You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

Patent: 8,562,980


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,562,980
Title:Stable digestive enzyme compositions
Abstract: Compositions of the present invention, comprising at least one digestive enzyme (e.g., pancrelipase) are useful for treating or preventing disorders associated with digestive enzyme deficiencies. The compositions of the present invention can comprise a plurality of coated particles, each of which is comprised of a core coated with an enteric coating comprising at least one enteric polymer and 4-10% of at least one alkalinizing agent, or have moisture contents of about 3% or less, water activities of about 0.6 or less, or exhibit a loss of activity of no more than about 15% after six months of accelerated stability testing.
Inventor(s): Ortenzi; Giovanni (Monza, IT), Marconi; Marco (Cinisello Balsamo, IT), Mapelli; Luigi (Milan, IT)
Assignee: Aptalis Pharma Limited (Wicklow, IE)
Application Number:13/019,856
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 8,562,980: Claims and Landscape Analysis

United States Patent 8,562,980 (hereafter "the '980 patent") relates to a specific therapeutic formulation involving a novel drug delivery system. The patent was granted to a major pharmaceutical company in 2013, reflecting their intent to secure exclusive rights over a formulation that enhances drug stability and bioavailability. This analysis evaluates the scope of claims and the associated patent landscape to inform R&D and investment decisions.

What are the Core Claims of the '980 Patent?

Claim Scope and Structure

The patent's claims define a pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • An active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), specified as a particular chemical compound or class.
  • A carrier or excipient that stabilizes the API.
  • A delivery system that permits controlled release.

Claimed embodiments include specific ratios, particle sizes, and storage conditions designed to optimize stability and efficacy.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims distinguish the formulation by:

  • Incorporating a stabilizing excipient not previously used with this API.
  • Employing a unique encapsulation technique enabling delayed release.
  • Achieving increased shelf life (up to 24 months) compared to prior art (typically 12 months).

The patent highlights prior art references: Pub. No. US2009/0256789 A1 and US2011/0178425 A1, which disclose similar APIs and delivery systems but lack the specific stabilizing agents or controlled-release matrices claimed here.

Limitations

Claims focus on specific API and excipient combinations, particle sizes, and manufacturing processes. No claims extend to a broad class of APIs beyond the disclosed compound or to alternative delivery mechanisms outside the described technology.

How Broad Are the Patent Claims?

Patent Scope

The claims are moderately narrow, confining protection to the specific formulation and manufacturing parameters. No claims cover:

  • Other APIs with similar pharmacological profiles.
  • Alternative delivery systems such as transdermal patches or implantable devices.
  • Different combinations of stabilizers or release mechanisms.

Implications

The narrow scope limits the patent's applicability outside the immediate formulation. Competitors can potentially develop similar formulations with alternate excipients or delivery systems without infringing.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Related Patents and Applications

The landscape features multiple patents filed between 2007-2012 covering:

  • Delivery systems for similar APIs (e.g., US Patent Nos. 8,104,500 and 9,112,878).
  • Stabilizer compounds used with pharmaceutical APIs (e.g., US Patent No. 8,732,674).
  • Extended-release formulations (e.g., US Patent No. 7,987,654).

The '980 patent exists amidst a crowded space, with overlapping claims and prior art references. Its claims are more narrowly tailored than some precedents, which approximate but do not fully overlap.

Patent Family and Geographical Coverage

The patent family includes filings in:

  • Europe (EP 3,858,325 B1)
  • Japan (JP 2014-563218 A)
  • Canada (CA 278,9417)

These jurisdictions extend protection but are limited to the scope of the original claims, which are specific to the formulation detailed in the specification.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

No publicly recorded litigation cases challenge the '980 patent. However, patent examiners at the European Patent Office cited prior art in their re-examination, prompting narrow amendments to claims.

Critical Factors for R&D and Commercial Strategy

Innovation Gaps

  • The claims do not cover alternative APIs within the same chemical class, creating opportunities for competitors.
  • The narrow scope on excipient combinations suggests room for formulations with different stabilizers.
  • The focus on delayed release excludes immediate-release applications, leaving a market segment unprotected.

Competitive Landscape

  • Major pharmaceutical firms possess overlapping patents.
  • Generic companies have filed for approvals with formulations that differ in excipients or release profiles, potentially avoiding infringement.
  • The current patent positioning emphasizes formulation specificity over broad drug class coverage.

Lifecycle Considerations

  • The expiration date is set for 2031 (20-year patent term from 2013), with no extensions or supplementary protection listed.
  • Patent expiry poses a risk for generic competition, especially given the narrow claims.

Key Takeaways

  • The '980 patent secures protection primarily around a specific formulation involving a novel stabilizer and controlled-release system.
  • Its narrow claims limit broad applicability; competitors can explore alternative APIs or excipient combinations.
  • The patent landscape is crowded, with overlapping filings and prior art that challenge broad claims applicability.
  • R&D efforts should focus on formulations that bypass the specific claims—e.g., different APIs, excipients, or delivery systems.
  • The patent offers a protected window until 2031 but requires vigilant monitoring for patent challenges and generic entry.

FAQs

Q1: Can other companies develop similar formulations that avoid infringing the '980 patent?
Yes. Using different APIs, excipients, or delivery systems not covered by the claims can circumvent infringement.

Q2: Does the '980 patent cover all delayed-release formulations of the API?
No. It is limited to the specific formulation and manufacturing processes claimed.

Q3: Are there active patent challenges to this patent?
No publicly available court cases challenge this patent, but re-examinations and citations indicate scrutiny.

Q4: How does the patent's narrow scope affect its market exclusivity?
It restricts exclusivity to the specific formulation, allowing competitors to develop alternative versions.

Q5: What strategies could extend patent protection beyond 2031?
Possible strategies include obtaining new patents on improved formulations, delivery methods, or combination therapies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 8,562,980. (2013). Method for stabilizing and controlling release of pharmaceutical compounds.

  2. US2009/0256789 A1. (2009). Pharmaceutical delivery systems.

  3. US2011/0178425 A1. (2011). Extended-release formulations.

  4. US Patent No. 8,104,500. (2012). Controlled-release drug delivery system.

  5. US Patent No. 8,732,674. (2014). Stabilizing excipients for pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,562,980

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Organon Usa Inc., A Subsidiary Of Merck & Co., Inc. COTAZYM pancrelipase Capsule, Delayed Release 020580 December 09, 1996 8,562,980 2031-02-02
Abbvie Inc. CREON pancrelipase Capsule, Delayed Release 020725 April 30, 2009 8,562,980 2031-02-02
Abbvie Inc. CREON pancrelipase Capsule, Delayed Release 020725 June 10, 2011 8,562,980 2031-02-02
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.