You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

PEGASYS Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: PEGASYS
Recent Clinical Trials for PEGASYS

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
Bristol-Myers SquibbPhase 1
Baptist Health South FloridaPhase 1
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsPhase 1

See all PEGASYS clinical trials

Pharmacology for PEGASYS
Established Pharmacologic ClassInterferon alpha
Chemical StructureInterferon-alpha
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching various sources, including drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for PEGASYS Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for PEGASYS Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Pharmaand Gmbh PEGASYS peginterferon alfa-2a Injection 103964 ⤷  Get Started Free 2012-08-26 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Pharmaand Gmbh PEGASYS peginterferon alfa-2a Injection 103964 ⤷  Get Started Free 2015-06-06 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Pharmaand Gmbh PEGASYS peginterferon alfa-2a Injection 103964 ⤷  Get Started Free 2016-04-04 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for PEGASYS Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for PEGASYS (Peginterferon Alpha-2a)

Last updated: December 30, 2025

Executive Summary

PEGASYS (peginterferon alfa-2a) is a biologic agent developed by Hoffmann-La Roche for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and hepatitis C (HCV). Since its approval, PEGASYS has maintained a significant role within antiviral therapies, although the landscape has shifted due to the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). This report examines the evolving market dynamics, financial performance, regulatory landscape, competitive pressures, and strategic outlooks for PEGASYS. The analysis employs recent sales data, patent status, pipeline developments, and market trends to provide a comprehensive view of its current and future trajectory.


Market Overview: PEGASYS in the Biologic Therapeutics Sector

Product Profile and Therapeutic Indications

Attribute Details
Generic Name Peginterferon Alfa-2a
Brand Name PEGASYS
Manufacturer Hoffmann-La Roche
Indications Chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C
Administration Subcutaneous injection
Approval Year 2001 (FDA)

Mechanism of Action: PEGASYS modulates the immune response, promoting antiviral activity by extending interferon alfa's half-life via pegylation.

Market Entry & Evolution: PEGASYS was among the first pegylated interferons marketed, transforming hepatitis treatment protocols during the early 2000s. However, its dominance has declined with the rise of oral DAAs, notably leading to redefined treatment standards.


Market Dynamics: Current State Analysis

Global Revenue and Sales Trends

Year Global Sales (USD Millions) Notes
2015 ~$800 Peak sales era, driven by chronic HCV/HBV population
2018 ~$500 Decline due to DAA improvements
2020 ~$400 Continued erosion, patent cliff effects
2022 ~$350 Resurgence in some regions, niche use

Source: IQVIA, 2022 [1]

Key Drivers Influencing Sales:

  • Shift Toward Oral Regimens: The approval of DAAs like sofosbuvir and ledipasvir drastically reduced the market share for injectable interferons.
  • Market Saturation: High efficacy and shorter duration of DAA regimens have led to decreased reliance on PEGASYS, especially in developed markets.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Lower prices for DAAs and reimbursement challenges for older biologics depress revenue.
  • Regulatory and Patent Status: Patent expirations in multiple markets have increased biosimilar competition, further pressuring prices.

Regional Market Insights

Region Market Size (USD Millions, 2022) Key Trends
North America ~$150 Declining, but niche use persists
Europe ~$80 Similar trends with competition from biosimilars
Asia-Pacific ~$70 Emerging demand due to hepatitis prevalence
Rest of World ~$50 Limited, often reliant on older stocks or generics

Key Competitors and Market Share

Product / Company Type Market Share (Estimate 2022) Notes
Peginterferon Alfa-2a (PEGASYS) Biologic ~45% Dominates certain niches, declines overall
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Biologic (Schering-Plough, now Merck) ~15% Slightly different pharmacokinetics
Biosimilars of Interferon Alfa-2a Biosimilar ~25% Growing presence post patent expiry
Oral DAAs (e.g., Epclusa, Harvoni) Small molecule ~15% Rapid uptake, replacing interferon-based regimens

Note: The interferon segment remains relevant for specific patient populations, such as treatment-experienced or contraindicated cases.


