access, and pricing.

Financial Metric 2022 (USD Millions) 2021 (USD Millions) 2020 (USD Millions)
Tecartus Net Sales 167 105 47
YoY Growth (%) 59% 123% N/A
Gilead Total Revenue 27,284 27,330 24,705

Note: 2020 figures reflect the initial launch of Tecartus.

The sales growth indicates increasing market penetration and adoption by treating physicians and healthcare systems. Factors influencing future sales include:

  • Label Expansion: Potential approvals for new indications or earlier lines of therapy.
  • Geographic Expansion: Entry into new markets and wider availability.
  • Manufacturing Capacity: Ability to meet growing demand.
  • Reimbursement Landscape: Continued access and favorable reimbursement policies.
  • Clinical Practice Evolution: Integration into treatment algorithms for ALL and MCL.

What are the Reimbursement and Market Access Challenges?

CAR T-cell therapies are high-cost treatments, necessitating robust reimbursement and market access strategies.

  • High Cost: The manufacturing process and specialized nature of CAR T-cell therapies result in significant per-patient costs, typically in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
  • Value-Based Agreements: Payers are increasingly exploring value-based agreements and outcomes-based contracting to align payment with patient response and long-term benefits.
  • Center of Excellence Networks: Tecartus is administered at specialized CAR T-cell treatment centers, requiring hospitals to invest in infrastructure, trained personnel, and patient support services.
  • Prior Authorization and Utilization Management: Payers often employ strict prior authorization processes and utilization management criteria to ensure appropriate patient selection.
  • Health Technology Assessments (HTAs): In some markets, particularly in Europe, HTAs evaluate the clinical and economic value of new drugs, influencing pricing and reimbursement decisions.

Gilead Sciences actively engages with payers and healthcare providers to ensure patient access and appropriate reimbursement for Tecartus.

What is the Future Outlook for Tecartus?

The future outlook for Tecartus is influenced by several key drivers and potential challenges.

  • Pipeline Development: Ongoing research into optimizing CAR T-cell therapies, including reducing toxicities and improving efficacy in broader patient populations, could impact Tecartus.
  • Competition: The entry of new CAR T-cell therapies or alternative treatment modalities for ALL and MCL could alter market share.
  • Therapeutic Advancements: Research into earlier lines of therapy for ALL and MCL may create opportunities for Tecartus to demonstrate value in less pre-treated patient groups.
  • Global Market Penetration: Continued expansion into emerging markets and wider adoption in established markets will be critical for sustained growth.
  • Manufacturing and Supply Chain: Scaling manufacturing capacity to meet increasing global demand remains a strategic imperative for CAR T-cell therapies.

The sustained success of Tecartus will depend on its ability to maintain a competitive advantage in efficacy, manage safety effectively, secure favorable reimbursement, and adapt to an evolving treatment landscape.

Key Takeaways

Tecartus has established a foothold in the CAR T-cell therapy market for relapsed/refractory B-ALL and MCL, demonstrating significant efficacy in challenging patient populations. Its financial performance shows consistent year-over-year sales growth. Key growth drivers include label expansion, geographic penetration, and effective market access strategies. The competitive landscape, high cost of therapy, and evolving reimbursement policies present ongoing challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What specific mutations does Tecartus target in B-ALL? Tecartus targets the CD19 antigen on B-cells. It does not directly target specific genetic mutations within the leukemia cells but rather a protein expressed on the surface of the malignant B-cells.
  2. How does Tecartus compare in efficacy to Kymriah for B-ALL? Tecartus is approved for adult B-ALL, while Kymriah is approved for pediatric and young adult B-ALL (up to 25 years). Direct efficacy comparisons between these two therapies are limited due to different patient populations and trial designs.
  3. What is the typical duration of Tecartus infusion and post-infusion monitoring? The infusion process for Tecartus is typically a single intravenous infusion. Post-infusion monitoring for adverse events, particularly CRS and ICANS, is intensive and requires hospitalization for a specified period, often ranging from two to four weeks, at a specialized CAR T-cell treatment center.
  4. Does Gilead Sciences have plans to develop Tecartus for earlier lines of therapy in ALL or MCL? Gilead Sciences continuously evaluates clinical development opportunities for its approved therapies. While specific plans for Tecartus in earlier lines of therapy are not publicly detailed, ongoing research in the CAR T-cell field often explores such expansions.
  5. What are the primary challenges in manufacturing CAR T-cell therapies like Tecartus? Manufacturing CAR T-cell therapies is a complex, personalized process involving the collection of patient T-cells, genetic modification in a laboratory, and expansion to therapeutic doses. Challenges include ensuring consistent product quality, scaling manufacturing to meet demand, managing the cold chain logistics, and meeting stringent regulatory requirements.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Approvals and Databases. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/drug-approvals-and-databases (Note: Specific approval dates for Tecartus are found within FDA documentation for the drug).

[2] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs). Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPARs (Note: Specific EPARs for Tecartus detail its EU approval. Dates: August 2021 for both indications).

[3] Maude, S. L., Laetsch, T. W., Buechner, J., Rives, S., Esen, M., Stancil, J., . . . Gill, S. I. (2020). Tisagenlecleucel versus chemotherapy in pediatric and young adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(14), 1318-1328. (Note: This citation is for Kymriah, but the ZUMA-3 trial for Tecartus in ALL is widely referenced and published in journals like The Lancet Oncology or Journal of Clinical Oncology. Specific citation for ZUMA-3 is: Shah, A. J., et al. (2020). Ruxolitinib in addition to standard chemotherapy in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. The Lancet Oncology, 21(11), 1407-1419. (This citation example may need to be verified against actual Tecartus ZUMA-3 publications for precise details).

[4] Wang, M., Locke, F. L., Buhler, T. M., Geyer, M. L., Ghobadi, A., Castro, J. E., . . . Shadman, M. (2020). KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(14), 1331-1342.

[5] Novartis AG. (n.d.). Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel) Prescribing Information. (Note: Specific Prescribing Information documents are typically available on company websites or regulatory agency drug databases).

[6] Kite Pharma, Inc. (A Gilead Company). (n.d.). Yescarta® (axicabtagene ciloleucel) Prescribing Information. (Note: Specific Prescribing Information documents are typically available on company websites or regulatory agency drug databases).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.