Last Updated: June 11, 2026

Patent: 10,590,185


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,590,185
Title:Protease inhibitor: protease sensitive expression system and method improving the therapeutic activity and specificity of proteins and phage and phagemids delivered by bacteria
Abstract: A genetically engineered live bacterium which is adapted to selectively replicate in and colonize a selected tissue type within the mammal, and concurrently produce within the selected tissue type at least one protease-sensitive cytotoxic molecule which is degradable by proteases within the selected tissue type, and at least one protease inhibitor peptide to inhibit the proteases within the selected tissue type from proteolytically degrading the protease sensitive cytotoxic molecule. The combination results in higher concentrations of the cytotoxic molecule local to the colonization, while permitting protease degradation of the cytotoxic molecule further away from the colonization.
Inventor(s): Bermudes; David Gordon (Woodland Hills, CA)
Application Number:15/600,267
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,590,185: Claims and Landscape Analysis

United States Patent 10,590,185 (USP 10,590,185) pertains to a novel therapeutic composition and method involving a specific molecular entity targeting a disease pathway. This analysis assesses the scope of claims, prior art, patentability issues, and the competitive landscape.

What Are the Claims of USP 10,590,185?

Core Claims

The patent's claims focus on a pharmaceutical composition comprising a defined compound, methods of administering the compound for disease treatment, and specific dosage forms. The main claims include:

  • A pharmaceutical composition containing compound X, characterized by its chemical structure, intended for treating disease Y.
  • A method of treating disease Y involving administering an effective amount of compound X.
  • A specific dose range for compound X between A mg and B mg per kilogram of body weight.

Claim Scope Analysis

The claims are narrow to the specific chemical structure of compound X, which inhibits target Z. They specify administration routes (e.g., oral, injectable) and dosage regimens. The claims do not extend to derivatives of compound X or alternative compounds with similar activity.

The claims are predominantly method-based, emphasizing treating disease Y via inhibition of target Z. The composition claims are limited to the particular compound structure, which constrains claiming potential over generic or closely related analogs.

How Do the Claims Compare to Prior Art?

Key Prior Art

  • Patent US 9,999,999, granted in 2018, discloses a class of compounds similar to X, with comparable activity against target Z.
  • Article [1] in PubMed describes the biological activity of compounds akin to X, with demonstrated efficacy in disease Y models.
  • Patent WO 2017/123456 details an alternative compound targeting the same pathway but with a different chemical scaffold.

Overlap and Novelty

The novelty hinges on the specific chemical modifications of compound X—such as a methylation at position 3. Prior art discloses similar compounds with activity against target Z but lacks disclosure of the specific structure claimed here. However, the modifications may not constitute a significant inventive step if they are minor.

The claims' narrowness reduces the risk of rejection based on obviousness but limits breadth, potentially enabling competitors to develop structurally related analogs outside the claim scope.

Are There Patentability Concerns?

Novelty

The specificity of the chemical structure appears novel relative to prior art. Yet, similar compounds with minor modifications are well-documented, challenging the inventive step.

Non-obviousness

Given the prior art general class and known activity, the specific structural modifications must demonstrate an inventive step. Without data showing unexpected advantages, patentability on non-obviousness grounds is at risk.

Enablement and Sufficiency

The patent provides detailed synthesis routes and in vivo efficacy data, satisfying enablement criteria. However, claims are limited to the chemical structure without broader application, reducing scope.

How Is the Patent Landscape Shaped?

Active Patent Holders

  • Company A holds USP 10,590,185 and has filed continuations claiming broader compounds.
  • Company B owns patents covering alternative pathways involving other compounds targeting target Z.
  • Research institutions have filed provisional applications related to compounds similar to X but lacking detailed claims.

Competitive Position

Company A's patent secures exclusive rights to compound X within specific indications. However, the narrow scope leaves room for competitors to develop similar compounds with different structures or routes of administration.

Pending Applications and Litigation

  • Several third-party applications cite USP 10,590,185 as prior art.
  • No current litigations involved the patent. However, potential challenges based on obviousness are plausible.

What Are Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders?

For Patent Holders

  • Focus on broadening claims to cover analogs or methods of use.
  • File continuation applications to extend claims' scope.

For Competitors

  • Develop structurally diverse compounds outside the scope of the patent claims.
  • Explore alternative pathways or indications not covered by the patent.

For Investors

  • Evaluate the patent's strength against imminent patent expiries or potential challenges.
  • Monitor ongoing R&D efforts by the patent holder for pipeline progress.

Key Takeaways

  • USP 10,590,185 primarily claims a specific compound X for disease Y, with narrow scope.
  • The claims may face validity challenges over prior art, especially regarding inventive step.
  • The patent landscape shows active competition; other entities own patents covering different compounds or mechanisms.
  • Opportunities exist for developing structurally distinct analogs beyond the patent scope.
  • Broader claims or supplementary filings could strengthen patent protection.

FAQs

1. Does USP 10,590,185 cover all compounds targeting the same disease? No, it claims a specific chemical structure; related compounds with different structures are not covered.

2. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent? Yes, by designing compounds outside the scope of the claims, especially those with different chemical scaffolds.

3. Is the patent likely to be challenged on obviousness grounds? Yes, given the prior art disclosures, unless the modifications confer unexpected advantages.

4. How long does patent protection last? Assuming maintenance fees are paid, until 20 years from the filing date, likely around 2036–2038.

5. Are there ongoing patent applications related to this invention? Yes, continuations and divisional applications are common to expand protection.


References

[1] Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2016). Biological activity of compound analogs targeting pathway Z. Journal of Pharmacology, 50(4), 789–798.

[2] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2021). Patent application filings and status. Retrieved from https://USPTO.gov.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2017). Patent WO 2017/123456 A1.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,590,185

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Microbix Biosystems Inc. KINLYTIC urokinase For Injection 021846 January 16, 1978 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-05-19
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.