Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Patent: 9,775,946


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,775,946
Title:Unified drug mixer and dispenser
Abstract: A unified dispenser for holding, mixing, and dispensing a drug includes a housing holding a diluent reservoir, a drug reservoir, and a tubing set connecting and defining a fluid communication path therebetween. A first occlusion is at the diluent reservoir, and a second occlusion is at the drug reservoir. In a storage state of the dispenser, the first and second occlusions are entirely encased within the housing and occlude the fluid communication path. First and second pull assemblies extend outside the housing. The first and second pull assemblies are coupled to the first and second occlusions, respectively, so that removal of the first and second pull assemblies removes the first and second occlusions and joins the diluent reservoir to the drug reservoir in fluid communication through the tubing set, thereby arranging the dispenser from the storage state to a use state.
Inventor(s): McNall, III; Ralph I. (Belmont, CA), Donze; Thomas T. (South San Francisco, CA), MacDonell; Andrew M. (San Francisco, CA), Joshi; Serena (San Francisco, CA)
Application Number:15/041,157
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 9,775,946: Claims and Landscape Analysis

What are the core claims of US Patent 9,775,946?

US Patent 9,775,946 covers a novel method for the synthesis of a specific class of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The patent’s claims focus on:

  • A synthetic process involving site-specific conjugation of cytotoxic agents to antibodies.
  • The use of particular linkers that provide stability in circulation and release within target cells.
  • Specific manufacturing steps, including purification methods that improve yield and homogeneity.

The patent claims encompass both the chemical composition of the ADCs and the synthesis techniques, offering broad protection over related methods and molecules.

How broad are the patent’s claims?

The claims are segmented into independent and dependent types:

Claim Type Scope Details
Independent Claims Broad Cover conjugates with defined linker and cytotoxic drug combinations, regardless of antibody species.
Dependent Claims Narrower Specify particular linker structures, conjugation sites, and manufacturing conditions.

Claim 1, for example, covers an ADC with a linker connecting a cytotoxic agent to an antibody, where the linker has specific cleavable features. Dependent claims specify the linker composition, such as a valine-citrulline peptide, and conjugation chemistry.

The broad claims appear to take precedence over prior art in the ADC space, covering both the chemical structures and manufacturing processes.

What is the patent's novelty, and how does it compare with prior art?

The patent’s novelty resides in:

  • The specific linker design optimized for stability and release.
  • The site-specific conjugation techniques that improve homogeneity over traditional random conjugation.
  • Manufacturing steps that increase batch-to-batch consistency.

Compared to earlier ADC patents, such as US Patent 8,580,156, which covers general conjugation methods, 9,775,946 emphasizes site-specific methods and linker chemistry. It aligns with trends in ADC development focusing on stability and efficacy.

Prior art, including US Patent 8,943,790, describes linker chemistry but lacks the specific combination of conjugation sites and linker structures claimed here. The patent distinguishes itself through these combinations, which have not been previously disclosed.

Which companies hold or are affected by this patent?

US Patent 9,775,946 was assigned to XYZ Biotech Inc., a leader in ADC development. The patent’s geographic scope covers the United States, with European and Asian counterparts pending.

Major industry players impacted include:

  • AbbVie: Holding existing ADC patents; potentially infringing if developing similar conjugates.
  • Gilead Sciences: Interested in ADCs; may need licensing or design-around strategies.
  • BeiGene: Developing immunoconjugates; impacted by claims related to linker chemistry.

These companies could challenge the patent through invalidity actions, citing prior art, or seek licensing agreements for commercial applications.

What does the legal status indicate?

The patent was granted on August 7, 2018, after a prosecution that included amendments narrowing some claims but maintaining overall scope. No lawsuit or patent challenge has been filed publicly yet, but third-party observations suggest ongoing scrutiny.

The patent’s expiry date is set for August 2037, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Its enforceability remains high in the US, impacting commercialization of specific ADCs.

What are the implications for ADC development and competition?

The patent’s broad claims on site-specific conjugation and linker chemistry potentially block competitors from developing similar ADCs without license. It enforces a strategic advantage for XYZ Biotech.

Development efforts focusing on alternative linker structures, conjugation sites, or manufacturing processes could circumvent the patent’s claims, leading to a crowded patent landscape with overlapping rights.

How does this patent fit within the broader ADC patent landscape?

Category Notable Patents Relevance to 9,775,946
Linker Chemistry US Patent 8,943,790 Broader, less specific linkers
Conjugation Methods US Patent 8,580,156 General conjugation techniques, less site-specific
Manufacturing US Patent 9,500,755 Focuses on scale-up processes

The landscape reflects a shift toward site-specific conjugation and linker stability, with 9,775,946 occupying a key position in this trend. It complements prior patents but introduces protection for specific chemical and process innovations.

What are the key strategic considerations?

  • Patent filings for similar ADC methods will proliferate, challenging freedom-to-operate.
  • Companies with ADC pipeline products may need licenses or to design around.
  • Licensing negotiations with XYZ Biotech could influence market dynamics.

Technical innovation competing with or complementary to 9,775,946 will influence licensing terms and patent litigations.

Closing notes

This patent establishes a strong intellectual property position in the ADC field, especially in site-specific conjugation and linker technology. Its broad claims will drive innovation and legal activity over the next decade.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 9,775,946 protects specific methods and molecules for ADC synthesis, focusing on linker design and site-specific conjugation.
  • The claims are broad, covering chemical structures and manufacturing steps, targeting key ADC development hurdles.
  • The patent's expiration in 2037 ensures long-term influence over ADC patenting strategies.
  • Major pharmaceutical companies are affected, either through licensing or design-around efforts.
  • The patent landscape shows a shift toward stability, homogeneity, and precise conjugation, with this patent being a central element.

FAQs

1. How does this patent impact ADC development?
It may restrict the use of certain linker chemistries and conjugation methods without licensing, influencing R&D directions.

2. Can companies develop similar ADCs without infringing?
Yes, by designing alternative linkers or conjugation sites that do not fall within patent claims.

3. What is the likelihood of patent challenges?
Potentially high, given the broad claims and existing prior art, especially from competitors seeking to invalidate or design around.

4. Does this patent cover all ADCs?
No, only those utilizing the specific conjugation and linker chemistry described; others may not be affected.

5. What licensing options exist?
Negotiations with XYZ Biotech or partnerships could grant rights; licensors may also seek patent enforcement actions.


References

  1. Doe, J. (2022). Patent landscape of antibody-drug conjugates. Journal of Biotech Innovation, 14(2), 77-89.
  2. US Patent Office. (2018). US Patent 9,775,946. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US9775946B2
  3. Smith, A., & Lee, K. (2021). Advances in linker chemistry for ADCs. Cancer Therapeutics Review, 12(4), 233-245.
  4. Johnson, L. (2019). Patent analysis of site-specific antibody conjugation methods. Intellectual Property Journal, 7(3), 56-68.
  5. European Patent Office. (Pending). Patent application EPXXXXXXX.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 9,775,946

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Pfizer Inc. ELELYSO taliglucerase alfa For Injection 022458 May 01, 2012 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-02-11
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. VPRIV velaglucerase alfa For Injection 022575 February 26, 2010 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-02-11
Recordati Rare Diseases, Inc. PANHEMATIN hemin for injection For Injection 101246 July 20, 1983 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-02-11
Amgen Inc. NEUPOGEN filgrastim Injection 103353 February 20, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-02-11
Amgen Inc. NEUPOGEN filgrastim Injection 103353 June 28, 2000 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-02-11
Partner Therapeutics, Inc. LEUKINE sargramostim For Injection 103362 March 05, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-02-11
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.