You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

MIRCERA Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: MIRCERA
High Confidence Patents:7
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for MIRCERA
Recent Clinical Trials for MIRCERA

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
USRC Kidney ResearchPhase 4
GlaxoSmithKlinePhase 4
Yonsei UniversityPhase 4

See all MIRCERA clinical trials

Pharmacology for MIRCERA
Physiological EffectIncreased Erythroid Cell Production
Established Pharmacologic ClassErythropoiesis-stimulating Agent
Chemical StructureErythropoietin
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching various sources, including drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for MIRCERA Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for MIRCERA Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Vifor (international) Inc. MIRCERA methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Injection 125164 5,441,868 2007-10-23 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Vifor (international) Inc. MIRCERA methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Injection 125164 5,547,933 2015-06-07 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Vifor (international) Inc. MIRCERA methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Injection 125164 5,618,698 2015-06-06 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Vifor (international) Inc. MIRCERA methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Injection 125164 5,621,080 2015-06-06 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Vifor (international) Inc. MIRCERA methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Injection 125164 5,756,349 2015-06-06 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for MIRCERA Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for MIRCERA: A Comprehensive Analysis

Last updated: September 29, 2025

Introduction

MIRCERA (methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) represents a significant advancement in the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As a long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), MIRCERA offers enhanced convenience and compliance over traditional therapies, shaping its market positioning and financial outlook. Understanding the evolving landscape of this biologic drug involves analyzing its market dynamics, competitive environment, regulatory influences, and financial trajectory.


Market Overview and Growth Drivers

Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease and Anemia

CKD affects approximately 9% of the global population, with a rising incidence driven by diabetes and hypertension prevalence [1]. Anemia, a common complication of CKD, substantially impacts patient quality of life and mortality. ESAs like MIRCERA have become standard care, addressing the increased erythropoietin deficiency.

Demand for Long-Acting ESAs

Traditional ESAs require frequent dosing, burdening patients and healthcare providers. MIRCERA’s long half-life allows for extended dosing intervals (every two to four weeks), improving adherence and reducing administration costs. This advantage aligns with healthcare systems seeking cost-effective therapies, bolstering demand.

Market Penetration and Adoption Trends

MIRCERA entered the global market in 2011 and has since established a firm presence in Europe, Asia, and select North American markets. Its adoption is influenced by physician preference, reimbursement policies, and patient acceptance, with increasing penetration driven by its dosing convenience.

Key Market Drivers:

  • Rising CKD prevalence counts as primary growth engine.
  • Healthcare push towards outpatient management and trajectory optimization.
  • Cost-effectiveness benefits from reduced administration frequency.
  • Rising adoption in dialysis and non-dialysis CKD, expanding the patient base.

Competitive Landscape

Major Competitors

MIRCERA operates in a highly competitive segment with key competitors including:

  • Epoetin alfa (Epogen, Procrit): Short-acting ESAs requiring weekly or multiple weekly administrations.
  • Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp): Longer-acting, but with different pharmacokinetics and dosing schedules.
  • Other biosimilar ESAs: Increasingly entering markets, offering lower-cost alternatives.

Differentiators

MIRCERA’s extended half-life minimizes injection frequency, which is a critical competitive advantage. Its pharmacokinetic profile reduces the burden on healthcare systems and patients. However, competition from biosimilars, especially in price-sensitive markets, poses a sustained challenge.

Regulatory and Market Reimbursement Factors

Market access hinges on regional regulatory landscapes and reimbursement schemes. Countries with favorable reimbursement for long-acting ESAs provide fertile ground for MIRCERA’s growth, while cost-control measures in certain markets restrict payer adoption.


Regulatory Environment and Market Access

Global Regulatory Approvals

MIRCERA has received approval in multiple regions, including the EU, US, Japan, and China. Notably, in 2011, the European Medicines Agency approved it for CKD-related anemia. Regulatory developments continue to influence market growth trajectories.

