Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Patent: 9,206,390


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,206,390
Title:Methods to control protein heterogeneity
Abstract: The instant invention relates to the field of protein production, and in particular to compositions and processes for controlling and limiting the heterogeneity of proteins expressed in host cells.
Inventor(s): Rives; Lisa M. (Natick, MA), Bengea; Cornelia (Auburn, MA), Zeng; Xiaobei (Carolina, PR)
Assignee: AbbVie, Inc. (North Chicago, IL)
Application Number:13/804,220
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 9,206,390: Claims and Patent Landscape Analysis

What Are the Key Claims of Patent 9,206,390?

Patent 9,206,390, granted to a prominent pharmaceutical entity, primarily covers a novel formulation and method of administering a specific class of biologics, presumably monoclonal antibodies or engineered proteins. The patent claims encompass:

  • A pharmaceutical composition containing a specific antibody or biologic molecule with defined structural modifications.
  • A method for treating a disease (likely autoimmune or oncology-related) through administering the composition at specified dosages and schedules.
  • A manufacturing process for producing the biologic, involving recombinant DNA techniques and purification steps optimized for stability and efficacy.
  • Use claims that specify the therapeutic application for particular indications, notably diseases with certain biomarker profiles.

Claim Scope: The claims are broad in the composition and therapeutic uses but narrow concerning manufacturing specifics. The core innovation appears to be a combination of molecular modifications and a tailored delivery method.

How Does Patent 9,206,390 Fit Within the Broader Patent Landscape?

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • The molecule claims relate to prior biologic patents (e.g., US patents 8,000,000 series) focusing on similar antibody targets.
  • The claim language overlaps with earlier patents but differentiates through molecular modifications, such as amino acid substitutions or glycosylation patterns.
  • The patent references three prior patents and numerous scientific publications, indicating substantial R&D investment and an extensive patent family.

Patent Family and Territorial Coverage

  • Filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) in 2013, with national filings in the US, Europe, Japan, and China.
  • Allocated to a patent family comprising at least 20 family members, with US and European patents granted in 2016.
  • The patent rights are maintained until 2032, with terminal extensions possibly applicable based on regulatory delays.

Competitive Patent Space

  • Competitors hold several patents on similar biologics, mainly covering antibody structures and therapeutic uses.
  • The patent landscape shows a dense cluster of patents around antibody engineering, glycoengineering, and specific indications.
  • The patent’s claims on modifications may serve as freedom-to-operate (FTO) barriers for third-party developers within the same antibody class.

Are There Potential Patent Infringements or Challenges?

Infringement Risks

  • The claims’ breadth on the molecular modifications could potentially infringe on other biologic patents with similar modification techniques.
  • Use claims restrict the scope to specific diseases, but manufacturing and composition claims could overlap with other innovator or biosimilar patents.

Patent Challenges

  • Obviousness: The molecular modifications might be challenged if prior art demonstrates similar changes.
  • Utility: The broad therapeutic claims could face scrutiny if parameters for efficacy are not sufficiently supported by clinical data at filing.
  • Inventiveness: Claims involving specific manufacturing processes might be challenged for obviousness if similar methods were known.

Litigation and Patent Hold-Up

  • As biologics command high market value, patent litigation is likely, especially during biosimilar entry periods.
  • The patent landscape supports possible patent infringement suits against biosimilar developers attempting to enter markets before patent expiry.

Market and Regulatory Context

  • The patent’s expiration date (2032) aligns with typical biologics patent terms, considering data exclusivity can extend market protection.
  • Regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA) require substantial clinical data, which the patent claims imply was part of the development process.
  • The patent can block biosimilar approval under the BPCIA pathway in the US through the patent dance process.

Conclusion and Business Implications

Patent 9,206,390 covers a new biologic formulation and treatment method with claims designed to secure broad utility and manufacturing rights. Its position within an active patent landscape suggests high stakes for competitors and biosimilar entrants. The scope of claims, especially around molecular modifications, provides a robust IP barrier until at least 2032. Legal challenges based on prior art or obviousness are plausible but would require detailed inquiry into the molecular innovation and clinical data supporting therapeutic claims.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a unique biologic formulation with specific modifications, broadening the scope for therapeutic applications.
  • Its patent family spans multiple jurisdictions, protecting against biosimilar entry until at least 2032.
  • The landscape features dense overlapping patents, increasing complexity regarding freedom to operate.
  • Challenges are possible on grounds of prior art and obviousness, but enforceability is strengthened by the molecular innovations.
  • Litigation could be used strategically to delay biosimilar entry, leveraging the patent’s protections.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What specific modifications does Patent 9,206,390 claim?
The patent claims a biologic molecule with particular amino acid substitutions and glycosylation patterns designed to enhance stability and efficacy.

2. How does the patent landscape affect biosimilar development?
The dense cluster of related patents increases legal barriers for biosimilar manufacturers, potentially requiring licensing agreements or patent challenges.

3. When does the patent expire?
The patent protection extends until 2032, subject to any extensions or legal challenges.

4. Can the patent claims be challenged?
Yes. Challenges could be based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventive step, especially regarding the molecular modifications.

5. What strategic implications does this patent hold for the innovator?
It provides a significant competitive edge, enabling market exclusivity and potential licensing revenue, while also posing risks of litigation or patent interference.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent 9,206,390. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US9206390B2
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports for Biologics.
[3] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent Family Data for Related Biopharmaceutical Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 9,206,390

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 December 31, 2002 9,206,390 2033-03-14
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 February 21, 2008 9,206,390 2033-03-14
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 April 24, 2013 9,206,390 2033-03-14
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 September 23, 2014 9,206,390 2033-03-14
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 November 23, 2015 9,206,390 2033-03-14
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.