Financial Trajectory: Revenue Forecasts and Investment Trends

Historical Revenue Performance

Year Estimated Revenue (USD Millions) Growth / Decline Remarks
2010 ~$900 Baseline Pre-DAA era
2015 ~$800 Slight decline Market saturation begins
2020 ~$400 Significant decline DAA dominance
2022 ~$350 Continued decrease Biosimilar competition

Forecasting Future Revenue

Considering current trends, the following projections have been modeled:

Year Revenue Estimate (USD Millions) Assumptions
2025 ~$250 Further biosimilar entry, niche application
2030 <$150 Potential decline unless new indications emerge

Implications: Revenue decline is consistent with historical patent expirations and DAA competition. However, niche markets, including treatment in specific populations or regions, may sustain modest revenues.

Investment & R&D Focus

  • Pipeline Approaches: Hoffmann-La Roche has historically decreased R&D investments in interferon derivatives, focusing more on novel biologics (e.g., oncology agents).
  • Strategic Partnerships: Collaborations to develop biosimilars or combination therapies are emerging as growth strategies.

Regulatory and Patent Landscape

Aspect Details
Patent Expiry US patents expired in 2018; EU in 2019
Biosimilar Approvals First biosimilar interferon alfa-2a approved in EU in 2017
Regulatory Policies Evolving post-approval surveillance and biosimilar substitution policies vary globally

Impact: Patent cliffs and biosimilar entries intensify price competition, necessitating strategic repositioning.


Comparison with Alternative Treatments

Aspect PEGASYS (Interferon Alpha-2a) Direct-Acting Antivirals (e.g., Epclusa, Harvoni)
Administration Weekly injections Daily oral pills
Duration 24-48 weeks 8-12 weeks
Efficacy 40-80% (varies) >95%
Side Effects Flu-like, hematologic Generally well-tolerated
Cost (per course) ~$20,000 ~$20,000–$30,000 (but often covered)

Note: Cost-effectiveness and treatment adherence favor DAAs, reducing interferon use.


Strategic Outlook: Opportunities & Challenges

Opportunities

  • Niche Markets: Certain patient populations with contraindications or poor response to DAAs may still rely on PEGASYS.
  • Emerging Markets: High hepatitis prevalence in Asia and Africa could sustain demand.
  • Combination Therapies: Potential integration with newer agents to improve outcomes.
  • Biosimilar Adoption: Growing biosimilars might lower manufacturing and procurement costs.

Challenges

  • Declining Market Share: Competition from DAAs curtails growth prospects.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Variability in approval pathways for biosimilars.
  • Pricing Pressures: Government and payer policies favor cost reduction.
  • Pipeline Limitations: Limited innovation pipeline for PEGASYS-like agents.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Decline: PEGASYS's global revenues have declined from approximately $800 million in 2015 to an estimated $350 million in 2022, driven by DAA dominance.
  • Patent and Biosimilar Impact: Patent expiry has facilitated biosimilar proliferation, exerting downward pressure on prices and market share.
  • Regional Variations: While Western markets see attrition, regions with high hepatitis prevalence and limited alternatives retain some demand.
  • Strategic Positioning: PEGASYS’s future likely hinges on niche applications, biosimilar collaborations, and regional markets resistant to oral DAA adoption.
  • Investment Outlook: R&D investments in PEGASYS are minimal, reflecting a broader shift away from interferon-based therapies toward more effective, patient-friendly oral regimens.

FAQs

1. Will PEGASYS regain market share in the future?
Unlikely, given the sustained superiority of DAAs for HCV and the diminishing role of interferons, unless significant new indications or formulations emerge.

2. How does biosimilar competition affect PEGASYS's pricing?
Biosimilars reduce price points, increasing affordability but decreasing margins for original manufacturers.

3. Are there any new therapeutic developments for PEGASYS?
No significant pipeline developments are underway; focus has shifted to more innovative biologics.

4. Which markets present the best opportunities for PEGASYS?
Emerging regions with high hepatitis prevalence, limited DAA access, and specialized patient cohorts.

5. What strategies could extend PEGASYS’s commercial relevance?
Developing combination therapies, expanding indications, or leveraging biosimilar partnerships could prolong its market presence.


References

  1. IQVIA. (2022). Global Sales Data for Hepatitis Biologics.
  2. FDA. (2001). PEGASYS Approval Document.
  3. European Medicines Agency. (2019). Biosimilar Interferon Alfa-2a Approval Announcements.
  4. Hoffmann-La Roche. (2021). Annual Report.
  5. Global Hepatitis Report. World Health Organization. (2022).

This comprehensive analysis supports business and investment decisions by highlighting PEGASYS’s evolving market landscape, financial trajectory, and strategic considerations within the biologic therapeutics domain.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.