Reimbursement Policies

Reimbursement dynamics are crucial. European markets have generally embraced cost-effective long-acting ESAs, while US payers exhibit cautious adoption due to pricing and formulary considerations. Emerging markets, especially in Asia, demonstrate expanding access, bolstered by government health initiatives.


Financial Trajectory and Revenue Forecasts

Historical Revenue Performance

Since its launch, MIRCERA has experienced steady revenue growth, driven by expanding indications and geographic penetration. In fiscal year 2022, MIRCERA generated approximately €700 million globally, reflecting strong market acceptance [2].

Forecasted Growth and Key Influences

Analysts project a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 5-7% over the next five years, driven by factors including:

  • Increasing global CKD prevalence.
  • Medical community preference for less frequent dosing.
  • Entry into emerging markets.

Revenue Drivers

  • Market expansion via new regional approvals, especially in China and India.
  • Increased usage in non-dialysis CKD populations.
  • Consolidation of biosimilar competitors and pricing strategies.

Risks and Challenges

  • Potential biosimilar erosion, reducing market share.
  • Cost containment policies, especially in public healthcare systems.
  • Potential safety concerns impacting physician prescribing behavior.

Intellectual Property and Patent Landscape

Patent Expirations and Biosimilar Entry

MIRCERA’s key patents are set to expire by 2025–2027, opening pathways for biosimilar versions. The biosimilar market could intensify price competition, impacting revenue streams.

Patents and Exclusivity Strategies

The originator company’s ongoing patent strategies and lifecycle management remain critical to sustaining market dominance until biosimilars gain full market access.


Strategic Opportunities and Future Outlook

Diversification and Indication Expansion

Further development of MIRCERA for anemia management in oncology or chemotherapy-induced anemia could unlock new revenue streams.

Digital and Value-Based Healthcare Integration

Incorporating real-world evidence and pharmacovigilance can enhance safety profiles and support value-based reimbursement models, positively influencing financial trajectories.

Emerging Market Penetration

Accelerating access and affordability in Asia and Latin America are pivotal, given demographic trends and healthcare infrastructure development.


Conclusion

MIRCERA’s market dynamics reflect a combination of demographic shifts, clinical advantages, and competitive pressures. Its long-acting nature remains a key driver of growth, especially amid rising CKD prevalence worldwide. While patent cliffs and biosimilar competition pose challenges, strategic expansion into emerging markets and indication diversification offer promising avenues to sustain its financial trajectory.


Key Takeaways

  • Growing CKD burden globally fuels demand for long-acting ESAs like MIRCERA.
  • Market penetration benefits from dosing convenience, improving compliance and reducing healthcare costs.
  • Competitive pressure from biosimilars and regulatory changes necessitate continuous lifecycle management and innovation.
  • Emerging markets and indication expansion represent significant growth opportunities.
  • Patent expirations require strategic planning to mitigate revenue erosion from biosimilar competition.

FAQs

1. How does MIRCERA differentiate itself from other ESAs?
MIRCERA’s extended half-life allows for less frequent injections (biweekly or monthly), improving patient compliance and reducing healthcare resource utilization compared to traditional ESAs requiring weekly dosing.

2. What are the primary factors influencing MIRCERA’s market growth?
Key factors include rising CKD prevalence, healthcare systems favoring outpatient and cost-effective treatments, and regional regulatory approvals expanding geographic access.

3. How will biosimilar competition impact MIRCERA’s revenue?
Biosimilars entering markets post-patent expiry may lead to price reductions and market share erosion; strategic differentiation and indication expansion are critical to maintaining revenue streams.

4. What regions offer the most significant growth potential for MIRCERA?
Emerging markets such as China, India, and Latin America present substantial upside due to increasing CKD awareness, improving healthcare infrastructure, and governmental health initiatives.

5. What strategies can the manufacturer employ to sustain MIRCERA’s market position?
Strategies include pipeline development for new indications, lifecycle management, value-based pricing agreements, and expanding access through collaborations and local manufacturing.


References

[1] Global CKD Prevalence Data, CDC, 2021.
[2] Company Annual Report, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.