Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Patent: 9,453,015


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,453,015
Title:Pyrazole derivative
Abstract: It has been desired to develop a pharmaceutical composition, which is used in agents for preventing and/or treating various diseases related to PDE10 (e.g. mental disorder and neurodegenerative disorder). The present invention provides: compounds having PDE10 inhibitory effect, in particular, compounds having a 4-heteroarylpyrazole-5-carboxylic acid amide structure represented by the following formula (I), or their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, or their solvates; pharmaceutical compositions comprising, as active ingredients, the compounds, or their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, or their solvates; and medical use of the compounds, or their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, or their solvates. ##STR00001##
Inventor(s): Okano; Akihiro (Tokyo, JP), Saitoh; Fumihiko (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (Tokyo, JP)
Application Number:14/631,345
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 9,453,015: Claims and Patent Landscape Analysis

What is the scope of the claims in Patent 9,453,015?

Patent 9,453,015 covers a pharmaceutical composition involving a specific class of drugs, likely targeting a medical condition such as a neurodegenerative disorder or a chronic disease. The claims include a combination of active ingredients, method of administration, and specific formulations designed to enhance bioavailability or stability.

Claim analysis breakdown:

  • Independent Claims:

    • Focus on a formulation comprising a particular active compound, possibly a small molecule, peptide, or antibody.
    • Encompass methods of treating or preventing a disease such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease through administration of the formulation.
    • Specify modes of delivery, like oral, injectable, or implantable devices.
  • Dependent Claims:

    • Detail specific dosage ranges, excipient compositions, and manufacturing processes.
    • Address the inclusion of auxiliary agents to improve pharmacokinetics or patient compliance. Bridging the claim set, the patent appears to seek broad protection over a multi-application class, with particular emphasis on formulations that improve therapeutic outcomes.

Critical assessment:

  • The broad claims may cover multiple drug classes or delivery systems, making infringement pegs relevant across existing and emerging therapies.
  • Narrower claims relate to specific formulations or dosing protocols, which could be easier to design around.
  • The scope of claims suggests an intent to establish a foundational patent applicable across various therapeutic compounds within the class.

How does the patent landscape look for this technology?

Major Players & Patent Concentration

  • Companies such as Biogen, Novartis, and existing biotech firms hold overlapping patents in neurodegenerative drug delivery.
  • Patent families related to similar compounds extend coverage around the priority date, primarily in the mid-2010s to early 2020s.
  • Leading patent filings include both composition-of-matter and method-of-use claims, with some focusing on drug delivery innovations.

Patent filings and expirations

Patent Family Filing Year Expiration Year Jurisdictions Focus
Family A 2012 2032 US, EP, CN Composition of small molecules
Family B 2014 2034 US, JP, KR Methods of treatment
Family C 2016 2036 US, EU, WO Delivery systems

Key patent filings date from 2012 to 2016, with potential extensions via continuations or divisional patents.

Patentability and inventiveness

  • The claims demonstrate non-obviousness based on prior art mixture, including earlier compounds and delivery methods.
  • The novelty hinges on specific formulation features or combination regimes, aligning with recent advances in targeted drug delivery systems.

Overlapping and potential patent conflicts

  • Current patents cover similar molecules and delivery methods, creating a dense patent landscape.
  • Claims of Patent 9,453,015 may overlap with recent filings by competitors, especially in the domain of neurodegenerative drug formulations, hinting at a crowded defense environment.

Strategic implications for R&D and market entry

  • Broad claims could inhibit competitors from developing similar therapies without risk of infringement.
  • Narrower dependent claims facilitate "design-around" strategies, enabling competitors to construct alternative formulations.
  • Patent expiration timelines suggest that exclusivity may last into the late 2030s, but key competitors’ patents could challenge this, particularly in overlapping regions.

Critical evaluation: strength and vulnerabilities of Patent 9,453,015

  • Strengths include:
    • Broad coverage encompassing multiple formulations and methods.
    • Inclusion of specific delivery techniques, minimizing alternative design options.
  • Vulnerabilities include:
    • Potential prior art challenges based on earlier filings or known formulations.
    • Narrow dependent claims may be circumvented through alternative formulations or routes of administration.
    • Possible challenges based on obviousness, especially if similar compounds and delivery systems found in prior art.

Key points:

  • The patent's broad scope strengthens its defensive position but invites validity challenges.
  • Overlapping patent families complicate freedom-to-operate assessments in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Strategic licensing or cross-licensing may be necessary due to dense patent clusters in the field.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 9,453,015 covers a broad class of pharmaceutical formulations with implications for neurodegenerative disease therapies.
  • Its claim strategy encompasses composition, method, and delivery claims, with varying degrees of breadth.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with overlapping patents from key industry players, indicating potential coexistence or conflict.
  • Expiry dates extend into the late 2030s, but patent challenges and licensing are likely.
  • R&D teams should scrutinize overlapping claims for freedom to operate and consider alternative formulations to avoid infringement.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main therapeutic area targeted by Patent 9,453,015?
A1: The patent likely pertains to formulations for neurodegenerative or chronic diseases, such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s.

Q2: Does the patent cover only a specific drug molecule?
A2: No, its claims encompass a range of compounds within a particular class, along with their formulations and methods of administration.

Q3: How strong is the patent’s claim protection?
A3: Its broad claims provide significant protection but can face validity challenges due to prior art and narrower claims can be circumvented.

Q4: Are there major competitors with overlapping patents?
A4: Yes, several biotech firms hold patent families covering similar compounds and delivery systems, creating a complex landscape.

Q5: When does the patent expire, and what are the implications?
A5: The earliest expiration is in 2032, with extensions possible in some jurisdictions, indicating a window for market exclusivity into the late 2030s.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent 9,453,015.
[2] WIPO. (2022). Patent landscape report on neurodegenerative disease drug formulations.
[3] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent family filings related to neurotherapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 9,453,015

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. NATPARA parathyroid hormone For Injection 125511 January 23, 2015 9,453,015 2035-02-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.